Hi all,
Interesting link to Flux Resonator lens that lets you see magnetic lines of flux in real time.
Good site, money back guarantee. Expensive for me, but interesting useful tool for those who work with magnets.
http://www.magnetostatics.us/
Tishatang
Does it work by having some stuff inside a liquid in the device or something?
How does it compare to the way cheaper 'magnetic viewing film' ?
It reveals flux in 3-D instead of 2-D. Also, I think in color instead of black and white?
Tishatang
Quote from: tishatang on June 23, 2006, 04:37:52 PM
It reveals flux in 3-D instead of 2-D. Also, I think in color instead of black and white?
How can it do this, if the 'flux resonator' itself is a disc shaped object and thus only is a 2D cross section through the 3D field ???
Don't get me wrong, it looks really nice, but I doubt that it gives more information than the viewing film. If it really produces a hologramm (hence the colors), then it gives you a spatial fourier transformation of the field that is even harder to interpret than the green shades of the film.
However, a nice but very expensive toy.
Quote from: IcyBlue on June 24, 2006, 05:07:01 AM
Quote from: tishatang on June 23, 2006, 04:37:52 PM
It reveals flux in 3-D instead of 2-D. Also, I think in color instead of black and white?
How can it do this, if the 'flux resonator' itself is a disc shaped object and thus only is a 2D cross section through the 3D field ???
Don't get me wrong, it looks really nice, but I doubt that it gives more information than the viewing film. If it really produces a hologramm (hence the colors), then it gives you a spatial fourier transformation of the field that is even harder to interpret than the green shades of the film.
However, a nice but very expensive toy.
much cheaper is it to do this experiments with an
old CTR. take a look here:
http://mindprint.dyndns.org/trmweb%20II/startframe_physik.htm (http://mindprint.dyndns.org/trmweb%20II/startframe_physik.htm)
regards
Norbert
Not only is the field visible as a 3-d hologram, but there is much more detail than viewing film can render.
And as mentioned earler in this thread, this lens affords the ability to see the changes in real-time without image retention.
Would a side-by-side comparison of viewing film and the resonator be something worth putting on the site?
You can't see electron spin with any other passive device. Take a closer look at the moebius on the first webpage-
The electrons are moving into the lens from the right, and leaving the lens on the left. See the shadows? The peak? The valleys?
I'd love to make these things cheaper, but high quality glass is expensive. Plastic doesn't work very well and it scratches easily.
I agree with you concerning the film. Im just not so shure how to interpret the image. Since you say it is a hologram, I guess it has something to do with microstructural changes. Holograms have a periodic grid. So the actual information in a hologram is a set of spatial (flat, 2D) superimposed frequencies, while the 3D image is just a illusion.
So what is the fundamental principle of this device, if it creates a hologram ? What is the grid made of and how is it manipulated by the magnetic field ? "It shows the electron spin" is a little bit to vague for me. Is it sensitive to polarized light ? Does it cause field strength dependent phase shifting ? Does it require monochromatic light (to obtain a real information) ?
QuoteThe electrons are moving into the lens from the right, and leaving the lens on the left.
this would result in a 1D (fence like) optical grid, thus the observed image would be 1D too. Since the image is 2D, the grid must be 2D too. ???
Don't get me wrong. I find this thing very interesting. I'm just curious about what it really does.
The holographic image is created by these three phenomenon occuring simultaneously: Light waves from the source pass through the first glass plate, the nano-matter mixture and the second glass plate. These are the "reference waves" that are NOT affected by the magnetic field.
Areas where the magnetic field is present, result in a phase shift (Faraday rotation) of the source waves, creating object waves.
The transmittance and refractive properties of the mixture while "under the influence" of magnetism contribute to the generation of interference waves. These three wavesets combine to produce a holographic image, apparently in space- between the source of light and the observer.
If you look at the image gallery (http://www.magnetostatics.us/photo.htm) look at the first column on the left, third image down and you can plainly see the three dimensional wave of flux. That's my finger holding a cylinder magnet (encased in shrink tubing) next to the light and behind the lens.
Thanks. I already guessed this. So it is sort of a counterpart to ZnTe, which does a phaseshift by the electric field component ?
Not really. There are no crystals, and the lattice is dynamic. I can't really discuss what is in the mix, just yet.
Hi All
Well the patent has been filed and there are many researchers using my lenses now.
So, my lens is open for discussion !
new site: http://www.nanomagnetics.us
8)
:o
Great job, Just 2 questions on the research you have done:
The Magnetic Helix i.e. Double Helix Theory is real?
Can you tell us more abouth the magnetic block wall in the middle of the magnet?
Best regards
Marzio
If you are referring to the published paper by Fredrick David Tombe on the Double Helix Theory, then I would say YES - the double helix exists. I posted his paper on my site because his theory seems to correlate with the findings that we have gleaned from our experiments.
I'm not quite sure what you are asking me in relation to the Bloch wall. Could you be more specific?
Have you read this paper? : http://www.nanomagnetics.us/magnetic%20anomaly.pdf
;D your new logo image explain better what I mean....
I refer to Steve Bowman document:
Understanding Magnets With EFD and SMP
his type of field visualization show not "standard" field line like this one:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Magnet0873.png
in the center of the magnet it seem that there is a narrow lines coming out/in perpendiculary like Howard Johnson show us:
http://www.cheniere.org/books/HoJo/p10.htm
Marzio
When viewing a magnet that is perpendicular to the lens surface and a point-source light, the photons follow the lowest potential of the magnetic field. This type of experiment not only shows the 'Bloch wall' that you refer to, but also the bi-directional 'flow' of the field. Very much like Howard Johnson's computer plots do.
This image shows it well: http://www.nanomagnetics.us/anothermoebius3.jpg
The physics community will not accept this because it conflicts with their standard model, but our experiments show otherwise.
Quote from: pinestone on June 16, 2008, 06:17:47 PM
When viewing a magnet that is perpendicular to the lens surface and a point-source light, the photons follow the lowest potential of the magnetic field. This type of experiment not only shows the 'Bloch wall' that you refer to, but also the bi-directional 'flow' of the field. Very much like Howard Johnson's computer plots do.
This image shows it well: http://www.nanomagnetics.us/anothermoebius3.jpg
The physics community will not accept this because it conflicts with their standard model, but our experiments show otherwise.
In addition, here's an interesting movie made by one of my collaborators using a special Flux Resonator lens:
http://www.scivee.tv/node/5988
enjoy !
Quote from: pinestone on June 16, 2008, 06:17:47 PM
When viewing a magnet that is perpendicular to the lens surface and a point-source light, the photons follow the lowest potential of the magnetic field. This type of experiment not only shows the 'Bloch wall' that you refer to, but also the bi-directional 'flow' of the field. Very much like Howard Johnson's computer plots do.
This image shows it well: http://www.nanomagnetics.us/anothermoebius3.jpg
The physics community will not accept this because it conflicts with their standard model, but our experiments show otherwise.
Have you done experiment adding a coil with pulsating current on one end of the magnet in order to move the block wall this can be very useful to understand many OU devices?
Marzio
Yes, our early experiments were performed using electromagnets. We've found it takes a lot of current to equal the Teslas obtained with small neodymium magnets. For simple tests, the neo's work very well-
They don't get hot and they are 'ON' all the time.
If I was trying to build some sort of OU device, I certainly wouldn't use electromagnets. You're screwed right from the get-go, as any type of wire (other than super-cooled) has a resistance that will reduce the efficiency of the device. You couldn't even achieve unity, so there's no chance of over-unity, no matter what the arrangement (or claims).
New pictures here (CRT) ;)
https://mindprint.dyndns.org/forum3/viewtopic.php?f=65&t=1042
Geetings from mindprint.dyndns.org