Ok, so if you had a transformer with a single primary winding and multiple secondary windings - let's just say 10 secondary windings - what could you do with this? Say if all of these windings were 1:1 with the primary to the secondary. In theory, you could charge a battery with 5 of the secondary windings and then switch the original power source of the primary winding to the battery which output the same voltage and current as the original power source. So you'd essentially have a unity circuit already running. Could you use the other 5 secondary windings to power external sources like another battery which could be used for several things? This would be considered overunity I believe. Since you are outputting more power than was originally input into the device. This transformer could be a standard solenoid or a toroid.
Alright, correct me if I'm wrong with any of this theory. It seems possible, but I could be missing a few things or even everything. I'm probably skipping over something completely necessary to electrical engineering. Any input would be very helpful.
well, buddy that's possible.
But you have to arrange the secondaries in different way actually, and that is the secret of many successful experimenter here. ;)
You actually need an extra coil in the primary as booster. :)
Can you explain what part of my theory was wrong in detail? Like what would it take to make it 100% theoretically possible? You mentioned a different arrangement of the secondary coils, what might that be? Does anyone know?
hi buddy
You try to study and decrypt the hubbard coil technology. ;)
efficiency = success
I posted this exact same post on http://physicsforums.com/
I was shot down and told that this device, and any over-unity devices or perpetual motion machines, would always and forever fail. And that no true device such as these will ever achieve over-unity. What is your opinion on these statements? It is true that over-unity devices defy the First Law of Thermodynamics.
The FLEET prototpyes are already doing that.
See overunityreasearch.com - the ltseung888 bench under "the two Oscilloscope Experiments".
In these prototypes, we rely on two techniques:
1. Rapid pulsing. In normal transformers, the emf is dependent on the rate of change of the flux. The rate of change of flux in the primary is equal to that of the secondary for the normal AC. In rapid pulsing, the back emf can be much larger.
We used the Joule Thief circuit as the primary. The rapid switching of the transistor (e.g. 2N2222) allows a large jump in Voltage even though the windings are 1:1.
2. Resonance. At resonance, the system will lead-out or bring-in electromagnetic energy. To be more exact, it will bring-in the orbiting energy of the electrons. When 1 and 2 are combined, we can get the Output Power much greater than the Input Power. When suitably tuned, the Output Power Waveform is that of a large standing wave.
So far, we have achieved COP >> 1 (best result is 280). We can light up 108 LEDs. We can recharge 9 Volt batteries with 1.5V batteries. Please read the information at overunityresearch.com. Patrick Kelly also described the technology in Chapter 5 of his excellent on-line book.
The material cost of a FLEET prototype is less than US$10. You can build one yourself. I am training at least 6 people in Irvine, California, USA. They will all have a working overunity FLEET tested with oscilloscopes within the next few weeks.
A sample result is attached.
Quote from: ltseung888 on December 28, 2011, 11:24:50 PM
The FLEET prototpyes are already doing that.
See overunityreasearch.com - the ltseung888 bench under "the two Oscilloscope Experiments".
In these prototypes, we rely on two techniques:
1. Rapid pulsing. In normal transformers, the emf is dependent on the rate of change of the flux. The rate of change of flux in the primary is equal to that of the secondary for the normal AC. In rapid pulsing, the back emf can be much larger.
We used the Joule Thief circuit as the primary. The rapid switching of the transistor (e.g. 2N2222) allows a large jump in Voltage even though the windings are 1:1.
2. Resonance. At resonance, the system will lead-out or bring-in electromagnetic energy. To be more exact, it will bring-in the orbiting energy of the electrons. When 1 and 2 are combined, we can get the Output Power much greater than the Input Power. When suitably tuned, the Output Power Waveform is that of a large standing wave.
So far, we have achieved COP >> 1 (best result is 280). We can light up 108 LEDs. We can recharge 9 Volt batteries with 1.5V batteries. Please read the information at overunityresearch.com. Patrick Kelly also described the technology in Chapter 5 of his excellent on-line book.
The material cost of a FLEET prototype is less than US$10. You can build one yourself. I am training at least 6 people in Irvine, California, USA. They will all have a working overunity FLEET tested with oscilloscopes within the next few weeks.
A sample result is attached.
I'm not very good at interpreting these things, but are you saying that these experiments have yielded over-unity results?
Yes. The many FLEET prototypes shown at overunityresearch all have COP >1.
Compare the Input Power waveforms (middle) with the Output Power waveforms. The Output Power waveforms contain much more area. Many showed characteristics of standing waves.
Achieving overunity with a less than USD10 FLEET prototype is not a dream.
Quote from: ltseung888 on December 29, 2011, 10:31:10 PM
Yes. The many FLEET prototypes shown at overunityresearch all have COP >1.
Compare the Input Power waveforms (middle) with the Output Power waveforms. The Output Power waveforms contain much more area. Many showed characteristics of standing waves.
Achieving overunity with a less than USD10 FLEET prototype is not a dream.
Interesting... Then if over-unity is achievable, then why do so 90%+ of all electrical engineers and physicists deny it is possible and say they are all fake? Why haven't any of these experiments been done by Universities or been peer-reviewed and given credit?
For those people new to the site,
Lawrence Tseung (ltseung888) is well known on this site and others for making these claims he has been doing it for many years,
unfortunately no one with any credibility has ever managed to match his result, despite this he continues to believe he has created free energy,
if you click on his user name you can look through all his previous post and see that all his claims have come to nothing,
he joins the list of many through the years who believe they have done it, unfortunately for the rest of us the search continues.
Quote from: gabeparmley on December 30, 2011, 02:00:04 AM
Interesting... Then if over-unity is achievable, then why do so 90%+ of all electrical engineers and physicists deny it is possible and say they are all fake? Why haven't any of these experiments been done by Universities or been peer-reviewed and given credit?
It is a matter of time. Prof Steven Jones of BYU has successful replicated and improved on it.
Continue to check the updates at overunityresearch.com under the bench of ltseung888. Expect to see dozens if not hundreds of working prototype from many researchers. Some of them are using my oscilloscopes for verification.
I am just the lowly Server of the Divine Wine.
Here is that thread from Prof Steven Jones for all to see
http://www.overunity.com/10773/physicsprof-steven-e-jones-circuit-shows-8x-overunity/msg308824/#msg308824
So far we have not seen nothing remarkable, it is very much in the testing and work in progress situation and arguments about measurements we can only hope that in the future he will have the breakthrough we arel all looking for.
Quote from: powercat on December 30, 2011, 09:35:04 AM
For those people new to the site,
Lawrence Tseung (ltseung888) is well known on this site and others for making these claims he has been doing it for many years,
unfortunately no one with any credibility has ever managed to match his result, despite this he continues to believe he has created free energy,
if you click on his user name you can look through all his previous post and see that all his claims have come to nothing,
he joins the list of many through the years who believe they have done it, unfortunately for the rest of us the search continues.
Thank you for that clarification. So no one has officially achieved true over-unity, correct?
Quote from: gabeparmley on December 30, 2011, 03:26:54 PM
Thank you for that clarification. So no one has officially achieved true over-unity, correct?
If they have their keeping it to themselves or it is something unique to that individual, once a device has been established as being genuine you should see many more successful replications.
Often ther are near misses which normally turn out to be mistaken measurements or a self runner that has been deliberately faked, sometimes ther is not enough information about the device for replication to be attempted.
On the positive side there are a lot of good people on this site doing good research with out making claims they can't support, I am sure one day we will have a genuine working device that we can all replicate, it is only a question of efficiency and time.
The best free energy device you can get at the moment is a solar panel.
I shall show and explain the results from one of the prototype done on Dec 28.
We can use the oscilloscope to display the instantaneous voltage, instantaneous current (Voltage across a 1 ohm resistor). Their product at any instant is the instantaneous Power. This is true no matter we use AC, DC or Pulse.
Thus we can display the Input voltage (top), Input current (bottom) and the Input Power (middle). We can see that all three curve are much smaller than the Output in this particular prototype. Examine Dec28c carefully.
If the oscilloscope displays are correct, it is clear that the Output Energy is greater than the Input Energy. Energy is the area contained inside the Power Curves. We can do rough estimates using the peak-to-peak values or the rms values. Or we can do the more exact calculation using the data stored in the CSV files. The CSV data can be manipulated with the Microsoft Ecel program.
For the scientists (such as those from China), the oscilloscope results are already confirmation of overunity. We have dozens of such results. We can also reproduce them at will in both China and USA (Irvine, California)
Amen.
ltseung888
We have heard it all before ::)
That's right you even said you would win the overunity prize and you even started a thread about it, though you never sent Stefan
you're working OU device for him to test, did you Lawrence ?????????????? no you Never did, now why wouldn't you do that,
BS
Maybe you don't realise that your claims that you have free energy are actually damaging the free energy community, most of us that have been here long enough and live in the real world know what you are saying is delusional at best, nothing that you claim has ever been proved, yet you still insist on wasting time with your claims for so many years it is ridiculous STOP IT NOW.
we have seen you do this so many times it is getting really boring ::)
For those people not interested in the truth just read his previous posts, before you take anything he says as serious.
This will be my last post in this thread.
It is the prototype from Allen.
Those interested should go to the bench of ltseung888 at overunityresearch.com.
Here is a direct link to that thread, interesting that all the posts so far are from you except one, speaks volumes
http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?PHPSESSID=6c5793bf13d3238b9883e873ef47a65f&topic=1171.msg19471;topicseen#msg19471
Why not also transformer with multiple primary windings?
Quote from: rensseak on December 31, 2011, 01:19:51 PM
Why not also transformer with multiple primary windings?
That would essentially be pointless... You would need more secondary winding's for every additional primary winding and would theoretically be doing the same thing.
is that not somehow the principle of the TPU? Multi primary windings each pulsed with dif. frequency?