Hi everybody,
I'm currently involved in a little debate on this website. www.guerrillanews.com
The debate is regarding Sean McCarthy and Richard Walshe's claims to have created a free energy device in Dublin.
I need your help regarding a statement somebody made in regard to the claim:
"If the law of conservation of energy is wrong, it?s incumbent on those making the claim to publish a mathematical proof or experimental evidence for peer review and examination.
There has not been a single claim of free energy that has withstood that requirement"
My actual blog entry can be found here:
http://bodo.gnn.tv/blogs/17997/The_Scientists_Who_Claim_They_Can_Create_Free_Energy
My belief is that it is crucial not to disregard the Dublin claim simply because it is in opposition to conventional scientific establishment dogma. However, i am no physicist or engineer, and so i need your expertise on this matter.
His statement that "There has not been a single claim of free energy that has withstood that requirement" is what i have the most contention with, due to my knowledge of how the system of suppression operates. However, i am not aware of any specific case examples (i have read on it in the past and found examples, but i can't locate that literature), and my searches have run dry.
Any Takers???