Some Russians have mastered the "Akula" LED Lamp circuit and now can light 30 Watts LED light lamps for free !
Part 1 http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1_iutxqAz_M&feature=youtu.be (http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1_iutxqAz_M&feature=youtu.be)
Part 2 http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=YleTYEVZaxs&feature=youtu.be (http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=YleTYEVZaxs&feature=youtu.be)
About time...
I wish that he could make a video as well as he can build the circuit.
I got sea sick just watching it. I thought that my videos were bad.
Anyways, that's encouraging. I would assume that by using a bigger core, like the Tv yoke cores, that the output can be increased.
Who will be the next kid on the block to replicate it???
Very doubtful. Why can only "russians" do this?
I know why.... and so do you.
Maybe, it's because they are going to be the first ones to patent and sell it, while we still have no idea how or why it works. But, not for long...
Dear all.
Where has Stefan been hiding ??
I watched those two videos probably 6 to 8 weeks ago !!
Nothing new here !!
Cheers Grum.
Here's the Lasersaber rendition of the Akula coil:
I don't want to start any thing, but Tesla said excess energy comes from reactance, also resonance happens when you have C and L are equal. Make what you will, but i don't see any C in any of the Akula lantern circuits. So don't give up yet.
Quote from: AlienGrey on May 20, 2014, 04:51:07 PM
I don't want to start any thing, but Tesla said excess energy comes from reactance, also resonance happens when you have C and L are equal. Make what you will, but i don't see any C in any of the Akula lantern circuits. So don't give up yet.
Don't dismiss them. They work on COP=1 I suppose.
Quote from: AlienGrey on May 20, 2014, 04:51:07 PM
I don't want to start any thing, but Tesla said excess energy comes from reactance, also resonance happens when you have C and L are equal. Make what you will, but i don't see any C in any of the Akula lantern circuits. So don't give up yet.
Really? Can you provide an exact reference to Tesla's writings where he said that?
And can you prove that "resonance happens" when C and L are "equal"? How can a capacitance (measured in Farads) be "equal" to an inductance (measured in Henrys)?
And there is always "C" in any circuit, as well as "L". Not only in discrete components called.... wait for it.... "capacitors", which do appear in Akula circuits ..... but also simply between wires in coils, and across circuit boards, and so on.
Quote from: Grumage on May 18, 2014, 12:55:54 PM
I watched those two videos probably 6 to 8 weeks ago !!
Hi Grum :)
Do you know how a led projector needs to be modified so to be powered out of Acula's device? I saw at the first video above that the Russian guy had taken off the driver out of the box. Any idea about the dc voltage that leds need for full brightness? I ordered a similar projector for experimentation and I don't know what to expect for.
Input 220V,
30W
http://www.abashop.gr/p.Provoleas-LED-30-W.659411.html
Quote from: AlienGrey on May 20, 2014, 04:51:07 PM
I don't want to start any thing, but Tesla said excess energy comes from reactance, also resonance happens when you have C and L are equal.
Most important post I've seen here. 👍 No free energy without C & L in this type of tech. That's where the magic is :)
Use magnetic cores that have the lowest loss-- low magnetic viscosity.
These are amazing cores. They pop out of tv high voltage coils. You can buy them on ebay cheap. In the milli ohm loss region below 100KHz:) I was just measure the resistance of this core at resonance: @328KHz 0.25ohm.
But that core alone won't get you free energy as far as I know. It needs the 2nd magic ingredient, C, and I'm not talking about a separate capacitor. That core literally needs capacitance built into it.
Quote from: TinselKoala on May 21, 2014, 08:38:11 AM
Really? Can you provide an exact reference to Tesla's writings where he said that?
And can you prove that "resonance happens" when C and L are "equal"? How can a capacitance (measured in Farads) be "equal" to an inductance (measured in Henrys)?
And there is always "C" in any circuit, as well as "L". Not only in discrete components called.... wait for it.... "capacitors", which do appear in Akula circuits ..... but also simply between wires in coils, and across circuit boards, and so on.
Yes I can 'when he was taking the piss' ;D ;D ;D ;D
If you have any idea how the Moray device worked do please give ne a buzz 8) :o ;D What about Tinsel dust ?
Quote from: Theoretical Research on April 04, 2017, 12:21:25 AM
These are amazing cores... In the milli ohm loss region below 100KHz:)
Since when is core loss measured in Ohm's ?
Quote from: verpies on April 04, 2017, 04:39:37 PM
Since when is core loss measured in Ohm's ?
That's easy to answer. When you get your education from DumbTube.
Quote from: verpies on April 04, 2017, 04:39:37 PM
Since when is core loss measured in Ohm's ?
I'm referring to the loss in the core due to resistance caused by magnetic viscosity and wire resistance. If you place a cap in series with the core at resonance you can measure this resistance. Does that help?
Quote from: citfta on April 04, 2017, 05:09:08 PM
That's easy to answer. When you get your education from DumbTube.
Haha good one. My usage of the word "loss" was a grammatical description, not a factor or unit of measurement such as "loss factor."
Quote from: Theoretical Research on April 04, 2017, 05:45:02 PM
I'm referring to the loss in the core due to resistance caused by magnetic viscosity and wire resistance. If you place a cap in series with the core at resonance you can measure this resistance. Does that help?
A little, because the loss of energy in the winding's resistance is a separate phenomenon from the loss of energy in the core, which is a separate component of an inductor or a transformer (...and an optional one at that).
Note, that I am only guessing that you mean
energy loss or more precisely the undesirable conversion of other forms of energy to heat.
FYI: core loss is measured in J/kg per cycle or J/m
3 per cycle. The loss of energy in a wire's resistance is called Joule heating and is equal to i
2R so it is a function of current as well as resistance.
I'm fully aware of that. I use spice sims extensively prior to building most of my circuits. Spice needs to know resistance.
I'm not going to get into the physics of this tech, yet, but it's very difficult to build a self-runner unless one uses low loss cores. Anyhow I just thought it would be more meaningful to people to specify resistance, which causes loss. It's the parameter I would be prefer to see.
Additionally it helps to know the cores Z, X, and R curve. The core I showed in photo is fairly linear up to at least 11MHz with respect to R. IOW, twice the frequency will double R. Although to my surprise it appears to have a "sweet spot" around 330KHz where R is significantly less.
Quote from: Theoretical Research on April 04, 2017, 07:25:01 PM
I'm not going to get into the physics of this tech...
Then you are are a proponent of flying blind
Quote from: Theoretical Research on April 04, 2017, 07:25:01 PM
I'm fully aware of that. I use spice sims extensively prior to building most of my circuits. Spice needs to know resistance.
I'm not going to get into the physics of this tech, yet, but it's very difficult to build a self-runner unless one uses low loss cores. Anyhow I just thought it would be more meaningful to people to specify resistance, which causes loss. It's the parameter I would be prefer to see.
Additionally it helps to know the cores Z, X, and R curve. The core I showed in photo is fairly linear up to at least 11MHz with respect to R. IOW, twice the frequency will double R. Although to my surprise it appears to have a "sweet spot" around 330KHz where R is significantly less.
I don't know what the heck you are measuring but resistance does not change with frequency.
Impedance changes with frequency.
Have you seen a self-runner? If not, then how do you know you have to have a low loss core to attain one?
Respectfully,
Carroll
Quote from: citfta on April 05, 2017, 07:33:07 AM
I don't know what the heck you are measuring but resistance does not change with frequency.
Impedance changes with frequency.
Have you seen a self-runner? If not, then how do you know you have to have a low loss core to attain one?
Respectfully,
Carroll
Hey I think we have our wires crossed somewhere. As the frequency increases the core will almost always lag more which is seen as increased resistance in the circuit. You can verify this in FEMM or better yet real life if one is careful and knows what they're doing. :)
Some measurements taken with the core shown a few posts ago
@48.3KHz 2.3uH 0.125Ohm (4.7uF(big square red, WIMA 63V))
@183.8KHz 2.3uH 0.36ohm (330nF(large green))
@331KHz 2.3uH 0.19ohm (.1uF(big blue, verified on WIMA .1uF))
@912KHz 3.0uH 1.8ohm (10nF(WIMA red))
@5.4MHz 0.4uH 12.5ohm (2.2nF)
@11.58MHz 0.4uH 24.2ohm (470pF(burgundy mica))
Circuit is the coil in series with a cap and a 0.05 ohm resistor, connected to a signal gen. Voltage is measured across the signal gen and the 0.05 R. The signal gen is adjust to resonance, and the core resistance is calculated as
Rcore = Vs / (Vr / R) - R
where Vs is signal gen voltage, Vr is voltage across R (0.05 ohms), R is 0.05 ohm resistor
You'll most likely need to view the voltages or at least Vr on a spectrum analyzer unless Vr is high enough above noise to an accurate reading.
Vr / R is the circuit current.
Vs / (Vr / R) is the total resistance.
It's nice to see that someone actually knows just how to build an electronic self running free energy device and what circuit elements and parameters are important in doing so.
I'll repeat Carroll's question, which you didn't answer. Maybe you just missed it:
QuoteHave you seen a self-runner? If not, then how do you know you have to have a low loss core to attain one?
So, TR, when will we be seeing _your_ self runner demonstrated?
The bump in inductance seen at 912KHz is not uncommon for cores just prior to when their inductance starts to decrease with frequency. I've seen this in plenty of amidon core graphs.
The low R anomaly seen at 331KHz is interesting. I verified that on two different caps thinking it was just a very efficient cap, but it seems not due to the caps. The thinking was the perhaps a lot of the R at other frequencies was due to some cap R and the cap at 331KHz had low R, but that doesn't seem to be the case.
You are confusing impedance with resistance. Unfortunately they are both expressed as OHMs. They are not the same thing. Impedance does change with frequency but resistance does not.
Respectfully,
Carroll
Quote from: TinselKoala on April 05, 2017, 10:33:18 AM
It's nice to see that someone actually knows just how to build an electronic self running free energy device and what circuit elements and parameters are important in doing so.
I'll repeat Carroll's question, which you didn't answer. Maybe you just missed it:
So, TR, when will we be seeing _your_ self runner demonstrated?
Hm, lets see if this posts goes through. I didn't want to expand on that but yes. I want to simplify it, do experiments at other locations to make sure it works well enough, and then drop it on Elon Musk's desk. If he kicks me out without a deal then I'll post the details at every applicable website I can find. FYI this device does not utilize magnetic fields as a source for space flow. Rather, it relies 100% on the earths gravitational space flow, which produces a magnetic field within the core due to the charge in the cap that is wrapped in the core. Therefore, if the device is rotated 180 degrees with respect to earth, then the ac voltage caused by the caps reverses, which goes against the starter voltage, which means it stops operating. Furthermore, since this tech has to do with the velocity of space (at earths surface it's ~11Km/s) and not the acceleration of space (which is the cause of gravity), mainstream will learn that the velocity of space on earths surface varies a lot. Although the acceleration of space is relatively stable.
If you want to build a simple experiment to verify the above effect that mainstream has no knowledge of, then take a magnetic toroid core with high resistivity, wrap some copper foil inside, and then wrap some outside of the core, thus forming a capacitor. ... Ug, this is too complex to describe. I'd have to post a circuit and photos of such a core, and I doubt anyone's interested. More on this later.
ps that's enough to understand the physics, and I don't want to talk about it for awhile.
pss is this when the MIBs take me away? ;)
Quote from: citfta on April 05, 2017, 10:44:37 AM
You are confusing impedance with resistance. Unfortunately they are both expressed as OHMs. They are not the same thing. Impedance does change with frequency but resistance does not.
Respectfully,
Carroll
Reactance is measured in ohms and is lossless, often show as X. Impedance is often shown as Z and has both reactance and resistance. R is the lossy part, shown as R. Here's a graph showing a magnetic cores typical Z, X, R. It's a ferrite core made by Amidon. See how R changes. Again, the resistance I am referring to is part the produces a loss.
Quote from: Theoretical Research on April 05, 2017, 10:52:23 AM
Hm, lets see if this posts goes through. I didn't want to expand on that but yes. I want to simplify it, do experiments at other locations to make sure it works well enough, and then drop it on Elon Musk's desk. If he kicks me out without a deal then I'll post the details at every applicable website I can find. FYI this device does not utilize magnetic fields as a source for space flow. Rather, it relies 100% on the earths gravitational space flow, which produces a magnetic field within the core due to the charge in the cap that is wrapped in the core. Therefore, if the device is rotated 180 degrees with respect to earth, then the ac voltage caused by the caps reverses, which goes against the starter voltage, which means it stops operating. Furthermore, since this tech has to do with the velocity of space (at earths surface it's ~11Km/s) and not the acceleration of space (which is the cause of gravity), mainstream will learn that the velocity of space on earths surface varies a lot. Although the acceleration of space is relatively stable.
If you want to build a simple experiment to verify the above effect that mainstream has no knowledge of, then take a magnetic toroid core with high resistivity, wrap some copper foil inside, and then wrap some outside of the core, thus forming a capacitor. ... Ug, this is too complex to describe. I'd have to post a circuit and photos of such a core, and I doubt anyone's interested. More on this later.
ps that's enough to understand the physics, and I don't want to talk about it for awhile.
pss is this when the MIBs take me away? ;)
Here's the completed description of the test:
If you want to build a simple experiment to verify the above effect that mainstream has no knowledge of, then take a magnetic toroid core with high resistivity, wrap some copper foil inside, and then wrap some outside of the core, thus forming a capacitor. Wrap coil around core to measure the voltage. Apply ac voltage on cap (top & bottom part) without shorting the core. Measure voltage on coil. Rotate entire experiment 180 degrees and watch how the ac voltage on the coil reverses with respect to the applied voltage on the cap. In theory there should be no voltage on the coil. ... Ug, this is too complex to describe. I'd have to post a circuit and photos of such a core, and I doubt anyone's interested. More on this later.
Is it okay to post this here? If not then no problem if you delete it or move to a new thread. I think it's related since akula devices seem pretty close to this tech. Assuming akula devices are legit. I'm not saying akula places large copper foil like I do, but his breakdown video shows wire that reverses in opposite direction thus in normal terms is useless, but it adds capacitance. I don't think he understands the cause of the extra energy.
Here's a photo of a core as an example so you'll know how to place the cap in the core. See the copper foil inside and outside.
ps Instead of apply cap voltage on top & bottom of core, you can instead slide a wire between both top & bottom core (see the core is split because there're two cores there in this experiment) and of course the other ac wire lead goes anywhere on the outside of the core on the copper foil.
Also I'm guessing that akula devices use the space flow of magnetic fields from the core instead of gravity. Yeah I have no idea about his devices or if they're even legit or fake. What's that other guys name? Steven Marks? His videos seem more convincing to me. He mentions how the device stalls when turned upside down, along with other effects that are real, but who knows maybe he's also a faker or legit.
TR, there is a thread (Smudge's musings) that may be somewhat related to what you are describing, as it postulates a possible effect that could vary with orientation.
But, unfortunately, your photos and graphs do not quite a demonstration make. YouTube videos are better as long as they aren't faked. I have no reason to believe that you would fake anything, so why not put together a nice YouTube demonstration of your overunity effect and its orientation-dependence? I'm sure that many people _are_ interested and would be glad to see such a demonstration.
Guesses about the _causes_ of effects are fine, if they are converted into solid hypotheses that are testable by true experiments with proper controls.
I have some guesses about why my invisible pink unicorns can't be seen, but it's hard to round them up for actual experiments... since I can't see them. ;)
Quote from: citfta on April 05, 2017, 10:44:37 AM
You are confusing impedance with resistance. Unfortunately they are both expressed as OHMs. They are not the same thing. Impedance does change with frequency but resistance does not.
Respectfully,
Carroll
Be silent, imbecile.
Be very respectful.
Theoretical research,
I appreciate that you come here and share your views and theory.
But I fail to see the benefit or point with argumenting, if you expect people to agree or a pat on the back, sorry it wont happen.
You have your cores, you feel strongly about you theory, build the coil thing, the circuit, and test your theory.
If you have problems and cant get the circuit to give you the nice signal you expect, ask verpies or Tinselkoala for pointers and continue your progression, that would be a practical action.
Dont come here to discuss theory, be practical and build your thing, then come back.
So basicly, dont come back here again, go assemble your coil thing and solder the circuit, you are the man with the theory
you know what should be done, nobody here is of any use to you.
Dont be a lazy little millenial that wants to be discovered by these forums, go and do you thing, if your thing needs funding, for what exactly? What is stopping you from assembling your Akula?
Quote from: citfta on April 05, 2017, 10:44:37 AM
You are confusing impedance with resistance. Unfortunately they are both expressed as OHMs. They are not the same thing. Impedance does change with frequency but resistance does not.
Respectfully,
Carroll
Carroll
I have to disagree with that.
Resistance can change with frequency,and it is known as the !skin effect!.
Im sure you know what that is,and maybe just an over sight on your behalf ?.
Brad
Quote from: tinman on April 19, 2017, 07:06:49 AM
Carroll
I have to disagree with that.
Resistance can change with frequency,and it is known as the !skin effect!.
Im sure you know what that is,and maybe just an over sight on your behalf ?.
Brad
Hi Brad,
You are correct. I had forgotten to consider the skin effect. Thanks for the correction. My apologies to TR.
Respectfully to all,
Carroll
man.i don't understand you guys.
akula is well known fake,and you still want to waist your time on him.
He is doing you a favor when he signs his fakes,for you to avoid.
But still, you give him so much space,you all must be desperate...
Read 15948 times ,very ,very desperate
"akula is well known fake,and you still want to waist your time on him."
Can you prove this??? I doubt it....
Quote from: Theoretical Research on April 05, 2017, 10:32:07 AM
Some measurements taken with the core shown a few posts ago
@48.3KHz 2.3uH 0.125Ohm (4.7uF(big square red, WIMA 63V))
@183.8KHz 2.3uH 0.36ohm (330nF(large green))
@331KHz 2.3uH 0.19ohm (.1uF(big blue, verified on WIMA .1uF))
@912KHz 3.0uH 1.8ohm (10nF(WIMA red))
@5.4MHz 0.4uH 12.5ohm (2.2nF)
@11.58MHz 0.4uH 24.2ohm (470pF(burgundy mica))
Circuit is the coil in series with a cap and a 0.05 ohm resistor, connected to a signal gen. Voltage is measured across the signal gen and the 0.05 R. The signal gen is adjust to resonance, and the core resistance is calculated as
Rcore = Vs / (Vr / R) - R
where Vs is signal gen voltage, Vr is voltage across R (0.05 ohms), R is 0.05 ohm resistor
You'll most likely need to view the voltages or at least Vr on a spectrum analyzer unless Vr is high enough above noise to an accurate reading.
Vr / R is the circuit current.
Vs / (Vr / R) is the total resistance.
Ingles is not my language, but how are you messured this ?
This porch light gizmo you were all diligently arguing amungst yourselves ;D
Well wasn't it a Delomorto device ?
But has any one got any of this pie in the sky to work ?
Here is one for Mr Tinsel see if he can get this one to work or figure it out.
the circuit is fed with AC.
The one coil is wound in the opposite direction to the other one on a ring.
Quote from: verpies on April 05, 2017, 02:52:45 AM
Then you are are a proponent of flying blind
Verpies GOOD choice of words ! :D
Quote from: TinselKoala on April 05, 2017, 12:42:19 PM
TR, there is a thread (Smudge's musings) that may be somewhat related to what you are describing, as it postulates a possible effect that could vary with orientation.
But, unfortunately, your photos and graphs do not quite a demonstration make. YouTube videos are better as long as they aren't faked. I have no reason to believe that you would fake anything, so why not put together a nice YouTube demonstration of your overunity effect and its orientation-dependence? I'm sure that many people _are_ interested and would be glad to see such a demonstration.
Guesses about the _causes_ of effects are fine, if they are converted into solid hypotheses that are testable by true experiments with proper controls.
I have some guesses about why my invisible pink unicorns can't be seen, but it's hard to round them up for actual experiments... since I can't see them. ;)
Have you tried coating your sun glasses in 'copper fake foil' before trying to round them up I'm told it works for many at OU ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
Quote from: TinselKoala on May 21, 2014, 08:38:11 AM
Really? Can you provide an exact reference to Tesla's writings where he said that?
And can you prove that "resonance happens" when C and L are "equal"? How can a capacitance (measured in Farads) be "equal" to an inductance (measured in Henrys)?
And there is always "C" in any circuit, as well as "L". Not only in discrete components called.... wait for it.... "capacitors", which do appear in Akula circuits ..... but also simply between wires in coils, and across circuit boards, and so on.
I solder mine in
;D