Unbalanced Lever is able to run perpetually if...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c9YLkoJz7rM
Hi Veproject 1. !
Your question : "Unbalanced lever is able to run perpetually if...?
My opinion : ...IF you play variable leverage with two eccentered masses , only...
Take a look at an identical design , at :
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Upp-Xr5JAg0
His proposal (as yours...) is : a centered mass + an eccentered mass (pendulum )
Al_exa
.....vs. "unbalanced leverS " (wheel...) , at :
www.peswiki.com/index.php/Image:Andy_Motor_animated_by_Jim_Ross.gif
...is a real cross-road to a workable gravity powered device.
So..."Qvo Vadis?"
Al_ex
Working Model says this does not work
Here is the first version of the approach I posted awhile back. It uses 2 but I have done test with 1 arm. They tend to have a side drag that stops them from working. Is it beatable to go perpetual? Possible but don't show much hope for strength. Other applications are possible for other designs but again they will have the same drag effect that slows them down. But you can get a nice run time with them. 8)
http://youtu.be/b2XTzFZpYK0 (http://youtu.be/b2XTzFZpYK0)
Interesting idea ;)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0WvcuG1iYPU
.....as a comprehensive , minimal but "generous" image-idea can be diversified into a variety of shapes.
One possible test , with : www.geocities.ws/iacob_alex/Some_Drafts/untitled026.jpg
We intend to maintain the torque difference ( gravity unbalance ) on the same side of the fulcrum , and so , a possible continuous rotation of this simple double leverage.
The red mass plays a constant arm.
The green mass plays a variable arm , if paired with the blue mass.
Al_ex
Quote from: veproject1 on June 05, 2014, 06:52:43 PM
Unbalanced Lever is able to run perpetually if...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c9YLkoJz7rM (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c9YLkoJz7rM)
It's no "IF". It does not run by itself.
If you isolate the pendulum, the only thing that makes the "rotor" unbalanced, would you imagine that this pendulum will repeat cycles just by itself? I guess you'll say "No".
Again, as I have told others repeatedly: A mass that is limited to travel within a given altitude does not gain potential or kinetic energy.
In other words; There are no powersource in gravity.
Vidar
.....clearly evident , open to view , needs no more than two masses : if one plays a constant arm , the other must play a variable arm.
Because the movie shows three masses ( pendulum/eccentered mass + balanced lever/two equal arms,two equal masses ) , there is no hope to play a continuous unbalance ...
A seesaw is a gravity game with two partners/ masses ,only...
Exceeding what is necessary or natural is truth that lost its temper,if not the failure to find it.
Al_ex
Quote from: iacob alex on December 04, 2014, 05:04:05 AM
.....clearly evident , open to view , needs no more than two masses : if one plays a constant arm , the other must play a variable arm.
Because the movie shows three masses ( pendulum/eccentered mass + balanced lever/two equal arms,two equal masses ) , there is no hope to play a continuous unbalance ...
A seesaw is a gravity game with two partners/ masses ,only...
A rotating unbalanced lever, with a single variable arm , at :
www.geocities.ws/iacob_alex/Some_Drafts/text028.JPG (http://www.geocities.ws/iacob_alex/Some_Drafts/text028.JPG)
Here, the VAP (variable arm procedure ) is your choice...
Exceeding what is necessary or natural is truth that lost its temper,if not the failure to find it.
In my opinion, this time we have a "redundant key/design"/movie for a gravity powered device: if we "cut" a mass , have we a lab-demo , or an "incredible toy" ?!
Al_ex
Quote from: veproject1 on June 05, 2014, 06:52:43 PM
Unbalanced Lever is able to run perpetually if...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c9YLkoJz7rM
Here is a better kind of (possibly) unbalanced lever, that actually has some experimental proof... (see attachment)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBr1hNN1lN4&list=PLcttXCrYoAgMhZ3f3nf3PRsJqMuKRrn7D
.....as a proposal , at : http://gabydewilde.googlepages.com/gravity-engine (http://gabydewilde.googlepages.com/gravity-engine)
One more time , a simplified design to play a possible gravity self powered oscillatory leverage...
Al_ex
Quote from: iacob alex on March 07, 2016, 04:00:31 PM
.....as a proposal , at : http://gabydewilde.googlepages.com/gravity-engine (http://gabydewilde.googlepages.com/gravity-engine)
One more time , a simplified design to play a possible gravity self powered oscillatory leverage...
Al_ex
The vertical movement of the weights, does move inside a boundary. As long this movement is limited by this boundary, you cannot harness exsess energy. Gravity pulls on objects only vertically, and no device can "trick" gravity to act differently.
The device will not work. Do the math, and you'll be convinced ;-)
Br.
Vidar