Bedini, Bearden,MEGs,TPUs,Kapanadze,and a million other promises and patents. But have you ever seen a working product that does what was promised? Where is the investors money going? Why has Beardens and co's magnetic energy ltd MEG for example gone so quiet? It was supposed to have been the big breakthrough we were all waiting for.With China manufacturing cheaply, products should have emerged years ago.
http://youtu.be/PuaeBE7CMpo?t=21s
???
They're all firmly in the elitests pockets by now pomodoro.not such a bad place to be
Free energy can improve life on the planet but unlikely will bring money to investors...
Also it make dificulter to control people for goverment...
So nobody really want invest in Free Energy :(
You are very mistaken vasik. Corporates will throw money into your pocket if you got a good,or even a shitty machine but they won't allow it onto supermarket.it will sit on corporate shelve unless: 1) it can be disguised as underunity or 2) it can be hovering on the line between overunity and underunity ie. 'A efficient thingy'. If your thingy is competitive with oil-powerdensity and in price then forget it.it will remain on shelve
Quote from: profitis on November 07, 2014, 03:36:41 AM
You are very mistaken vasik. Corporates will throw money into your pocket
That's not what investment is :-)
But anyway, result is the same - no ready available cost effective FE devices...
True yes.but at least the inventor can rich if he play cards right (-:
Quoteat least the inventor can rich if he play cards right
Thats also quite significantly contribute to the issue.
Most of people don't care about common good when significant sum of money involved :(
Ya especially if they watch other guys get girls while they sit in their labs vasik
I believe quite a few of these guys are a little on the crazy side. They believe that they are on the verge of some great discovery and convince investors that they have a working prototype. They obviously have a fake prototype on display and gobsmack the investor with lots of formulas and other hi tech sounding garbage. With the money they attempt to make the machine work, but keep failing. Some of these publish books with titles like ' final secret' or 'free energy secrets' but reveal nothing more that whats already been known, not to mention that some of the stories in the books are not traceable. Companies like TESLA, who make those fantastic electric cars would pay a kings ransom for such technology and they won't be scared to use it. Bearden, Bedini and other demi gods, stop publishing books full of your non working ideas which waste our time and make simple products that we can buy and actually do what you promised- if you are for real that is.
You really think tesla would put a over-unit engine direct on the market pomodoro?I wunda
99% of it is scam..
1% is legit, but they want money (patents, investors, etc...) so it never gets to the open source public domain
Tesla was the only legit person who wanted to improve human conditions through his inventions. This is why I always respected him.
Well as far as I can tell Tesla was an honest gentleman, a genius and a great inventor. His inventions worked and many did come out into the marked. Did he mention over unity from his inventions? I don't think he did. His inventions did what they were supposed to do, no more. Bearden on the other hand did promise overunity from his MEG. He promised working units would be made in 2003 (http://www.rense.com/general21/free.htm). Well, 11 years later I am still waiting and so are the investors. Its unfortunate I had to mention this crooks name in the same post as Tesla as the two are true opposites. Bearden would not put any OU devices onto the market, why would he, he doesnt have any.
Bearden never struck me as a con artist. He's a theoretical physicist. He doesn't know how to build anything with his own hands. He simply got involved with a few other people who did build the MEG. Whether it worked or not is subject for debate.
The reason this website exists is because of people like him who dream of free energy. I learned about BEMF, inductors, capacitors, 555 timers, and even learned how to build a motor out of simple components all because of Bearden, Bedini, and other people who inspire us to challenge the impossible. The only reason i've heard of Tesla is because of these guys .... lol. When mainstream science ignored and forgotten that man, Bearden and Bedini kept bringing up Tesla's name that I was forced to study all about him and his work.
If you want a physical proof of a working device, perhaps you should talk to Joseph Newman ??
Madeo, its good to see you got something positive out of these chaps, but most people learn of these simple devices from a myriad of other places. Bearden is part of Magnetic Energy Ltd so he is not just an innocent physicist, he specifically said this MEG worked and will be in production. To have a dream of overunity is commendable but to actually say you have achieved it when you have not is a disgrace. To take money for such a lie is a sin. Fundamentally these guys are no better than any of us here. They don't have any working devices, they have theories and ideas. Their advantage is to have a following of disciples. Now don't get me wrong, I do think some inventors may have been able to get OU but its not these guys.You know what they say, an empty can rattles the most and these chaps have been able to remain popular for decades with nothing concrete to show, now that in itself is a remarkable phenomenon is it not?
Quote from: pomodoro on November 07, 2014, 08:29:01 PM
Well as far as I can tell Tesla was an honest gentleman, a genius and a great inventor. His inventions worked and many did come out into the marked. Did he mention over unity from his inventions? I don't think he did. His inventions did what they were supposed to do, no more. Bearden on the other hand did promise overunity from his MEG. He promised working units would be made in 2003 (http://www.rense.com/general21/free.htm). Well, 11 years later I am still waiting and so are the investors. Its unfortunate I had to mention this crooks name in the same post as Tesla as the two are true opposites. Bearden would not put any OU devices onto the market, why would he, he doesnt have any.
Nikola Tesla DID mention Over Unity.
For one, remember his Magnifying Transmitter. Then do
more research.
He apparently did discover how to abstract energy out of the , what we would presently call the Quantum Field, and demonstrated it on numerous times.
I also greatly admire his true humanitarian intentions, and honesty. In my mind he personified the title of true gentleman.
CANGAS 93
I could not find any statements by Tesla regarding the magnifying transmitter that are indicative of overunity without any doubts when not taken out of context. I would appreciate being shown that I am wrong regarding this! What he definitely said was that was a device for transmitting power to distant places without the need of wires. Where does he mention that constant power out is more than constant power in, he only talks of rates of power being greater, which we can all achieve when charging capacitors slowly discharging them quickly.
I think bearden and bedini etc with their multimillion dollar equip are in exellent position to know overunit when they see it and have given some valuable info in my opinion but I doubt they will just throw a working device out for every1 to see.they are more guidence teachers.most of the circuits which they give away are basicly efficiency savers as opposed to overunit.they hold the good stuff back I reckon.
Nothing wrong with that, after all they spent time and money investigating OU. Except that Bearden's company promised production to its investors. We are talking 11 years of non production. Each and every one of these OU companies never deliver. No regular company reports either.
Hello folks,
I do not know why Beardes is regarded a physicist or generally a scientist.
http://www.cheniere.org/books/excalibur/glossary/014edited.htm (http://www.cheniere.org/books/excalibur/glossary/014edited.htm)
...but would I trust his curriculum being a former army-member and taken into account the following informations ?
Now this here will give you some clue and please pay attention how old this info is:
http://www.chemtrailcentral.com/forum/thread9268.html (http://www.chemtrailcentral.com/forum/thread9268.html)
aah, and this here:
http://quantumfuture.net/quantum_future/bearden.htm (http://quantumfuture.net/quantum_future/bearden.htm)
Why would you believe that they will spoon-feed you ?
Part about switching caps removed. My calculator did an error
Second example here presented by a real scientist:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EB-jWfzkz_E (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EB-jWfzkz_E)
its written in the second sentence of the first paragraph
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-energy (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-energy)
Kator01
Just out of curiosity check this www.cheniere.com
Can it be a coincidence that Bearden and co. has web site on www.cheniere.org ? ;)
Great work once again Kator!
I need to study that video carefully as it seems very much related to my current investigation.
pomodoro,
if you are investigating in this field you might also watch this guy here:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9RuDKWbf05CEr6Ss7lWvUQ (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9RuDKWbf05CEr6Ss7lWvUQ)
He was close to what Jeong proposed. I showed him Jeong`s vid.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0bDXyv6n_rA&list=UU9RuDKWbf05CEr6Ss7lWvUQ (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0bDXyv6n_rA&list=UU9RuDKWbf05CEr6Ss7lWvUQ)
Kator01