.....due to a reciprocative self rotation of a pendulum , if we combine :
http://u2.lege.net/John_Keely/keelytech.com/news/oscillations/secondary.gif
and
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Upp-Xr5JAg0
As a matter of fact we play seesaw or a "switching " driver-follower (two masses...) relation.
Al_ex
This looks like the same thing but a live demo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c9YLkoJz7rM
However, I can see edits in the video where he repeats segments ???
Luc
Hi !
The problem with this last video is a simple redundancy : it has 3 "segments"( spare parts) vs. Milkovic's lever with pendulum (two "segments"/masses ,only ).
To obtain a continuous unbalance of a lever , we need a certain (variable arm) procedure , as :
www.geocities.ws/iacob_alex/Some_Drafts/text028.JPG (http://www.geocities.ws/iacob_alex/Some_Drafts/text028.JPG)
There are a lot of possible procedures , so to get a continuous variable/oscillattory leverage ("unbalanced lever") , playing two masses/"segments"/spare parts , only:
-two swinging masses (Milkovic's lever with pendulum)
-two rotating masses
-one swinging mass-one rotating mass
As you see , we can use a "minimal wheel" (two masses on two opposite spokes...) so to imagine and make an easy test of a possible (continuous ) "unbalanced lever".
Who knows , maybe we can remind Bessler's beneficial quote "greed is an evil root"...
Al_ex