Hello all,
This is very interesting research I was doing on gravity a few month back.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYJXE4FCm7Q
Has anyone looked into Viktor Grebennikov experintents?
Tom
Tom:
I would be very interested in your research and experiments regarding Viktor's writings. Through the years I have read about his work on and off but never was convinced if it was "real" or "imaginary" . . . . and haven't done any experiments either.
However, if you have any "proof" for or against it I would be interested in knowing. . . :)
truesearch
In 2021, interesting information appeared on the Internet, which added additional facts.
Let's start in order:
Viktor Grebennikov is generally an expert on insects, he did not really understand theoretical physics.
Serious scientific theories were put forward by his companion, professional physicist Valentin Zolotarev.
Together with Grebennikov, he wrote 2 scientific articles.
1. "Theory of field radiation of multicavity structures" 1988
Influence of De Broglie waves on the formation of elementary particles. Close to quantum physics.
...
the EPS field consists of displayed de Broglie standing waves, i.e. these waves are not emitted if there is no radiation from material particles.
https://greencapitalcity-narod-ru.translate.goog/unknown/Data/Anomal/Html/tech/eps_theory.html?_x_tr_sch=http&_x_tr_sl=ru&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=ru&_x_tr_pto=wapp (https://greencapitalcity-narod-ru.translate.goog/unknown/Data/Anomal/Html/tech/eps_theory.html?_x_tr_sch=http&_x_tr_sl=ru&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=ru&_x_tr_pto=wapp)
2. "Fast processes in the environment of physical vacuum as a source of physical phenomena" 1988–1991
Quantum physics, structure of physical vacuum, quantum basis of gravity.
https://ru.djvu.online/file/LFwzw48MlQ2mT (https://ru.djvu.online/file/LFwzw48MlQ2mT)
Nothing more was known about Zolotarev until recently.
In 2021, the daughter of Valentin Zolotarev posted a biography of her father on the Internet, which lists numerous scientific articles.
https://habr-com.translate.goog/ru/post/566074/?_x_tr_sl=ru&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=ru&_x_tr_pto=wapp (https://habr-com.translate.goog/ru/post/566074/?_x_tr_sl=ru&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=ru&_x_tr_pto=wapp)
Original:
https://habr.com/ru/post/566074/ (https://habr.com/ru/post/566074/)
Based on this, it became clear that Zolotarev worked at the main university of the USSR, engaged in nanotechnology in the 70s of the 20th century.
"F.V. Lukin State Research Institute of Physical Problems"
Probably Zolotarev developed photomatrices for first special cameras. This is clear from reading the list of his works.
Of course, now the parameters of the first matrices of those times look very weak, even an ordinary new smartphone has 1000 times better parameters:
https://www-155la3-ru.translate.goog/k1200.htm?_x_tr_sch=http&_x_tr_sl=ru&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=ru&_x_tr_pto=wapp (https://www-155la3-ru.translate.goog/k1200.htm?_x_tr_sch=http&_x_tr_sl=ru&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=ru&_x_tr_pto=wapp)
The elements of such a first matrix are probably relatively large, micrometers.
Of course, in those ancient times, they could not have dimensions of 7 nanometers, as now in processors from AMD or Intel.
But the vertical structure of the layers could probably have been very small.
A list of works by Zolotarev, in which, it seems to me, he could observe the influence of De Broglie waves, Casimir forces and other quantum effects, and even anti-gravity effects:
33. Method for studying adhesion levels in photosensitive translucent films
49. Method for determining the parameters of sticking levels
56. Method for determining adhesion levels in translucent films
92. Parameters of sticking levels in amorphous selenium
127. Method for studying adhesion levels in photosensitive translucent films
The numbering corresponds to the list in the article:
https://habr-com.translate.goog/ru/post/566074/?_x_tr_sl=ru&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=ru&_x_tr_pto=wapp
Conclusions:
- probably Grebennikov's anti-gravity structures had very, very small dimensions, nanometers.
- Larger structures Grebennikov demonstrated as a model, and as a way of influencing the biostructures of humans and insects, which, in his opinion, are very sensitive.
- could Zolotarev somehow secretly manufacture nanostructures at his place of work at the research institute? Some kind of hidden technology? The option is bad, it is unlikely that it will be possible to repeat it.
- could Grebennikov obtain such structures, in the range of nanometers and less, from natural materials?
Quote from: TommeyLReed on January 06, 2015, 11:47:32 AM
Hello all,
This is very interesting research I was doing on gravity a few month back.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYJXE4FCm7Q
Has anyone looked into Viktor Grebennikov experintents?
Tom
What does this forum have to do with levitation? This is a forum for electricity, energy. I think that the subject does not make sense here and especially the insects - botany. I came to this group to learn energy electronics. UFOs, mystical energy, and conspiracies cannot be tested or reproduced by electronic engineers. Also there are a lot of scammers who pretend that they could levitate object and ask for money... This is my opinion, without offense.
I would love to be flying a bit. :) I would even very like to.
Now it's time to cut the branches on the trees. Branches climb on electrical wires
The branches are thin and long. Where you need to go you can't.
It would be great, stood on the platform, rose to the desired height. :)
But I wanted more than just that. There can be many applications, it is not necessary to fly.
To make a wheel with shields having cavity structures on one side.
And it will rotate forever, producing work.
From Grebennikov's description of a hypothetical flight, this is not a flight. Whoever explained to Grebennikov what a flight might look like meant something else. Teleportation, wormhole, etc. No wind, impossible to fall, invisibility. If it were possible to change the speed of time for an object standing on the platform, even by 0.0001 seconds relative to the surrounding space...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5PfjsPdBzg (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5PfjsPdBzg)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKxQTvqcpSg (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKxQTvqcpSg)
I didn't know that idea. Are there some patents somewhere ?
hmm...
Grebennikov Interference pattern generated to counteract gravity waves flowing upward in the ether, from ground. These were extremely tiny cavity resonators as from those bugs wings. His built unit to stand on, had the high voltage electrical field on metal screen from car coil, in same vicinity as the 4 layers aided the process. The 4 gimbals would spread out the 4 layers , so as covering area of the lower board. Handle bar controls moved the cables for orientation. Mass above the board is weightless. Looks like the microscopic pores on a cd disc. The folded up unit would fit in very large microscope case, and had to be held vertical at all times , unless unit being used unfolded horizontal and stood upon. Russian government confiscated part of the unit. The lab is open to the public, but flying bug species is censored. The beetles did not fly in wet, humid weather. The wings vibrations generated high voltage electrostatics.John W. Keely from late 1800's also demonstrated gravity control with tuning fork array with ratio harmonic frequencies applied over thermopiles of silver, gold, and platinum wire transmitter, to heavy metal mass. Signed affidavits of visitors present during demonstrations were done.
Quote from: russwr on October 16, 2023, 01:42:49 PM
Grebennikov Interference pattern generated to counteract gravity wave//in the ether,// tiny cavity resonators as from those bugs wings.
His built // high voltage electrical field on metal screen from car coil,
The 4 gimbals would spread out the 4 layers ,//
Russian government confiscated part of the unit.
The wings vibrations generated high voltage electrostatics.
John W. Keely from late 1800's also demonstrated gravity control with tuning fork array
with ratio harmonic frequencies applied over thermopiles of silver, gold, and platinum
wire transmitter, to heavy metal mass. Signed affidavits of visitors present during demonstrations were done.
Such a bunch of nonsense posted and/or created by some Russian I suppose. ether/eather as a concept died in ~1900+ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aether_(classical_element (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aether_(classical_element))
-so the early adult life of a "Russian comedy hero Grebennikov " was at full motion of Einstein relativity,
but of course he didn't care.
He was self-proclaimed Russian (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russia) scientist (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientist), biologist (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biologist), entomologist (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entomologist) and paranormal (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paranormal)
researcher according to Wikipedia.
John Ernst Worrell Keely was born in (September 3, 1837 – November 18, 1898)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Ernst_Worrell_Keely (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Ernst_Worrell_Keely)
so he couldn't demonstrate anything
before he was born.although he was a
fraudster and self-proclaimed inventor from Philadelphia who claimed
to have discovered a new motive power which was originally described as "vaporic" or
"etheric" force,
Quote from: russwr on October 16, 2023, 01:42:49 PM
demonstrate gravity control with tuning fork array
with ratio harmonic frequencies applied over thermopiles of silver, gold, and platinum
wire transmitter, to heavy metal mass. Signed affidavits of visitors present during demonstrations were done
history of thermopile is here: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0927796X18301566 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0927796X18301566)
Radio was discovered in 1880 not in 1800.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invention_of_radio (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invention_of_radio)
The first solid-state device (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solid-state_electronics) was the "cat's-whisker detector (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat%27s-whisker_detector)" first used in the 1900s in radio receivers.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electricity (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electricity)
gravity wave - the theoretical construct was observed only in
2017
QuoteNobel Prize in Physics (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_Prize_in_Physics) was subsequently awarded to Rainer Weiss (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainer_Weiss) Kip Thorne (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kip_Thorne) and Barry Barish (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barry_Barish) for their role
in the direct detection of gravitational waves.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_wave (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_wave)
Quotein February 2016 when the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) and
Virgo collaborations announced the long-awaited first detection of gravitational waves,
this paper also explains what it takes to do it:
https://home.cern/news/news/physics/constructive-interference-cern-and-gravitational-waves (https://home.cern/news/news/physics/constructive-interference-cern-and-gravitational-waves)
History of a
gimbal is quite impressive but requires quite sophisticated tooling and machinery only aristocrat could afford in 1800
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gimbal (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gimbal)
Wave interference interference pattern Quantum mechanically are the theories of Paul Dirac and Richard Feynman - offer a more modern approach.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave_interference (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave_interference)
Mechanical forces related to Grebennikov have nothing to do with quantum mechanics
and Electromagnetic wave phenomena belongs to it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viktor_Grebennikov (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viktor_Grebennikov)
QuoteGrebennikov's flight and other paranormal claims were promptly rejected by skeptics and scientists
Oddly unpleasant aftertaste sensation lasts for some time after reading such trash.
But some Russian from Russia lucky to learn more than just Cyrillic alphabet doesn't know that.
opinion expressed is my own Wesley
Thank you all of you for excellent time .
Wesley :)
Quote from: sergeyman on February 17, 2022, 03:19:08 PM
What does this forum have to do with levitation? This is a forum for electricity, energy. I think that the subject does not make sense here and especially the insects - botany. I came to this group to learn energy electronics. UFOs, mystical energy, and conspiracies cannot be tested or reproduced by electronic engineers. Also there are a lot of scammers who pretend that they could levitate object and ask for money... This is my opinion, without offense.
To the uneducated nothing makes sense and the more we learn the more sense things make.
By "educated" I mean the pursuit of knowledge and understanding with an open mind. Anyone can educate themselves.
In any case, I found it's always the least educated people trying to tell us what our limitations are and how impossible everything is. Like nothing can do more work than a horse, man cannot fly, we can never go to other planets, machines cannot do math let alone think and so on. Meanwhile, the most educated people were actually trying to make progress.
Here's a clue...
https://theconversation.com/why-do-people-reject-science-heres-why-4050
QuoteThe historical evidence is overwhelming that some of that opposition has been organized by vested interests, often successfully delaying political and regulatory action that posed a perceived threat to corporate profits. The peer-reviewed literature has clearly identified the subterfuge, distortion and manufacture of doubt with which vested interests delayed the control of tobacco, CFCs and sulphur emissions.
It's common knowledge that many see any kind of change as a threat to there beliefs or worldview.
QuoteIt is revealing to analyze how far people are prepared to go when they are exposed to belief-threatening scientific evidence. In one study, people dismissed the scientific method itself when confronted with threatening information. People will rather declare that an issue cannot be resolved scientifically than accept evidence that's in opposition to their threatened beliefs.
So it's best to ignore the naysayers because there the least likely to make any progress...
AC