Hi all,
I have proven this concept on the bench and it in fact does work, if you want energy amplification that is.
Thomas Bearden has stated or hinted at the fact the modern electrical community has failed to realize or suppressed the knowledge that energy can be used more than once in a system, as it can neither be created or destroyed, we are free to use multiple pass techniques if we can find such a way to do it efficiently.
-Dave Wing
YESSSS,,,,,,
I fully agree with amplifacation
as in, ELECTRICITY MULTIPICATION
Come on guys and gals
Let's get with the program
THIS WORKS and is so logical that it must work
You put a very small amount of DC electricity into a motor
That has a large 100 cm circumference pulley + only has to rotate once
Then you use a belt or strap to connect it to one or more mini pulleys,
That are of 1 cm circumference, which rotate 100 times + have AC motors
So you put in 1 unit of DC electricity
To gain 100 units of AC electricity = 50 – 100 electricity multiplier
Please remember, you could add many mini pulleys as you want
Multiplying your electricity by massive amounts
Don't listen to Satan's torque arguments
Think of how easily mini motors turn
It takes practically no effort
This is not only free energy from God =(Eze 1:16)
DIAGRAM + DISCRIPTION @ http://free-energy.yolasite.com/
Not only do we know free energy as Truth, but it is also good news twice
1) This will take away massive sums of money given to nations growing terrorists
+ This is info from The Big Guy Himself, so
2) This was found as a description of the workings of a UFO, so we should be able to discover antigravity, or be able to figure what ever helps these UFO'S levitate + travel so fast
(EZE 1:16) The appearance of the wheels and their work was like unto the colour of a beryl: and they four had one likeness: and their appearance and their work was as it were a wheel in the middle of a wheel.
as in, a little wheel inside a big wheel, but I could not afford to buy a big wheel with threading on the inside, and a mini wheel with the same threading on its outside. So I did the next best thing, I connected a big wheel to a mini wheel through a belt, strap, rope or even a piece of string in a pinch to connect the two pulleys with motors attached. This was easier to build out of many parts that one might have around, especially for the Tribulation Saints, when they are running from the evil authorities = in less than 5 years. http://my2020vision.yolasite.com/
Please remember this, when before 2020 the Tribulation starts =
the 7 year peace treaty signing with Israel = START OF TRIBULATION
Please view all the info that I have picked up @ http://beliefstoliveby.yolasite.com/
He gave me these two other Gifts also @
http://ultimatejoysticks.yolasite.com/
(an awesome next generation joystick = measures movement in all three axis's + measures rotations in all three axis's = that's 6 movements = 3 times basic joystick) -
AND http://ultimatevideogamecontrols.yolasite.com/
(which is awesome 3D virtual reality room = video on all 4 walls + ceiling + floor + you are held in the centre by cables to each corner. you are standing non a mat of bearings so you can walk or run in place, while graphics move around you )
These are all free for all to use, as they are displayed on the web + are without patents
We should use these to earn plenty of income to help spread the Gospel.
http://fire-starter.yolasite.com/
Before http://my2020vision.yolasite.com/ occurs,
Door closes on Christ return http://doorschristmustpassthrough.yolasite.com/
Now first off let's loose this fairytale of EVil-sOLUTION
God proves it wrong with His Creation Hourglass = MOON=
it only has 6000 years (very small amount) worth of sand on it,,,,,,
http://decimationofthisevolutionfairytale.yolasite.com/
FREE ENERGY
The only reason that this has not been used earlier to create free energy, are the billions of fallen angels, trying desperately make sure that we never discover this technology
Quote from: Dave Wing on January 06, 2015, 12:55:27 PM
Hi all,
I have proven this concept on the bench and it in fact does work, if you want energy amplification that is.
Thomas Bearden has stated or hinted at the fact the modern electrical community has failed to realize or suppressed the knowledge that energy can be used more than once in a system, as it can neither be created or destroyed, we are free to use multiple pass techniques if we can find such a way to do it efficiently.
-Dave Wing
Hi Dave,
Thanks for showing this setup. My question would be whether you considered running the system with precharged capacitors instead of batteries? If not, what do you think?
Gyula
Hi All,
What one needs to do is put switches on each negative side and run one loop at a time starting with a load across the single 12 volt battery and progressing onward. Run the 12 volt battery with the motor across it for 10 minutes. Then run the next closest section 24-12volt for 10 minutes it will charge the 12volt battery and put back in what you took out. Then move up the line to the 36-24 volt section and do the same thing. Rpm's of each motor will drop as you move up the line, because the differential will become closer however the battery will still charge in the 10 minute runtime period. That is what I have found... So far. Of course the last battery set will not charge... But if you took a percentage of the shaft energy and stored it to put back into the 60 volt section you may have a free runner. I have not yet done this though...
In order to increase rpm's of the motors in the later stage like the 48-36 and 60-48 volt sections, differential may need to be increased to 60-36, 72-48 and 84-60. Because my 12 volt batteries easily each charge to over 16.3 volts. So with the 60 volt section running at 13volts x 5 batteries = 65 volts and 4 batteries x 15.8 volts = 63.2 for a differential of 1.8 volts for the 60 and 48 volt section to run on. That is why we need to increase the differential between sections as the voltage goes higher. Just thinking outloud here.
Are we not taking out only 12 volts for 10 minutes out of the 60 volt section at the end but have been able to run the system for 50 minutes for no cost all we have to pay for is the last 10 minutes of the 12 volt differential we have taken. So should it be easy to close loop the system.
In my opinion, again, after spending much time on the bench from what others elsewhere have mentioned the circuit as drawn will and does only function as a series circuit so nothing special there. It had me fooled for a while. But as explained in the above, in the two paragraphs, I was inspired by a fellow member Nityesh from Energy Science Forum, that the switching between each section may be the key. So I modified the circuit and performed the above tests.
-Dave Wing
Quote from: gyulasun on January 12, 2015, 06:48:07 PM
Hi Dave,
Thanks for showing this setup. My question would be whether you considered running the system with precharged capacitors instead of batteries? If not, what do you think?
Gyula
Hi Gyula,
It will work if you switch the motor off before the small side cap equalizes with the large high potential cap on the other side, you have to maintain a fair amount of differential 11-13 volts, otherwise the motor will slow down and or stop when equalized. All this is dependant upon actual cap size and switch on time. But it can be done. Here is the configuration below in the pic drawn up from Matt over on Energetic Forum. If you want to run with caps I want to make a suggestion remove the end 12 volt battery and put a capacitor there with the motor across it. Keep all capacitors empty and run the circuit in steps from the 60 volt side down to the last capacitor and finally the motor.
One could use one motor just switch it in and out of each decreasing potential loop all the way down to the end capacitor. Making sure to switch the motor over to the next capacitor section prior to anything smaller than a 11-13 volt differential on the loop in use.
Hope this makes sense, it does in my mind but may not to anyone else.
In all honesty this was just to prove a concept of energy amplification, in the form of getting a motor to make multiple passes with the same energy it uses. After thinking about it... The Bedini Tesla switch does a much better job at making the energy complete multiple passes of the same energy, it simply ping pongs the energy from the right battery bank to the lower potential on the left battery bank and back again. This process repeates it's self over and over again without stopping it produces a dc pulsed square waveform and re-uses the same energy in multiple pass format to run a AC load for free or for a very long time. The Bedini Tesla switch is the only way to go... That is where I am going with all this. If you want something that would work a lot better than what I am suggesting here... seriously look at John's DvD's and build big and then you will have something.
-Dave Wing
Dave Wing: If you look up Carlos Benitez patents, he has already figured out your idea.
He uses the splitting of the positive to generate energy but with a twist.
He interposes a tank circuit and a spark gap to introduce static energy into the circuit.
I've already verified the concept experimentally and so has Matthew Jones on energetic forum.
Yes I have seen the patent before I ran across it on Energetic forum not to long ago. Thanks for the memory refresher about it though.
What did Matt and yourself find out about the circuit and what was the end result, if you don't mind me asking? I would also like to know, if you are willing share, what are you looking for in all your endeavours in this field?
Even though you did not ask I will share my goals, they are simply to learn, then teach others about a real practical, functional, self powering piece of equipment that anyone can make for themselves... That will have more than enough power to suit ones daily needs, whether it be a slef powering bike, automobile, house or household appliance. We are at the cusp of the great energy revolution... That is a sure thing.
-Dave Wing
I ran the Benitez 4 battery system for a week constantly powering an 11 watt cfl bulb and intermittently abusing the setup by powering a motor of something like 300 watts and an electric 12v car kettle at say 250 watts. At the end of the week all the battery voltages were the same as at start up.
I used 2 car batteries and 2 Lorry batteries in the experiment. My Tesla switch was a terribly built affair which kept failing, also. I am not a good builder.
My beef is that the device was cumbersome and I was looking at a a way of switching the batteries several times a second.
(Because the splitting of the positive constantly loses it's voltage. ie one set is charging up, and the other is diminishing so the difference between the two positives constantly diminishes )
Matt Jones obtained a steady 500 watts for about 6 months. He used electronic switching.
My conclusion is that the Tesla switch has to be "right" and top quality. -Unless you can get hold of an old Rhumkoff coil with it's own interrupter.
My endeavors are the same as yours.
Quote from: a.king21 on January 13, 2015, 05:31:35 PM
I ran the Benitez 4 battery system for a week constantly powering an 11 watt cfl bulb and intermittently abusing the setup by powering a motor of something like 300 watts and an electric 12v car kettle at say 250 watts. At the end of the week all the battery voltages were the same as at start up.
I used 2 car batteries and 2 Lorry batteries in the experiment. My Tesla switch was a terribly built affair which kept failing, also. I am not a good builder.
My beef is that the device was cumbersome and I was looking at a a way of switching the batteries several times a second.
(Because the splitting of the positive constantly loses it's voltage. ie one set is charging up, and the other is diminishing so the difference between the two positives constantly diminishes )
Matt Jones obtained a steady 500 watts for about 6 months. He used electronic switching.
My conclusion is that the Tesla switch has to be "right" and top quality. -Unless you can get hold of an old Rhumkoff coil with it's own interrupter.
My endeavors are the same as yours.
So let's see. You ran an 11 Watt bulb continuously for a week. How much actual _energy_ was that, assuming it was actually dissipating the full 11 Watt nameplate value?
There are 7 days x 24 hours/day x 60 minutes/hour x 60 seconds/minute = 604800 seconds in a week. Right? So your bulb required 11 Watts x 604800 seconds, or 6652800 Joules of energy. Right?
How much energy is there in your 4 batteries, two automotive and two lorry batteries? You don't specify so let's just assume that they are all 4, 12 volt nominal, 65 amp-hour batteries, quite reasonable values. What is the energy content of this battery stack at 12 volts (ignoring that they will read 13.2 V or higher when fully charged)? 4 batteries x 12 volts x 65 amp hours = 48 V x (65 amp-hours x 60 minutes/hour x 60 seconds/minute) = 11232000 watt-seconds, or Joules. Right? So running the 11 watt bulb for a week uses just a bit over half the energy in Joules in the battery stack.
You do not specify for how long you ran the other loads. Ten minutes per day, each, every day? 7 days x 10 minutes/day x 60 seconds/minute = 4200 seconds, and with 550 Watts load that is 4200 seconds x 550 Watts = 2310000 Watt-seconds or Joules. So the total energy required to run the 11 Watt bulb continually for a week, and the other two loads for ten minutes each, every day, is 8962800 Joules. Right? And this is quite a bit less than the total starting energy content of the batteries, right?
Please check my math.
And anyone who has worked with lead acid batteries knows that the open circuit terminal voltage may not dip below the nominal 12 volts until the batteries are 80 percent discharged or so.
So can you refine the calculation somewhat? What are the actual ratings of the 4 batteries you used? Were the "lorry batteries" 24 volt batteries? Exactly how much power were you actually supplying to the "11 Watt" bulb? For precisely how long did you run the heavier intermittent loads?
The lorry batteries were 12 volts and about a third more power than the car batteries which were about one horsepower each.
I ran the heavier loads for maybe 4 hours several times. The data is not very scientific, because I was experimenting with the device.
The fact that the batteries retained the start voltages I agree does not prove very much as batteries can be deceptive.
All I can say is that it is worth pursuing as a patent replication. Of course the good thing about criticising dead people (Benitez) is that you can call him a liar and he cannot fight back.
One thing which spooked me , however, was that at one point the batteries were charging up at such a rate that I could hear them "breathing" ie making a strange breath like sound so I decided to reduce the power as I feared a gas build up.
Benitez does explain how the device works however. So if you disagree with him I suggest you take it up with Benitez.
And if you don't like my suggestion then you can complain to the internet. lol
(The last quote is from Family Guy - I'm trying to inject a little humour here)
Batteries are not rated in Horsepower! One horsepower is a bit under 750 Watts. Any car battery can produce much more than that power easily. Automotive batteries are rated in energy capacity (Amp-hours) and in "cold cranking amps" and it is not unusual for a car battery to have 500 or more CCAs, which would be 12Vx500A= 6 kW or about 8 horsepower! And that's the bottom end of the CCA range necessary for reliable starting in cold weather! A new modern battery will have 750 CCA or more! And power is not energy, anyway!
So at any rate it looks to me like your testing may not have really exceeded the energy capacity of the batteries when all is put together. Sure, it's possible to transfer charge from, say, two batteries in series into one battery, and thus overcharge it to the point of outgassing -- and you were wise to reduce power at that point. But in every case that I have ever seen properly tested, like in Bedini systems or other battery-switching systems, the _average charge_ on all the batteries taken over time is always decreasing and always eventually runs out. I'd be happy to see some real data that proves otherwise, though. So it's too bad that your testing wasn't scientific... experimentation without actual data recording isn't very useful because it can mislead you into thinking things that aren't exactly true.
This is a simple test to show energy can be reused multiple times, with minimal losses if any. Run the test for at least 10 minutes for each section, with a stop watch. At the end you run for 50 minutes but how much energy have you actually lost in the system?
-Dave Wing
Quote from: TinselKoala on January 14, 2015, 01:27:16 AM
Batteries are not rated in Horsepower! One horsepower is a bit under 750 Watts. Any car battery can produce much more than that power easily. Automotive batteries are rated in energy capacity (Amp-hours) and in "cold cranking amps" and it is not unusual for a car battery to have 500 or more CCAs, which would be 12Vx500A= 6 kW or about 8 horsepower! And that's the bottom end of the CCA range necessary for reliable starting in cold weather! A new modern battery will have 750 CCA or more! And power is not energy, anyway!
So at any rate it looks to me like your testing may not have really exceeded the energy capacity of the batteries when all is put together. Sure, it's possible to transfer charge from, say, two batteries in series into one battery, and thus overcharge it to the point of outgassing -- and you were wise to reduce power at that point. But in every case that I have ever seen properly tested, like in Bedini systems or other battery-switching systems, the _average charge_ on all the batteries taken over time is always decreasing and always eventually runs out. I'd be happy to see some real data that proves otherwise, though. So it's too bad that your testing wasn't scientific... experimentation without actual data recording isn't very useful because it can mislead you into thinking things that aren't exactly true.
I am not semantic pedantic.
The car batteries were approximately 750 watts.
I suggest that in the interests of fair play you familiarise yourself with late 19th century, and early 20th century electrical engineering terms.
Then you critically appraise the following GRANTED patents:
http://www.tuks.nl/pdf/Patents/Benitez/GB191514311A.pdf
http://www.tuks.nl/pdf/Patents/Benitez/GB191514311A.pdf
Especially the attachment, which seems harder to find online these days.
Quote from: that_prophet on January 12, 2015, 06:00:52 PM
YESSSS,,,,,,
I fully agree with amplifacation
as in, ELECTRICITY MULTIPICATION
Please view all the info that I have picked up @ http://beliefstoliveby.yolasite.com/
He gave me these two other Gifts also @
http://ultimatejoysticks.yolasite.com/
(an awesome next generation joystick = measures movement in all three axis's + measures rotations in all three axis's = that's 6 movements = 3 times basic joystick) -
AND http://ultimatevideogamecontrols.yolasite.com/
(which is awesome 3D virtual reality room = video on all 4 walls + ceiling + floor + you are held in the centre by cables to each corner. you are standing non a mat of bearings so you can walk or run in place, while graphics move around you )
These are all free for all to use, as they are displayed on the web + are without patents
We should use these to earn plenty of income to help spread the Gospel.
http://fire-starter.yolasite.com/
Before http://my2020vision.yolasite.com/ occurs,
Door closes on Christ return http://doorschristmustpassthrough.yolasite.com/
Now first off let's loose this fairytale of EVil-sOLUTION
God proves it wrong with His Creation Hourglass = MOON=
it only has 6000 years (very small amount) worth of sand on it,,,,,,
http://decimationofthisevolutionfairytale.yolasite.com/
FREE ENERGY
The only reason that this has not been used earlier to create free energy, are the billions of fallen angels, trying desperately make sure that we never discover this technology
I happen to be struggling with an electronic simulator at the moment,
trying to get a working model of this awesome free energy machine that God Shared
I believe that He wishes for this to be priority for me,
it is so simple, and easy to build,
could I ask for help getting a working model of this device out to the world,
http://free-energy.yolasite.com/
evil forces have put up barriers for me at every turn,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
THIS WORKS, IT IS SO SIMPLE THAT IT HAS TO WORK
this device generates AC electricity by using mechanics of varying pulley sizes
to multiply rotations,
generated additional AC electricity by using multiple generators
Free Energy made simple = electricity multiplier using 100cm to 1cm pulleys
Don't believe in God or good + evil forces
Free Energy is so simple,,, that it MUST be hidden by evil forces.
It is simplicity at its best; you simple put the minimal power into a DC motor with a 100cm pulley connected to it, which only has to rotate the once. This large pulley is connected to a belt, strap, rope or even string in a pinch, which is also connected to another small one cm pulley, which rotates 100 times. So you put in the DC power to rotate your input motor only the once, and you get out of this system 100 cycles of AC power. You have just created your first free energy machine, that multiplied your electricity by 50 or 100. If anybody starts complaining about torque being a problem, just think about how smoothly bearings are nowadays, as well as how easily electric motors rotate. You could add ten of these small pulleys, without gaining any sufficient torque, giving you a 1000 power electricity multiplier.
A drawing and better description of how this works is at:
http://free-energy.yolasite.com/
Please believe me + not all of the evil spirits
That are continuously saying, "this won't work"
Free energy is super simple
It has been staring us right in the face
Ever since we discovered how to make AC electricity
How is AC electricity made?
It is simply made by rotating wheels or pulleys
With these wheels connected to an AC motor
Which is easily created, by using a few coils of wires
And rotating them within the field of two opposing magnets
They will try to say what about torque
Torque is not a problem in the slightest,
As electric motors are the easiest to rotate
They have some of the smoothest running bearings
So you could add tens, maybe even hundreds
Of these AC motors, attached to mini pulleys of one cm circumference
On the same belt that you have a DC motor attached to as a drive motor
With a large 100 cm circumference pulley or even larger
So you only have to input enough electricity to rotate the drive motor one rotation
Then you get 100 cycles of AC electricity out of this system
For every mini pulley with an AC motor attached that you connect to the belt
What you are doing is called "SPAMMING". You have posted multiple copies of the same UNWORKABLE scheme in six threads. What do you hope to accomplish by this? Do you even realize what you are doing?
And you really should stop claiming that you have a working model of this system, because you don't, and your wheelchair batteries will run down.
Quote from: TinselKoala on April 21, 2015, 11:42:34 PM
What you are doing is called "SPAMMING". You have posted multiple copies of the same UNWORKABLE scheme in six threads. What do you hope to accomplish by this? Do you even realize what you are doing?
And you really should stop claiming that you have a working model of this system, because you don't, and your wheelchair batteries will run down.
OK, then please explain where the extra power is coming from
when I do my experiment of going up hill fast (large wheel)
+ then back down hill slow (small wheel)
if you read my experiment in my web page http://free-energy.yolasite.com/
why can I gain the power to go 20 feet higher up the steep hill
every time I did the experiment = 60 feet when I did experiment 3 times
TIME IS SHORT = the Pre-Trib Rapture + the infamous 7 year Peace Treaty with Israel MUST START before this 1ST DOOR closes on 2019.04 = Jan 14th http://my2020vision.yolasite.com/ - "know that it is near, even at the doors",(Mat 24:33) http://doorschristmustpassthrough.yolasite.com/.
-
Free Energy + perpetual motion can be easily produced using pulleys, costing only the minuscule bit of power that it takes to rotate a DC motor with a large 100 cm circumference pulley one single time. You can gain or multiply massive amounts of AC electricity using mini-pulleys with AC generators. You are capable of doing this by running this long length of belt, (off the circumference of large pulley) past a few 1 cm circumference mini-pulleys, with AC generators attached. This GEM-(Geometrical Electricity Multiplier) device is gaining you 100 cycles of AC electricity, for every mini-pulley that you choose to attach to this sane belt. So, if you added 10 mini-pulleys, you could get a return of 1000=10X100 cycles of AC electricity, and all costing you only one mere spark of DC current. How could you not be multiplying AC electricity, when you are using simple pulley mechanics to trade one spark of DC current, for 100-1000 cycles of AC electricity-(duel sparks).
-
This super simple free energy technology: http://free-energy.yolasite.com/ works on the ability of combinations of pulleys being able to easily + freely multiply your total # of rotations. You can do this because of the fact that you don't have to expend 100 times more electricity to rotate a large 100 cm circumference pulley, than it takes to rotate a 1 cm circumference mini-pulley. Yet if you run the 100 cm of moving belt, that comes off the one rotation of a large 100 cm pulley, past any # of mini-pulleys of 1 cm, then you could gain a return of 100 rotations for every mini-pulley that you choose to attach to the same belt. (As for torque, it only comes from generating power, and power is voltage multiplied by current) + We only need to produce one single spark of DC current to make this a self-powering mechanism. So one spark of DC current, (which is practically nothing) multiplied by even massive voltage, would still equal practically zero power, which takes practically zero torque to rotate.
-
This multiplication of rotations could be extremely helpful, if you only added AC generators to these mini-pulleys, you could be multiplying the total cycles of AC electricity. This AC generator takes no torque to rotate, because although it would be winding up massive voltage, it does not need to be winding up practically any current-(1 mere spark) which is practically zero. Torque is only caused when you are generating power, and you are generating practically zero power, as power is equal to voltage times current. So, no matter how massive of voltage you are generating, it is multiplied by practically zero current, as we only need one spark of current, or practically zero. This works because zero times anything is still equal to zero, and practically zero works the same way.
-
What is AC electricity, + how is it made = it is made out of the easy rotations of coils of wire through a magnetic field of two oppositely positioned magnets right. Using pulley technology, we can easily + freely convert one rotation of a large 100 cm circumference pulley, into 100 rotations of as many 1 cm circumference mini-pulleys that we choose to attach to the same belt that comes off of your large pulley. So, if you added 10 mini-pulleys to this same belt, and added AC generators to each mini-pulley, you could gain you 1000 = 100X10 cycles of AC electricity.
-
All these cycles of AC electricity are from the single burst of DC electricity, which is the small amount of current that a DC motor takes to rotate one single time =(one mere spark). These cycles of AC electricity would cost practically zero torque to rotate, as torque is only caused when you are generating power, and you are not generating practically any power in this system. This is because although you may be winding up massive voltage,(electrical pressure) to keep this GEM mechanism running, you only need to generate one single spark of DC current, and P=IV, or power equals current multiplied by voltage.
-
So your total power output would be practically zero current multiplied by any amount of voltage, which would still be equal to practically zero power, taking practically zero torque. So, you could be easily + freely generating massive amounts of rotations of these mini-pulleys, which are generating you massive voltage, or the ability/potential to gain plenty of current, which will allow you to produce plenty of power. This is because the greater the voltage/pressure, the greater the ease that there is to generate more current. PLEASE,,, let me show you how ridiculous this mythical torque problem really is. Do you think that the 100 cycles of AC electricity would have a hard time producing the single spark of DC current, which is all that you need to crank over your DC motor once, with your 100 cm circumference pulley attached?
-
Mankind was given the best Gift from God, (other than Jesus) http://free-energy.yolasite.com/ right here in Atlantic Canada + just before the infamous 7 years Peace Treaty. This seven years of time, which the 2nd half of is the Great Tribulation, is when this GEM tech will be needed most. This will be the worst time for earth, where not only is there constant war, but most all of the evil fallen angels, and the Nephilum , will be sent to the earth. Nephilum are the offspring of fallen angels + human women, as angels are all male, because God only wanted there to be a set # of angels. This is not only the ones that are still alive, but also the spirits of all that have died. This could be massive amounts of evil spirits, considering that this includes the ones from before the flood. (How can we be billions of years old, when the moon will leave orbit within 10,000 years) + all orbiting bodies will have messed up orbits, because of this yearly amount of space debris adding mass.
-
This is free energy technology, which we all will need and love, as it has practically no cost to run, and there is no need for any fuel to be purchased. Nor would there be any exhaust to cause environmental or noise pollution. So,,, why haven't we figured this simple little bit of technology out long ago? Evil spirits are, and have been hiding this simple technology from mankind. These AC generators are extremely easy to rotate, because the only resistance torque,(other than the viscosity of the lubricant in the bearings) would come from a great need for current, which would practically never happen, especially when you are dealing with such small amounts of power as the example that I describe here.
-
I confirmed that this free energy technology, discovered in the early 2000's, was from God + not from evil forces, by finding it in a UFO motor description in Ezekiel 1:16. Thankfully, there are many ways that we can freely multiply the total # of rotations, like a set of varied sized pulleys, can be easily used to multiply the total # of rotations. Then, by simply adding an AC generator to your mini-pulley, you can convert your rotations into cycles of AC electricity.
-
This is one super simple GEM of an idea, and it is made from pre-school technology, so why was this not out long ago. Can you believe the power that evil spirits have, to be able to dumb down a whole population of humans + for so long. I still have problems getting people to believe that there is no torque problem. Think that this may actually be a good enough reason for you to find out if GOD IS REAL = http://beliefstoliveby.yolasite.com/ + if HE IS RETURNING SOON = http://my2020vision.yolasite.com/
-
Do you want to hear how truly super simple this technology is, Where you only pay to crank over the DC motor one time, with a 100 cm circumference pulley, Then you use the 100 cm of moving belt off this large pulley circumference, + run it past one or more mini-pulleys of only one centimeter circumferences, All that you have to do is add an AC generator to these mini-pulleys, giving you a free return of 100's of cycles of AC electricity. That's one small pulse of DC current as an input, returning you 100 cycles of AC electricity output, How can you not multiply your AC electricity, with this rotation multiplication technology
-
IT IS TRULLY THAT SIMPLE
-
Come on Canadians,,,
Come on Nova Scotia,,,
-
This is where this GEM-(Geometrical Electricity Multiplier) technology of free energy for the End Times was 1st started, (early 2000's when He first shared this with me). Let's get out there and start taking advantage of it, by not only building GEM units to power all of our electric tools, toys + gadgets, but we could be starting companies that have electric appliances, utensils, devices, tools, toys, + gadgets with these GEM perpetual power supplies built into them, (let's start letting electricity generate itself) + on our labels we could even proudly say "FIGHTING TERRORISM + FIGHTING POLLUTION"
PROOF OF CREATION + A YOUNG EARTH = (space dust) has mass + billions of years of dust would add up eventually + mess up the orbits of all planets + moons. We could measure the amount of dust on the moon, and divide the total by the amount of dust that is deposited every year, coming up with an age for the moon, and thereby finding out the age of our earth. Most of us have seen pictures of the moon landing, and realize that there is only a few centimeters, meaning that by the deposit of space dust, the moon has only been orbiting us for a few thousand years. Less than 10,000 year
-
COME ON,,, ALL OF YOU BACK YARD MECHANICS,,, Get some AC + DC motors together of the same voltage, and start building these GEM free energy power supplies,, + not only for 1.5, 3, 6, 9 + 12 volt batteries, but household 120 volt, + 12 volt, to powering these new electric cars. Let's throw the oil companies out of work, producing toxic smoke + maybe even make money with them, by throwing any excess power from these perpetually running energy generators that we have the time, + small amount of money to purchase parts to build. Think of it as not only keeping money in your pocket, but you are keeping money from the countries that either fund terrorist, or which are unknowingly funding them. This is not to mention the experimenting that we could be doing with the anti-gravity + speeds approaching light speed. Now I know that there are many out there like me, which would enjoy knowing how one type of this motor was powering a UFO in the Bible, in Ezekiel 1:16. http://aliensandghosts.yolasite.com/
-
Most people have heard that the "day + hour knoweth no man"-(Mat 24:36), but why does nobody mention the soon arriving doors that we are not only allowed to know, but in the original Greek, it is worded like a command = "know that it is near, even at the doors",,, + that 1st Door will close on 2019.04 + the last Door will close on 2025.94. So we are guaranteed that Jesus will set His foot on the Mount of Olives before the year 2026.
-
Did you ever wonder how you could know that it's near, if we can't know the day. Near to what then, maybe it's near to the door/deadline = "know that it is near, even at the doors" Mat 24:33. Doors are plural, because of the two appearances of Jesus, the first is in the clouds,(Rapture) http://rapturequestion.yolasite.com/ before the 7 year peace treaty is signed + then His second arrival is as His Foot touches earth, on the Mount of Olives. DOOR = (this is not the date of His Arrival, which we are warned that nobody can know, but this is the date that Christ must return before) A day that the Tribulation Saints will not only know, but they will probably being counting down the days until. = (He Returns when the 7 year peace treaty ends)
-
EVil-sOLUTION = isn't it amazing what Truth can be revealed, when the "il-s" of life are included. http://decimationofthisevolutionfairytale.yolasite.com/
-
I can give you a free to run, perpetual power supply = http://free-energy.yolasite.com/ This GEM mechanism can do this because of how AC electricity is created by rotations. as in the more rotations the greater amount of AC electricity, and pulleys can be used to multiply rotations. So, you are using pulley mechanics to multiply your total amount of AC electricity, by trading one rotation of a large 100 cm circumference pulley, into 100 rotations of as many 1 cm circumference pulleys as you choose to add to the same belt. If you add AC generators to these mini-pulleys then you could be multiplying AC electricity. If you added 4 of these mini-pulleys with AC generators attached, you would gain 400 cycles of AC electricity, and all for the single burst of DC current, the minute amount of current that a DC motor takes to rotate one single time.
-
These mini-pulleys would be easy to rotate, as the only resistance that they would generate, would be caused by any power that they were generating. These mini-pulleys would only be winding up massive voltages, because the only current needed to rotate your large 100 cm pulley on a DC motor, is one simple spark, or short burst, the amount to rotate your large pulley only one single time. Torque is only caused when you are generating power, and power is generated by current multiplied by voltage. Since we only need one single spark of current, (practically zero) the total amount of power being generated would still be practically zero, costing practically zero torque.
-
This was given to mankind before the first door closes = http://my2020vision.yolasite.com/
Especially for the soon coming Tribulation Saints http://doorschristmustpassthrough.yolasite.com/
-
Sorry if it offends you, that I add a little bit of Biblical stuff in my explanations, but when I came up with this super simple idea, it was just after asking God for a way to help the Tribulation Saints. Just think about how super simple this AC electricity multiplier truly is, and how the voices in your head tell you that it cannot work. When how much more simple can it be, then to only pay for the one rotation of a large 100 cm pulley, when you can get a return of 100 cycle of AC electricity, for every 1 cm mini-pulley that you attach to the same belt, (with AC generators attached). Yes that's an input of one single spark of DC current, returning you 100 cycles of AC electricity for every mini-pulley that you attach to the same belt. If you only added 4 mini-pulleys, you would get a return of 40 cycles of AC electricity. Please remember, that there is a most powerful spiritual warfare going on over this GEM technology.
-
There is a most powerful spiritual warfare going on over this GEM technology. Can you believe the problems that I have had, getting this super simple way of using pulleys to multiply the total amount of AC cycles of electricity? I think that it's totally ridiculous, when you truly take a close look at it. Pulleys can be used to multiply the # of rotations, and AC electricity is made of rotations of a coil through a magnetic field. It should be dirt simple, as you are using pulleys to multiply your total # of rotations, and AC electricity is made of rotations, so you are effectively multiplying AC electricity. .