BELOW YOU NEED FROM BOOKS ( physics ) TO UNDERSTAND MY POST
*****************************************************************************
James Clerk Maxwell, in 1861–64, published his theory of electromagnetic fields and radiation, which shows that light has momentum and thus can exert pressure on objects. Maxwell's equations provide the theoretical foundation for sailing with light pressure. So by 1864, the physics community and beyond knew sunlight carried momentum that would exert a pressure on objects.
Radiation pressure in classical electromagnetism:
... it was published by James Clerk Maxwell in 1862,
and proven experimentally ( 1900 - 1901)
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_sail
*****************************************************************************
m=m but Q ???
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-BHgIIFU8ON8/VP_zX3KcL3I/AAAAAAAACQ8/5nk25md2wEk/s1600/CIMG3705.JPG
in universe exist many Starts and moons ( star = Active source ) (moon = passive source )
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-9QfHhbdcroQ/VP_0TYmE3NI/AAAAAAAACRE/FTe_jaMhcGo/s1600/CIMG3700.JPG
m --V--> M
when small m is moving V and is hiting big mass M You can hear wave ( sound )
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-1kiLUNIA0zk/VQKtkz5l-uI/AAAAAAAACSI/3kGuQloeYHw/s1600/CIMG3721.JPG
electron ---> <<< EM WAVE
when electron is hiting EM wave
You can SEE wave ( it is not sound but it is similar mechanism electron is exchanging P=M*V with light )
it is HUGE SPEED and wave has got very short long !!!
electron = big M
EM wave = small m
NEW PHYSICS FUNDAMETS
1600 Gallileo relativity hypothesis and Naturall Fall Law
1686 Newton ( Gravitation Law ) Grav. mass def. F = ma ( Inertial Mass )
1861 Maxwell ( EM radiation problem )
1905 - Einstein copied Newton and Copied Gallileo without modyf.
Einstein's target was rope all old facts in one
Gallileo and Newton wrote physics without EM radiation !!!!
2012 - POLAND MAROSZ ( city Walbrzych )
m=m !
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-W27DEEsOhxs/VQU1RR4AaZI/AAAAAAAACSw/Msi6Mn8_wCQ/s1600/CIMG3728.JPG
Inverse Cubic Law ( EM preasure graph )
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-XOxE9OYcVys/VP1HK3fFPgI/AAAAAAAACQc/EnJXXu4d2lg/s1600/CIMG3541.JPG
Please evaluate A-A area for Earth ( Energy's density )
Why Earth is making rotation respect to own axis ( 66.66 )
IN PHYSICS WE HAVE NORMAL TEMPERATURE and NORMAL AIR's preasure
IN SHOR TIME WE WILL HAVE NORMAL EM RADIATION LEVEL
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-BHgIIFU8ON8/VP_zX3KcL3I/AAAAAAAACQ8/5nk25md2wEk/s1600/CIMG3705.JPG
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-G8XXBln--6k/VP_2zF35VwI/AAAAAAAACRg/oFtCjI5NMtE/s1600/CIMG3703.JPG
THANK YOU FOR SUPPORT MY JOB
I ALREADY INFORMED UNIVERSITETS IN MY COUNTRY ( zero reply )
I'm very open to start cooperate ( it will develop many new dyscyplines )
Engineer and Inventor Poland city Wlbrzych
http://tesla4.blogspot.com
http://maroszphysics.blogspot.com/
http://physicshelpforum.com/showthread.php?t=11024
Something I keep "pinned" to my desktop for the future...
The agreement of the results seems to show that light and magnetism are affections of the same substance, and that light is an electromagnetic disturbance propagated through the field according to electromagnetic laws.
So we find the propagation velocity of waves in both electric and magnetic fields is C!! 300,000,000
I enjoy "chewing" on it, over and over again...lol
Cheers,
Bruce
Quote from: Bruce_TPU on March 16, 2015, 01:15:06 PM
Something I keep "pinned" to my desktop for the future...
The agreement of the results seems to show that light and magnetism are affections of the same substance, and that light is an electromagnetic disturbance propagated through the field according to electromagnetic laws.
So we find the propagation velocity of waves in both electric and magnetic fields is C!! 300,000,000
I enjoy "chewing" on it, over and over again...lol
Cheers,
Bruce
Bruce, I must add to that a bit, by stating the fact that, in a purely magnetic domain, it is only the "wave", i.e. change in flux that is restricted to a velocity of C
(well, and the mass it has an effect on.....)
HOWEVER!!! -- The field itself propagates at speeds much greater than C, and can often be "instantaneous", even at great distances.
This was verified by Ed Leedskalnin, IBM, NASA, U.S. Navy using comparatively (near c) velocity of electricity.
It was re-verified in the academic sector, by "passing" light with a lagged magnetic field, to have it effect (interfere/refract) with it further up the path.
It is only a change within the field that is restricted to C, not the propagation of the field itself.
Quote from: sm0ky2 on March 16, 2015, 07:23:41 PM
Bruce, I must add to that a bit, by stating the fact that, in a purely magnetic domain, it is only the "wave", i.e. change in flux that is restricted to a velocity of C
(well, and the mass it has an effect on.....)
HOWEVER!!! -- The field itself propagates at speeds much greater than C, and can often be "instantaneous", even at great distances.
This was verified by Ed Leedskalnin, IBM, NASA, U.S. Navy using comparatively (near c) velocity of electricity.
It was re-verified in the academic sector, by "passing" light with a lagged magnetic field, to have it effect (interfere/refract) with it further up the path.
It is only a change within the field that is restricted to C, not the propagation of the field itself.
Bravo, smOky2.
There is also a very simple mathematical proof rooted in, would you believe, the Maxwell wave equation. If I ever find it again I will copy it and post it. The field propagation is instantaneous according to Maxwell Wave Equation.
CANGAS 155
The agreement of the results seems to show that light and magnetism are affections of the same substance,
That was the piece of it that I chew on. ::)
e = BLv. V is the velocity of the magnetic field. I'm not sure how fast the magnetic field of my "magnets" are moving at this point but always thinking ahead.
Cheers,
Bruce
If I understand well, if you have electrostatic field detector it will sense field earlier than wave reaches it. Object charged by square wave will propagate that field faster when stop charging. That implies that square "wave" travels instatenously, and sinusoidal wave travels at speed C . It doesnt sound logical
Quote from: Vladokv on March 17, 2015, 09:18:25 AM
If I understand well, if you have electrostatic field detector it will sense field earlier than wave reaches it. Object charged by square wave will propagate that field faster when stop charging. That implies that square "wave" travels instatenously, and sinusoidal wave travels at speed C . It doesnt sound logical
At great distances ( and subsequently greater field strengths) such may be testable, but as it stands in earth conditions, this might prove difficult. Remember that the response time of your 'detector' is also constricted to the velocity of "c".
Exist Two type EM RADIATION
STATIC and MOTION
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-SVuAlKNPcdw/VQVwVcKglbI/AAAAAAAACTM/ghyxuhHCNAw/s1600/CIMG3731.JPG
sometimes velocity is very very important
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-1kiLUNIA0zk/VQKtkz5l-uI/AAAAAAAACSI/3kGuQloeYHw/s1600/CIMG3721.JPG
m --V--> M
when small m is moving V
and is hiting big mass M You can hear wave ( sound )
electron ---> <<< EM WAVE
when electron is hiting EM wave You can SEE wave not hear wave
( it is not sound but it is very similar mechanism electron is exchanging P=M*V with light )
electron = big M
EM wave = small m SPEED IS HUGE !!!
EVERYTIME WHEN ELECTRON IS HITING EM WAVE WE HAVE NEW WAVE
SUN ------MOON ----------------------------EARTH
please preapare desk ( please make double slits in desk )
Do you see many lines ? BUT MOON IS NOT INSIDE TWO SLITS AT ONE TIME ? !!!!
THIS WHAT WE HAVE IN BOOKS = ONE BOG FICTION
please study NEWTON but AGAIN ( important is body Size B area is much more biger compare to A area )
and DYNAMICA PREASURE not statica
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-W27DEEsOhxs/VQU1RR4AaZI/AAAAAAAACSw/Msi6Mn8_wCQ/s1600/CIMG3728.JPG
DO WE SEE CZERENKOW's RADIATION ?
Each body that is moving making EM wave consumption
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-iNHYy6u9bRg/VF9En99DNmI/AAAAAAAACFA/vOX3fZYchx4/s1600/em.jpg
All this wondering gives final question. What is speed of exiting electron in FEL lasers in function of speed of ongoing electrons? What is Δv of entry electron compared to exiting electron? From data known on relativistic dopler effect electron doesn't lose speed.
My expectation is that Δv is 0. FEL laser gives monochomatic light. It is possible only if electron don't losse own speed during travel trough undulator!
So to quote wiki -> The transverse acceleration of the electrons across this path results in the release of photons (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photons) (synchrotron radiation (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synchrotron_radiation)), which are monochromatic but still incoherent
please evaluate A-A area for SUN and Earth
A- A = huge distance and surface
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-XOxE9OYcVys/VP1HK3fFPgI/AAAAAAAACQc/EnJXXu4d2lg/s1600/CIMG3541.JPG
Why Earth is making rotation respet to own axis ?
delta V must exist !!!
m --V--> M
when small m is moving V
and is hiting big mass M You can hear wave ( sound )
electron ---> <<< EM WAVE
when electron is hiting EM wave You can SEE wave not hear wave
( it is not sound but it is very similar mechanism electron is exchanging P=M*V with light )
electron = big M
EM wave = small m SPEED IS HUGE !!!
HOW I'M SURE ? why very small doth feel parabola ( left side below picture )
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-HEnn7T9o9cw/VHOZTzOjBBI/AAAAAAAACLg/CoXd_JoyeI4/s1600/22.jpg
Quote from: Vladokv on March 17, 2015, 06:10:21 PM
All this wondering gives final question. What is speed of exiting electron in FEL lasers in function of speed of ongoing electrons? What is Δv of entry electron compared to exiting electron? From data known on relativistic dopler effect electron doesn't lose speed.
My expectation is that Δv is 0. FEL laser gives monochomatic light. It is possible only if electron don't losse own speed during travel trough undulator!
So to quote wiki -> The transverse acceleration of the electrons across this path results in the release of photons (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photons) (synchrotron radiation (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synchrotron_radiation)), which are monochromatic but still incoherent
While the decrease in velocity of the electron is small (negligible) it is definitely not 0.
If you take a look inside an atom during photon emission - the electron increase its' orbital radius, then decreases, the energy of the photon being emitted being equal the decrease in electron energy.
E = mv^2, m being 1 electron mass.
the orbital path (circumference: 2pi *r) is a given distance, divided by the period time (1 / freq) gives you the velocity.
if this distance is decreased, the velocity is lower. Thus by the energy of the photon emitted, we can infer the loss in energy of the electron, and thus compare this to its' ground state orbital distance, determine the decrease in distance traveled over time, and subsequent loss in velocity.
This is in reference to an electron orbiting a nucleus, but also applies to a projectile (free) electron in a similar manner.
the energy of the photon is equal (negating losses) to the energy decrease of the electron that initiated the photonic emission.
So, if you know the initial velocity of the electron (slightly less than c in most cases), then you can calculate and/or measure the change in v. v = (sqrt) [m / E] This gives us the relationship between the velocity of the electron and the energy of the photon.
http://physicshelpforum.com/showthread.php?t=11035
Quote from: tesla2 on March 19, 2015, 12:11:51 PM
http://physicshelpforum.com/showthread.php?t=11035
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FgsJrimgPiQ (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FgsJrimgPiQ)
I can't understand the language, but this seems to demonstrate the laws of pressure equilibrium in a closed vessel.
First throw, there is equal pressure on both pistons, when the primary mass strikes the actuator.
Both masses travel with equal force and velocity.
Later (8:00+/-) one mass is removed, and all the pressure goes into moving the cylinder with no mass on the piston.
the unmassed cart travels far, the mass on the other piston hardly moves at all...
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-xs_Pq6LAbDE/VQsdrusV4aI/AAAAAAAACTg/RWNGLIiRZz4/s1600/x1w.jpg
M---------------------------------------Long pipe----------------------------------M
....I
....I (short arm)
....I
....M
more energy will go to shorter arm
energy will be first inside shorter arm
Sprinter A
sprinter B >>>
start
If sprinter A started first he need lower enegry to win !!!
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-xmdO_nivRh4/U3muXoV-6eI/AAAAAAAAB1M/ldGGse-8KuI/s1600/1Lm.jpg
Marosz I found Inverse Cubic Law !!!
joul/cubic meter = N*m /m^3 = N/m^2 ( pascall )
Energy's density inside pipes ?