.
A SUPERCONDUCTOR ELECTRIC-MOTOR WOULD BREAK THE LAWS OF PHYSICS / THERMODYNAMICS
If an Electric-Motor was made of a room temperature superconductor like graphene, then no electricity would be consumed ( or lost, or leaked ), and the resulting kinetic energy would be gained from nothing, the kinetic energy would just be a side-effect )
( For this experiment, the Power-Source, would have to be one in which no energy is unintentionally leaked, so batteries would be unsuitable ( heat loss etc ), even a bank of capacitors would lose heat )
( Actually, in a normal electric-motor, apparently, the resulting kinetic energy is not as a result of electricity being consumed / lost in order to produce it, the kinetic energy is like a side-effect. In normal electric-motors, electricity is consumed / lost, as a result of the materials not being superconductors )
( Note : I doubt that a totally 100% Superconductor exists, or can exist )
THIS THEORY COULD BE USED TO BUILD AN OVERUNITY DEVICE
This theory could be used to build an overunity device, made ENTIRELY of a room temperature superconductor material( like graphene ), a device in which no energy would be lost due to heat or anything else, and the resulting kinetic-energy would just be a side effect of the flow of electricity. Finding a power-source which does not unintentionally leak energy, could be difficult.
Quote from: guest1289 on July 22, 2015, 04:14:34 PM
.
A SUPERCONDUCTOR ELECTRIC-MOTOR WOULD BREAK THE LAWS OF PHYSICS / THERMODYNAMICS
If an Electric-Motor was made of a room temperature superconductor like graphene, then no electricity would be consumed ( or lost, or leaked ), and the resulting kinetic energy would be gained from nothing, the kinetic energy would just be a side-effect )
W O R S E . . . T H A N . . . W R O N G
Quote
( For this experiment, the Power-Source, would have to be one in which no energy is unintentionally leaked, so batteries would be unsuitable ( heat loss etc ), even a bank of capacitors would lose heat )
( Actually, in a normal electric-motor, apparently, the resulting kinetic energy is not as a result of electricity being consumed / lost in order to produce it, the kinetic energy is like a side-effect. In normal electric-motors, electricity is consumed / lost, as a result of the materials not being superconductors )
( Note : I doubt that a totally 100% Superconductor exists, or can exist )
THIS THEORY COULD BE USED TO BUILD AN OVERUNITY DEVICE
This theory could be used to build an overunity device, made ENTIRELY of a room temperature superconductor material( like graphene ), a device in which no energy would be lost due to heat or anything else, and the resulting kinetic-energy would just be a side effect of the flow of electricity. Finding a power-source which does not unintentionally leak energy, could be difficult.
NOT ONLY AM I RIGHT, I'M SO MUCH MORE..................THAN................RIGHT
Not only am I correct, but I grossly understated how correct I am ( I only just discovered these things when I searched the internet ).
THE POWER SOURCE FOR THIS OVERUNITY DEVICE ( SUPERCONDUCTOR ELECTRIC-MOTOR )
The Power-Source for this Overunity Device ( Superconductor Electric-Motor ) would be the phenomenon called 'Persistent Current', 'Persistent current is a perpetual electric current, not requiring an external power source', ( this has been scientifically confirmed ). Below :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persistent_current
( I wonder if they're actually wrong about 'Persistent Current', because all types of radiation pass through virtually every material, and that could somehow end up causing an electrical current to be generated in the materials they tested ( and the properties of the materials, magnetic or other, could cause the electrical current to just flow in one direction )
THIS OVERUNITY DEVICE WOULD BE MADE OF 'STANENE'
This Overunity Device ( Superconductor Electric-Motor ) would be made of STANENE , which apparently is 100% efficient ( although I thought only a vacuum could be a 100% efficient electrical conductor )
NOTE : This OVERUNITY DEVICE would be housed in a vacuum, and would only spin to generate electricity, and only in a generator-design which has no friction
Quote from: guest1289 on July 25, 2015, 05:39:36 PM
NOT ONLY AM I RIGHT, I'M SO MUCH MORE..................THAN................RIGHT
Not only am I correct, but I grossly understated how correct I am ( I only just discovered these things when I searched the internet ).
THE POWER SOURCE FOR THIS OVERUNITY DEVICE ( SUPERCONDUCTOR ELECTRIC-MOTOR )
The Power-Source for this Overunity Device ( Superconductor Electric-Motor ) would be the phenomenon called 'Persistent Current', 'Persistent current is a perpetual electric current, not requiring an external power source', ( this has been scientifically confirmed ). Below :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persistent_current
( I wonder if they're actually wrong about 'Persistent Current', because all types of radiation pass through virtually every material, and that could somehow end up causing an electrical current to be generated in the materials they tested ( and the properties of the materials, magnetic or other, could cause the electrical current to just flow in one direction )
THIS OVERUNITY DEVICE WOULD BE MADE OF 'STANENE'
This Overunity Device ( Superconductor Electric-Motor ) would be made of STANENE , which apparently is 100% efficient ( although I thought only a vacuum could be a 100% efficient electrical conductor )
NOTE : This OVERUNITY DEVICE would be housed in a vacuum, and would only spin to generate electricity, and only in a generator-design which has no friction
A motor that uses superconductors would suffer no I
2R losses. That means that if one could also eliminate the other losses such as windage and bearing friction that the motor would hypothetically be nearly 100% efficient converting electricity to mechanical power. No physical laws would be broken. No over unity would result. It would still take slightly more electrical energy input to accelerate the motor and its load to some angular speed than the resulting kinetic energy contained in the accelerated rotating parts.
This 'Overunity Device' would use Room-Temperature-Superconductor equivalents of Permanent-Magnet-Bearings, and it would be housed in a VACUUM.
( So, no moving parts would touch anything, and there would be no air friction )
THIS OVERUNITY DEVICE
The phenomenon called 'Persistent Current' would power the Superconductor-Electric-Motor, and the Superconductor-Electric-Motor would spin the Superconductor-Electrical-Generator.
( This 'Overunity Device' only uses room-temperature superconductors )
Since it uses 'Persistent Current' to power the Superconductor-Electric-Motor, there is No input of electrical energy coming from outside of this 'Overunity Device' , to power it.
THE REASON IT WOULD BE OVERUNITY
'If', it did require an initial electrical-input from outside of this Overunity-Device, in order to get the electric-motor spinning, and if that that input was for example 12-Volts for 10 seconds, then that would be much less than the Total-Power-Output of this Overunity-Device over 5 Years( as an example ), and I am very understating the 'overunity' there.
The only way to prove or disprove this 'Overunity Device' for sure, would be to build it .
Why doesn't someone try and disprove or prove a 'Permanent-Magnet-Motor' which CAN-ACTUALLY-BE-EASILY-BUILT ( unlike this Superconductor-Device ). I'm not able to construct anything at all.
THE 'DRUM VERSION' OF THE 'MAGNET-MOTOR' I POSTED ONTO THE THREAD I STARTED BELOW :
http://overunity.com/15860/can-anyone-identify-this-mystery-magnet-motor-or-provide-any-information/msg454682/#msg454682
Quote from: guest1289 on July 26, 2015, 10:59:25 AM
This 'Overunity Device' would use Room-Temperature-Superconductor equivalents of Permanent-Magnet-Bearings, and it would be housed in a VACUUM.
( So, no moving parts would touch anything, and there would be no air friction )
THIS OVERUNITY DEVICE
The phenomenon called 'Persistent Current' would power the Superconductor-Electric-Motor, and the Superconductor-Electric-Motor would spin the Superconductor-Electrical-Generator.
( This 'Overunity Device' only uses room-temperature superconductors )
Since it uses 'Persistent Current' to power the Superconductor-Electric-Motor, there is No input of electrical energy coming from outside of this 'Overunity Device' , to power it.
THE REASON IT WOULD BE OVERUNITY
'If', it did require an initial electrical-input from outside of this Overunity-Device, in order to get the electric-motor spinning, and if that that input was for example 12-Volts for 10 seconds, then that would be much less than the Total-Power-Output of this Overunity-Device over 5 Years( as an example ), and I am very understating the 'overunity' there.
The only way to prove or disprove this 'Overunity Device' for sure, would be to build it .
Why doesn't someone try and disprove or prove a 'Permanent-Magnet-Motor' which CAN-ACTUALLY-BE-EASILY-BUILT ( unlike this Superconductor-Device ). I'm not able to construct anything at all.
THE 'DRUM VERSION' OF THE 'MAGNET-MOTOR' I POSTED ONTO THE THREAD I STARTED BELOW :
http://overunity.com/15860/can-anyone-identify-this-mystery-magnet-motor-or-provide-any-information/msg454682/#msg454682
Learn how to calculate energy. And perhaps also learn to stop shouting so much.