What are the consequences of an overunity device, the destruction of the economy so the WW3.
If an overunity device exist (maybe it's not possible), this could say an antigravitationnal device could exist, so it is more dangerous than 10000 nuclear weapons (it's possible to launch a 10 km meteorite on Earth), this could be the end of Humanity.
Maybe one day we need to push away a meteorite and earlier Humanity could have the antigravity device better it could be. But if all countries have this device one can destroy another coutry very quickly. What country could be the best to assure the peace in the world ?
When I was a child we would have nuclear bomb drills in school
It was decided that just hiding under the desk was not good enuff,we had to go into the hallways
And hunker down .(I was five years old at the time)
We've had the ability to completely destroy our planet for over seventy years
I believe somebody must be watching over us to keep this from happening.
Just my 2 cents
Chet K
Quote from: EOW on August 23, 2015, 11:06:49 AM
What are the consequences of an overunity device, the destruction of the economy so the WW3.
If an overunity device exist (maybe it's not possible), this could say an antigravitationnal device could exist, so it is more dangerous than 10000 nuclear weapons (it's possible to launch a 10 km meteorite on Earth), this could be the end of Humanity.
Maybe one day we need to push away a meteorite and earlier Humanity could have the antigravity device better it could be. But if all countries have this device one can destroy another coutry very quickly. What country could be the best to assure the peace in the world ?
hi, the subject title was both serious and amusing.
(human people <--)
could self replicating robots suddenly go on a killing spree because they went murderous sociopath due to being hacked,
and had power systems built into them capable of overunity.
that would not be good.
very present concerns with those such as self driving vehicle developers.
perhaps the right encryption designed into the device programmers code itself can be created to never allow destructive variables to be added. if wireless or even hardwired connections are to be expected to perform as safely as possible.
although free energy is always going to be a good idea for the human people.
agreed, there is meteorites that aim to hit earth.
we have been lucky that not often one large enough reaches earth causing damage.
will more large ones find a trajectory that could hit earth at some point? yes.
can those be stopped from hitting earth? maybe so.
what is the best country to assure peace in the world?
that would depend on that countries citizens being able to exist without their own political corruption.
not being an expert on knowing which country would be the best, i do know that many elected officials
make a lot of unkept promises, and their explainations given for not keeping them are sometimes designed to be as
unclear as possible for many important matters, in their effort to see if enough time can pass so their voters
will move focus towards the next elected set of politicians instead.
could a system be created where more accountabililty becomes the new standard for elected officials? yes.
will it have its share of corruption still? no doubt.
could that still present corruption be given less opportunity to present itself? yes.
it appears to be a slow evolution mainly because of a corrupted few too many.
depending on who gets elected, sometimes it only takes 16 words to effectively mess things up.
or a leaders own unproven belief system clouds their common sense better judgement, holding evolution back as a result.
its better to side with optimism about the future, carefully.
Who has control of the energy is in control of the population, the energy can be power, the power can also be destructive. If the population does not need energy becomes uncontrollable and this scares the leaders of society who can not live without being in control of everything, they do not know how to deal with that eventuality. The community should decide to keep herself and others under control for security, then the community would benefit greatly from such a discovery (including the skeptics) and certainly would decide to distribute it to all, but is no longer the community to decide, today decides who has the control over energy. However, the obstacle is around very easily, if the energy will become free will be banned, rationed and monitored every energy carrier, or conductor such as copper & co. In Europe are monitoring the refrigerant gas with a maniacal attention, buy refrigerant is more difficult than buying plutonium in Italy, I'm wondering if this sudden rush towards ecology does not conceal something "dangerous" for those who govern the energy..
No,the madness will always exist.
Only culture can keep us alive. If we would sell our reason to obtain some time to spend,in each case,who will go on,will go on,will be the enemies or the friends...
Who steal culture,time from another,will come with me to hell.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZThquH5t0ow
I hope not, because it appears a proof of concept has been found. Has anyone in this forum read the paper on quantum dis-similar metal gap molecule sorting.
Idegen: you're surely be right because in the contrary we would have already found ! But it's possible to ask the question.
What country could be the best to assure peace in the World with the antigravity device ?
Argentina
Bresil
Canada
China
France
India
Iran
Israel
Germany
Quatar
Russia
Spain
Swiss
Sweden
USA
etc.
Have you an idea ?
Is it dangerous to give an overunity device to the human people ?
Yes, it should only be given to the other people.
Quote from: lumen on August 24, 2015, 10:18:23 PM
Yes, it should only be given to the other people.
How to recognize them ? Where they are ?
IT IS ACTUALLY DANGEROUS TO THE SUPPRESSORS. ;D
Steven Mark PROVED Free Energy Devices EXIST with Several Videos & Witnesses.
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=TPU+steven+mark (https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=TPU+steven+mark)
.
Wrong. Steven Mark proved that he can fool some of the people, some of the time. And we knew that already.
Remember that one of the minimum standards of proof in this area is _replication_. And of the TPU... there ain't any.
Re: Is it dangerous to give an overunity device to the human people ?
What kind of a loaded question is that ? it's obvious the American elite already has the ability to create and use such devices, there is a video around where a deceased brilliant engineer Stan Myers, describes exactly the physics employed and used in such a device in the 1980s find that and watch it if you want the truth or shut the BS up for ever more.
Quote from: FatBird on August 25, 2015, 09:00:24 AM
Steven Mark PROVED Free Energy Devices EXIST with Several Videos & Witnesses.
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=TPU+steven+mark (https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=TPU+steven+mark)
.
The device you show and talk about was on here years ago, Sargent Gatley, some one like that, then that patent came into view, i think every one must have made it and playd with it, sorry to say it did not work as it is, and sad tails of money wasted on replication. The first unit lookes as if it has bugger all in it, but look at the jars under the bulbs, how many PP9 batterys would you need for 110 volts and some clever switching ?