Solid-State-Generator Ideas
Just using this thread to type some ideas.
_________________
Compression
The people at this site are Obviously aware of the concept of 'compression', for example, if you totally cover a length of conducting-wire with 'Ferrite-Beads' then you would hopefully force the electromagnetic-field back into the wire, with the aim of trying to increase the voltage?/ohms?/amperes? in that circuit, and maybe even aim for overunity.
I don't actually know what the results of this idea would be.
But I thought of some very simple ways to test this theory/concept, they are :
( 1 ) - Place a Very-thin-Aluminium-Foil-Ring in between two Flat-Style-Permanent-Magnet-Ring-Magnets , which are wider than the aluminium-foil-ring, so as to cover it completely.
And somehow feed current to the aluminium-foil-ring only.
Then measure the difference of the current, with, and without the Flat-Style-Permanent-Magnet-Ring-Magnets.
- Maybe there would be a way of embedding the whole circuit including battery and current-measuring-device inside a hollowed out part of the ring-magnets, WITH THE AIM OF COMPRESSING ALL THE ELECTROMAGNETIC-FIELD OF THE ENTIRE CIRCUIT AND COMPONENTS, TO ENSURE THAT THERE IS NO ELECTROMAGNETIC-FIELD LEAKAGE, in case its possible that a lot of electromagnetic-field can escape from any part of the circuit which is not compressed, if it needs to do that to stay in keeping with the laws of physics and not cause overunity power production.
( 2 ) - My second idea is very similar to number ( 1 ), but it is that while a Permanent-Magnet-Ring-Magnet is being made and magnetized, a ring-of-aluminium-wire is placed inside the Permanent-Magnet-Ring-Magnet while the Permanent-Magnet-Ring-Magnet is still in a liquid state.
So when the Permanent-Magnet-Ring-Magnet is magnetized as part of it's manufacturing process, the ring-of-aluminium-wire will not become magnetized because it is aluminium ( aluminium cannot be magnetized ).
And put current in the aluminium-ring, via the ideas in method number ( 1 ) .
This method would completely cover the aluminium, unlike method number ( 1 ), because in that method it's possible that electromagnetic-field could escape from even the micrometer thickness of the aluminium-foil sandwiched in between the 2 ring-magnets.
So I'm thinking that if electromagnetic-field can escape from any part of the uncovered circuit, it will do that, to avoid producing overunity power generation.
Making this new post, instead of editing my last post, so as not to affect the time-stamp of my previous post some minutes ago.
_______
For all I know successful solid-state-overunity-generators may already exist, and sitting on some members desks while they type.
Referring to historical-devices, and claims by some members on this site.
_______
I had the idea of a self-running-solid-state-device made of coils( bifilar, or pancake, or others ), and using cores, iron or maybe even permanent-magnet-cores, the idea being that one core affects another core, and there's something like an eternal wobble to and fro between the 2 or more cores, and these field movements are somehow amplified by the coils.
( I assume this is the general idea of many devices that have been around for a long time )
Thinking about it, not only specific designs of coils would be the secret to a successful overunity device like this, could the secret also be permanent-magnets or permanent-magnet-cores, since it's proven that magnets can do work.
And 'compression' in my previous post, could also have been the secret of some of these devices, in the coils or cores.
_______
This may or may not be relevant to this thread.
I recently just realized( or remembered ? ) that a method of 'Magnetic-Shielding' is to actually use 'Permanent-Magnets'.
For example, if you want to shield a 5cm x 5cm x 5cm ceramic-magnet cube, you might use a 1-cm x 5cm x 5cm ceramic-magnet sheet, to at least partially shield it, or thats what I'm thinking .
I'm typing this because I read that they use permanent-magnets as magnetic-shields for some very large and powerful professional devices.
_______
I have been thinking of some imaginative names for some of my electric-motor designs, so I thought of the following :
- The Put-Paul-##thers-Into-The-Legal-Custody-Of-##izabeth-##thers-Electric-Motor
- The Surely-A-Picture-Of-That-Person-Spending-All-Afternoon-And-Evening-Sitting-At-That-Corner-Establishment-With-That-Emblem-On-It's-Banner-Would-be-A-Priceless-Picture-Electric-Motor
- The Why-Doesn't/Can't-Buddy-Number-2( ######actor-Critter )-And-Or-Paul-And-Or-#, -Go-Down-And-Drink-With-That-Person-Down-At-That-Corner-Establishment-With-That-Emblem-On-It's-Banner,-Or-At-Least-Just-######actor-Critter-And-Or-Paul, -Electric-Motor
Quote from: guest1289 on October 24, 2016, 04:16:53 PM
Compression
The people at this site are Obviously aware of the concept of 'compression', for example, if you totally cover a length of conducting-wire with 'Ferrite-Beads' then you would hopefully force the electromagnetic-field back into the wire, with the aim of trying to increase the voltage?/ohms?/amperes? in that circuit, and maybe even aim for overunity.
I don't actually know what the results of this idea would be.
But I thought of some very simple ways to test this theory/concept, they are :
( 1 ) - Place a Very-thin-Aluminium-Foil-Ring in between two Flat-Style-Permanent-Magnet-Ring-Magnets , which are wider than the aluminium-foil-ring, so as to cover it completely.
And somehow feed current to the aluminium-foil-ring only.
Then measure the difference of the current, with, and without the Flat-Style-Permanent-Magnet-Ring-Magnets.
- Maybe there would be a way of embedding the whole circuit including battery and current-measuring-device inside a hollowed out part of the ring-magnets, WITH THE AIM OF COMPRESSING ALL THE ELECTROMAGNETIC-FIELD OF THE ENTIRE CIRCUIT AND COMPONENTS, TO ENSURE THAT THERE IS NO ELECTROMAGNETIC-FIELD LEAKAGE, in case its possible that a lot of electromagnetic-field can escape from any part of the circuit which is not compressed, if it needs to do that to stay in keeping with the laws of physics and not cause overunity power production.
( 2 ) - My second idea is very similar to number ( 1 ), but it is that while a Permanent-Magnet-Ring-Magnet is being made and magnetized, a ring-of-aluminium-wire is placed inside the Permanent-Magnet-Ring-Magnet while the Permanent-Magnet-Ring-Magnet is still in a liquid state.
So when the Permanent-Magnet-Ring-Magnet is magnetized as part of it's manufacturing process, the ring-of-aluminium-wire will not become magnetized because it is aluminium ( aluminium cannot be magnetized ).
And put current in the aluminium-ring, via the ideas in method number ( 1 ) .
This method would completely cover the aluminium, unlike method number ( 1 ), because in that method it's possible that electromagnetic-field could escape from even the micrometer thickness of the aluminium-foil sandwiched in between the 2 ring-magnets.
So I'm thinking that if electromagnetic-field can escape from any part of the uncovered circuit, it will do that, to avoid producing overunity power generation.
I made a mistake in stating 'Ferrite-Beads' in that post, instead of stating 'Ferrite-Beads', I should have stated Ring-Magnets.
( I thought that 'Ferrite-Beads' are in fact Ring-Magnets , but it seems I was wrong.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferrite_bead )
So I should have typed Ring-Magnets, not 'Ferrite-Beads' .
( Note : Although I want 'Ferrite-Beads' replaced with Ring-Magnets in that post, I notice that ferrite-beads are on the very long-thin cables for laptops etc, and if these cables carry dc-current then there would be some loss over the length of these long-thin cables, I don't suppose it's possible that they're also acting as a mild current booster/amplifier( overunity ).
Even though they are not actually permanent-magnets, the current may make them temporary-magnets or electromagnets, and members on this site have said that ferrite-metals have the ability to 'remember' current-directions or whatever, when they were talking about their coils ( don't know if their coils were actually made of ferrite-metals )
A distraction from 'Compression'
I'm stating the obvious below, but I was never interested in the effect below, because back then, before commonly available internet, it was impossible to research overunity devices etc etc, so I never really noticed the following effect properly, and especially not since I never built anything relevant enough etc.
It's very possible that the secret of past devices( like Figuera's device, and others ) was the following :
"Electromagnets are usually in the form of iron core solenoids. The ferromagnetic property of the iron core causes the internal magnetic domains of the iron to line up with the smaller driving magnetic field produced by the current in the solenoid. The effect is the multiplication of the magnetic field by factors of tens to even thousands."
"The effect is the multiplication of the magnetic field by factors of tens to even thousands."
Is that 'Effect' not a very definition of free-energy / overunity, I don't know what the trade-offs are for that effect, I don't have enough knowledge about current etc.
However, I'm sure it is not difficult to design all sorts of designs to optimize that 'effect', to create a self-runner .
That quoted text is from the webpage page below :
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/magnetic/elemag.html
( strangely, now it is often not possible to load the above webpage )
A design that instantly occurred to me was lots and lots flat-money-coin-shaped cores with some sort of wire around them , and each one induces a current in a corresponding non-contact ( secondary ) coil ( with or without core ), but I haven't fully thought through the design.
( Actually, although I assume electromagnets function via steady non-pulsed dc-current, I haven't fully confirmed it on my web-searches )
-----------
The following may be a very slight side-track, from the basic 'free-energy' effect of the electromagnet, since it mentions certain frequencies and resonance , or it may be directly relevant.
The following mentions that the electromagnet draws it's extra energy from the environment.
Search for the text "can exceed" in the following webpage :
http://www.energeticforum.com/archive/index.php/t-11259.html
And below is a Google-Image-Search link for an image in the above webpage, which cannot be accessed via any other way other than google-image-search :
https://www.google.es/search?q=%22http://i50.tinypic.com/vdjwpt.jpg%22&biw=1024&bih=485&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjBzLWd1oXQAhXGuhoKHUkMB1AQ_AUIBigB
-----------
.
I found the following concept on another forum, and it seems to fit in with things I have posted, although the things I posted were concerning induction in electric-motors.
I am typing it using my own wording, rather than just posting quoted text.
A 2-Amp Input Light-Bulb, Will Output Exactly 2-Amps, It Uses Up No Energy, Exactly The Same Energy Is Used Up If It Was Just A Closed Loop With 'No' Light-Bulb .
( I don't know if this refers to AC or DC ? )
They also stated that you can use the input electricity, to generate electricity, but didn't detail or mention anything about overunity.
And - The Energy Depleted in The Battery In The Above Scenario, Is Completely As A Result Of 'Shorting' The Battery', And The Chemical Change Resulting From 'Shorting' The Battery'
( In the 2 lines above, I am expanding upon what I read on another forum )
_________
Using A Shape To Obtain A Moving Magnetic-Field From A Non-moving Permanent-Magnet
I had read a theory that the gigantic hexagon on saturn, occurs because it is the most efficient shape for the fluid-dynamics( gas ) in those circumstances.
Wondering if maybe this, or another shape, could be used to invoke the opposite function, that is to create moving magnetic-fields purely from ( non-electric ) non-moving permanent-magnets.
( Yes, many people accept that the magnetic-field of a permanent-magnet does not rotate with the magnet ( farday's-paradox ), so I'm not sure how my idea fits in with farday's-paradox )
_________
The Concept of Very Fast Discharging And Charging Of Multiple Capacitors In A Circuit, To Try And Achieve Overunity
- To me, this could force the capacitors ?, to extract electromotive-force( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromotive_force ) , Or, Aether, from their surrounding space ( air, vacuum ? ) , to keep the electrical current flowing, or, to maintain the 'ratio' of drifting-electrons/electromotive-force in the current in balance, Or, just to maintain the 'ratio' of Non-drifting-electrons/electromotive-force in the materials in balance.
It seems related to my post below( and to lots of other peoples theories which are similar ) :
http://overunity.com/16961/aether-drive/msg495704/#msg495704
.
Lo que sería muy efectivo, para mí recibir, solo es información
( cambiador de juego, por algunas razónes )
- el bnjmn, tecnología no
envíame cualquier información, y imágenes, de el, y intrínsecamente conectado con el ( así que no hablo de amgs etc )
( probablemente no seria util enviarme información sobre los dos dispositivos que actualmente están con él )
__________________________________
What would be very effective, for me to receive, it's only information
( game changer for some reasons )
- the bnjmn , tech no
send me any information, and images, of it, and intrinsically part of it ( so not talking about frnds etc )
( probably not be useful sending me info about the two devices currently with it )