We are in the final phase of funding to Pay Major University to complete testing and analytics. So Professor who is heading up research can publish paper for peer review.
This is it and new form of propulsion that will revolutionize space travel.
https://www.gofundme.com/prove-propellantless-propulsion
All information from past 6 yrs.
https://www.facebook.com/qdeinc
Thank you,
Harry Sprain
How would you like to really lower your TV, phone, and Internet prices by 50% forever.
Currently there are over 20,000 satellites orbiting our planet. Of those less than 900 are actually operational. All the rest have run out of fuel and are no longer able to maneuver so they are no longer useful. This comes at a enormous price the average launch is close to $100 million dollars. This does not include the satellite which can range from 20 million to 1 billion depending on the size of the satellite they're putting into orbit.
So this means every satellite that is put into orbit only has a 12 to 15 year life. That means the satellite providers have to put another one up every 12 to 15 years.
And the reason is they can't carry enough fuel to last more than 12 to 15 years. But what if someone came up with a propulsion device that can allow them to use sunlight to charge batteries that then run this device that creates thrust to keep the satellites in orbit. This would mean a tremendous savings to the satellite people who wouldn't have to replace their satellites every 12 to 15 years. It's about a $300 million per launch savings. Which they then can pass on to you which will lower your television and Internet bill.
The other exciting thing about this technology is for the first time we could have a satellite sitting Geo synchronously in a very low orbit only 200 miles above the earth right over the United States. This is because we can provide constant thrust to keep the satellite stationary in a low orbit. The signal would be so strong cloud cover and atmospheric conditions will not knock out your satellite reception. Currently satellites have to be tens of thousands of miles away from Earth in order to sit in a geosynchronous orbit. By the time the signal travels that incredible distance it's very weak. That's why the slightest cloud cover or atmospheric condition can disrupt the signal.
So by helping fund this research and getting this propulsion system used on the next generation of satellites. It will directly impact the price you have to pay for Internet TV phone and any other type of satellite communication.
This is a revolution in space technology not having to carry fuel will allow us to travel to the most distant planets and beyond.
Sincerely,
Harry Sprain
Pres. CTO Quantum dynamics Enterprises Inc.
https://www.facebook.com/qdeinc/
https://www.gofundme.com/prove-propellantless-propulsion
Quantum Dynamics Enterprises, Inc is proud to present C.I.D. centrifugal impulse drive. Patent pending.
A new replacement for the ion drive and hall thruster.
In this video we will prove propulsion.
HOW CID WORKS: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallel_axis_theorem
https://www.gofundme.com/new-form-of-propulsion
All videos:
Proving propellantless propulsion.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OnP5WnSzlbI
Video at 3x normal speed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SlH5yiuuu7Y
Reverse Thrust.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Ve7xkFhoKI
Complete powerpoint video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=li67qzfsBaM
Torsion balance Test.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HN785Un_ykc
Taped rotor.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfC8P4z3MMs
Closeup of magnet orbit.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4ny9ng4wXU
Wrapped in cellophane test.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2fXH_ioogpQ
No magnets on rotor.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fA3zniDUMrI
Sincerely,
Harry Sprain
Pres. CTO Quantum dynamics Enterprises Inc.
https://www.facebook.com/qdeinc/
https://www.gofundme.com/new-form-of-propulsion
If anyone wants to help they can place the below widget on their pages.
<object classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" width="258" height="338" title="Click Here to donate!" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"><param name="movie" value="/Widgetflex.swf" /><param name="quality" value="high" /><param name="flashvars" value="page=new-form-of-propulsion&template=0" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><embed allowScriptAccess="always" src="/Widgetflex.swf" quality="high" flashVars="page=new-form-of-propulsion&template=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="258" height="338"></embed></object>
The reason CID works.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallel_axis_theorem
This concept is so simple, it didn't take long to prove it works.
It's actually quite a novel breakthrough in inertial propulsion technology.
Not sure that there's too many billionaires on this website that could help you
Launch stuff into outer space, but best of luck to you.
Mind if I 'borrow' this to play around with propeller-less watercraft?
The real reason it works is because the compressed magnetic field is released and expands as the magnet moves outward forming a local flucuation or polarization in space time causing the magnet and slide to have slightly less apparent mass. Then after space time is normalized the magnet is pushed back in by the frame magnets collapsing the magnetic field causing space time to compress as the magnet and slide are pushed back into position at a slightly larger apparent mass causing the device to slightly shift position on each cycle.
Quote from: Quantum_Spider on November 16, 2016, 09:31:40 AM
The reason CID works.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallel_axis_theorem (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallel_axis_theorem)
Hi,
thank you for posting idea here. I like it. Videos provided are sufficiently proving concept to me that it will work on earth. But will it also in space? in zero gravity environment? In one of videos was planned to use second rotor-stator combination but I think this will compensate only for stator rotation in zeroG. There are also other actions like magnet going outwards which is then pushed inwards by stator. It is dificult to see what would be resulting force vector. On earth is stator kept stable by gravity but in space it is just an object with certain mass folowing third newton law: every action has equal but opposite reaction.
anyway I'll consider a small donation,
Marcel
The torsion balance simulates zero gravity. So the device sitting there as a begins to move if you watch it carefully it goes backwards and then forward and backward just a little bit and then forward more and the back and forth back and forth and he keeps doing that but one motion is stronger than the other and that begins to build inertia and the device starts to accelerate and makes about three revolutions. Until the tension in the string becomes so great it can no longer rotate. But it doesn't just unwind it will sit there as long as you keep it turned on only when you turn it off will it unwind.
Thank you,
Harry
Quote from: lumen on November 16, 2016, 11:55:38 PM
The real reason it works is because the compressed magnetic field is released and expands as the magnet moves outward forming a local flucuation or polarization in space time causing the magnet and slide to have slightly less apparent mass. Then after space time is normalized the magnet is pushed back in by the frame magnets collapsing the magnetic field causing space time to compress as the magnet and slide are pushed back into position at a slightly larger apparent mass causing the device to slightly shift position on each cycle.
Very nice I like it.
Harry
Quote from: MT on November 17, 2016, 04:44:27 PM
Hi,
thank you for posting idea here. I like it. Videos provided are sufficiently proving concept to me that it will work on earth. But will it also in space? in zero gravity environment? In one of videos was planned to use second rotor-stator combination but I think this will compensate only for stator rotation in zeroG. There are also other actions like magnet going outwards which is then pushed inwards by stator. It is dificult to see what would be resulting force vector. On earth is stator kept stable by gravity but in space it is just an object with certain mass folowing third newton law: every action has equal but opposite reaction.
anyway I'll consider a small donation,
Marcel
The torsion balance simulates zero gravity. So the device sitting there as a begins to move if you watch it carefully it goes backwards and then forward and backward just a little bit and then forward more and the back and forth back and forth and he keeps doing that but one motion is stronger than the other and that begins to build inertia and the device starts to accelerate and makes about three revolutions. Until the tension in the string becomes so great it can no longer rotate. But it doesn't just unwind it will sit there as long as you keep it turned on only when you turn it off will it unwind.
Thank you,
Harry
Why not improve the design, to make it more practical. What determines the force, I assume it's the rpm?
The angular momentum is a factor of not only the rpm
but also the distance from the center of rotation.
When this distance is changed, the tangential force is also changed
Along the working vector.
The magnetic inertial dampening system reduces forces in other vectors
In space, there may be no upper limit on the velocity of such a system.
The inertial frame of the drive is always the same, regardless of the observed
relative velocity of the craft.
Quote from: broli on November 20, 2016, 05:43:11 PM
Why not improve the design, to make it more practical. What determines the force, I assume it's the rpm?
I no longer have the device it is now down at the University be tested.
Quote from: sm0ky2 on November 21, 2016, 01:15:00 AM
The angular momentum is a factor of not only the rpm
but also the distance from the center of rotation.
When this distance is changed, the tangential force is also changed
Along the working vector.
The magnetic inertial dampening system reduces forces in other vectors
In space, there may be no upper limit on the velocity of such a system.
The inertial frame of the drive is always the same, regardless of the observed
relative velocity of the craft.
Correct. Because the magnetic field is always present there is no upper limit to the rpm speed. Finally great to speak to someone that understands. The world is slowly beginning to understand. There is no RPM limit to this device.
Quote from: Quantum_Spider on November 21, 2016, 07:17:12 AM
Correct. Because the magnetic field is always present there is no upper limit to the rpm speed. Finally great to speak to someone that understands. The world is slowly beginning to understand. There is no RPM limit to this device.
Think of the Ferris liquid material.
Quote from: Quantum_Spider on November 21, 2016, 07:18:34 AM
Think of the Ferris liquid material.
In if you take a step farther imagine the magnets each one of them are on a separate actuator so you can move the gap to any position you want one device in the center of the ship controlling all propulsion.
Hi everyone, we all come here because were really interested in alternative forms of propulsion that go against the mainstream. That's what I've discovered but because of this investor that lied. I've been placed in the terrible position, eight months ago I brought this device down to the professor at the University. I'm not supposed to tell you his name are the name of the University because of the contract that we have with the University.
When we brought it down we knew that it was going to be very expensive that's why we waited until this investor said he was putting the money in. He never put the money in he strung us along for about six months almost bankrupting the company. We now owe the University of lot of money for the research that they have preformed over the past eight months. Once they're paid the professor in charge will publish the results for peer review.
You've seen the videos of the device you know precisely how it works I really think this is it a completely new form of propulsion that is so much more efficient than the hall thruster are the ion drive it's not even funny.
The owner of this website "overunity" Stefan has known me for years. And can tell you that everything is absolutely true.
I've been an inventor all my life, and I think this time I've really come up with something that can benefit mankind.
So please donate just a few dollars, and if everyone does I can pay the University next week. And get the paper published in like 30 days I'll even get a copy of it before everyone and publish it here.
Thank you,
Harry sprain
https://www.gofundme.com/new-form-of-propulsion
So if you say increase the RPM by a factor of 10 would this increase the force by the same ammount? If so wouldn't a smaller prototype spinning at much higher rpm's 10k+ (not so high as to overcome the magnetic force) show a very significant force?
Would it operate the same if the device was mechanically operated instead of using the magnets.
It could just as easily use a cam roller to achieve the same action but possibly not the same result.
I have a few questions:
1) You mention patents and patent applications - can you list all your patents here?
2) Have you been granted patents for your CID device?
3) If you've been granted patents for your CID device, has anyone successfully built a prototype using your patent?
4) if you had an independent duplication of your work, would that help convince people that your device is real, and help you get the funding that you need?
5) Have you tried modeling your drive using something like MapleSoft, so you can try varying parameters (size, rotation speed, strength of magnets, position of magnets, etc) to see what might produce a stronger thrust, without the expense of having to build a new prototype for every change that you want to try?
Quote from: Quantum_Spider on November 21, 2016, 07:17:12 AM
Correct. Because the magnetic field is always present there is no upper limit to the rpm speed. Finally great to speak to someone that understands. The world is slowly beginning to understand. There is no RPM limit to this device.
I was actually referring to the acceleration of the drive as a whole.
Of course there is an upper rpm limitation, and it is not the physical material properties of its construction.
The upper rpm limit will be a factor of the frequency of impulses to the response of the vehicle mass.
Above this specific rpm, the drive will become less effective at generating directional momentum.
But right at or slightly below this maximum rpm is a range of maximum impulse.
It could theoretically (from an outside observer's perspective) accelerate to the speed of light given enough time.
Quote from: broli on November 23, 2016, 10:09:19 AM
So if you say increase the RPM by a factor of 10 would this increase the force by the same ammount? If so wouldn't a smaller prototype spinning at much higher rpm's 10k+ (not so high as to overcome the magnetic force) show a very significant force?
The force increases slightly with rpm as a function of the mass of the rotating arm.
Increasing the mass of the arm has a lot more effect than increasing the rpm.
What the rpm does do - is increase the frequency of the impulses.
More times that force is exerted over a given time.
With an arm of a constant mass, increasing the rpm within a reasonable range
Will maintain a relatively constant force,
But this force will be exerted many more times this resulting in a
Faster acceleration
Think of a vibrating pager walking itself across a table.
Quote from: sm0ky2 on November 24, 2016, 09:01:56 PM
Think of a vibrating pager walking itself across a table.
Thats experiment I would like to see result of. Place a mobile in middle of room at the International space station. Call it, would it move?
M
Quantum Dynamics Enterprises, Inc is proud to present C.I.D. centrifugal impulse drive. Patent pending.
A new replacement for the ion drive and hall thruster.
In this video we will prove propulsion.
torsion balance
torsion balance, instrument used to measure small forces. It is based on the principle that a wire or thread resists twisting with a force that is proportional to the stress. The torsion balance consists essentially of a wire or thread attached at one end and arranged in such a way that a force applied at the other, or free, end tends to twist it out of shape. The force is measured by the extent to which the wire or thread is so twisted. Torsion balances are used to measure small electric, magnetic, and gravitational forces. One type is used to measure small weights. The invention of the torsion balance is commonly credited to the English geologist John Michell, who made his instrument c.1750, and to the French physicist Charles A. de Coulomb, who independently devised such a balance c.1777.
HOW CID WORKS: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallel_axis_theorem
All videos:
Proving propellantless propulsion.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OnP5WnSzlbI
Video at 3x normal speed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SlH5yiuuu7Y
Reverse Thrust.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Ve7xkFhoKI
Complete powerpoint video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=li67qzfsBaM
Torsion balance Test.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HN785Un_ykc
Taped rotor.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfC8P4z3MMs
Closeup of magnet orbit.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4ny9ng4wXU
Wrapped in cellophane test.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2fXH_ioogpQ
No magnets on rotor.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fA3zniDUMrI
Sincerely,
Harry Sprain
Pres. CTO Quantum dynamics Enterprises Inc.
https://www.facebook.com/qdeinc/
https://igg.me/at/QDE/x/15580283
info
To test an ESD indisputably one would like to place this engine at the center of a superconducting lead baggett such as was done for critical
electromechanical components of the Einstein Gravity Probe B spacecraft. A real neat way of powering it would be to use a fiber optic cable at a
power of 1Kw optical to high efficiency photocells inside. A superconducting lead walled container cancels out all magnetic fields. The only problem
with this is one would need to remove all the heat being generated, as the electrical energy is being used for the drive. One of those 80% efficient
magnetrons such as used in the ITER fusion reactor would help.
If you think about it an ESD within a superconducting lead container would be the unquestionable way to test the ESD drive as any magnetic field would
be able enter penetrate into the engine cavity normally. The ESD drive then would unquestionably have to convert upgraded energy into inertial momentum
if it is to produce any trust.