::)
::)
www.pbs.org/tesla/ll/ll_whoradio.html :
... magnifies ... !
What and /or how magnifies the Tate/Don Adsitt ambient module ?
The same like Lloyd Crump work for the US-government,US2813242 ?
S
dL
::)
::)
::)
I'm not seeing how this is coming together to produce electricity. I'll read it over again when I have more time.
How did an SM hit on this 15 years ago? How could he have stumbled onto it?
Like SM said on the video, it's "just a knowledge of the coils and how they interact with each other" - no mention of the molecular contents of objects.
He stated that the device was tuned to earth's gravitational field (7.3 hz or something similar), but recently stated that he did not know if it actually derived energy from the earth's magnetic field.
::)
So, the excess power comes from the potential energy of the static megnetic fields. I don't believe his magnets or the magnetic field of the earth has the flux requried to produce this much power in a small area.
Also, SM stated that the coils were meerly a means to an end - no induction between control and output.
He built a poor-man's pulsar - with bailing wire - the nerve!
I'll put together something to add some details...
::)
Pardon,between NMR and MRI/MRA is a difference:
www.nscl.msu.edu/tech/devices/betanmrstation/description.html
"Towards an Acoustic Theory"VORTEX1 is nicer-and more natural- than your trial !
S
dL
p.s.:Studying the MRI/MRA Technology like other amplification processes
-rator/-tron is a must for the MEG/linear generator !
To explain the work of the Toroid/"Kerntrafo" as amplifier:
it is to early !
Hi EmDevices:
What happened ? I was interested in your posts and your theory of NMR. Seems like you pulled it all. There is a place for all theories to be developed here. Was there a flaw in it somewhere ? I don't know enough about this subject to know if there was. I don't like it when comparisons are made early on, killing someones baby before it is born.
Come on back........V
There's no control on this forum over the threads, even if you're the originator. I'm moving on to another one. Stephan is too busy to moderate all and I like to keep a thread nice and clean and focused.
I see your point and agree. What a shame.
@EMDevice
That is unfortunate. Straight your descriptions gave the possibility, also to discoveries too compare and to possibly understand, that Hans Coler, Hendershot Trawoeger and other one have made.
Continue your postings here.
Pese
I lost most of, but got this back from Google cache:
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (the stimulation of the atoms to resonate)
Read this link carefully and you will understand.
http://www.es.oersted.dtu.dk/~masc/resonance.htm make sure you play with the animations
Note the LARMOR resonant frequency formula on the web page.
It's all about precession, just like a top. You apply a bias field (or static magnetic field, lets say in the 'z-axis') and a side field for driving the pheonmena (lets say in the 'y-axis') and the atoms start to spin their magnetic moment (they are little magnets due to spin) and induce a field orthogonal to the previous two directions, i.e they induce a field in the remaining direction of 'x-axis' . So if we place coils normal to the 'x-axis' we pick up a signal that defies EM coupling, but now I understand why it is. Very exciting stuff!! these are my words I put them in italic for emphasis.
So, even if we use NMR, we still need to match our input (driving) coil and output coils with some matching network of resonant elements. They will now be 90 deg out of phase and we need to think about all this phaseing.
To bad EMDevice departed - he was definitely a searcher (or is he still lurking?)
EDIT:
hmm - what if the molecule's angular velocity achieves speed of light and the excitation keeps pushing them faster?
Deleted
Hi Freedomfuel
quote
"Here is why I think that Sparkman is barking up the wrong tree."
unquote
Exactly which tree is it that I'm wrongly barking up. Please clarify. I'm open to being wrong, just want to know what the context is. You didn't state that. I respect your theories.
Thanks
Quote from: sparkman on November 23, 2006, 08:35:14 PM
Hi Freedomfuel
Exactly which tree is it that I'm wrongly barking up. Please clarify. I'm open to being wrong, just want to know what the context is. You didn't state that. I respect your theories.
Thanks
I think that I confused you with EM devices in my post. I was refering to the idea of nuclear magnetic resonance as a hypothesis for the workings of the TPU. It seems highly unlikely to me since in the laboratory they use a magnetic field up to 10 Teslas.
I agree with Freedomfeul.
I think that EMdevices realized that he was wrong all along. That is why he deleted his posts.
He just want to help others so they don't follow the wrong path.
Please someone explain to me, what has happened to most of EMdevices posts? Even if they were wrong they should have been kept as a mater of record.
AM
Do it yourself NMR and Magnetometers
https://overunity.com/17735/wesleys-kapanadze-and-other-fe-discussion-forum/msg552959/#msg552959
Wesley