Is There A Free Or Cheapest Method To Trade In Stock, Forex, or Penny Stock ?, as a source of income to fund your projects.
I have never done any of this, since I don't know of very cheap ways of doing it.
( Note : It would be useful if another website 'identical' to this one could be created for Stock/Forex/Penny-Trading or other related income-generating matters.
Note : I did state above that this is so people can fund their projects on this site )
Not only do you have to deposit an initial amount to get started in 'Stock-Trading' and 'Forex', whatever brokerage-company you use will have fees for each time you buy or sell or do anything else .
Stock-Trading
From my point of view, even spending a minimum of $500 to establish a Stock-Trading account is too much and risky, so unless there's a method which costs no more than $10, I'm not interested in Stock-Trading.
Forex
As far as I remember you can get started in Forex with a minimum of $100, or is it $500
However, you have to wait 2 or 1 days to receive your traded-currency-? or is it profit-?
This seems to be the very opposite of what I want to be doing.
( Note : An Unofficial Forex - I wonder if people who have bank-accounts in more than one country, that if they send themselves say $100000 from one currency into another at strategic times, that maybe they can make $1000 profit each time they do that, so that they could make $1000 every 1 or 2 days, although I assume banks have limits and things to limit that )
Penny-Stock
Obviously I have read that everyone recommends to avoid Penny-Stock trading because it's all unregulated and scams( inflating stock prices ) and all that, and obviously if you invested more than $1 or $10 the chances are you'd lose it all very fast.
However, it seems perfect for what I want to do
I want to get into trading with $1 or $10 maximum, and then spend a few hours now and then rapidly buying and selling in 1-session, buying and selling 500-1000 times in just a few hours , obviously trying to turn $1( or $10 maximum ) into $100, and once I reach $100 it would be important that I rapidly transfer that to a external bank-account not related to the trading .
The problem is, that because I would plan to be buying and selling 500-1000 times in just a few hours, I would have to pay a high-fortune in fees for each time I buy or sell and transfer the balance to an external bank-account.
So obviously I'm searching for a site with no fees for each time I would buy or sell, or unusually low fees like .001-cent, and no fees for transferring the account-balance to an external bank-account.
Due to various circumstances, I would want to always never have more than $100 in one of these trading accounts
I've researched as much as I can on the internet.
You basically want to use some gambling means to obtain money to fund your projects.
At one time, if you were a card counter, you might be able to obtain funds from casi*os. Each bet may be as low as one USD. But you need much more than that to wait for the odds to swing in your favor.
In Forex Trading, the leverage offered by the Broker or Exchange can be very high (some can be 1,000. 200 is common). Each order can be as low as 10USD. You may be able to spot some special situations allowing a sure-win. One example was from Aug 2015 to Jan 2017 when the crocodiles attacked the Chinese currency RMB. The crocodiles claimed that RMB would devalue. The Peoples Bank of China stupidly Forex Traded on the Forex Exchanges of New York or London. It was the only major player popping up the Exchange rate of RMB. It burnt one trillion USD reserve and still failed. The RMB exchange rate CNH depreciated over 6%. If you know how to trade, a 1,000 dollar bet could earn you 100K within that period. (The opportunity is now gone as China Forex trades via its own exchange.)
There is a sure-lose way of binary options. That gambling setup allows you to trade starting at 1USD and bet hundreds of times in a few hours like a casi*o but the odds are insanely in favor of the unregulated casi*o.
The easiest way to get funding for worthwhile projects in China is to discuss your ideas in one of the coffee shops or tea houses in the "entrepreneur support" zones in Beijing, Shanghai or Shenzhen. Angel funders will come to you.
You can get more information on the thread - UFO Propu in this overunity.com forum.
I do not have any project( related to this site ) that I want to raise funds for, but obviously many other members do.
( To be honest, I would only seek to raise funds to obtain the use of accommodation that would have a very 'special-type' of quiet( but with all the other 'normal' types of noise of all places ), or rather, accommodation that would only have one 'special-type' of noise problem not present )
You already know most of the material below, but I will type it anyway and also for anyone else reading this
Capacitor Propulsion in a high-vacuum :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGN65lse5yE
And, in a lower vacuum :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hw1N5wNzJk8
They say it is very difficult/costly to replicate the same vacuum as space, on earth, so why do they not just test this Capacitor-Propulsion and others up in space, maybe because it might work
The tests above may indicate indicate it is not( or not the same as ) ion drift or ion wind being generated in air
It may work because of one of the examples in the Faraday-Paradox( there is a wikipedia page for the Faraday-Paradox ).
If you spin a Disc-Shaped-Magnet( near 'nothing' else ), an electrical-current will be generated onto the magnet, and can be collected from the magnet.
It works because the magnetic-field of the Disc-Shaped-Magnet does not spin with the magnet, in other words the magnetic-field stays stationary and causes friction( induction ) with the Disc-shaped-Magnet which generates an electrical-current onto the magnet.
So the magnetic-field is ? made up of Aether or stationary-? particles sitting in a grid/lattice pattern in space.
Therefore it is possible Capacitor-Propulsion could be pushing against Aether or stationary-? particles sitting in a grid/lattice pattern in space.
The webpages below do not mention any tests carried out in space
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrogravitics
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biefeld%E2%80%93Brown_effect
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Townsend_Brown
The following quoted text is from my post :
http://overunity.com/17203/magnetic-and-gravity-motor-update-and-notes/msg506161/#msg506161
QuoteTesla had stated somewhere that the source of the energy from his overunity? invention( was it one of his inventions related to this ) was not 'electromagnetic' , that makes me wonder if the source of the energy from his overunity? invention was 'gravity', that his Solid-State-? invention converted gravity to electricity,
- Is it possible he visually confirmed this by observing an anti-gravity-effect
And, if a radio-receiver-device was to be funneling energy from a radio-transmitter-device as described on http://amasci.com/tesla/tesceive.html , would there be a physical pulling force between them, for-example, if the receiver-device and transmitter were on free-floating boats, would they move toward each other, either like an artificial version of gravity, or, as a possible alternate explanation of how gravity works, if so, then could this be an idea for producing anti-gravity
That could be another method of anti-gravity, emitting a field that is in resonance with gravity but somehow out of phase with it, or should it be completely synchronised/in-phase with gravity
The following quoted text is from the same post :
http://overunity.com/17203/magnetic-and-gravity-motor-update-and-notes/msg506161/#msg506161
QuoteHowever, keep in mind, that there seems to be 2 different concepts in this topic :
( 1 ) - You emit a radio-signal( same amplitude and frequency, but offset phase, as the target radio-signal), to funnel the radio-signal from the target-transmitter into your device to gain the energy
( 2 ) - Your equipment funnels in the radio-signal from the target-transmitter by a method other than 'emitting a radio-signal' , so your device can gain the energy, I assume this would be the most difficult method
So number ( 2 ) method may-? be a method of anti-gravity without needing to emit a field, and may be be different to gravity-shielding, I think it is mentioned on :
http://amasci.com/tesla/tesceive.html
That webpage above is where I became aware of number ( 2 ) method, and it makes no reference to gravity, except for a link your can find by searching for the text "gravitation"
So I just made some assumptions/theories from that page
Lol just flitz btween here and wikipedia
Quote from: guest1289 on May 07, 2017, 03:25:43 PM
Penny-Stock
Obviously I have read that everyone recommends to avoid Penny-Stock trading because it's all unregulated and scams( inflating stock prices ) and all that, and obviously if you invested more than $1 or $10 the chances are you'd lose it all very fast.
However, it seems perfect for what I want to do
There used to be a monthly London based publication called "The Penny Share Guide" which was quite intriguing. It was printed on a duplicator and ran to about four sides of A4 paper. But it has gone.
What was fascinating was that very occasionally, one could spot why a company was going to the wall. and of course, if one could buy up half the stock for a tenner, move in and fix it, then there would be a fortune to be made.
But the cost of a share is no measure of its value. It depends how many have been issued.
Quote from: guest1289 on May 09, 2017, 08:22:39 PM
They say it is very difficult/costly to replicate the same vacuum as space, on earth
Is this true? With a suitable vessel and a good vacuum pump?