Thomas Townsend Brown discovered in 1929 that a charged capacitor experiences a push towards the positive side.
Anyone can check this in a laboratory.
There's only one problem: Electric charges have very little mass, so ...
... according to the Law of Universal Gravitation, this effect is impossible.
This may seem like a paradox, but it is not.
The truth is that we can NOT apply the Laws or Principles of a branch of Physics to the phenomena observed in another branch of Physics (which also has its own Laws).
If we have two objects with different temperatures and we put them in contact, what happens?
What happens is that the object that is at the highest temperature releases energy to the one that has less until the temperatures are even.
Thermodynamics has its own Principles.
It would be a TOTAL absurdity to say that: "According to Ohm's Law this is impossible, because there is no intensity between the objects, the resistance between them is infinite, therefore there can be no heat transfer"
Faraday, in his experiments, discovered that a copper coil reacted to magnetic changes by producing electrical current.
What happens is that copper is a diamagnetic material, and in order to oppose the magnetism of the magnet, it must put its own electrons in motion in order to generate a magnetic field that opposes that of the magnet.
There is no magnetic energy "transforming" into electrons.
There is no kinetic energy of the magnet "transforming" into electrons.
The electrons come out of the copper of the coil to generate a magnetism opposite to the external to it.
The Principle of conservation of energy was enunciated for Thermodynamics, which is the branch of Physics that describes the states of thermal equilibrium.
And when it talks about energy, it refers only and exclusively to thermal energy.
It is NOT demonstrated for any other type of energy (nuclear, electrical...).
But we continue to use it to deny the possibilities of other branches of Physics that have their own Laws.
Making a simple experiment is an added job (no matter how small the experiment).
I guess it's much easier to "seem" smart by saying: "According to the second Principle of Thermodynamics ...", so you don't have to experiment.
I leave a link for downloading a pdf of only 18 pages with drawings and little text.
I have tried to make it as simple and basic as possible to make it understandable by anyone (even if you do not have much knowledge of the subject).
I assure you that what it says is true, is science and of course verifiable.
I would not publish it here if I had not checked it myself.
The pdf clearly explains the principle on which systems like Tesla, Kapanadze, Gray... are based.
It only remains then to check it or deny everything (without checking or reading it).
I recognize that the latter is much easier.
Greetings, Gentlemen.
https://www.4shared.com/office/SSQfWl-iee/EFUSystem.html
https://www.mediafire.com/file/ezikicxbgqvhqmz/EFUSystem.pdf/file
Makes more sense than anything else I've read.
I think this principle applies to many of Don Smith's devices. In spite of what he said about the electric field resulting in a "heat death".
When I first watched this video https://youtu.be/XkAMNFKjds4 (https://youtu.be/XkAMNFKjds4) I new there was free energy but lacked the skills to create a suitable circuit.
Duplicate post deleted
"The electrons come out of the copper of the coil to generate a magnetism opposite to the external to it"
This is exactly what's happening with AC impedance--the copper valence electrons break free from their orbits and come together to impede the externally applied AC. Actually, I don't think the electrons break-free in order to impede. It's just that the positive high voltage provides a greater attractive force to the electrons than does the copper atom, and the +HV in essence tricks the electrons into thinking that they have somewhere to go much like the positive of a charged battery is somewhere for the electrons to go. The impedance comes during the negative phase of the AC cycle when all of the freed electrons in the coil in essence butt heads with the negative of the AC cycle (like repels like). So forced current isn't the only way to get a coil to release its cemf! Electrons want to be where electrons are not. Electron-free positive High voltage is exactly where electrons want to be! So simple yet so elusive to those who are tunnel visioned! BRAVO!!!!!!!!!!!
Quote from: tomd on June 11, 2019, 04:28:43 AM
Makes more sense than anything else I've read.
I think this principle applies to many of Don Smith's devices. In spite of what he said about the electric field resulting in a "heat death".
When I first watched this video https://youtu.be/XkAMNFKjds4 (https://youtu.be/XkAMNFKjds4) I new there was free energy but lacked the skills to create a suitable circuit.
What Don was talking about was forcing
current into a coil to get it to produce a magnetic field as is traditionally done. You can never get out more than you put in by doing it that way. On the other hand, you don't need to force current into a coil to get it to produce a magnetic field if you use current-free high voltage at the coil's resonant frequency. Just think of how a crystal radio works. The impedance to AC is when your coil is in resonance and producing a tremendous magnetic field; hence "magnetic resonance".
To Efusystem:
I do not doubt that the "systems" described in the PDF-File "EFUSystem" generate spikes of high Voltage and very low Amperage.
I play a lot with electrostatic generators (electrophore, Wimshurst Machine, Triboelectric effects) and can also generate such spikes, even with up to a hundred spikes per second. The big problem is to find a practical application, since the overall energy output is very very low (in the Microamps). One can hardly light a single LED (it will always blink instead of shining continuously). Also gas discharge lamps will only blink. One can drive an electrostatic motor with these spikes, but the torque of the motor will be very very low.
So, did your wisdom lead to any practical applications? Or are you only engaging in theoretical speculations?
Greetings, Conrad
I think some guys found solution to this problem among them was Tesla. The solution is the way to generate strong magnetic field with HV low current. I think Tesla way was to use properly matched antenna and resonant rise to create amps and surrounding huge magnetic field pulses.
Quote from: forest on September 25, 2020, 05:06:16 AM
I think some guys found solution to this problem among them was Tesla. The solution is the way to generate strong magnetic field with HV low current. I think Tesla way was to use properly matched antenna and resonant rise to create amps and surrounding huge magnetic field pulses.
Yes, Sir! The below video is a perfect demonstration of the magnetic field that the primary coil is
generating from the resonance and applied low current high voltage. In the video, the primary coil is producing maybe 1% of the magnetic field that it could be producing with the correct amount of applied voltage. A length of copper wire is made up of an amount copper atoms. Those copper atoms each have a valence electron that will come free in response to a positive, electron-free high voltage. When those valence electrons come free, they will give off magnetic energy. The idea is to release the maximum amount of valence electrons that are contained within that length of copper wire, and in so doing, generate the largest magnetic field possible using only high voltage. At the resonant frequency of the coil, you will need a high frequency gauss meter to measure the magnetic field coming off of the coil. In the below video, if he would have increased the voltage in steps and measured the magnetic field from the primary coil at each voltage step/increase, he would have witnessed an increasing magnetic field. At some point in increasing the voltage, that magnetic field will no longer increase no matter how much voltage you put in. Why? Because the maximum amount of valence electrons contained within that length of copper wire will have been freed from their valence bonds. Joseph Newman recognized and documented this in his book "The Energy Machine Of Joseph Newman". Thus, a small amount of energy/power is used to generate a magnetic field with power far exceeding the input. Just study how a crystal radio gets its energy! To keep my explanation here short, I've tried to summarize the gist of phase one of a true free-energy device.
https://youtu.be/kQdcwDCBoNY (https://youtu.be/kQdcwDCBoNY)
Quote from: NdaClouDzzz on September 25, 2020, 07:46:58 AM
Yes, Sir! The below video is a perfect demonstration of the magnetic field that the primary coil is generating from the resonance and applied low current high voltage. In the video, the primary coil is producing maybe 1% of the magnetic field that it could be producing with the correct amount of applied voltage. A length of copper wire is made up of an amount copper atoms. Those copper atoms each have a valence electron that will come free in response to a positive, electron-free high voltage. When those valence electrons come free, they will give off magnetic energy. The idea is to release the maximum amount of valence electrons that are contained within that length of copper wire, and in so doing, generate the largest magnetic field possible using only high voltage. At the resonant frequency of the coil, you will need a high frequency gauss meter to measure the magnetic field coming off of the coil. In the below video, if he would have increased the voltage in steps and measured the magnetic field from the primary coil at each voltage step/increase, he would have witnessed an increasing magnetic field. At some point in increasing the voltage, that magnetic field will no longer increase no matter how much voltage you put in. Why? Because the maximum amount of valence electrons contained within that length of copper wire will have been freed from their valence bonds. Joseph Newman recognized and documented this in his book "The Energy Machine Of Joseph Newman". Thus, a small amount of energy/power is used to generate a magnetic field with power far exceeding the input. Just study how a crystal radio gets its energy! To keep my explanation here short, I've tried to summarize the gist of phase one of a true free-energy device.
https://youtu.be/kQdcwDCBoNY (https://youtu.be/kQdcwDCBoNY)
So you're saying to bring the short primary into resonance? What is the effect of the primary's resonance on the secondary?
If I'm not mistaken, in a coil at series resonance, the inductive and capacitive properties of the coil (inductive above resonance and capacitive below resonance) cancel each other out.
Similar, but reversed with parallel resonance RLCs, where the below resonant inductance cancels out the above resonant capacitance.
So what exactly is the resonant primary doing to the secondary?
Respectfully,
Bob
Greetings, Bob.
Bringing the primary into resonance is the first step. The second is finding the ideal voltage, i.e, the voltage which releases the maximum amount of valence electrons contained within the length of copper wire that you're using as your primary coil. The reason? The greater the amount of freed valence electrons the greater the magnetic field produced by the primary. This is Don Smith's "magnetic resonance".
The "effect" of the primaries MAGNETIC FIELD on the secondary is electromagnetic induction. What you do with that magnetic field after the primary is up to you. But the idea is to cause the coil to generate the largest magnetic field that it can using the smallest amount of current possible. This video should clarify it a little: https://youtu.be/x-1EKjOtrPM (https://youtu.be/x-1EKjOtrPM)
This is all counter intuitive to the establishments way of creating a magnetic field using forced current.
Thanks NDA,
It makes sense to me, and it seems consistent with others have said regarding the DS devices, and magnetism being a key component. This is a very helpful hint. I'll catch the YT video when I get a chance this week.
Regards,
Bob
The EFU pdf above and some deep thinking on the matter will help to clear the establishments fog and open doors you didn't even know were there.
Cheers!
Quote from: Bob Smith on September 27, 2020, 08:10:18 PM
Thanks NDA,
It makes sense to me, and it seems consistent with others have said regarding the DS devices, and magnetism being a key component. This is a very helpful hint. I'll catch the YT video when I get a chance this week.
Regards,
Bob
Rick Friedrich has taught a lot on this, although He can be a little difficult to follow sometimes as He doesn't break things down in the simplistic way that I do.
https://youtu.be/18kOGVfkoik (https://youtu.be/18kOGVfkoik)
My intuition tells me that Tesla used some very strange coils as described in one of his early lecture and something closely related was then replicated in Edwin Gray motor which was known to convert electrostatic into large magnetic force.A. Hubbard was a boy interested in early radio systems, probably also knew the method of creating antenna to produce large magnetic field from small current. Amman brothers device had two antennas in form of metallic balls , possible they run current in circle creating near field radio and catching it until the avalanche produced strong magnetic current pulse they converted into DC huge power for driving their car ....the same used Tesla later...Of course all above are only speculations
And there is one more fact on Tesla.
He never used bucking coils in his search for ultimate energy source.
1. Because he was stupid and never saw their potential?
2. Because he tried bucking coils and saw no potential at all in them?
Was Tesla stupid person?
I would place my bets on 2.
What others say?
Quote from: v8karlo on September 30, 2020, 04:27:43 PM
And there is one more fact on Tesla.
He never used bucking coils in his search for ultimate energy source.
1. Because he was stupid and never saw their potential?
2. Because he tried bucking coils and saw no potential at all in them?
Was Tesla stupid person?
I would place my bets on 2.
What others say?
Whoops, foot in mouth again!
There is a word that describes, giving others information that is blatantly wrong, it slips my mind at the moment...
EMJ
Quote from: EMJunkie on September 30, 2020, 05:00:34 PM
Whoops, foot in mouth again!
There is a word that describes, giving others information that is blatantly wrong, it slips my mind at the moment...
EMJ
My exact words were:
"Tesla never used bucking coils in his search for ultimate energy source."
Chris, what are you showing is not Tesla's search for ultimate energy source.
The reason of your post is:
1. You dont have a clue what drawing shows.
2. You post just to post something.
3. You are extremely stupid.
My bet is on 3.
Quote from: forest on September 30, 2020, 04:09:03 PM
... convert electrostatic into large magnetic force....
EXACTLY how HV at low current causes valence electrons to come free of their copper atom orbitals! Pulling the copper valence electrons from their orbitals in a copper coil using HV at low current and at resonance is just a different approach on the same concept demonstrated by Don Smith ( https://youtu.be/yLjt3y1_ceY?t=4084 (https://youtu.be/yLjt3y1_ceY?t=4084) ). One of the key differences with the approach demonstrated by Don is that He is pulling electrons from ground where there is no limited amount of electrons, versus pulling electrons from a copper coil where there is a limited amount of electrons. Nonetheless, those limited amount of valence electrons are more than enough when properly utilized as a catalyst to a larger process.
I fried a pan with potatoes,and it took 1 hour and the power consuption was 3000 W. :-\
Is this normal?
Something is very very wrong with the things in this world....and the GATEKEEPERS here sold their ass for 100$ / month to keep things under control.This is insane !!
@Conradelektro is a good guy, I vouch for him...
The Newbs....what is going on here?....Every day I see Newbs with under 50 posts...that MAKE MORE SENSE than the Elite Users on this forum and every other forum.
Now,I am sad to say this but I have reasons to suspect that @EMJunkie is a Gatekeeper ! ( If he is one and the same with Chris from aboveunity forum. )
There are 2 "STUPID " guys, with the name of KEN Wheeler and Nassim Haramein....and they are saying that the Electron is a man made word...and that it may be wrong.
Video here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IwgRNS1Frs
I tried to bring this concept into aboveunity.com and Chris banned me because he said that I am a troll.....sad..very sad.
Another hidden thing is that in EARTH GROUND !!!---there is some kind of energy...that can be usefull if we use EARTH GROUND instead of COM that goes back to some circuit to the Electric Power Grid.
So further investigation about what gives Earth Ground....is to be considered.
Furthermore...FORGET about FREE ENERGY.....it takes too much of your time....
Why don't we talk about energy amplification...??..example 100 w in....and 200 W out....!!!! COP of 2.
It is not free...we must pay for it..(100w)....but we can use the 200w of beeter use than if it were only 100.
I do not want to upset anybody,but I HAD to write this post, because when I have seen my power consuption to coock 1 pan of fries....a fuse has blown in my brain....and now I see that theese devices we use....are specially made..to burry us in debt.
GREAT JOB Newbies !!! And PLEASE keep up the good work !!!
I loves me some fried taters ;D
Compare what you see Don Smith doing here ( https://youtu.be/yLjt3y1_ceY?t=4039 (https://youtu.be/yLjt3y1_ceY?t=4039) ) with what you see in this video ( https://youtu.be/HupFY_24o-4 (https://youtu.be/HupFY_24o-4) ).
Quote from: NdaClouDzzz on October 02, 2020, 11:57:06 PM
I loves me some fried taters ;D
Compare what you see Don Smith doing here ( https://youtu.be/yLjt3y1_ceY?t=4039 (https://youtu.be/yLjt3y1_ceY?t=4039) ) with what you see in this video ( https://youtu.be/HupFY_24o-4 (https://youtu.be/HupFY_24o-4) ).
Hello Mate.
Thanks for the reply.
In the first video I see and Old Don Smith,that has no intention of sharing anything,and his son, that says ""If we share it with you,it is like we stab our industrial friends in the heart with a knife""
So I see 2 people that want to take A PRINCIPLE of how things work..into the grave.
In the second video I see a person that tries to explain that some objects are negativ charged and other are positiv charged.
Did I miss something?
QuoteDid I miss something?
Yes, everything. But fret not, as most also miss everything. Desire, dedication and determination will eventually make it as clear as a breezy, sunny day on a sailboat.
Cheers!
SOLARIS I WILL OFFER YOU THIS FOR FREE. IT IS NOT HARD TO BUILD . IT
ONLY WORKS WITH RESISTIVE LOAD , LIKE YOUR POTATOR FRYERS.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ybzLpOypSDs
Quote from: seychelles on October 05, 2020, 03:06:23 PM
SOLARIS I WILL OFFER YOU THIS FOR FREE. IT IS NOT HARD TO BUILD . IT
ONLY WORKS WITH RESISTIVE LOAD , LIKE YOUR POTATOR FRYERS.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ybzLpOypSDs
👍👍👍👍👍
I watched your video (is it your video?) and also saw that you generously provided schematics and info at the end.
Can you please give a little more explanation on how you believe that the device works and is able to give what looks to be more energy/power out than in?
Thank you.
AC POWER HAVE TWO COMPONENTS OF POWER DERIVATIONS.
ONE IS RESISTIVE AND THE OTHER IS REACTIVE. THE RESISTIVE
POWER COMPONENT IS DERIVED IN THIS CIRCUIT AND THE
REACTIVE COMPONENT IS NOT. THIS IS NOT A FREE ENERGY
CIRCUIT BUT A PUC CHEATING HACK. THIS IS NOT MY VIDEO
AND THE INVENTOR IS PAMEL IMRIS.
Thank you for the reply. I assumed that it was not a true free energy device as it was plugged into mains. I was just curious if it was related to the Lorrie Matchett device: https://youtu.be/Kdup42Epq0o (https://youtu.be/Kdup42Epq0o) https://youtu.be/lXeCL3yse7E (https://youtu.be/lXeCL3yse7E)
Thank you for taking the time to reply. (666 ;D)
Cheers.
Quote from: seychelles on October 05, 2020, 11:26:03 PM
AC POWER HAVE TWO COMPONENTS OF POWER DERIVATIONS.
ONE IS RESISTIVE AND THE OTHER IS REACTIVE. THE RESISTIVE
POWER COMPONENT IS DERIVED IN THIS CIRCUIT AND THE
REACTIVE COMPONENT IS NOT. THIS IS NOT A FREE ENERGY
CIRCUIT BUT A PUC CHEATING HACK. THIS IS NOT MY VIDEO
AND THE INVENTOR IS PAMEL INRIS.
Nice find Seychelles! Thanks a lot ;)
ps. Not sure but i think that member "jacknoskills" was moving on the same lines with his capcoils. See attachment.
THANKS JEG FOR THAT INFO. I HAVE SAVED IT FOR LATER STUDY.
seychelles, (Dr. ) Pavel Imris (,Csc)
Alternatively to the Indrawan transformer
https://patentauction.com/patent.php?nb=15712 (https://patentauction.com/patent.php?nb=15712)
and
https://patentauction.com/patent.php?nb=15708 (https://patentauction.com/patent.php?nb=15708)
Low consume artificial photon/light generation for (example):
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19900201&CC=DE&NR=3817730A1&KC=A1# (https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19900201&CC=DE&NR=3817730A1&KC=A1#)
in the application written about fluorescent lamp use : 35 Watt lamp as " photon source"and 70 Watt solarelectric DC output
improvement !?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOp26wnzyXk&feature=youtu.be (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOp26wnzyXk&feature=youtu.be)
Watt in with " lighting system " and solarelectric DC Watt out ?
In the End-80s 5,25% solarcell efficiency standart : now with 10%,15%,20% and more conversion %efficiency DC Watt output change ?
phonon = heatwave electric conversion thermovoltaic cells use
https://patentauction.com/patent.php?nb=11044
We noticed, when we use our combo 3 on multiple layers of glass, heat increases with each layer. So there is no limit to how many times we can increase heat. Combo 3 increases heat which is a light and color (infrared), but slows down the speed and lumens of the light. (This is not important, because light is very fast and we need the heat not the light.)
Sincerely
HI LANCA GREAT TO HEAR FROM YOU, HOPE YOU ARE OF GREAT HEALTH.
THANKS FOR ALL THE IMFOS.
Tapping the L1 directly as this guy does ( https://youtu.be/_pm2tLN6KOQ (https://youtu.be/_pm2tLN6KOQ) https://youtu.be/Gm69RS2FVvs (https://youtu.be/Gm69RS2FVvs) ) is what Don Smith referred to as "chasing the electrical side" of the electron spin. It "will die a heat death". If instead the guy in the video would make an L2 (step-down) to couple to the L1 and pass the L2 output into a full wave bridge rectifier and some ceramic caps and an electrolytic cap, He could get much more out than what lights the LED/s. He already does something similar in his "2 Dollar RF Radiation Detector You Can Build" video ( https://youtu.be/vHVmJ5lD9jc (https://youtu.be/vHVmJ5lD9jc) ), although he is clearly unaware of the free-energy implications in what he does in that video in relation to his "Free Energy From Radio Waves" and "an unusual free energy source" video's (first Two link's). Of course, an L2 step-up (rather than a step-down) would be the better way to go. The free magnetic field coming off of the L1 is used to generate a high voltage in the L2 which gets rectified with a full wave bridge rectifier into DC and thus doubling the frequency and raising the voltage which then allows for a greater energy gain when using it to pull electrons from ground. (See EFU pdf in this thread) See also Don Smiths demonstration using only high voltage to pull/attract electrons from ground: ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLjt3y1_ceY&feature=youtu.be&t=4011 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLjt3y1_ceY&feature=youtu.be&t=4011) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oyionE-sCis&feature=youtu.be&t=3205 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oyionE-sCis&feature=youtu.be&t=3205) ).
Of course, he could get even greater energy/power from the L1 by coupling many satellite coils to L1 like Don Smith showed in his Device 2 (see attached jpg) and as Rick Friedrich has shown many times, as well as in this video ( https://youtu.be/18kOGVfkoik (https://youtu.be/18kOGVfkoik) ).
RIP Eddie
...
Cannot Prove OverUnity Over Internet. A few more coils https://youtu.be/tpoOWs8SfVo (https://youtu.be/tpoOWs8SfVo)
Yes
I have lost link to Bruno's page ( buried somewhere ?
Sent request for a link
Bruno is very good customer of Ricks
Thanks for posting been wanting to get
Back to this for a long time
Of course I should add
Tittle is insane "you can't prove anything on internet "
Internet teaches everyday
Now kids learn only on internet
Entire college degrees on internet with " proof diploma "
Billions learn daily on internet " how to"
Etc etc
Quote from: NdaClouDzzz on October 09, 2020, 04:19:37 AM
Cannot Prove OverUnity Over Internet. A few more coils https://youtu.be/tpoOWs8SfVo (https://youtu.be/tpoOWs8SfVo)
Rick Friedrich........................................
I love him....and I hate him.....
I love him because he talks about some things that I have always tried to tell people.......:
1: There are GATEKEEPERS everywhere..and they are on the payroll
2.You can not post youtube videos about OU and be well...Your life is not worth 10000 trillion $..
I hate him,because he runs around the bush....so I can not understand him...What is his reasoning...what is his plan?
It is not about an OU device....because there are hundreds and hundreds of OU devices out there....each different.....but they work on the same principle...
So the question is....WHAT IS THE PRINCIPLE of energy extraction from the Nature...Vacuum etc
NdaClouzzz...thank you for your good work and keep it up.
Much love ..Sollaris
Quote from: ramset on October 09, 2020, 04:28:56 AM
"you can't prove anything on internet "
Thank you for the reply.
I believe that what Rick means by that is that PROOF is all in the eye of the beholder. Of course, he also means that you can't prove OU over the internet because of the danger to one self by showing such a device to the world. It's a true conundrum: People want to see proof yet they also recognize that such inventors get killed over such proof.
Edit: Don Smith showed me the PROOF when he pulled 8000 volts worth of electrons from ground using milliamps from a 12 volt battery ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oyionE-sCis&feature=youtu.be&t=3205 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oyionE-sCis&feature=youtu.be&t=3205) ) ( See attached jpg for a similar take on Don's demonstration, courtesy of Zed at the Don Smith forum )
Cheers
Quote from: sollaris1989 on October 09, 2020, 04:39:45 AM
So the question is....WHAT IS THE PRINCIPLE of energy extraction from the Nature...Vacuum etc
...thank you for your good work and keep it up.
Greetings
Although I'm relatively new at all of this with no electrical or electronics training or practical experience beyond a few Joule thief circuits, my understanding of things is more of an intuitive understanding. With that, it seems to me that there is no "one principle" of energy extraction from nature. We are floating in a sea of energy. We simply need to find ways to tap into and extract that energy and transform it into the power that we use for our electrical devices. For example, we use solar panels to capture and transform some of the Suns energy into usable power. We also do the same with wind turbines, etc.
One of the complications with inventors such as Don Smith is that he wasn't very clear to the average listener when he would describe the different phenomena(?) that he would employ in his various devices. For example, when he would talk about magnetic resonance or the ambient background, etc. So it's up to the listener to dedicate themselves in order to figure things out for themselves. This is also how Rick seems to teach. You have to study to not only understand the particular phenomena being referenced, but which process that particular phenomena is associated with in the different stages of the particular devices. I have come to believe that my lack of formal electrical and electronics training is what allows me to consider and see things that are not considered by those with formal training. By considering something that may ultimately be wrong in the eyes of those with formal training, I venture down a path that may just have something worthwhile to be found. I don't limit myself to any particular teacher or teaching or point of view. IF I should ever become confident enough to build something, I will most definitely acquire the formal training necessary to ensure that I do not harm myself or others. Until then, I continue to build in my unrestrained mind. Those AH HA moments are waiting for us all if we just keep at it.
Cheers
My question for you is this. How can you possibly know when you have discovered something new if you don't take the time to learn what is already known? You sound like an explorer that wants to explore new territory but is not willing to learn how to read a map. And if you don't take the time to learn the basics then you are easy prey for those that wish to deceive. And there are plenty of them out there.
Respectfully,
Carroll
Quote from: citfta on October 09, 2020, 06:01:24 AM
My question for you is this. How can you possibly know when you have discovered something new if you don't take the time to learn what is already known? You sound like an explorer that wants to explore new territory but is not willing to learn how to read a map. And if you don't take the time to learn the basics then you are easy prey for those that wish to deceive. And there are plenty of them out there.
Respectfully,
Carroll
Greetings
Perhaps I've oversimplified my explanation. Of course I've acquired some basic electrical and electronics knowledge, just not to the point of being fully indoctrinated into the establishments way of thinking. I've been dabbling in the FE world for a good Three decades now. I'm not saying that the way that I approach things is the correct way, but it is the way that keeps me interested in this FE thing that officially does not exist.
Cheers
NDA
Here is Bruno's channel
https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCkp6KwvUDupNdS8tamQF06w (https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCkp6KwvUDupNdS8tamQF06w)
I believe a few members have interacted
As well as our host Stefan
Look thru a bit
Bruno is good customer of Rick F
Greetings, ramset.
Thank you. Yes, I'm familiar with Bruno's channel and research. I even have my hardback edition of Rick's Don Smith book in which Rick gives credit to Bruno for assisting in the preparation of the book. Bruno is a very dedicated researcher and I hope to eventually get to where he is at in the near future.
Regards
Sir
I am hoping that Bruno will restart his work
Seems to date he has no indication of any OU
On his channel
Plenty of really good investigating tho !!
Greetings, ramset
It's only a matter of time. THEY can't keep the world in the dark forever!
Cheers
Think about crystal radios
And how they powered themselves
Without batteries
Quote from: sm0ky2 on October 10, 2020, 11:01:06 PM
Think about crystal radios
And how they powered themselves
Without batteries
Greetings, sm0ky2
Zzzzzzzzactly! If this guy ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_pm2tLN6KOQ&feature=youtu.be (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_pm2tLN6KOQ&feature=youtu.be) ) would have instead taken advantage of the magnetic field coming off of the coil by, say, coupling a high voltage secondary (L2), he could begin to realize the GOOD STUFF!
Cheers
NDA
For many years I have spoken with persons globally here,
So many places in dire need of these types of techs!
My personal feelings on these men who
Claim a higher understanding and take
Many decades to draw out some presentation ?
And hold a knowledge Which would truly be world changing and life saving...
In soo many Places!
Well
I have written here somewhere to Rick ...how I feel
And he did not like it!! ( spoke with him on the phone too
It truly boggles my mind!!
Please if you ever find their secret
Don't play their game....
Open source in plain easy explanation ...make it simple to understand
where a man in a field
Struggling to get clean water for his family or his animals could benefit (making sea water or bad water Usable would be so simple with FE and keep pandemic conditions in check!
Or a family struggling in arid regions to raise crops
Life or death for so many !
FE would change this too ... many areas are deforested just for cooking or heating or?
Free Energy would change soo much on our planet !!
We need to be good stewards to persons and planet!!
Our world suffers every second !!
SmOkey2
Always a delight to see you around ( makes me smile !! ( there is a new LENR topic
Opening here soon !!
( will touch base soon always appreciate your perspective)
Greetings, ramset
Yes, I understand your feelings in this matter as I've read many of your post's over the years. I myself am not an actual builder. I see things in my mind and attempt to explain them the best that I can so that others more knowledgeable and capable than I will have the benefit of a perspective that they themselves may not have thought of. Plenty would say that without actually building, I'm not helping. But I prefer to think things trough the best that I can before I make the leap into actual experimenting and building. I've attempted a few small projects and it is tedious, to say the least. I have nothing but respect for those many builders and their projects that I've seen throughout this and other forums over the years. I myself have no desire for fame or fortune. I, too, would like to see a world where everyone thrives, not just the greedy. Most of us are indoctrinated into a way of thinking that blinds us to the truth that's right in front of us. In other words, we think that someone is being deceptive with us when in reality they are giving us exactly what we want and it's our own mind that is deceiving us by blinding us to the truth. Of course, the opposite also holds true: we see things that are not actually there. The way I see it: You can't see if you don't look. I don't ever intend or mean to suggest that I have some secret that I'm withholding. I simply write/type what I see for others to do with it what they will.
Everyday the light shines on us all. Keep the faith, my brotha!
Cheers
"When we exert stress upon part of a conductor (negative AC voltage), two things happen: Electrons dislodge from the atomic matrix (copper valence electrons come free of their valence orbitals) and migrate in a spiral trajectory (e.g., Don Smith's electron spin theory) toward an unstressed zone (positive AC voltage). This is inducted voltage".
The correct amount of current-free AC voltage applied to a parallel LC circuit at resonance will cause the copper atoms to release the maximum amount of valence electrons contained within that copper coil and in turn generate the maximum magnetic field.
FE is staring us in the face, Folks. Can you see it?
Cheers
Quote from: NdaClouDzzz on October 12, 2020, 01:26:54 AM
The correct amount of current-free AC voltage applied to a parallel LC circuit at resonance will cause the copper atoms to release the maximum amount of valence electrons contained within that copper coil and in turn generate the maximum magnetic field.
FE is staring us in the face, Folks. Can you see it?
Current free AC aplied to LC circuit.... = Signal Generator sine/ square hitting a parallel LC circuit and that means that in resonance the circuit will have maximum Resistance and no current will flow.
As the coil is in resonance the magnetic field is big...True.......but now what?......
Quote from: sollaris1989 on October 12, 2020, 04:12:15 AM
...and that means that in resonance the circuit will have maximum Resistance and no current will flow.
BINGO!
But it should be: "in resonance the circuit will have maximum Resistance and no current will flow..." INTO the circuit from an EXTERNAL source.
But current will be flowing in the LC circuit. How? The freed valence electrons! Those electrons are how we get our magnetic field. We want to free the maximum amount of valence electrons that the coil has to give in order to get the maximum magnetic field, and do it all using the smallest amount of electrons/joules/watts from the power source (e.g., a 12 volt battery).
You ask "As the coil is in resonance the magnetic field is big...True.......but now what?".
Let me ask you this: What can you do with an oscillating magnetic field that would normally require say 120 volts at 60 amps to create it, yet it only takes you 12 volts at 300 milliamps to create that same magnetic field? I'm just making up these numbers to convey the idea.
There are many ways to use that magnetic field, I listed at least one earlier in this thread when I posted a screenshot of Don Smiths device #2 with the satellite coils and Rick Friedrich's video ( https://youtu.be/tpoOWs8SfVo (https://youtu.be/tpoOWs8SfVo) ).
This is just one of the many ways to use that magnetic field. Remember, the idea is to have a device that produces more energy/power out than what YOU put in! Just think of a small sail boat: YOU put in a small amount of energy/power in hoisting the sail in order to intercept/capture a much larger amount of energy/power to sail around all day for free.
Study up on Don Smith's devices and teachings, because after all, what I've been trying to convey here is all Don Smith's stuff.
Cheers
Describing things and processes is easy !?
Valenz-electrons(or ions) from the elements their "Kristall-Gitter" to catch depends from the different " recombination time" of these 'shortly' unbonded particles !
Gibbs FE-Theorem !
To get higher 'catch efficiencies' thousands of scientists and engineers are working on it :
photo(n)-and phono(n)-voltaic up to thermionic conversion,reversible
Photoelectric : Dr.phys. Albert Einstein Phonoelectric : Dr.phys. Max Planck
Particle-Theory Wave-Theory
Particle-Wave = Quant/-um Paar - Dualismus Quanten-Wirkungszahl
Einsteins findings based by scientifical Plancks and Minkowski ( one A.E. his " Dr. Phy."- Fathers) mentorship !
From nano-seconds to Fermi-level : TeraHerz cycle circuit and higher
Sincerely
p.s. : Ohm ( non/valid) to Kirchhoff ( circuit knodes Theorem) to Ferdinand von Braun ( and his two " parametric generator"-study students Mandelstam and Papalexi )
Very informative. Thank you👍
Quote from: sollaris1989 on October 12, 2020, 04:12:15 AM
Current free AC aplied to LC circuit.... = Signal Generator sine/ square hitting a parallel LC circuit....
An SG is one way, but clearly insufficient to release the maximum amount of valence electrons that you want.
For example: Take this video in which the primary is being driven with a meager 11 volt signal generator ( https://youtu.be/kQdcwDCBoNY (https://youtu.be/kQdcwDCBoNY) ). What we see in that video is clearly not a coil producing its maximum magnetic field. It's my GUESS that that size of coil will take over 1000 volts (current free) to release its maximum amount of valence electrons and in turn generate its maximum magnetic field. That's why Don Smith used High voltage low current sources such as NST's. Copper coils have a lot of valence electrons in them and the greater the voltage the greater amount of valence electrons that will be freed from their copper bonds. Think of a fully charged battery. Attempt to push more negative voltage (no current) into the neg of the battery. You're further compressing those electrons and they have nowhere to go. They want to go to the positive side but until a connection to pos is made, they just get more compressed until the battery explodes. Now apply this to the LC circuit that I've been describing. You force a large amount of neg voltage into one side of the coil and the electrons come out of their valence bonds and migrate to the positive side, just like they would do in a battery. High pressure to low pressure! Just like the jpg I posted above describes. Just continue to jack the voltage up (no current) on a parallel LC circuit and measure the size of the magnetic field coming off of the coil, and when that field stops growing you know you have found the voltage that releases the max amount of valence electrons in that coil/LC combo.
Cheers
So what were really talking about is a kind of pseudo-fission at very low power levels. Which may explain the cooling effects and transmutation in some devices.
Knock off some electrons, add them to the free electron current then have them recombine in another area...interesting theory.
Regards
Greetings, onepower
Quote from: onepower on October 12, 2020, 04:19:46 PM
Knock off some electrons, add them to the free electron current then have them recombine in another area...interesting theory
I don't believe that there is any recombining until the device is powered off. Edit: Unless you're referring to the language in the above attached jpg: "When we exert stress upon part of a conductor, two things happen. Electrons dislodge from the atomic matrix and migrate in a spiral trajectory toward an unstressed zone. This is inducted voltage. Alien electrons resident in the higher stress level, are then
lured by the naked nucleus to assume the orbits vacated by their material counterparts. These in turn begin to flow toward lower stress, and a self-replenishing cycle is begun".
The idea in the parallel LC I'm attempting to describe is to continuously oscillate/cycle/spin those valence electrons back and forth at a high enough frequency for the skin effect per Don Smith's electron spin theory.
Thank you for the input.
Cheers
Sorry been trying to post for hours
Very busy here
Did not mean to step on ONe power
——///—-://—-NDA
I hope you don't mind
I leave this here for our wonderful and tireless aquaintance
Lanca he is member of German forum I believe?
"His"
Input or opinion if he has knowledge of efforts from German
Forum?
Plus you posted similar ambient harvesting
Member Grumpy shared this
https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=3963.msg84746;topicseen#msg84746 (https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=3963.msg84746;topicseen#msg84746)
Greetings, ramset.
Thank you👍
Watch this !
https://www.techzim.co.zw/2015/07/zimbabwean-inventor-showcases-his-own-drone-electric-car-and-green-generator/
Quote from: sollaris1989 on October 09, 2020, 04:39:45 AM
I hate him,because he runs around the bush....so I can not understand him...What is his reasoning...what is his plan?
Have you considered that He
IS giving you everything that you need but that your way of thinking is just preventing you from seeing it? The establishments way of things is not so easy to overcome. Most of the time you have to work/study hard to overcome it, and then one day the establishments conditioning just effortlessly falls away and you can see!
QuoteIt is not about an OU device....because there are hundreds and hundreds of OU devices out there....each different.....but they work on the same principle...
What way would that be, on BS? ;D
Quote from: NdaClouDzzz on October 15, 2020, 02:33:49 AM
Have you considered that He IS giving you everything that you need but that your way of thinking is just preventing you from seeing it? The establishments way of things is not so easy to overcome. Most of the time you have to work/study hard to overcome it, and then one day the establishments conditioning just effortlessly falls away and you can see!
What way would that be, on BS? ;D
Hello NdzCloudzz.
I have seen over 50 videos from Rick...That is 1 month of watching..taking in consideration that he has videos of 2.5 hours in lenght.
After watching all of that....I hoped that he would consider giving us a small piece of the puzzle....so that we can work with it...for example: "(( take a copper pipe and use your own ground"" )
Fuck the establishments, as I am not trained....and I have an open mind....however...
In Ricks Videos,there is nothing there mate...0.
As for the high voltage AC...well.....a bedini SSG or a 12 V joule thief would give that.
Energy spikes are considered AC and not DC.....SO you can hit an LC with 400 V spikes...to release more ""Valent electrons"" ..(my oppinion)
-Tesla
-Bedini
-Don Smith
-Rick
-Stanley Mayer
-JOE from the INSANE Joe CELL...
All of these people could have LECHED any time...some pieces of puzzle....(write down a paper...stick it in a bottle and throw 1 month in the river)....
I can not understand how do they think...What is their level of awareness taking in consideration that the Government want to kill millions of us...(Corona and other means)
Now...people that talk all day long about TESLA Patents are free now etc.....:))
If people think that the establishment would leave real patents on the internet.....They are delusional.
NsaCloudszzz...you can always PM me. 1 time or 10000 times. I am always opened to discussion at any time from day and night.
Love you guys..and take care of yourself!!
...🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃...
"halloween"-feelings ? 8)
Chet,the german overunity.de-forum is since several years 'off-line',actually maintenance stage !
Photoelectric : lumen,lux in Watt/Hz
Phonoelectric : dB in Watt/Hz thermo-voltaic also called thermal-noise
' Magnetic amplification and neutralization ........ ' instead : motor : coil or foil
And from foil to "power fluctuation conversion " like Joseph C. Yater developped,reversible conversion concept !
Newer improvements ( if possible or need ) in ' citing documents' in his application !
Parallel to " quantum computer ' we get ' quantum power converter ' ,
Some are here workung on 1x process circuit per time unit, macro dimensional
nano dimension technology and velocity
( ~ computering : flop or floating point operation per second )
" ... one trillion tiny radio receivers per square inch ... " ( Alvin Marks,NovaSolix,....)
Or : 155 000 000 000 tiny radio receivers per square centimetre
Hi-Fi : receiver ~ tuner + amplifier
Quantum technology : rectenna,nantenna
~ DE19737047 Magnetic field transistor in small
Anti - " recombination period time = gain window" velocity :
70'/80' wafer to processor technology development ,benchmark : Bit and Bytes
Home Computering ,R.A.M. and R.O.M.
8/16/32 Lord Sinclair Amstrad /64/128/256/512/1024 Commodore/Atari
1 Hertz/rotation/oscillation/cycle = 1 receiver circuit
to KiloHertz = 1000 Hertz MegaHertz = 1000 000 Hertz GigaHertz = 1 000 000 000 Hertz
Comparing grid : 50/60 Hertz x 60 sec = 3000/3600 rotations RPM
Ergo : given RPM in rotation number / 60 ( RPMinute to RPSecond ) = controlling .... Hertz ( per sec ),AC current
1 THz = 1 000 000 000 000 Hertz = 1 Tera units receiver circuits
155 000 000 000 tiny receivers per sq-cm
The Wattpeak per sq-cm conversion potential ( quantum well diode device cooled ! ) =
US5889287 : 10v7 Wp per sqm = 1000 Wp per sq-cm
compared Oscar Fellows MEMS-TAR ( device cooled ) : 10 Wp per sq-cm
and conventional solar cells with 20 % conversion peak : 1333 natural radiation per sqm x 20 %=
267 Wp/sqm and 0,0267 Wp/sq-cm
1000 Wp / 10 Wp /0,0267 Wp per sq-cm conversion concept technologies
Quantum well diode / conventional 20% solar cell : up to 37 450 times higher power area density
37450 sqm solar cell parc versus ? sqm Quantum well diode parc !?
Natural light/radiation conversion : 900 full-hours per year from 8766 hours/year= 365 x 24
24/365 Quantum well diode generator !? ::) 37450 x (8766/900 )= less land area need ;)
Hmm,someone dd it : compilation US8847720 Harold Goldbaum Electromagnetic Phenomena :)
Next 1 PetaHerz ( 2050 industrial average ) to 1 ExaHertz ( ? )
Nature works fast
Sincerely
Quote from: efusystem on June 10, 2019, 11:48:24 AM
Thomas Townsend Brown discovered in 1929 that a charged capacitor experiences a push towards the positive side.
My dear friend: look here at first:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrogravitics (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrogravitics)
Quote from: efusystem on June 10, 2019, 11:48:24 AM
I assure you that what it says is true, is science and of course verifiable.
I would not publish it here if I had not checked it myself.
The pdf clearly explains the principle on which systems like Tesla, Kapanadze, Gray... are based.
It only remains then to check it or deny everything (without checking or reading it).
I recognize that the latter is much easier.
https://www.4shared.com/office/SSQfWl-iee/EFUSystem.html (https://www.4shared.com/office/SSQfWl-iee/EFUSystem.html)
https://www.mediafire.com/file/ezikicxbgqvhqmz/EFUSystem.pdf/file
(https://www.mediafire.com/file/ezikicxbgqvhqmz/EFUSystem.pdf/file)
Honestly this post was written by you - the guy who made only two posts.
You opened 2 threads with different names:
-Heat to electric energy conversion (https://overunity.com/heat-to-electric-energy-conversion/) / The solution (https://overunity.com/18238/the-solution/msg535147/#msg535147)«
on: June 10, 2019,
05:45:41 PM » -
-
solid state devices (https://overunity.com/solid-state-devices/) / The solution !!!! (https://overunity.com/18239/the-solution/msg535148/#msg535148) «
on: June 10, 2019,
05:48:24 PM »
___________________________________
so let's analyze that:
1. You had time frame between
05:45:41 PM » and
05:48:24 PM »
= 2 minutes and 43 seconds to create two threads
2. lets take
-Heat to electric energy conversion / The solution typing the text and searching/copying link takes for fast English speaker
- ~ 1 minute 43 seconds
but it takes
~ 3 minutes 23 seconds
for an average person if he has text in his head prepared.
logging and creating another thread
- solid state devices / The solution !!!! and copying it takes
- ~43 seconds
so there was not a time for one person to create 2 of them in given time frame.
conclusion:
1. Two computers have been used and more than one person to do it.
I'm excluding case that someone had text prepared and all that was left is just to post it in two places as a not common practice ,
based on factor of motivation 2. after you made that posting - your interest in subject was zero posts....
summary:
this leads to conclusion of targeted action by interested party or individual in other people 9 the readers) clicking at link and exposing themselves to
lose of their privacy ( for me this is typical Trolling)
_____________________________________________________________So my friend I'm sure you'll not answer to me.
- all of Threads have only one post of yours, and no other participation of yours was noticed after that.
Did you lose interest in the discussion,right after posting?
- All of the two posts are exactly the same.
- You were doing everything to be as convincing as you possibly could just for one reason..
You wanted the readers to click on the two links posted by you:
https://www.4shared.com/office/SSQfWl-iee/EFUSystem.html (https://www.4shared.com/office/SSQfWl-iee/EFUSystem.html)
https://www.mediafire.com/file/ezikicxbgqvhqmz/EFUSystem.pdf/file (https://www.mediafire.com/file/ezikicxbgqvhqmz/EFUSystem.pdf/file)
1 of the links doesn't work
2 second of the link is asking:
to access your email, passwords, bank bills, private pictures, data...
And 5 pages of not very much smart guys in that particular area were responding to your crap ...
It sounds for me like some kind possibly Russian government paid trolls preying on access to our private life.
Our correspondence is helpful to them to identify any possible danger to their oil business and corrupt falling down economy.
"some" kind of organized mafia in the world is "possibly" interested in us now my friends.
As far as me: I'm an expert now in what's going on out there.
And try to call paranoiac me - the guy who was looking in the mirror of Toilet in the airplane from Prague to Tbilisi.
Knowing That I was poisoned and thinking what are my options now before I lose my conciseness.
thinking about:
-my wife,
-about me trying to make world better,
-about Tariel Kapanadze
- about the crime and punishment.
should an American who wanted to see Tariel Kapanadze device be punished with death
by "some" Russians?
______________________
Yes they have it perfected
It was not only me alone:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisoning_of_Alexei_Navalny
https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/08/01/why-russia-keeps-poisoning-people-navalny-suspected-illness-protests-moscow/
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/20/world/europe/navalny-poison-russia-kremlin.html (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/20/world/europe/navalny-poison-russia-kremlin.html)
legal note: all said above is only my personal opinion as an American and I have rights to express it based on my constitutional rights
Wesley
,
Quote from: stivep on October 16, 2020, 02:49:30 PM
And 5 pages of not very much smart guys were responding to your crap ...
EFU pdf attached....for all of my fellow "not very much smart guys ". ;D
Quote from: NdaClouDzzz on October 16, 2020, 03:01:01 PM
EFU pdf attached....for all of my fellow "not very much smart guys ". ;D
It is not about PDF attached or not.
It was about an access to our private passwords conversations pictures banks and emails.
Yes.. who other FE guys you talk to and who they talk to...
If the guy wanted to give information away he had a chance to give link top this PDF
exactly like you did now right?
So why he didn't do it?
And you did?
Can you my friend explain to me why only now that PDF is given
by you and not then in the very first day?
Do we need to analyze IP address history for verification?
Wesley
Quote from: stivep on October 16, 2020, 03:08:17 PM
Can you my friend explain to me why only now that PDF is given by you and not then in the very first day?
Sure, right after you explain why you would care about any answer given by a "not so smart guy[]".
QuoteDo we need to analyze IP address history for verification?
Not sure what you mean by that, but I'm in Colorado USA--- N da ClouDzzz
Cheers In The Clouds
Quote from: NdaClouDzzz on October 16, 2020, 03:14:25 PM
Sure, right after you explain why you would care about any answer given by a "not so smart guy[]".
You right
I must agree with you I had to correct this phrase :
Quotenot very much smart guys in this particular area:
sounds fair enough, as we all are not always professional in every direction..
I have team of experts in my entity responsible and paid for analysis in this area.
____________________
What strange is that you don't agree taking one side only and this is not for the first time my dear friend.
so you don't see any negatives?
Don't you see the guy creating two topics by copying the same exactly words and than not participating in conversation?
while asking convincing the audience to click on them?Wesley
Yes, your conspiratorial position seems to have validity. On the other hand, clicking a link is no longer necessary. Most of us are here to share information/perspective with those wishing to remain in the background with their experiments so as to protect themselves. The EFU pdf is self-explanatory and presented for those wanting to do the experiments to check the validity. Yes, I have many questions for the OP regarding things that are in the pdf, but if I really want those questions answered then I will do the experiments. no big deal.
I watch your threads and they are interesting and I may get around to further in-depth study of them.
Cheers....🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃
Quote from: NdaClouDzzz on October 16, 2020, 03:37:40 PM
Yes, your conspiratorial position seems to have validity.
Cheers
I do thank you for your response to my posts.
I have problem with your wording
Quoteconspiratorial position
I's a life My friend.
Think about yourself:
You got good education, paid your tuition,loans than you got married, kids, good life and recognition in society.
And now please picture yourself in my shoes in 2011.
How much time you have left.. another 20 minutes of your life?.. or 40...
You placed 2 fingers in you throat and try to vomit.. but it doesn't work..
you feinting..
I love you.
.( to your wife)Sorry for what I did..
I wanted you to be happy..
And than... it works.. you emptying your stomach..
But water in that airplane toilet is not flowing...it's a dropper..
you opened the door and you asking
Steward for more water...
S: O my god you are red ..so red in your face .. are you OK?
Just give me more water... please
S: OK...
and than you waiting for water and pushing yourself..again and again..
___________________
after an hour you are back in your sit and you see Tariel Kapanadze horizontally..
- God.. .. Yes he's moving a little , he is still alive.
He was in unconsciousness for 3 days and he swallowed only 2-3 spoons .
He was heavily drunk in airplane and he couldn't eat.. That saved him.
_____________________
And than you thinking about these "some" Russians and you learning everything about them including their language:
After some time your Russian is better than most of Russians born there.
You know their culture ,habits, perception , houses, taste, politics, recent events, history, banditism.corruption..vulgarism,
you know their life ..You are an expert.. in the biggest mafia in the history of modern world
What would you do in my place?It was not me alone:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisoning_of_Alexei_Navalny (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisoning_of_Alexei_Navalny)
https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/08/01/why-russia-keeps-poisoning-people-navalny-suspected-illness-protests-moscow/ (https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/08/01/why-russia-keeps-poisoning-people-navalny-suspected-illness-protests-moscow/)
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/20/world/europe/navalny-poison-russia-kremlin.html
(https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/20/world/europe/navalny-poison-russia-kremlin.html)
https://youtu.be/Uugr-ElDoMk?t=759
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHBEHOOsxT4&t=127s
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHBEHOOsxT4&t=127s)legal note: all said above is only my personal opinion as an American and I have rights to express it based on my constitutional rightsWesley
I forget that conspiracy is a bad word to some. I don't use it or intend it in a bad way. I mean it more as suspicious ponderings, questioning the underlying nature of what we are seeing on the surface; and our conclusions are not always able to be supported by objective evidence. To me, conspiracy just means hidden truth. I try to avoid conspiracies these days, or at least I try to limit my self to very little, as I've been there done that and I tend to lose myself when venturing down the endless rabbit hole. So, no offense intended.
cheers.....🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃.....
Thank You my friend
I do appreciate your comment
Wesley
👍👍👍👍👍🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃
www.feprinciples.wordpress.com (http://www.feprinciples.wordpress.com)
Janos Vajda ( since 2010 R.I.P. ) with study : violation of the energy thesis in wave fields
HU9601424 hungarian patent application
+ Alfred W. Huebler : digital quantum nano tubes array a. as battery b. as amplifier
Huzzah! Thank you, lanca!
At least I know I'm not TOTALLY imagining things!
"My take: Two equal radio frequencies going in opposite sides of a coil and colliding in the middle should not only lower (reduce) the frequency, but also increase the amplitude of the wave, thus increasing the power" https://overunity.com/18653/ac-voltage-from-single-magnetic-pole/msg552154/#msg552154 (https://overunity.com/18653/ac-voltage-from-single-magnetic-pole/msg552154/#msg552154)
"When two waves with identical polarization, frequency, phase and amplitude propagate in the same direction and meet (and merge) in free space, then their amplitudes will add together and the amplitude of the resultant wave will be double that of a single input wave. This physical phenomenon is called superposition or interference of the waves, when (under the above conditions) the amplitude of the resultant wave is calculated by simply adding together the amplitudes of the incoming waves" https://feprinciples.wordpress.com/how-to-gain-free-energy-from-wave-fields-simplified-explanation/ (https://feprinciples.wordpress.com/how-to-gain-free-energy-from-wave-fields-simplified-explanation/)
.....🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃.....
Yes,probably also one * unmoderated * aboveunity.com -member get his gladness !
Quote from: lancaIV on October 16, 2020, 06:43:42 AM
"halloween"-feelings ? 8)
Chet,the german overunity.de-forum is since several years 'off-line',actually maintenance stage !
Photoelectric : lumen,lux in Watt/Hz
Phonoelectric : dB in Watt/Hz thermo-voltaic also called thermal-noise
' Magnetic amplification and neutralization ........ ' instead : motor : coil or foil
And from foil to "power fluctuation conversion " like Joseph C. Yater developped,reversible conversion concept !
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19941018&CC=US&NR=5356484A&KC=A
Newer improvements ( if possible or need ) in ' citing documents' in his application !
Parallel to " quantum computer ' we get ' quantum power converter ' ,
Some are here workung on 1x process circuit per time unit, macro dimensional
nano dimension technology and velocity
( ~ computering : flop or floating point operation per second )
" ... one trillion tiny radio receivers per square inch ... " ( Alvin Marks,NovaSolix,....)
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=11&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19860304&CC=US&NR=4574161A&KC=A
http://www.novasolix.com/vision
Or : 155 000 000 000 tiny radio receivers per square centimetre
Hi-Fi : receiver ~ tuner + amplifier
Quantum technology : rectenna,nantenna
~ DE19737047 Magnetic field transistor in small
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19990708&CC=DE&NR=19737047A1&KC=A1
Anti - " recombination period time = gain window" velocity :
70'/80' wafer to processor technology development ,benchmark : Bit and Bytes
Home Computering ,R.A.M. and R.O.M.
8/16/32 Lord Sinclair Amstrad /64/128/256/512/1024 Commodore/Atari
1 Hertz/rotation/oscillation/cycle = 1 receiver circuit
to KiloHertz = 1000 Hertz MegaHertz = 1000 000 Hertz GigaHertz = 1 000 000 000 Hertz
Comparing grid : 50/60 Hertz x 60 sec = 3000/3600 rotations RPM
Ergo : given RPM in rotation number / 60 ( RPMinute to RPSecond ) = controlling .... Hertz ( per sec ),AC current
1 THz = 1 000 000 000 000 Hertz = 1 Tera units receiver circuits
155 000 000 000 tiny receivers per sq-cm
The Wattpeak per sq-cm conversion potential ( quantum well diode device cooled ! ) =
US5889287 : 10v7 Wp per sqm = 1000 Wp per sq-cm
compared Oscar Fellows MEMS-TAR ( device cooled ) : 10 Wp per sq-cm
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=4&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20020514&CC=US&NR=6385972B1&KC=B1
and conventional solar cells with 20 % conversion peak : 1333 Wp natural radiation per sqm x 20 % =
267 Wp/sqm and 0,0267 Wp/sq-cm
1000 Wp / 10 Wp /0,0267 Wp per sq-cm conversion concept technologies
Quantum well diode / conventional 20% solar cell : up to 37 450 times higher power area density
37450 sqm solar cell parc versus ? sqm Quantum well diode parc !?
Natural light/radiation conversion : 900 full-hours per year from 8766 hours/year= 365 x 24
24/365 Quantum well diode generator !? ::) 37450 x (8766/900 )= less land area need ;)
Hmm,someone did it : compilation US8847720 Harold Goldbaum Electromagnetic Phenomena :)
Next 1 PetaHerz ( 2050 industrial average ) to 1 ExaHertz ( ? )
Nature works fast
Sincerely
Lanca
Thank you
And yes a few play here as bored children !
Seems a game ... no concern for the planet
Just having fun with monkey wrenching!!
Hopefully soon something that actually works to play with here!!
Very soon !!
Hopefully they know how to build too ?
Quote from: sollaris1989 on October 15, 2020, 07:00:03 PM
Love you guys..and take care of yourself!!
.........🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃................
Folks, this guy is the REAL DEAL! If you want free-energy then do everything you can to understand what He is trying to tell you and show you!!!!!!!!
https://youtu.be/oQUgdVw58-Q (https://youtu.be/oQUgdVw58-Q)
https://overunity.com/16039/quantum-generator/ (https://overunity.com/16039/quantum-generator/) ( Ignore the naysayers! )
Okay,it shows great functional improvements in capacity delivery !
The question now : how many stable charge cycles ?
Re-charge time and battery weight ?
And the KW and KWh battery prices !?
By acceptable consumer end prices this ABPS is an ic-engine killer !
ABPS: Advanced Battery Power Source
Caution : ABPS also meaning Australian Battery Performance Standart by CSIRO
CSIRO's their Ultra-battery concept but then with ABPS-battery and Super-caps ?!
Sincerely
Quote from: lancaIV on October 20, 2020, 04:54:53 AM
The question now : how many stable charge cycles ?
Greetings, lanca
He's using Nickel–metal hydride batteries in the demonstration, so whatever the charge cycles of those batteries are: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nickel%E2%80%93metal_hydride_battery (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nickel%E2%80%93metal_hydride_battery)
He originally posted this as an OU device, but as we can see it's not OU as the battery runs down. As far as I can see, it's just a more efficient use of the energy in the battery. He's been very tight-lipped on details, I assume because he want's to sell the tech. He has changed the name of the device several times. Here is an old link giving some description: https://fringeenergy.com/samson-electron-battery-accelerator/ (https://fringeenergy.com/samson-electron-battery-accelerator/)
If I can use energy that would normally be wasted, then to me that's free-energy.
The downside that I see with this device is that it's on or off. So if you're not using the full power then it will just be wasting energy.
Edit: Okay, I think that I misunderstood you. This isn't a new kind of
BATTERY. It's just a
circuit that uses the energy in batteries in a more efficient manner, kind of like a joule thief.
Cheers
By the ABPS-video it seemed to be a concept by a new battery invention !
But nevertheless,when the circuit : TRI-3 works functional,why not !?
ideaconnection.com
by Ken F. ( without date )
I have sold my invention ,the ( Samson ) Electron Battery Accelerator due to the listening on IdeaConnection. ......
Buyer his interest/s ?
Sincerely
p.s. : I would like to see US4039352 Matei Marinescu
+ US3568039 Milton Knight
+ US4390605 Frank Marhanka
and FR633752 Marcel Meredieu
compact,eventually by warranted Stanfords 200 000 charge cycles ;)
Actually we have to be satisfied with Stanfords 7500 charge cycles and 1 minute recharge time aluminium
battery
Quote from: lancaIV on October 20, 2020, 06:20:09 AM
But nevertheless,when the circuit : TRI-3 works functional,why not !?
I'm not sure what you are asking.
QuoteI have sold my invention ,the ( Samson ) Electron Battery Accelerator due to the listening on IdeaConnection. ......
He really needs to work on his marketing skills. Every time he shows his device it's either being ready to be sold or has been sold or is patent pending. He comes across like a conman (which He is not!), I think only because he is paranoid that someone will steal his invention. He figures that if He makes things confusing then no one will be able to steal his invention. But his device does work. It's just a more efficient use of the energy in the battery. Instead of using the battery electrons to directly power a load, he instead uses the electrons to create a high frequency magnetic field, which in his case takes less electrons from the battery to create. He actually uses a multi-stage process. The AC/DC adapter which ultimately supplies the power to the load, is really part of a parallel resonance LC circuit ( Tank circuit )( https://overunity.com/16039/quantum-generator/msg461022/#msg461022 (https://overunity.com/16039/quantum-generator/msg461022/#msg461022) ). In fact, for all intents and purposes, this device is actually working within the same principle as an AM radio receiver. The primary of the AC/DC adapter is acting the same as the resonant coil/tuner of an AM radio with a secondary, and rather than getting his signal from the radio station, he supplies it himself (400 volts @ 50 milliamps). This is really just a miniature Don Smith device minus L1 and L2( see attached screenshot from Smith/PJK pdf for an example). He has apparently not yet figured out that He can make his device OU by using several of Don Smith's principles such as, for example, connecting an earth ground to the secondary of the AC/DC power adapter.
Cheers
Resonance in a parallel LC circuit: "If the frequency of the applied current is the circuit's natural resonant frequency..., resonance will occur, and a small driving current can excite large amplitude oscillating voltages and currents. In typical tuned circuits in electronic equipment the oscillations are very fast, from thousands to billions of times per second".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LC_circuit (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LC_circuit)
A battery charged and conditioned with a radiant charger / negative electricity....has more lifetime than a conventional battery.
What the man is showing in his video is nothing new....He is beating a dead goat...over and over again.
Condition a battery with a Joule Thief 2 weeks and you will see how go.
However that is not scalable.
You can not run a house or car on a Joule Thief.
I know a couple of people that tried to make money....to sell books Patents etc...and they all ended DEAD.
The only way to go is open source....and teaching one another...step by step..brick by brick.
The sales people never end good.
It's not a Joule Thief, at least not in the traditional sense, although a joule thief is part of the circuit. And he's also not using batteries that have been "charged and conditioned with a radiant charger / negative electricity". I linked to the other thread where you made the same comments under your other account so you would not have to leave the same comments here.
It is a DC-DC boost converter ( 1.2 volts to 3.5-5 volts [for voltage regulation] ) powering a Joule thief circuit with a high-voltage secondary. The high-voltage secondary connects to an AC/DC adapter with a cap in parallel to form a tank with the adapter primary. It's basically the same as that shown in this video ( https://youtu.be/kQdcwDCBoNY (https://youtu.be/kQdcwDCBoNY) ). I see you also left a comment there. The high voltage secondary of the joule thief takes the place of the SG in the video, and the AC/DC adapter takes the place of the two coils/tanks in the video. The primary of the AC/DC adapter is being ran as a resonant parallel tank and the magnetic field being produced by the primary excites the secondary step-down and charges the 16 volt electrolytic output cap to power the DC load.
Again, "If the frequency of the applied current is the circuit's natural resonant frequency..., resonance will occur, and a small driving current can excite large amplitude oscillating voltages and currents".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LC_circuit (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LC_circuit)
Yes, he does seem to be oblivious to the way this world works with regards to free-energy tech. My guess is that he is hoping that someone will pay him to shelve it, although I'm not sure how he hopes for that to happen with the babbling ways in which he has presented this stuff in his past postings. I believe that he has stated in other forums that he is from the Newman camp, and so his ways are unsurprising.
Sine wave being produced by a joule thief high voltage secondary found in the comments section at https://www.instructables.com/high-voltage-joule-thief/#intro (https://www.instructables.com/high-voltage-joule-thief/#intro)
Quote from: NdaClouDzzz on October 21, 2020, 07:26:09 PM
I linked to the other thread where you made the same comments under your other account so you would not have to leave the same comments here.
I have only this account on OU.com
I think you got the wrong person mate.
Quote from: NdaClouDzzz on October 21, 2020, 07:26:09 PM
It's not a Joule Thief, at least not in the traditional sense, although a joule thief is part of the circuit. And he's also not using batteries that have been "charged and conditioned with a radiant charger / negative electricity"....
It is a DC-DC boost converter ( 1.2 volts to 3.5-5 volts [for voltage regulation] ) powering a Joule thief circuit with a high-voltage secondary. The high-voltage secondary connects to an AC/DC adapter with a cap in parallel to form a tank with the adapter primary. It's basically the same as that shown in this video ( https://youtu.be/kQdcwDCBoNY (https://youtu.be/kQdcwDCBoNY) )....The high voltage secondary of the joule thief takes the place of the SG in the video, and the AC/DC adapter takes the place of the two coils/tanks in the video. The primary of the AC/DC adapter is being ran as a resonant parallel tank and the magnetic field being produced by the primary excites the secondary step-down and charges the 16 volt electrolytic output cap to power the DC load.
NOTE: My comment is based on my own take on the device inventors limited description of his device. I have not communicated with the inventor nor been privy to any design info other than what the inventor has posted publicly. But I can state that my iteration of his device far surpassed the performance of the device that he has demonstrated in his now private video.
Quote from: NdaClouDzzz on October 23, 2020, 10:16:19 PM
NOTE: My comment is based on my own take on the device inventors limited description of his device. I have not communicated with the inventor nor been privy to any design info other than what the inventor has posted publicly. But I can state that my iteration of his device far surpassed the performance of the device that he has demonstrated in his now private video.
DO NOT worry so much.
There are almost no people left on this forum....and IF you build a device that you use for personal use....the ELITES will not care.
When you make a youtube video and stat teaching people how to power a house with 1.5 V baterry...that only stimulates the circuit to tap into the ether field...Than..you have a serious problem on your hands.
Do not worry buddy.
Its ok to contact people and talk to them.
Quote from: sollaris1989 on October 24, 2020, 07:37:49 PM
There are almost no people left on this forum....
Yep, Stefan has done a great job at getting rid of most of the reality-show crowd.
QuoteIts ok to contact people and talk to them.
But I'm just a newb with newb ideas that I share freely with all.
Ideas are for sharing and not for the...
Quote from: sollaris1989 on October 24, 2020, 07:37:49 PM
When you make a [Y]outube video and sta[r]t teaching people how to power a house with 1.5 V bat[t]e[]ry....
REALLY?
You know damn well that the inventor did NOT say anything about powering a house
with a 1.5 (or 1.2) volt battery.
More distraction from the master of distraction?
Too bad that Stefan can't stop the distractor's from creating multiple accounts!
Why distraction when we have a fixed program ?
Looking for SELF by empa.ch,a preview about the Nearly Zero Energy
to Net Zero Energy
and finally
Grid Zero Energy building and society lifestyle ,off grid = independent in situ electricity and energy generation !
This is not eco-pirate ideology,this is E.U.plan and order !
But : when actually f.e. the net exploring costs for 1 KWh electricity fob power plant is in the 8€cents range (all sources : nuclear,gas,oil,renewables) and the private consumer actually has to pay in average 20 €cents/KWh (b2c ) compared to 4,75 €cents/KWh the commercial/industrial consumer (b2b ) ,
the private off-grid household can calculate with low profit = 8 x 0,3 = 2,4 €cents/KWh electricity self-costs and the commercial/industrial consumer will see higher electricity costs or will also leave their contracts and will self-explore !
Energy markets in change !
The "negative delivery prices" from electricity exchange shows the great margin from this industry !
KW installation costs decreasing from 1500 € to 250 € average and generator portability will also accelerate the evolution !
Covid-lockdown as preview about well organized society AI-system existence relevanz,50% less limiting structure and figures !
250 €/KW seems less,comparing with billions of 1-2 $ income per day world habitants we see it is
much
250 Euros divided 365 days x 2US$ x 3 familiy work members ~ 10 % from 1 year household income
In G7 estates with high credit price and loan leverages ,10% from annual household income,assumption net 24 000 Euros total p.a.
equates ~ 2400 Euros per KW in G7
AI and 3d print technology will bring down the prices of existential goods up to 80% from actual market price level !
By the other side : income decreasing up to 80% ! Full-time work places dividing in many part-times !
Loan-price-spiral up/down to up loan-credit/credit-price spiral in the last decades to now market down development !
Credit-brake and -limitation,also valid and order to central banks by BIZ : Basel I,II,......V
Economical global finance system "down-syndrom" !
Btw : Pramod Mittal,instead thought 150 Mio. british pounds debit 2,5 Billions debit !? Insovency !
Who controles the investors (private,commercial,public) their financial solvency ?
And maximal credit purchase ability ?
Forbes,Fortune-listenings : real ,own,richdom ? by cash market prices calculated !?
Or only a "foreign capital user" = mostly debitors -listening,
EZB and their uncontrolled = competent multimillions STEINHOFF junk-paper investment
or : how to make junk to tripple-A "treasure" 8) Ask f.e. EY
Quote from: lancaIV on October 25, 2020, 09:21:03 AM
Why distraction when we have a fixed program ?
Looking for SELF by empa.ch,a preview about the Nearly Zero Energy
IancaIV..yes you are right...however there are countries where the total cost of living in 1 month is very high...not only energy wise.
For example in GERMANY the minimum wage is 1200 euro / month.....and after paying rent..power..gas..insurance...fuel..car etc...you must bring money from relatives because the 1200 will not suffice.
If you have a family that is worse because there are extra expenses.
Even if the energy price will go down a lot..at the end of the month when it sums up....It will not be good.
Off grid living is the future...and not 10 million people stacked one above the other in Flats.
Much love.
From Le Corbusier his Skeleton concept to 'urban platform housing' POLIKATOIKEA . ::)
Living in Garden Villages has not to be expensive,Dante Bini dome parc !
A NEARLY ZERO ENERGY house construction costs are for families today in the 20.000 Euros range,calculating 4 capita area by 38 sqm + 12 sqm + 12 sqm + 12 sqm = 74 sqm living area , +- 250 Euros/sqm
International social housing dimension since CIAM conference 1929 !
Inclusive BAUHAUS-/Werk-Bund-architects participation ! Weiszenhofsiedlung,Stuttgart 1927 ,"Neues Bauen "
Social dimension by U.N.-habitat.org and Federation of American Scientists ' social housing'-program,
"Elemental" international architecture competition project (Santiago,Chile)
74 sqm ~ 2 x 35 sqm IKEA 2 adults + 2 child house prototype
74 sqm not far away from the actual house area average in Europe !
Now : plot price ? Renting or buying ?! ( Foldable,portable house ? B.Fuller Dymaxion ? Kalinowski's FPB ? )
Next costs :
Alimentation
Clothing and shoes
Hygiene( house,body,clothes)
Water,heating,cooling,electric energy
Culture costs: education,information,entertainment,communication
Transport,traffic
Freetime,holiday
Mobiliar,inventar,machines : repair/refurbishment
Financial reserve : for emergency cases and 3rd age
Yes,1200 Euros is for 1 citizen less,but for existence enough !
Portugal minimum wage : around 600 Euros before tax/social insurance
Pension 2/3 !
widow's pension 2/3 from pension
28.12.2019 der Spiegel,"Geburtenkrise in Italien"
Catania,4 capita 1500 Euros liquid per month ,500 € rent payment
Question : 3rd world 1-2 $ per day/capita versus european S.O.S. Kinderdorf per KIND cultivation costs per day !?
To know how to survive or to organize
S.O.S. citizen-dorf concept in need ? ::)
Successfull week wishing
Sincerely
p.s. : the target is the Zero Energy House,off grid architecture,for 200 Euros/sqm
probably with the now 'open source' ISORAST foam block
THIS IS ONE OF THE GREATEST INVENTION TO ACHIEVE FREE ENERGY.
LET YOUR IMAGINATION RUN WILD.
http://rexresearch.com/hiddink/hiddink.htm
Comprehend the following device, and I mean TRULY comprehend it, and you will have the understanding and knowledge to build your own "Earth Electrical System".
https://youtu.be/Kdup42Epq0o (https://youtu.be/Kdup42Epq0o)
https://youtu.be/yLjt3y1_ceY?t=3988 (https://youtu.be/yLjt3y1_ceY?t=3988)
https://youtu.be/oyionE-sCis?t=3112 (https://youtu.be/oyionE-sCis?t=3112)
https://youtu.be/dICbnzfY464 (https://youtu.be/dICbnzfY464)
Note on above links: Do NOT be distracted by the low power output of the device in the first link. All that you want to do is UNDERSTAND the CONCEPT or WORKING PRINCIPLE! Consulting all of Don Smith's teachings will aid you greatly!
Quote from: seychelles on October 05, 2020, 11:26:03 PM
AC POWER HAVE TWO COMPONENTS OF POWER DERIVATIONS.
ONE IS RESISTIVE AND THE OTHER IS REACTIVE. THE RESISTIVE
POWER COMPONENT IS DERIVED IN THIS CIRCUIT AND THE
REACTIVE COMPONENT IS NOT. THIS IS NOT A FREE ENERGY
CIRCUIT BUT A PUC CHEATING HACK. THIS IS NOT MY VIDEO
AND THE INVENTOR IS PAMEL IMRIS.
Why do you consider this a cheating hack and not free-energy?
HAVE YOU BUILD IT, IT IS EASY JUST GET TWO SIMILAR MICROWAVE OVEN
TRANSFORMER AND GET SOME ZINC SHEETS AND THERE. USE START CAPACITORS
OR EVEN MWO CAPS WILL DO THE JOB. JUST BY SERIES OR PARALEL TO GET THE
RESONANCE. THE MOTHER AND FATHER OF FREE ENERGY IS EFFICIENCY, BUT ONE
NEEDS TO KNOW WHERE THE ENERGY IS COMING FROM.
Thank you for your reply, seychelles
The reason that I asked you why you think it's a cheating hack and not free energy is because everyone seems to have their own definition of what they think free energy is. Before the world can have free energy, the world must understand what free energy is and believe that it's real.
I haven't built or even studied the device in the video that you gave ( https://youtu.be/ybzLpOypSDs (https://youtu.be/ybzLpOypSDs) ), but it seems to me to be based on the same principle or idea as the Lorrie Matchett device ( https://youtu.be/Kdup42Epq0o (https://youtu.be/Kdup42Epq0o) ); except a much more powerful iteration of the Matchett device. People being able to keep their electric on by reducing their monthly bill may not be free energy, but it is a way to bring free energy to the worlds awareness. People being able to power their home using the POTENTIAL supplied by the electric grid while keeping their bill low has great value to me, and I'm sure it would also have great value to those who need electricity to heat or cool their home, but can't afford to pay a big electric bill. The tech exists as shown in the video's, but people need to see it and understand its value.
So again, why do you think it's a cheating hack and not free energy? Also, do you think that it (the device in the video you gave) has no value?
Quote from: seychelles on October 30, 2020, 02:13:18 AM
HAVE YOU BUILD IT, IT IS EASY JUST GET TWO SIMILAR MICROWAVE OVEN
TRANSFORMER AND GET SOME ZINC SHEETS AND THERE. USE START CAPACITORS
OR EVEN MWO CAPS WILL DO THE JOB. JUST BY SERIES OR PARALEL TO GET THE
RESONANCE. THE MOTHER AND FATHER OF FREE ENERGY IS EFFICIENCY, BUT ONE
NEEDS TO KNOW WHERE THE ENERGY IS COMING FROM.
Is this what you are refering to?: http://www.electro-generator.com/ (http://www.electro-generator.com/) If it is, that does not appear to be what is being shown in the video that you linked to: https://youtu.be/ybzLpOypSDs (https://youtu.be/ybzLpOypSDs)
This sounds more like/closer to what is in the video: https://patents.google.com/patent/DE19927355A1/en (https://patents.google.com/patent/DE19927355A1/en)
https://overunity.com/7679/selfrunning-free-energy-devices-up-to-5-kw-from-tariel-kapanadze/msg407342/#msg407342 (https://overunity.com/7679/selfrunning-free-energy-devices-up-to-5-kw-from-tariel-kapanadze/msg407342/#msg407342)
I am wondering me about the 'electro-generator ' out/in 4: 1 ratio,because in Dr. Pavel Imris application there is not written something like this,only undefined output ≥ input !
And yes,it makes also part from my FE device compilation list ,beside :
A.Tanaka Saburo ,Japan
JP2019022271 JP2016174482 JP2015089324 JP2005130682 JP2005160215 JP2004056987
B.Jose Luis Ramos Suarez , Spain
ES2265253
By the last,but also in geral, the US Navy/Eddie Sines
' Electrical power cooling tecnique' US6259347
can become well incorporated = high power density and/or less material/investment costs !
Quote from: lancaIV on October 30, 2020, 07:07:42 AM
I am wondering me about the 'electro-generator ' out/in 4: 1 ratio,because in Dr. Pavel Imris application there is not written something like this,only undefined output ≥ input !
And yes,it makes also part from my FE device compilation list ,beside :
A.Tanaka Saburo ,Japan
JP2019022271 JP2016174482 JP2015089324 JP2005130682 JP2005160215 JP2004056987
B.Jose Luis Ramos Suarez , Spain
ES2265253
Thank you, lanca
Yes, I'm wondering the same thing. Someone in the video comments said it was a Pavel Imris invention, but I can't find anything from Pavel Imris matching the drawing at the end of the video: https://youtu.be/ybzLpOypSDs?t=520 (https://youtu.be/ybzLpOypSDs?t=520) "Inventor Yusuf"
honour whom honour belongs
The video 'transformer'-device inventor/developper his name : Yusuf Indrawan,Indonesia
What some means is that this concept is similar Dr.Pavel Imris his ' capacitive winding/-s-circuit' development since the Seventies !
Sincerely
p.s.: #99 this is the individuals and social/ecological target,beginning
Nearly Zero Energy consume stage decrease of energetic house applications their losts
to on-grid Net Zero Energy consume stage in situ energy consume - in situ energy generation
= +- 0 KWh secondary/primary energy
to off-grid Zero Energy in situ 100% energy consume/generation
by ultra-low/no GHG production/emission
vapor ( water et cet. ) and surplus heat is part from GHG/-effect
and 'green-house'- temperature increase calculation
Thank you, lanca👍
https://overunity.com/18225/real-overunity-transformer-with-ancient-technology/ (https://overunity.com/18225/real-overunity-transformer-with-ancient-technology/)
Quote from: DdaNlouBzzz on October 30, 2020, 05:46:11 AM
Thank you for your reply, seychelles
The reason that I asked you why you think it's a cheating hack and not free energy is because everyone seems to have their own definition of what they think free energy is. Before the world can have free energy, the world must understand what free energy is and believe that it's real.
I haven't built or even studied the device in the video that you gave ( https://youtu.be/ybzLpOypSDs (https://youtu.be/ybzLpOypSDs) ), but it seems to me to be based on the same principle or idea as the Lorrie Matchett device ( https://youtu.be/Kdup42Epq0o (https://youtu.be/Kdup42Epq0o) ); except a much more powerful iteration of the Matchett device. People being able to keep their electric on by reducing their monthly bill may not be free energy, but it is a way to bring free energy to the worlds awareness. People being able to power their home using the POTENTIAL supplied by the electric grid while keeping their bill low has great value to me, and I'm sure it would also have great value to those who need electricity to heat or cool their home, but can't afford to pay a big electric bill. The tech exists as shown in the video's, but people need to see it and understand its value.
So again, why do you think it's a cheating hack and not free energy? Also, do you think that it (the device in the video you gave) has no value?
Solid-state device, electronic device in which electricity flows through solid semiconductor crystals (silicon, gallium arsenide, germanium) rather than through vacuum tubes. The first solid-state device was the "cat's whisker" (1906), in which a fine wire was moved across a solid crystal to detect a radio signal.
Quote from: NdaClouDzzz on October 20, 2020, 02:28:22 AM
Folks, this guy is the REAL DEAL! If you want free-energy then do everything you can to understand what He is trying to tell you and show you!!!!!!!!
https://youtu.be/oQUgdVw58-Q (https://youtu.be/oQUgdVw58-Q)
https://overunity.com/16039/quantum-generator/ (https://overunity.com/16039/quantum-generator/) ( Ignore the naysayers! )
Video is unavailable. I get a message "Video unavailable. This video is private".
Why do we need to pump electrons from ground? The tank circuit, which the primary coil is a part of, should generate sufficient magnetism to power the secondary coil and any load thereof as demonstrated in this video - https://youtu.be/kQdcwDCBoNY.
As I understand it, in a true free energy device of this nature, the load is separated from the rest of the circuit using capacitors and a full wave bridge rectifier.
RIP Eddie
I miss my Brother!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Blessed be, my Brother!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Mein geliebter Bruder. Ich bin immer mit dir!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
https://youtu.be/3vPWEQy2DI0 (https://youtu.be/3vPWEQy2DI0)
Quote from: tomd on November 08, 2020, 04:22:28 AM
Why do we need to pump electrons from ground?
We don't NEED to! It's just an enhancement! HV and a copper coil of sufficient size is ALL you need for ALL of your electrical needs! Accelerated electrons galore!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I also think we don't need ground. Maybe it has some beneficial effect like delaying signal or shifting phase or else like in Tesla coil
Quote from: forest on December 12, 2020, 03:33:54 PM
I also think we don't need ground. Maybe it has some beneficial effect like delaying signal or shifting phase or else like in Tesla coil
Greetings, forest
IMO, it all depends on what kind of FE device. For example, most of Don Smith's devices obtain their FE from harvesting electrons from an air or earth ground. Many other so-called FE devices are not clear on where they get their FE from, so it's not so easy to know if an air or earth ground is needed. Electrostatics are my area of interest with regard to FE. If people would just stick to something simple like harvesting electrons using a simple device such as demonstrated by Lorrie Matchett ( https://youtu.be/Kdup42Epq0o (https://youtu.be/Kdup42Epq0o) ), then they would have the foundation for all of the FE that they could ever need. Instead, most just look at a simple device like that and dismiss it as being nothing. They want big power NOW, not realizing that they need to start with the basics first. There are too many people on the forums intentionally and unintentionally confusing things. Charging by electrostatic induction! ( https://youtu.be/pJ36EtABLAk (https://youtu.be/pJ36EtABLAk) ). That is all any newb needs to start with. Once they grasp that then everything else is just improving functionality and power output.
Cheers.
Quote from: conradelektro on August 24, 2020, 07:23:36 AM
To Efusystem:
I do not doubt that the "systems" described in the PDF-File "EFUSystem" generate spikes of high Voltage and very low Amperage.
I play a lot with electrostatic generators (electrophore, Wimshurst Machine, Triboelectric effects) and can also generate such spikes...
Well, you can collect the charge from say a Wimhurst into a capacitor and discharge into a resonant circuit...
If it discharges into a many turn coil than transforms into a step down you can get real current also.
At any rate the more interesting fact is that you can make elecrostatic devices work as devices that compress aetheric energy as they do for electrical.
If you do this then you will have a shot at Free Energy or other interesting effects.
But the key to doing this is to input some "aetheric" energy, just as it works with some initial electrical charge and increases the voltage, you input some initial aetheric charge and it amplifies it.
This is possible because what I am referring to is aetheric energies that mimic positive and negative ions but at a subtle level, I can show you how to create an initial charge easily.
Quote from: efusystem on June 10, 2019, 11:48:24 AM
Thomas Townsend Brown discovered in 1929 that a charged capacitor experiences a push towards the positive side.
Anyone can check this in a laboratory.
AC Capacitor: A Water Tank Analogy https://www.wisc-online.com/learn/career-clusters/stem/ace4803/ac-capacitor-a-water-tank-analogy (https://www.wisc-online.com/learn/career-clusters/stem/ace4803/ac-capacitor-a-water-tank-analogy)
I keep wanting to go back to very simple principles:
- Ambient powered resonant LC circuit
- Step up coil
- Step down coil
The Lahkovsky apparatus has always intrigued me because it seemed to be able to harness ambient (aetheric) charge for healing purposes. Could we not do this to power an LC circuit?
Bob
Recommended coil-builder freeware: https://coil32.net/download-coil64-for-windows.html
Quote from: tomd on November 08, 2020, 04:22:28 AM
Why do we need to pump electrons from ground? The tank circuit, which the primary coil is a part of, should generate sufficient magnetism to power the secondary coil and any load thereof as demonstrated in this video - https://youtu.be/kQdcwDCBoNY.
As I understand it, in a true free energy device of this nature, the load is separated from the rest of the circuit using capacitors and a full wave bridge rectifier.
Energy Propagation https://youtu.be/kQdcwDCBoNY (https://youtu.be/kQdcwDCBoNY)
Tortuga0303 (
Armagdn03 on the forums) tells you how to reproduce the effect: https://www.energeticforum.com/forum/energetic-forum-discussion/renewable-energy/14511-energy-propagation (https://www.energeticforum.com/forum/energetic-forum-discussion/renewable-energy/14511-energy-propagation)
Used by
Tortuga to create his demo: https://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-6/parallel-tank-circuit-resonance/ (https://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-6/parallel-tank-circuit-resonance/)
OUR member
NerzhDishual also reproduced
Tortuga: (
Reply# 54 ) https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=2309.msg35940#msg35940 (https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=2309.msg35940#msg35940)
Parallel Resonance Circuit https://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/accircuits/parallel-resonance.html (https://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/accircuits/parallel-resonance.html)
Power Factor Correction https://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/accircuits/power-factor-correction.html (https://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/accircuits/power-factor-correction.html)
Power Triangle and Power Factor https://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/accircuits/power-triangle.html (https://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/accircuits/power-triangle.html)
NOTE: More inductance = more magnetic field! Paul Babcock's "magnetic energy secrets" is highly recommended watching!
Melnichenko's resonance https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.skif.biz/index.php?name%3DPages%26op%3Dpage%26pid%3D2 (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.skif.biz/index.php?name%3DPages%26op%3Dpage%26pid%3D2)
"the capacitance must correspond to the inductance"
Melnichenko's patents
https://3jhehcks7fktlxe2qny3nxcxpi--www-skif-biz.translate.goog/index.php?name=Pages&op=page&pid=11 (https://3jhehcks7fktlxe2qny3nxcxpi--www-skif-biz.translate.goog/index.php?name=Pages&op=page&pid=11)
Comments on descriptions of resonant systems https://3jhehcks7fktlxe2qny3nxcxpi--www-skif-biz.translate.goog/index.php?name=Pages&op=page&pid=1 (https://3jhehcks7fktlxe2qny3nxcxpi--www-skif-biz.translate.goog/index.php?name=Pages&op=page&pid=1)
What could be a companion video to the first part of Tortuga's ENERGY PROPAGATION video:
A Light Bulb Mystery- Electric Resistance // Homemade Science with Bruce Yeany https://youtu.be/teHFi47qCEA (https://youtu.be/teHFi47qCEA)
Energy Propagation(Tortuga video) https://youtu.be/kQdcwDCBoNY (https://youtu.be/kQdcwDCBoNY)