I wanted to start this thread because years have passed since an Italian team of researcher published their first paper in a mainstream journal and no one has batted an eye.
They proved in that paper, and in two others published later, that energy applied to a fluid metal trough an ultrasonic vibrating electromechanical device induced transmutation.
This should have been major news, as this is completely impossible by any understanding of orthodox science, yet it happens and can be independently reproduced.
I will post the link to the three papers on transmutation induced in mercury by means of ultrasound (they refer to the same experiment but took three papers to publish the range of results, with different levels of peer review conditions).
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/F_Cardone/publication/285754907_Nuclear_metamorphosis_in_mercury/links/5777af9208ae1b18a7e438eb.pdf (https://www.researchgate.net/profile/F_Cardone/publication/285754907_Nuclear_metamorphosis_in_mercury/links/5777af9208ae1b18a7e438eb.pdf)
https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0217979217501685 (https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0217979217501685)
https://iscmns.org/2018/11/jcmnsv27/ (https://iscmns.org/2018/11/jcmnsv27/) (First article of the volume)
I will also post a Link to a more recent paper where they reported the effect of apparent reduction of radioactivity in a solution of Ni63, which is also achieved by transmutation of the elements by means of ultrasound cavitation.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42452-019-1391-6 (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42452-019-1391-6)
I will then post a video of one demonstration of the mercury transmutation by the Italian team.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xQ-_T1nWqP0 (https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xQ-_T1nWqP0)
Hope you enjoy!
Since Fleischmann and Pons cold fusion or cold transmutation is still elusive. Some try it with electricity in special solutions, some with cavitation and some in a plasma.
Let's hope it will work soon. The world would need it.
It would be difficult to do experiments at home.
Greetings, Conrad
Cavitation can be induced at home with an ultrasonic denture cleaner. Here you can find an experiment that has compelling evidence of transmutation induced in a piece of indium foil using this method:
http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/home/mfmp-blog/552-ultr-affordable-ultrasonic-driven-transmutation (http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/home/mfmp-blog/552-ultr-affordable-ultrasonic-driven-transmutation)
The biggest hindrance to so called cold fusion or LENR has been the lack of acceptance of the existence of the phenomenon by mainstream, not the repeatability of the phenomenon.
In the case of ultrasonic or other means of mechanically induced cavitation, the main problem is that no one has ever taken the claims seriously enough to attempt replication.
The patent application of Ryushin Omasa for the use of his apparatus for creating more valuable metals starting from simpler chemical solutions has some impressive data of transmutation in cavitated solutions. I totally recommend taking a look. The effect is enhanced when the vibrating plates are plated with palladium and also when heavy water is added.
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/5a/11/30/8ec98a558f3b83/US20180012673A1.pdf (https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/5a/11/30/8ec98a558f3b83/US20180012673A1.pdf)
I believe the copper wire in my Spiral Quadfilar Toroid coil transmuted to selenium. The coil was Radio Shack speaker wire; All copper. After repeated very high speed Neo magnet sphere run ups, the wire turned dull silver in color and tougher to bend, more brittle. I really believe the quantum magnetic forces that caused the magnet sphere to actually gain several grams in weight while spinning, caused a transmutation of the copper metal wire!
I should have measured the weight of the coil before and after the run up. The coil probably gained weight along with the Neo magnet! Electrons were probably added to the copper's atomic shell. I can still compare the weights but it's obvious the metal is completely different just from sight and touch!
This process could be potentially catastrophic for the International commodities market. I believe different frequencies and materials may possibly transmute baser metal wire to gold or platinum.
Quote from: synchro1 on September 21, 2020, 05:47:55 AM
...the wire turned dull silver in color and tougher to bend, more brittle.
It should be easy enough to snip off a bit of this wire and have it tested for selenium. Selenium is a standard medical blood test. You could try and dissolve a bit of the dull silvery stuff in a mild acid, neutralise it with a base and run it through a hospital blood test system. Do you know your doctor well enough to ask him or her to do this for you?
You could try a flame test if you have a gas cooker to hand. Apparently, Se is azure blue, which is close to Cu but significantly different.
Quote from: Paul-R on September 21, 2020, 06:59:58 AM
It should be easy enough to snip off a bit of this wire and have it tested for selenium. Selenium is a standard medical blood test. You could try and dissolve a bit of the dull silvery stuff in a mild acid, neutralise it with a base and run it through a hospital blood test system. Do you know your doctor well enough to ask him or her to do this for you?
@Paul-R,
Right, good approach. Thank you. Melting point! I thought about a scientific test confirmation; The looming question is: What would follow from the results of a positive finding? The ramifications of the discovery would threaten to trigger a collapse in the commodity markets, that's why no one will help further the Italian's project. Who would care to pay attention to a discovery with such disastrous consequences?
This is the reason why the Italian researcher is a leper and not celebrated as a benefactor.
Why do you think you may have ended up with Se (as opposed to some other element)?
The number of electrons in the shells of copper and selenium on the table of periodic elements factor mathematically. 29 electrons for copper 34 for selenium. The first three shells are identical; 2, 8, and 18: The copper only needs to bond 5 electrons to it's outer shell to transmute:
Transmutaion is only possible with outer shell alteration between elements.
Aren't you forgetting that for a new element you need to change the nucleus of the element, not Just adding electrons?
@ChileanOne,
The notion of the electron is deficient. The actual transformation can be viewed as vibrational and intertwining with the nucleus. Acoustic vibration and sand patterns are a better example. Pockets form in the outer shell at those nodes, and the nucleus transformed.
There's a lot of theories about and all might have part of the picture right, but I think electrons alone can't create new nucleons. I think there is a lot we don't know, but certain things are moderately clear. Electron clusters as described by Kenneth Shoulders Can rearrange nucleons and transmute matter, but themselves can't become nucleons.
gold wire should transmute to bismuth;
An Oxy-acetelene torch would raise both samples of copper and the altered material to the melting point. If the copper melted first. it would prove the other material was selenium, if it them melted at its listed temperature; Somewhat higher then copper. Pretty simple! What then?
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42452-019-1391-6 (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42452-019-1391-6)
if ultrasound creates transmutation of matter than what happened to energy released from that transmutation?
______________________
additional materialhttps://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0217979217501685
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQ-_T1nWqP0 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQ-_T1nWqP0)
https://iscmns.org/2018/11/jcmnsv27/ (https://iscmns.org/2018/11/jcmnsv27/)
Opinion of my friend
Dr Roy.
Theoretically,
I guess the generic answer would be :
that if and when all the mass, binding forces, and other mass-energy components of the interaction
were added up, mass-energy would be conserved.
-, mass-energy conservation is, at best, a local 'law' that breaks down when you consider
that the volume of the Universe changes over time - a Universal mass-energy conservation
law would require a steady state Universe, which is not where you or I am living in.
Piezonuclear Decay or Piezonuclear Fusion is a very dubious theory, as far as I am aware, it remains unproven.
One of the authors that you cited, Wesley, - Fabio Cardone (along with his colleague Alberto Carpinteri)
have caused the resignation of Italian politicians, when they had planned to elevate them to positions
of importance (after all the dust settled, no one was elevated anywhere,
and they went back to their school and continued their unproven research).
Piezonuclear decay reads like Cold Fusion, with an Italian accent.
The claims that his laboratory findings
"could appear as a confirmation of the DST theoretical hypothesis" seems rather absurd, since
DST is also a rather abstract unproven theory, based upon a non-Einstein variant of General Relativity
that would suggest that some frames of reference are better than others, which sounds like it trashes
General Relativity as most physicists understand it.
It sounds as though Fabio is 'cherry picking' his data, since he mentions
in his article that his results are very sensitive to location and orientation of his experiment
- my guess is that he has a LOT of data points that fail to show any Piezonuclear decay,
so he just 'doesn't waste his time on those results'.
I don't know him, but I guess that he is some crackpot that got tenure in a department of
Chemistry and fell down a rabbit hole. People publish all manner of nonsense
these days just to keep the journals full of stuff.
Wesley's opinion:
I must agree with Dr Roy.
Wesley
RESPONSE#1
read this first and than go here to the video:
https://overunity.com/18632/ultrasonic-mechanical-cavitation-used-to-transmute-matter/msg550943/#msg550943 (https://overunity.com/18632/ultrasonic-mechanical-cavitation-used-to-transmute-matter/msg550943/#msg550943)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQ-_T1nWqP0 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQ-_T1nWqP0)
In regards to opinion of Dr Roy I must say that mentioned video from above
is done in the environment similar to 19 century alchemy lab.
- there is lack of analysis by means of
-EDXRF
-Electron microscope
- chromatography
- HPGE with Ortec/ Canberra software to assign energies into its byproducts if Beta, Gamma/ Alpha is active after transmutation.
Ironically truthful and shockingly obvious is the fact that all of these Italian chemists, nuclear scientists, engineers
didn't have access to the listed by me equipment in their Italian Universities
and I have all of it in my lab..also the place the examination was provided looks like church room, or
old Harvard storage room and not like fully prepared experimental facility.,
The weight measured was using scale that was tragically inaccurate. I can buy similar one in supply store for American elementary school.
Note: yes I don't have chromatography analyses at present time but that is like go around the corner to the Hunter College and ask
a professor for help.
Wesley
Wesley Thank you for commenting and Hunter mention [My Mom went to school there for short time till life changed plans and geography] :)
Will be a few days till things get sorted,
respectfully Chet
RESPONSE#2
Equipment needed to provide full proof of experiment made by Fabio Carzone
1. EDXRF picture #1
link1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQ3gPFfgDp8 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQ3gPFfgDp8)
link2. https://youtu.be/k2PJVIkyW5Y (https://youtu.be/k2PJVIkyW5Y)
all of the equipment shown here can be applied to measurement of radiation, especially Neutron and Gamma.
link3. https://youtu.be/GdlkeI0bXy4?t=211 (https://youtu.be/GdlkeI0bXy4?t=211)
Video presents ORTEC Detective EX ( many of them)
the new one cost around $93 000
And software Gammavision32 ~$4000
However there are inexpensive devices giving you similar results for ~1000 dollars
Video starts not from the beginning - you can rewind it
Wesley
Before start with the mockery and the name calling, please at least have the courtesy of reading the papers, where all the technologies and the laboratories that performed the analysis on the solid obtained from mercury are listed extensively, and also all elements known or found to be part of the experimental setup and instruments were discarded as potential results of transmutation. The first and last papers are freely available online, the other Can be retrieved using a very known page, but I got a copy by asking for it to the researchers through ResearchGate.
The video is just a quick demonstrative exercise, nothing more, nothing less, and you are "cherry picking" it for making a mockery of this serious and interesting research.
There is also a recent exposition of the whole line of Research that was presented in a small event held in Asissi, Italy by GianLuca Cherubini, where he discusses the whole line of research since it's origins to the more current results. It's in Italian but it can be watched with auto subtitles.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=G2IL4vvhjfk (https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=G2IL4vvhjfk)
RESPONSE#3Purpose of this debate is not to prove anyone wrong but to take all possible sources to create in a mind of the reader credible or at least clear picture of reality seen from science perspective:
One of opinions is that:
Whenever "some" Russians put their nose into science we may expect
-corruption,
-lies,
-deformation
-and falsification of the official science.
-or just pure form of unrestricted banditism
if allowed.
-and Fabio Cardone is taking Russian statements for granted.
What the foolishness example :
Russians 1 month ago poisoned Alelsey Navalnyi with forbidden Russian NOVICHIOK
the military Nerve Agent :ethyl N-[(1E)-1-(diethylamino)ethylidene]-phosphoramidofluoridate
Official Russian Science said that there was no reason to believe and no prove that such substance was used as they
didn't find anything from that what was found by independent German, British, French analysis.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A-234_(nerve_agent (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A-234_(nerve_agent))
https://military.wikia.org/wiki/Novichok_agent (https://military.wikia.org/wiki/Novichok_agent)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisoning_of_Alexei_Navalny (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisoning_of_Alexei_Navalny)
________________________
So what about Italian cooperation with Russians and Italian revelations:
here is few facts( the rest I'll add later.
From Wesley:
I must agree that your opinion about subject matter Dr Roy is quite convincing.
However Transmutation mentioned in Cardone paper is not stating a firm piezonuclear reaction but is suggesting a possible one.
in this case we are not taking as an example Mercury but Thorium:Quotequote :
We show that cavitation of a solution of thorium-228 in water induces its transformation at a rate 1
04 times faster than the natural radioactive decay would do. This result agrees with the alteration
of the secular equilibrium of thorium-234 obtained by a Russian team via explosion of titanium foils in water and solutions.
These evidences further support some preliminary clues for the possibility of
piezonuclear reactions (namely nuclear reactions induced by pressure waves) obtained in the last ten years.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222763261_Piezonuclear_decay_of_thorium (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222763261_Piezonuclear_decay_of_thorium)
_________________________________
I also must agree that I didn't find yet any other paper but Fabio Cardone in this area.
but I found criticism of Fabio Cardone revelations
.
Wesley
RESPONSE#4
https://overunity.com/8503/ultrasonic-piezonuclear-reactions/
the whole discussion
Wesley
RESPONSE#5
Fight who is wrong and who is Right :
AbstractCardone et al. [F. Cardone, R. Mignani, A. Petrucci, Phys. Lett. A 373 (2009) 1956] claim that cavitation speeds up radioactive
decay of 228Th dissolved in water.
The experimental evidence they presented was criticized by Ericsson et al. [G. Ericsson, S. Pomp, H. Sjöstrand,
E. Traneus, Phys. Lett. A 373 (2009) 3795].
This Comment focuses on a presumably-ignored trivial effect that might be responsible for the reported
experimental results. It also contains suggestions for improving the quality of future investigations.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0375960109014893 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0375960109014893)
https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0907/0907.0623.pdf (https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0907/0907.0623.pdf)
more here:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/45872090_Comments_on_the_Reply_to_'Comment_on_Piezonuclear_decay_of_thorium_Phys_Lett_A_373_2009_1956'_Phys_Lett_A_2009_in_press_Phys_Lett_A_2009_in_press_by_F_Cardone_et_al (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/45872090_Comments_on_the_Reply_to_'Comment_on_Piezonuclear_decay_of_thorium_Phys_Lett_A_373_2009_1956'_Phys_Lett_A_2009_in_press_Phys_Lett_A_2009_in_press_by_F_Cardone_et_al)
https://arxiv.org/abs/0910.2368 (https://arxiv.org/abs/0910.2368)
RESPONSE#6
in response to that criticism Cardone team replied:
Reply to "Comment on 'Piezonuclear decay of thorium' [Phys. Lett. A 373 (2009) 1956]" [Phys. Lett. A 373 (2009) 3795] Cardone, Fabio (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#search/q=author:%22Cardone%2C+Fabio%22&sort=date%20desc,%20bibcode%20desc);
Mignani, Roberto (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#search/q=author:%22Mignani%2C+Roberto%22&sort=date%20desc,%20bibcode%20desc);
Petrucci, Andrea (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#search/q=author:%22Petrucci%2C+Andrea%22&sort=date%20desc,%20bibcode%20desc)
Abstract In a paper appearing in this issue of Physics Letters A, Ericsson et al. raise some critical comments on the experiment [F.
Cardone, R. Mignani, A. Petrucci, Phys. Lett. A 373 (2009) 1956] we carried out by cavitating a solution of thorium-228,
which evidenced its anomalous decay behaviour, thus confirming the results previously obtained by Urutskoev et al.
by explosion of titanium foils in solutions. In this Letter, we reply to these comments. In our opinion, the main shortcomings of the
criticism by the Swedish authors are due to their omitting of inserting our experiment in the wider research stream of piezonuclear
reactions, and to the statistical analysis they used, which does not comply with the rules generally accepted for samples with small
numbers. However, apart from any possible theoretical speculation, there is the basic fact that two different experiments (ours and
that by Urutskoev et al.), carried out independently and by different means, highlight an analogous anomaly in the decay of thorium
subjected to pressure waves. Such a convergence of results shows that it is worth to further carry on experimental investigations,
in order to get either a confirmation or a disproof of the induced-pressure anomalous behaviour of radioactive nuclides even different from thorium.
https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0907/0907.0623.pdf (https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0907/0907.0623.pdf)
_____________________________________________
Wesley
RESPONSE#7
MIT
Massachusetts Institute of Technology:
https://www.technologyreview.com/2009/07/07/211779/can-pressure-waves-speed-up-nuclear-decay/ (https://www.technologyreview.com/2009/07/07/211779/can-pressure-waves-speed-up-nuclear-decay/)
Uncategorized (https://www.technologyreview.com/topic/uncategorized/)Can Pressure Waves Speed Up Nuclear Decay?If cavitation can speed up the decay of nuclei in solution, we've yet to see good evidence for it.by Emerging Technology from the arXiv archive page
July 7, 2009Is it possible to speed up radioactive decay by squeezing atoms?
In the last few months, Fabio Cardone, at the Institute of Nanostructured Materials, in Rome, Italy, and a few pals have posted on the arXiv a growing body of evidence that it is.
In March, Cardone and co reported an increase in neutron emissions when crushing marble and granite.
Their conjecture is that the crushing causes the piezonuclear fission of iron atoms into two aluminum nuclei emitting two neutrons.
But our focus today is a paper published in February, in which the team reported that cavitation–the generation and collapse of tiny
bubbles in a liquid using pressure waves–causes the rate of decay of thorium-228 in solution to increase 1,000 times.
I guess it's not entirely beyond belief that cavitation could have an effect on the nuclei of atoms in solution.
Cavitation is known to generate huge pressures and temperatures. By some theories, the energy released in this process is
close to that needed for fusion. But it's fair to say that the current consensus is that there is no good evidence that this line has been crossed in practice.
Nevertheless, Cardone's claims are interesting, and his paper was published in Physics Letters A earlier this year.
Today, however, Stephan Pomp and pals from Uppsala University, in Sweden, cast some doubt on the result and the methods used by the Cardone team in the Physics Letters A paper.
They point out that the Cardone claim is extraordinary given the body of evidence gathered over the past 100 years about nuclear decay. Such an extraordinary claim should be backed by extraordinary evidence.
"We find that such evidence is missing in this paper and it even seems that methodological mistakes have been made," they say.
Thorium decays by emitting alpha particles. Pomp and pals say that Cardone and co placed their detector underneath the glass vessel containing the thorium solution.
"We note that the range of the emitted particles in glass is in the order of tens of micrometers and that it thus would be impossible for particles ... to penetrate the vessel."
They suggest a number of tests that Cardone and co can do to strengthen their results, such as measuring the background counts when the vessel is empty or filled with pure water in which cavitation is taking place.
It'll be interesting to see the Cardone team's reply to these criticisms; perhaps they'll be able to answer each point made by Pomp and pals.
In the meantime, the question still stands: can pressure waves accelerate nuclear decay? Not on the evidence presented by Cardone and co so far.
Ref:
arxiv.org/abs/0903.3104 (http://arxiv.org/abs/0903.3104) : Piezonuclear Neutrons from Fracturing of Inert Solids
arxiv.org/abs/0710.5177 (http://arxiv.org/abs/0710.5177): Speeding Up Thorium Decay
arxiv.org/abs/0907.0623 (http://arxiv.org/abs/0907.0623): Comments on "Piezonuclear Decay of Thorium" by F.
Wesley
RESPONSE#8
The previous paper from 2012 of Alberto Carpinteri is taking on all together the:
-
CAVITATION OF LIQUID SOLUTIONS
FRACTURE OF INERT AND NON-RADIOACTIVE SOLIDS
https://staff.polito.it/alberto.carpinteri/piezonuclear%20reactions%20conference/4maggio2012.pdf (https://staff.polito.it/alberto.carpinteri/piezonuclear%20reactions%20conference/4maggio2012.pdf)
(piezo)nuclear reactions in fracture and in the Italian press! in 2012
(https://ci5.googleusercontent.com/proxy/wEJrcuivSjP-N5x4bOQxYJupMszf9ue
3RiKH8pbBfQ3UFU0Ea4LDA28QdKngotwPsShtm_wc1gNQGw53pIYsPvJLMTDO5y1
3jg=s0-d-e1-ft#https://imechanica.org/files/pictures/picture-1020.gif) (https://imechanica.org/user/1020)
Sun, 2012-06-17 06:48 - Mike Ciavarella (https://imechanica.org/user/1020)
The research appears in effect controversial, and alongside previous research on sonofusion for example by
Rusi Taleyarkhan whom Carpinteri cites in his paper, despite it is well known that "
He was judged guilty of research misconduct (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Research_misconduct) for "falsification of the research record" by a Purdue review board in July, 2008.[2
https://imechanica.org/node/12621 (https://imechanica.org/node/12621)
Wesley
You are again "cherry picking" the research papers, you have not adressed, at all, the most important results, those of the transmutation of Mercury.
I am very aware of the controversy that Cardone and others have faced.
The thorium decay was adressed by Cardone in several manners, but they have published recently three papers on the reduction of radiocativity of Ni63.
You insist in finding the evidence that supports your biased assertion that there's no way that Cardone et al might have found something real, you prefer to discredit their characters and cherry pick the results that have stirred the most controversy, but you say absolutely nothing about the VERY STRONG published results of their experiments in Mercury.
That says much more about your motivations than about their research.
You are also, in passing, trying to smudge Talerkhayan, who has been relatively recently (2019), vindicated.
RESPONSE#9Quote from: ChileanOne on September 23, 2020, 06:25:34 PM
You insist in finding the evidence that supports your biased assertion that there's no way that Cardone et al might have found something real,
No my friend .
I'm not against any revelations, and definitelly not against Prof. Cardone
You not reading what I wrote:
Quote
RESPONSE#3
Purpose of this debate is not to prove anyone wrong but to take all
possible sources to create in a mind of the reader credible or at least
clear picture of reality seen from a science perspective:
https://overunity.com/18632/ultrasonic-mechanical-cavitation-used-to-transmute-matter/msg550955/#msg550955
Please provide your own answer/ opinion - to the doubts and criticism of the cited papers proving them wrong, mutually opposed or inconsistent ( contradictory) or invalid.
Wesley
Quote from: synchro1 on September 21, 2020, 05:47:55 AM
I believe the copper wire in my Spiral Quadfilar Toroid coil transmuted to selenium. The coil was Radio Shack speaker wire; All copper. After repeated very high speed Neo magnet sphere run ups, the wire turned dull silver in color and tougher to bend, more brittle. I really believe the quantum magnetic forces that caused the magnet sphere to actually gain several grams in weight while spinning, caused a transmutation of the copper metal wire!
I should have measured the weight of the coil before and after the run up. The coil probably gained weight along with the Neo magnet! Electrons were probably added to the copper's atomic shell. I can still compare the weights but it's obvious the metal is completely different just from sight and touch!
This process could be potentially catastrophic for the International commodities market. I believe different frequencies and materials may possibly transmute baser metal wire to gold or platinum.
I am recovering the coil from storage for melting point testing. The relativistic theory used tp explain the weight gain can more easily explain the apparent change in metal, from lighter to heavier element.
I plan to tweet Jeffery Bezos if scientific testing confirms the element transmutaion. I was part of G.K. O'Neil's Princeton group and share Jeff's vision.
Ultimately a materials construction technology may include seamless element transition 3d printing.
Quote from: synchro1 on September 27, 2020, 12:21:20 PM
The relativistic theory used to explain the weight gain ...
Determination of weight gain can involve scales of immense accuracy and resolution. The most interesting ones i have come across are made by Tellermate, and count bank notes by weighing them. You could have a chat with your bank manager and he or she might let you weigh an item in the branch - before and after. (The units are going to be a bit odd).
Tantalum
A wire coil of this element has a chance of transmuting to gold on the harmonic of copper to selenium:
Bump
Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR), Chemically Assisted Nuclear Reactions (CANR)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_fusion (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_fusion)
but not nuclear.. another source
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-point_energy (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-point_energy)
A tablespoon of vacuum can evaporate all the oceans on the planet? It is possible?
The theoretical estimate of the vacuum energy is 10 to the power of 112 Erg, or 1 00000000000000000... (102 zeros after one) kilojoules per cubic centimeter of vacuum.
(see video below) Not necessarily a vacuum, any space.
The total amount of solar energy absorbed by the atmosphere, land surface and ocean is approximately 3,850,000 exajoules (EJ) per year:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_energy (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_energy)
1 exajoule = 10 in 18th joules. In total, only 4 * 10 in 21th kilojoules enters the planet from the Sun in a year.
1 cm3 of vacuum theoretically contains 1*10 in 102 kilojoules.. :o
it is quite possible to evaporate the oceans with such gigantic energy. The difference between theoretical and practical assessment is big, why? Probably because this energy simply does not pass into our material world, otherwise it would shatter into not only atoms, but into quarks, etc. In this case, the chances of using this energy are extremely small, but even tiny parts of such a gigantic value can be very significant.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6jAOV7bZ3Y (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6jAOV7bZ3Y)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rh898Yr5YZ8 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rh898Yr5YZ8)
https://overunity.com/17735/wesleys-kapanadze-and-other-fe-discussion-forum/msg563519/#msg563519
Wesley