.....due to a possible continuous gravity unbalance and rotational inertia , at :
www.geocities.ws/iacob_alex/Some_Drafts/untitled023.jpg
Al_ex
@Al_ex
I like the idea. But just looking at the required lifting of the red "ball" weight in sub-image #3 and then again in sub-image #6 I would intuitively guess that the energy required to lift the weight would be equal to whatever energy could be pulled from the resulting rotational motion. . .
Hi !
Try to "think" it as a switching hinge-hub and a bigger rotating arm "red" lever , something alike :
www.geocities.ws/iacob_alex/Some_Drafts/text045.jpg
If we have a free fall from a greater gravity level , we can store (and play...the reset/possible self) a greater momentum.
Simply:think/play it bigger.
Al_ex
.....proposals , with some "compositions " of commons ( or rising butt ones...) hinges , at :
www.geocities.ws/iacob_alex/Inertial_Rotors/untitled001.jpg
.....playing gravity free fall (up...down) and inertia ( variable angular velocity ).
Al_ex
What if you changed the ball weights to hollow balls and changed their connecting rod to a bunch of capillary tubes that transfers water from the lower water-filled ball to the empty higher ball? Would we approach perpetual motion? :)