I beleive it's true, i know a lot of peoples will say it's fake but i actually see the ship myseft on real nasa photo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rc7mkHtuLOs
here the photo and take a look at the center of the image, its the same ship
Hi,
where is the web address of the original NASA photo ?
On YouTube some people say it is a fake and some say it is genuine.
Also Apollo 17 seems to have been the last Saturn 5 mission, so
when at which date was this supposed Apollo 20 mission ?
Did nobody notice this ?
Hmm... !?
Regards, Stefan.
here the link from the nasa site
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/frame/?AS15-P-9625
for the prove of apollo 20, i cannot really tell, but you know they are thousand humain on the moon in the alien base, and nobody know about it, they prob wanted to be low profile onthe next mission
Hello The One:
Althought the picture shows some interesting anomaly, the video seems as fake as it can be. The resolution of the images is too good.
Also, there was no Apollo 20 mission launched.
Bear in mind that I am a UFO believer, but I think that hoaxes like this do a poor service to the search of the truth.
I also forgot to say that if you want to confirm it is a hoax, go to the profile page of the poster and watch the alleged video of the city on the moon. That one is a really crappy attempt.
Are we talking about the cigar shaped object in the middle? To the right of those massive overlaping craters?
According to the lens focal length and altitude given with the photo that particular object is around 7.4km in length. I'm going to apply Ockham's Razor and assume that it is a rock.
well .. the best way to check .. is to have a very powerful telescope point in the direction, and SEE it .. o wait .. there is the possible excuse that it is on the "other side" of the moon.
but if those are official nasa images, then i would have to think that something is indeed there. definately worth sending a satellite to the location to do a recon of it. ofcourse, what am i thinking, the government has probably already done that.
devilzangel
..
That area of the moon is indeed on the far side. That link shows the latitude and longitude as 19?S and 117.5?E.
I'm quite interested in knowing what everyone thinks the object is and how they have come to that conclusion.
I think it is a big rock because there isn't much else on the moon. Rocks and dust and a few golf balls.
i took a closer look at the vid. after the APOLLO 20 logo (which i cant corroborate from anywhere else that it is official), there is a blue screen, and on that it says "APOLLO 11 .. VIEW OF EARTH AND CREW .. GMT .. 190:01:15 TO 196:01:39 ... YEAR 1969"
it seems the whole vid is probably from a VCR cassette or Betacam. One vid written on top of another. Then the moon vid .. one interesting thing is those 3 strips of light that seem to be reflected from the module to the moon.
the camera technology seems on par with the technology at that time.
BUT, there is every possibility it is fake .. someone can easily work up a miniature model of the landscape, and use a minicam, and make it look like they r in orbit around the moon.
if it is a fake, who ever did it probably works in the Hollywood industry. but If it ISNT a fake, who ever released it probably works with very classified data.
attached is an enlarged image of the nasa image .. as you can see, the object is above the ground at the nose section .. i doubt the moon would have such a terrain naturally .. there is no wind or fluids that could erode a "rock" in that manner
devilzangel
..
Quote from: devilzangel on May 12, 2007, 08:23:13 PM
attached is an enlarged image of the nasa image .. as you can see, the object is above the ground at the nose section .. i doubt the moon would have such a terrain naturally .. there is no wind or fluids that could erode a "rock" in that manner
It depends a great deal on how you interpret the image. The shadows at the right end could be caused simply be the rock being taller at that end and casting a shadow. It doesn't appear to me to be off the ground at all. Nor does it appear to have a nose section.
However, if it is off the ground I don't see any reason why that would make it unnatural. Possible ways this could happen include:
It is part of an asteroid that has impacted on the surface and ended up in that position.
It may be harder than the surrounding moon surface and has remained whilst the surrounding matter has been blown away by nearby meteorite impacts.
Quote from: Flit on May 13, 2007, 03:02:12 AM
It depends a great deal on how you interpret the image. The shadows at the right end could be caused simply be the rock being taller at that end and casting a shadow. It doesn't appear to me to be off the ground at all. Nor does it appear to have a nose section.
However, if it is off the ground I don't see any reason why that would make it unnatural. Possible ways this could happen include:
It is part of an asteroid that has impacted on the surface and ended up in that position.
It may be harder than the surrounding moon surface and has remained whilst the surrounding matter has been blown away by nearby meteorite impacts.
please go to the NASA site again, and look at the stereo image .. (a second shot at a slightly different angle .. ) http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/frame/?AS15-P-9625 and http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/frame/?AS15-P-9630 .. it will help you get a more accurate 3d representation of how it is oriented to its surroundings. (i really do wish i had higher res images, but we don't .. I am sure NASA has them somewhere)
any asteroid hitting the moon would have been pulverized, creating a crater .. no "chunks" would have been left. This is due to the speed, and direction of the collision (at such speeds, the impact would have changed the rock from solid to molten). If you would like to prove that the moon can have such sharp nose cliff structures naturally, one would be able to find more feature like this in abundance on the moon ... please show any other image from NASA that shows other places on the moon like that.
devilzangel
..
here is another vid that reveals much more detail via images of the moon structure taken by an astronaut
Quote3 stills metric photography made by alexei leonov during the last revolution before descent on the Izsak Y Crater. More details visible than the apollo 15 panoramic shot
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usfiV5fYllQ
devilzangel
..
yeah, this video (image) show well the spaceship!
Quote from: devilzangel on May 13, 2007, 05:07:32 AM
If you would like to prove that the moon can have such sharp nose cliff structures naturally, one would be able to find more feature like this in abundance on the moon ... please show any other image from NASA that shows other places on the moon like that.
I disagree that there needs to be more than one of something to prove it is natural. I don't know of anything similar to Uluru or Niagra Falls or the Grand Canyon, that doesn't negate their natural origins.
It would seem that I'm the only one that thinks it's just a big rock. I'd love to know exactly what everyone else thinks it is and what has lead you to that conclusion. Secret government project? Alien technology?
Cheers.
Quote from: Flit on May 26, 2007, 11:29:05 AM
Quote from: devilzangel on May 13, 2007, 05:07:32 AM
If you would like to prove that the moon can have such sharp nose cliff structures naturally, one would be able to find more feature like this in abundance on the moon ... please show any other image from NASA that shows other places on the moon like that.
I disagree that there needs to be more than one of something to prove it is natural. I don't know of anything similar to Uluru or Niagra Falls or the Grand Canyon, that doesn't negate their natural origins.
It would seem that I'm the only one that thinks it's just a big rock. I'd love to know exactly what everyone else thinks it is and what has lead you to that conclusion. Secret government project? Alien technology?
Cheers.
we are talking whether there can exist such a natural structure on an environmentally desolate body/moon in space .. we are NOT debating the MAGNITUDE of that natural structure (Earth's largest canyon or mountain etc .. there are hundreds of canyons on earth buddy!!! and thousands of mountains, and thousands of waterfalls) .. on earth we can see millions of examples of water, wind and other elemental erosion processes via satellite imagery.
if it is NATURAL, there will DEFINITELY be MORE such features!!! this is indeed scientifically proven and does not require debate. (just ask any geologist) .. of course the features wont be EXACTLY the same, duhh... But, it will represent the PROCESS of the erosion very well.
i guess some people still think the world is flat because they personally haven't gone to space to see the earth as a whole.
people have the right to be ignorant, you have exercised that right.
I am not complaining, i am just saying that people need to have an open mind.
just look at the images of the Face on Mars for example .. JPL and NASA labs PROCESSED the images they got and CHANGED the dimensional aspects of it (thus intentionally distorting the image to make it look as if the face was simply a badly deformed hill).. but when independent scientists used the RAW data and did conservative processing without much alterations .. they got a MUCH truer image, that DOES show a real face on mars.
also how do u explain all the images that show INTENTIONAL airbrushing by NASA labs.
At this point, the evidence far outweighs NASA's ridiculous claims of being honest to the international public.
it is an even bigger fact that the USA government is almost NEVER honest about anything. (all in the retarded name of national security)
devilzangel
..
here is an interesting read on this subject : http://www.angelismarriti.it/ANGELISMARRITI-ENG/REPORTS_ARTICLES/Apollo20-InterviewWithWilliamRutledge.htm
devilzangel
..
Has anyone noticed that NASA has released virtually nothing? Look at the picture sizes of their releases. If you have an old obsolete camera lying around you may be able to chose a lower resolution of half a megabyte. A 1990 spy plane took picture over 2 gigabyte in size, I'm sure they like sent a 1970 Polaroid Stick Shot to Mars to take these pictures, uhuh, uhuh. We are getting circle jerked by the government! They are hiding information from us clear back to day one. I zoomed in on this picture, it's resolution is so poor I couldn't make up my mind about anything. Could just be one of NASA's airbrush artists having a little fun. Look at the moon picture with the airbrushing in the post Mars color, 4 airbrushed faces on it, one an alien grey type face. I want to see real untouched high resolution images, they have them and they aren't letting us see them. Matter of fact almost all the images of the moon have been reported missing and the people haven't made them produce them. Most of the people don't even remember them reported missing. Chemicals really do dumb down the population. I worry about the mind control thing too. We have alread multiplexed voice commands to a 20 kilohertz signal and broadcast it at people to see if it works, believe me it does. This was reported as first generation mind control by a scientist that worked on the project and can still be found on the net today. The newer stuff reported we haven't tried but I assume the whistle blowers are telling the truth. People just have to wake up and demand results from the space program or start running their own program. 50,000 people that are serious could throw in $100 and put a high resolution camera with a telescopic lens into low orbit around the moon. The solar panels would by far be the most of the payload, could be done with a much smaller rocket than what the government is using. Remember when they recently said they could launch small rockets to place shields up in space to block sunlight?
Am I the only one to notice that this is supposed to be a fly by before landing and yet as soon as the camera flares you see the orbiter has mysteriously stoped and is hovering over the supposed crash site. This could not happen! and it couldn't be that they were zooming in on the object while still orbitting the moon as they would soon be out of range. IMHO this is a hoax.
:P The problem is, with things such as this, is that the human mind sees things that are not there. It's a known fact. Look outside the window at some clouds and you may see a deer or a rabbit or person's face or a dragon.....but it's only just a cloud. The same thing applies to people seeing Jesus' face in a moldy piece of bread or Mary in hard water stain on the side of a building. Those things ARE what they are, but the human mind always tries to see it as something more.
Besides......If the pictures WHERE officially from NASA, and there WAS something really there to see besides "the Moon", they would have heavily doctored them before releasing them. :-\
Just my two cents.
Yes , for shure : Aliens ..
http://www.freenet.de/freenet/wissenschaft/paranormal/aliens/60_jahre_roswell/index.html
1947 roswell
they was also on earth .
New Informations that this History was and is TRUE.
(German) Some folk will find also english equivalent to that...