LOL!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zEgiZPGKQ_Y
Bravo Scott Hall!
That is his follow-up to http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4uLPMGrMohc
Recently published by Sterling Allan on www.freeenergynews.com
Here is a 3D image I made ;p
Tao, I think we're on the same page on this one. I made the following post here last night:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,2974.0/topicseen.html (http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,2974.0/topicseen.html)
j
edited to add: I noticed he was burning the dog food along with his wheels. That's class.
I just tried this but using 4 bars instead of 3 because i used knex to make one fast and with 4 its not working the wheel get balanced, hoverer with 3 I cannot tell sine knex stuffs are just multiple of 4 :)
LOL,
I know it was foolish, but I just HAD to do it, hahahah!!!
Please forgive me... ;)
$6 in stuff from Hobby Lobby, one hacksaw, one drill, and a steel square... lol
Like my crude method of measuring 120 degrees with a steel square? ;p
does it work? seam not :P
Quote from: TheOne on August 10, 2007, 12:51:52 AM
does it work? seam not :P
It works as a nice 'CLINKING' noise maker!
That is about it, lol...
Level ground, it seems like it wants to go, but always stops, and it stops WAY before Scott Hall's did.
I think he burnt the devices to make it seem like he did have FE!
We wouldn't he show the level AND show the device moving one way and the other way. Nope, he just showed the level on the ground and then them burning. Well, now it's been replicated, and he isn't vindicated.
But, it does make a good noise maker :P
Actually if it was really working he will show more of it with different location, and if no one are able to replicate a simple device like that... his other wheel prob work with ground gravity too :)
When i tried mine I was using more like a wheel with a pivot instead of directly to the ground, its more easy to see the balance, but mine was not a perfect replication, your is quite similar but failed so I guest we prob need another one confirmation before putting this device in the garbage :)
hmmm i dont think this will work, but i still have to make sure though.
it would be nice if someone could simulate this in working model 2d.
also please post more videos of actual replications of this. thanks :)
peace
This is what they say about it at Free Energy News:
"Scott Hall Burns his Prototypes - In protest over a barrage of negative comments he received about his gizmos, including two gravity wheels, artist/inventor shoots a video showing a level that signifies that his garage floor is flat; then the view shifts to outside his garage where his prototypes are together in a heap -- on fire. He said he would be back when he had a "bulletproof" demonstration. (PESWiki; Aug. 9)"
I guess this means his next wheels will be made out of Kevlar.
j
"artist/inventor shoots a video showing a level that signifies that his garage floor is flat"
Is it me or does one shot of the level look like it is slightly raised at one end.. Looks like the end the wheel went... Hard to tell.. Oh well.
Check out what Peswiki.com says now that a Douglass K. Furr, Ph.D. Mechanical Engineer, with PES Network, Inc built a highly precise replica of the Scott Hall gravity wheel, and it ummmm didn't work ::). Seems they now think the garage floor was in some mysterious way -- something other than flat. Who woulda thought? You just gota love these guys. They certainly are optimists -- to a fault.
http://peswiki.com/index.php/OS:Hall_Gravity_Wheel_B:Replica:Doug_Furr (http://peswiki.com/index.php/OS:Hall_Gravity_Wheel_B:Replica:Doug_Furr)
Of course it didn't work...he forgot to add the magnets and moebius coil! ::)
I have given this a bit more thought in a serious way. :-\ What if you drilled out the center of the rods and inserted a couple of steel BB's then capped off the end. The BB's would roll back and forth and add more shifting mass. The question is would it shift it in a positive way. ??? Guess I will have to build one and experiment... It would even be easier to drill it from the rod end that way the rod would hold back the BB's from escaping and you could easily change the amount of BB's. Humm.. I hate it how my mind gets stuck on trying to improve and fix a faulty design.....
i don't think it is faulty. it's incomplete, thats all. ;D instead of burning everything after the first try, the inventor should look for a solution to overcome the "sticky point" without interfering the main-function-principle too much. Every free energy machine needs combined machanisms. Of course such research costs much time and effort.
Just the same old pattern re: the reveal; fained indignation; burning.
i.e. Deception > Distraction > Distance
You got that right.. Really sad... >:( The fancy wheel was a nice build... Guess it got him a few minutes of fame but at a loss of future believability. :o Lets say he does actually build a 'bulletproof' one which I hope he does. It will be harder for people to take it seriously unless it can be replicated and who will want to replicate after this. :'(
Reminds me of a project I was involved with years ago with a group of other internet builders replicating an Adams motor. The guy that 'claimed' to have a working unit was actually using the group to do his research with the hopes that one of us could 'solve' the problems he was having with his motor and get it to run for him while at the same time taking the credit for all these 'creative ideas' the the rest of the group was generating. That really sours one attitude about working on replications... Some people... :-[
New video of another newly built gravity wheel by Scott Hall
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aKyOtImTl94
Really hard to tell how it is built from the video. No details visible since it is painted black. All I can tell is a black spinning disk with plexiglass sides. Hope he releases the plans so it can be replicated.
this guys made fake wheel that some tryed to replicate without success so i believe this one is fake also
You'll be waiting a long time Hydro.
Hans von Lieven
Hans wrote :
QuoteYou'll be waiting a long time Hydro.
I suspect you are right. :D At least his video of the first two devices he created showed enough detail to warrant a replication (although failed) this newest video shows no details. :-\ I find it interesting he is holding the wheel in his hand instead of having it on a cradle which would have kept the skeptics from saying he was spinning the axle with the thumb and finger of the hidden hand behind the wheel. :o If Scott really has created his 'bulletproof' gravity wheel he needs to do a better job of presenting it in a more 'bulletproof' manner. Holding the axle in his hand is not that manner. A better proof would be to have a camera walk around of the stationary spinning device on a cradle with better lighting, more video time and better resolution. I suspect you are correct. I will be waiting a long time. ;)
It seems,
the only thing he can produce are fake videos...
what a shame...
Hey now.. ;) I was not claiming the video was fake.. :o I was just indicating the video could be done much better to keep it from appearing fake. I was giving him the benifit of the doubt.. It is possible that it does work.. Until a better 'bulletproof' video is made I will bite my tongue.. ::) Ow.. thats hurting. :o
I see the details of his latest wheel are based on this
http://peswiki.com/index.php/OS:Scott_F._Hall:Old_Indian_Gravity_Wheel
At least this video and still picture give better details of construction. Of course that is presuming that are the same wheel.. I would have to agree with the statements made in the comment section of the link I posted above. One of those being ;
QuoteI think Scott is having fun. I think what Scott is doing is "entertainment", not news.
it does not work, some try to replicate some of his device without success, its all fake
My understanding is he is an art professor, so I think he is treating this as an art project or social experiment, or he is just having some fun.
I am sorry but this design is not going to work. If you look at it from the end, and I am speaking about the "burned" simple wheel from earlier, there is nothing close to "over-balance" that I can see. It is a nice effort and his wood-working skills are good but...think about it...I actually have a working over-balance device that can withstand all examination, but I burn it because I don't like the feedback I get on the internet???? I probably would have burned it if it didn't work. I don't buy that this ever worked on a level surface.
Bill
I got cought with it as well. I made one of metal just to play with it. It clicked about 6 times and stopped. So being someone who can normaly sove problems with a bad design, got out my drawing pad and started ideals that might make it work. So when I do this I will post of course. Just don't make fun of me trying to make a faild design work some how. ;)