--- In jlnlabs@yahoogroups.com, "vallee1208" <vallee1208@y...> wrote:
> I just discovered your new publication about the MAGH Device.
> I just want to congratulate you for this new work and also for the
> results.
>
> This device tends to confirm the many results that could be obtained
> with Hydrogen reactions. It completes the set of devices already
> demonstrated in the past just as the cold fusion reactor and the water
> engine.
>
> It also confirms synegetics prediction about the capability of
> capturing space energy by exploiting the particular state of the
> proton, called sub-excited neutron.
>
> Regards.
http://jlnlabs.imars.com/mahg/tests/index.htm
Yes, congratulations Jean Louis !
Well done measurements.
So how difficult is it to build such a MAGH unit ?
Does the guy who invented it already sell these
units ?
Thanks.
Regards, Stefan.
This sounds amazing ......
I wonder how much it would cost to replicate this?
it looks extremely promising, but more in depth details are needed as to how they did it.
If anyone has more information let me know
Cheers
And if there's one guy who should know by now, how to accurately resolve input vs. output ratios.....It's Jean.
8)
This reminds me strongly to the Chernetski tubes.
There also H2 at a lower pressure were excited, but there the
power output was not heat but directly electrical
energy.
Maybe the OU energy output could also be got via
pickup coils somehow in the MAGH device ?
It is nice, that we can get around 500 Watts of free power
when supplying 500 Watts input.
So this could reducemuch the heating costs.
To get a selfrunner with heat only output would required
although a much higher COP like 300 to 400 % efficiency
to get the positive feedback running in a loop with teh conversion
losses from heat to electrical energy back.
Regards, Stefan.