A few of you may have noticed that I stopped posting a bit back. Well I decided (while out of town on business) to re-read every archived document I had that I felt was relevant to specifically cold electricity, not just OU in general.
What I found was that my first time through these documents, i had bits and pieces of knowledge, and nothing really seemed to add up to form one coherent picture. When I went back and read them, I found that it all seemed to make perfect sense, and things seem more clear to me now than ever before.
I went home, tinkered for about a day, and produced a singular stinging shockwave................
At this point I litterally took a 10 mile walk to think. and what I decided was that I didn't wan to go anywhere after this point without the involvement of others.
I would like to propose a group effort for research in the spark gap / apparent negative resistor (note apparent) department. Of course, maybe only a few are interested, but I am dead serious. I even have extra capacitors I would be willing to mail to people free of charge if someone were so inclined to help out in this effort.
We have spent too much time speculating and bullshitting.
The Dr. Stifler thread has made marvelous progress along these lines, and I believe we can do one better. (for he is working with simulated solid state spark gaps with very interesting, though less powerful results)
If you are interested in helping out I would love to hear from you, soak up your knowledge, and work in a collaborative effort towards a common goal.
I would like to start very slow, from the beginning, and see if we cant get at least a good inch or two ahead of where we are now.
if nothing else we can maybe categorize and document some good information for others to follow, information and pathways it has taken me years of research to find.
Take care my brothers in arms!
I am listening dude.
What have you been thinking? I am curious about your line of thought int the spark gap thingy.
What is it? Got a link?
Hmmm...
If energy is transformed from one frequency and time domain
into another frequency and time domain with an almost "passive"
looking circuit - than we need some negative resistance to compensate
the losses of the lc circuit.
There are lots of diodes - impatt- , gun -, esaki -, avalanche- , tunnel - which have
a differential negative resistance if correctly biased.
This diodes transform the energy sucked from DC bias current into
the target frequency.
Another chance is that ferromagnetic material might have
"inverse hysteresis" effect which causes something similar.
http://scitation.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&id=APPLAB000086000006061113000001&idtype=cvips&gifs=yes
rgds.
Quote from: fritz on October 30, 2007, 05:21:25 AM
Hmmm...
If energy is transformed from one frequency and time domain
into another frequency and time domain with an almost "passive"
looking circuit - than we need some negative resistance to compensate
the losses of the lc circuit.
How about the negative GMR being seen in green, blue and white organic LEDs? This is not a new finding. Just not well explained.
BEP
Quote from: armagdn03 on October 30, 2007, 12:27:40 AM
I went home, tinkered for about a day, and produced a singular stinging shockwave................
Hi,
Is this unusual in that the power input you were playing with was very small?
What did the shockwave feel like?
A few other people have experienced similar effects when playing with certain frequencies fed into a TPU.
It would be interested to see what your tinkering involved.
When experimenting with OU, its always possible that many have missed the overunity results because they failed to convert the output into a usable form.
Regards
Rob
I am beginning to compile a list of resources one should read in order to become well versed in this.
My experiment was simple.
I constructed a variable distance spark gap out of two very large sewing needles. They were completely enclosed in a Lexan ?box? with two valves on it. One for pressurizing the box, and one for removing pressure from the box. I used about 4 decent sized neo magnets on either side of the spark gap which sprayed with shellac for insulation. And placed them to either side of the spark gap. I used hot glue to hold them in place, so that I could remove them and change orientation if needed.
Once all sealed, I bought a few of those hand warmers you can buy at local drug stores in cold climates. Opened one and poured a bit of the contents into the box. These had warmers react with oxygen in an exothermic reaction. Once the box cooled back down to room temp, I knew that all the oxygen had been removed. This is important because we do not want oxidation reactions at the plasma contact points in the gap to start degrading performance. (this was the only way I could think of to rid the oxygen, but im sure there are many others) I also would like to try pure hydrogen, so I may build myself a cell later. I will also experiment with xenon flash tubes as spark gaps.
I have a 7.5kv peak Russian radar capacitor mean for pulse discharges, but any high voltage cap will do.
I made myself some variable resistors out of different things like graphite, and carbon inks, and hooked this up to the anode.
Then I played with the variables until I felt a distinct shock radiate away, not powerful, but it was there. It passed through all shielding, glass, plastic, metal etc.
To answer your question MeggerMan, no the input was not small, BUT, right now I don?t care about small. I just want to be able to create the effect reliably, learn what variables affect what, and move on from there. I?m sure the Wright Brothers did not worry about fuel efficiency or top speed on their first plane. I?m sure we will be starting well below OU, but this is only the start. I have yet to see anybody reliably show this community anything close to the characteristics described in cold electricity, what is stopping us? Why don?t we have an alive and thriving Tesla thread? We all concede he was a genius and had the right idea, but we don?t replicate.
You are absolutely correct, many may have seen OU but do not recognize it. This is why I propose this set of experiments.
Why do we go about starting at the end when we have yet to really begin? Why are we playing with function generators, and solid state devices, when we don?t even have the basic principles down yet? Did Tesla begin trying to find ways to use the energy he found right away? Or did he just try to see if he could control the effect?
I personally believe that we need to establish the BASICS before we move on. For example, in the stifler thread, he states that he is not sure weather it is cold electricity or not. He has never seen it before, so he is not sure. I?m not sure either. I think we could learn a TON about what we have already done, if we take a step back from what we are doing, and work on the principles of cold electricity (if this is the path one wishes to take in OU research)
I will continue my trial and error experimentation (for what other engineering tools do I have other than chance? Lol) and I hope at least one or two others will join me in my quest.