no i do not know!!
that would be the reason for this thred
answer thease questions
all will be clear as i understand thease are the deepest darkest secreats of the universe
ist
might they be the binding forces that holds this entire universe togather ??
ist
jep jep
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copper_wire
copper number 29 and last one is loose cannon
http://www.geocities.com/archisgore/articles/speed_of_electricity.html
http://www.electronicstheory.com/html/e101-18.htm
I don't know what exactly things are but I do know some things about them. Personally I like to keep things really simple.
The electricity makes magnetism
The magnetism makes induction.
The Induction makes the magnetic forces.
The force scales with the smaller induction field.
Important note:
The induction happens in a chain reaction, so it should be easy to build a permanent magnetmotor. If you accept that fact it should take you no more then 10 min to find a drawing of something that works.
cant prove it does work + cant prove it doesn't work = doesn't know if it works
Physics simply self destructs where the position of the magnets changes by an infinite small amount. It's making the induction and it's forces change by an infinitely large amount.
Linear motion would cause linear change, induction happens over time so the speed determines the rate of change.
When aligned 2 magnets induct fields into another the flux goes up.
The linear motion also changes the alignment, it's induction and it's rate of change.
There are to much factors changing values in the system. Most changes affect their own source. The magnets evidently interact with themselves.
How it all works exactly I don't know. It does show me that perpetual motion is quite easy.
The joy is in eating the soup?
ppm
is there in nature every where ;)
to mimic it is yes verry easy indeed
ist
to understand it is difficult
As far as I know, and I will be glad to stand corrected if wrong, NO ONE knows what electricty is, or what magnetism is, or, what gravity is. They all know, or think they do, how they behave and what you can or can't do with them but, it never ceases to amaze me that, in this day and age, NO ONE knows. This tells me that they are the key to the secret of the universe...otherwise, we would already know all about them.
Bill
Hello,
I don't know and have never seen a real answer just it effects and manipulations.
How I try to look at it.
Electricity - imagine a steel slinky. stretch it This is electricity. Now hit one end. A wave will go from one end to the other and back again. This is a signal in a wire. now put something on one end of the slinky that vibrates easier. Hit the other end of the slinky - the wave moves along the slinky and then disapates as the item on the end uses the wave energy. This item at the end corresponds to a light or a motor or whatever 'uses' electricity. Understand, its potential is always there it is in everything but different materials will vibrate differently - some more readily than others. This is conductivity. The wire of the slicky are the electrons in an item. Each spiral segment effected by the adjacent segment.
What is magnetism - a tornado, a vortex, an electon stuck in its orbit such that it can only move it a very small space which would be the vortex. like being attached to the nucleus of an atom by a thread and as it tries to escape it can only go in circles not orbits.
Now pass the slicky past a row of vortexes and it will cause a wave to be generated in the slinky due to the elecrons of the vortexes moving the electrons along the slicky arc which will cause a wave to be generated and if the slicky is tapped then the wave is moved out to do work elsewhere.
Hope I made sense. This is sort of how I envision things. Coudl be wrong but I haven't heard any better.
What I can't understand is how my chenestry teacher in primary school said that an electron belonging to an atom could be anywhere, as in inches or yards or miles away from the nucleus. I don't think so.
Bernard
Quote from: Pirate88179 on November 06, 2007, 03:16:10 AM
As far as I know, and I will be glad to stand corrected if wrong, NO ONE knows what electricty is, or what magnetism is, or, what gravity is. They all know, or think they do, how they behave and what you can or can't do with them but, it never ceases to amaze me that, in this day and age, NO ONE knows. This tells me that they are the key to the secret of the universe...otherwise, we would already know all about them.
Bill
well i know there are people out there that in fact do know what it is and how it does work and i aint talking me here :(
but TESLA knew ;) im sure sm knows lol!! and you know what im sure a few other too
we will all see and understand this b4 too long
what might sm be trying to teach us??
hummmmm
ist
Its Juice! thats what. it flows dont it? then its Juice! you cant get no juice throu circuits coz they are all plugged up with wires,resisters diodes mosfetts trannys and stuff! :). Yep its Juice alright! :o
I look at it this way trying to explain electomagnetic interaction when an electrical conductor is involved. Magnetism is a force which is trying to reproduce. It tries to make that which surrounds it as it is. Magnetism when encountering a conductor begins to work on the atom to orient the neucleus to look like it. The neucleus of the atom does not move away or towards the magnetic force but begins to roll to align itself with the magnetic force lines. The electrons of the conductor are caught up in this roll because of the reorientation of the protons in the neucleus. The electrons in the outer energy orbits find themselves being drawn through space still trying to stay in their orbitals but gaining relative velocity in a uniform direction within the conductor.
Then the real trick happens. The neucleus stops rolling cause it looks about as much like the magnetic force as it ever is going to. The electrons though very light are moving in a vectored path now and have built up momentum. They snap the rope tieing them to the proton and go off on their own free at last. Unfortunately they dont get far before they run into the next atom with a proton looking to pickup some electrons. And the electrons are trapped again. They aren't too happy either because they are all caged in on one side of the atom. So they start to go towards their mutual corners and in so doing begin to roll the neucleus back to a position controlled both by the orbits of the electrons and the magnetic force on the neucleus. Well then why does an electron movement cause a magnetic field change perpendicular to the electron vector. As the recently freed electrons crash the next electrons party the neucleus reacts by rolling away from the new electrons. The neucleus itself has it's own magnetic desires and with a bunch of these coward protons rolling in the same direction create a new magnetic field because the atomic orientation has become more ordered. The new electrons get into the fray and electrons that were invited find themselves pushed out the door to the neighbors house where they start havoc again.
Change the magnetic look back in the generator and the whole chain reaction starts over again. This doesn't serve to explain the universe just a scenario that serves my purposes in explaining electromagnetic interaction within a conductor.
A very finite situation.
I have found that electricity is nothing more then a frequency. The more vibrant the frequency is, the more powerful the current. The sun would be a good example due to it's enormous explosions accruing all the time. The frequency's created from those explosions are what gives us light and heat. The frequencies are attracted to iron because iron has a resistance to frequencies. This is what gives us light and heat. Our air is made up of evaporated water which contains iron. The iron heats up from the resistance and glows which gives us light as well as heat. The iron content in the air is transparent to the naked eye as is it's content in water.
This is my opinion of what electricity is and it would be the same as saying electricity is a flow of resistance.
Quote from: nightlife on January 14, 2008, 12:32:16 AMOur air is made up of evaporated water which contains iron. The iron heats up from the resistance and glows which gives us light as well as heat. The iron content in the air is transparent to the naked eye as is it's content in water.
nightlife,
I'm at loss as to where IRON can be found in WATER portion of AIR. Please explain your comment.
Earth's atmosphere (AIR) contains 78% nitrogen, 20.95% oxygen, 0.93% argon, 0.038% carbon dioxide, trace amounts of other gases, and 1% water vapor.
Water vapor can be produced from the evaporation of liquid water or from the sublimation of ice.
- Schpankme
Schpankme, when to much water is accumulated in the air it creates rain and rain water contains iron, so there for, the water content in the air must also contain iron. IMO
Electricity is just a change in matter as is all energy. Matter is a fleeting equilibrium between two forces everpresent in the universe One that wants everything dispersed and one that wants everything concentrated. Magnetism arises from the dispersion force and gravity arises from the concentration force. Gravity and Magnetism are not the forces they are what the forces do. All energy is a change in matter. Magnetism is something the dispersion force does in it's attempt to make all void. Gravity or electrical potential is what the concentrating force does to attempt to make all as one.
Iron exists because it changes it's atomic structure according to how dispersion force enacted upon it. So it has magnetic memory. It will react to dispersion force in a predictable way because of this memory. That is why iron is all that is left once a black hole has sucked up everything else. It can ride on the river of dispersion where a whole sun's worth of matter is migrating towards the center of a black hole.
Quote from: sparks on January 14, 2008, 09:14:11 PMIron exists because ... That is why iron is all that is left once a black hole has sucked up everything else. It can ride on the river of dispersion where a whole sun's worth of matter is migrating towards the center of a black hole.
Sparks,
There is not NOW, nor has there ever been a BLACK HOLE (not found, not observed); and you acting like a PARROT and repeating the same bs does not make it so!
Big Bang is dead.
- Schpankme
Quote from: nightlife on January 14, 2008, 01:32:03 AM
Schpankme, when to much water is accumulated in the air it creates rain and rain water contains iron, so there for, the water content in the air must also contain iron. IMO
nightlife,
There's no IRON found in the "Unpolluted" air you breath; how did IRON get into Rain Drops?
- Schpankme
[
Sparks,
There is not NOW, nor has there ever been a BLACK HOLE (not found, not observed); and you acting like a PARROT and repeating the same bs does not make it so!
Big Bang is dead.
- Schpankme
Don't yell at me yell at Nasa or piss on Einstein's grave or something. May the dispersion will and the concentrating will be with you on your long strange voyage through time.
I was studying some relativistic physics concerning the gain in mass of an electron undergoing velocity change. The electron gains no electrical energy yet gains mass. Therefore the gain in mass must be magnetic in nature. The size of the electron does not increase with velocity either. The electron most contain a magnetic vortex or vorti whose velocity is increased in order for more mass to exist within the same particle. If we change the magnetic flow in a field in which a conductor lies there arises an electrical potential. This energy could be due to the velocity change of the magnetic vortex within the electrons. The mass of the electrons changing with a resultant orbital shift of the electrons within the atoms of the conductor.
I dont think anybody can claim that NOBODY knows what electricity is....................That would be a little presumptuous ???.
@ Sparks
Lay off the mersh/commercial product your headache should go away and things might be more clear
@local joe
Just trying to understand how increasing or decreasing a magnetic field creates emf.
If the magnetic dipoles of the electron spin to align with the external magnetic field this results in a change in the spin angular momentum of the electron. If the spin angular momentum of the electron is coupled to the orbital angular momentum then there will result a change in the orbit of the electron. The uncoupling of the spin momentum from the orbital momentum results in a conversion of the orbital momentum into vectored energy. As the external magnetic field stabilizes the dipole shift stops and the spin angular moment recouples with an orbital moment and current ceases.
We don't know what they really are, we observe them as force fields. In an oscillating system, the electric field stores energy like a spring, and the magnetic field stores energy like momentum in a moving mass. People always assume that a moving charge creates a magnetic field, but can't the magnetic field create the moving charge? How do we know which comes first?
Personally, I feel they are both states of energy. The electric field is the potential energy of the universe while the magnetic field is the kinetic energy of the same. Gravity is an affect created by them. When these two forces are made to oscillate in phase with each other at a specific location, light is produced and radiates from that location. At a high enough frequency, light will interact with the smallest particles of matter (the particles that make up everything, that makes up everything in an atom). If light produces a perfect reflection with a particle, it will transfer twice the momentum. This is known as radiation pressure. If we then assume that a piece of matter is being constantly bombarded by ultra high frequency cosmic radiation from all directions, we have an interesting phenomenon. If an object of matter is alone, then no net force is exerted on it, since the momentum transfer is in all directions. However, if a second object is placed near the first, the ultra cosmic radiation is shielded on the sides of the two particles that face each other. This produces an unbalance of force and the radiation pressure pushes these two objects together. The more mass the two objects have, the greater the shielding will be. This "shielding" is what we perceive as gravity. So objects with large mass will exhibit more "gravity". This theory then explains gravity as the absence of light (light at a frequency that interacts with the building blocks of matter). This of course is only a theory that I read somewhere... but it makes a lot of sense and I like it - still doesn't explain everything, but what does?
If you read anything dealing with basic thermodynamic principles, you will quickly come to a realization - if everything is less than 1, and entropy is working to neutralize all the energy in the universe, then we should never have existed to begin with. Therefore, since we are obviously here, the universe must have an opposite form of entropy, an ordering - basically there must be a way that the universe creates energy just as fast as it dissipates it away. I think if people in the researching field would come to this realization, then a collective search to how energy is created could be accomplished.
Since the universe's foundation is based on electric and magnetic fields, the answer will lie in them. To create energy, I think you need to have a way of producing changes without a reactionary force (or atleast with a greatly reduced reactionary force). By applying a little force, you create a greater change that does not counteract your applied force. In order to do this, you need a field that is self supporting, a field whose internal direction is different from its outward direction - something that interacts with the outside environment yet its flux returns to itself. Well, right away we see that it can not be the electric field, since its flux is only in one direction, it radiates outward and does not come back. An electric dipole has a direction of flux in one direction, both inside and out, from positive to negative. However, the magnetic field is different. A magnetic dipole has a flux in one direction on the outside and an opposite direction on the inside. The flux radiates out yet returns to itself.... so it is in the magnetic field that will create energy. This is where my research is at.
But after all that is said, I still don't really know what a magnetic or electric field is!
Hi all....
Here is what Tesla said....
"The day when we shall know exactly what electricity is will chronical an event probably greater, more important than any other recorded in the history of the human race.
Then it will be a mere question of time, when men will succeede in attatching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature....see the excitement coming" Nikola Tesla.
--------------------------------------
Researchers, experimenters and other people, read about Magnetic Current, then you will know what it is, how it is made, what makes it, and how it runs in a wire. Then you will know what the North and South pole individual magnets can do, THEN YOU WILL KNOW WHAT ELECTRICITY IS.
Ed Leedskalnin.
---------------------------------------
A semiconductor is an element with a valence of four, which means that an isolated atom of the material has four electrons in its outer or valence orbit. Electrons in the valence orbit are only weakly attracted by the nucleus of the atom, and thus, can be dislodged from the valence orbit to become free electrons. When a free electron is dislodged from the valence orbit, a vacancy is left in the valence orbit, called a hole. The hole behaves like a positive charge, which will attract and capture any electron in the immediate vicinity.
------------------------------------------
So we get positive charges from a vacancy? and the vacant spot can attract and capture electrons? then where does the positive charge go...back to nothing from where it came?
We get charges from nothing.. ???.....lol
------------------------------
Read about magnetic currents
Scotty
I consider all matter as light resonating. Light caught in a fleeting equilibrium of two forces willing it to be on it's way (anywhere but here) and a second force wanting light to be in one point. The absense of time/energy is inertia and standing waves. Time /energy is what we all want to control. Control of light energy so that time will be what we want it to be.. Light becomes the true commodity of life. In an electron there is trapped light. It isn't much compared to the sun prison but it is there. If we add just a little bit of discord to the electron equilibrium then light, the energy of all life is freed. Not for long though because the forces will try to put it back under their control. By using time/energy to mess with the fundamental forces we can upset the electron resonance. From the electron will come energy in excess of the energy used to upset the resonance. Like punching a hole in the bottom of a plastic bag filled with water. Electricity is energy or time creation. Magnetism is force controlling how light will travel and charge is force controlling where light will go. We don't need to annihalate the atom or fuse it to another one. Just give it a poke and let the light free.
"I think that the North and South pole individual magnets are running in an orbit around a common core in an atom the same way as they run in an orbit around a common core in the perpetual motion holder that I made. The only difference is that an atom has a small orbit, but the perpetual motion holder has a large orbit. I have never seen an atom but i think the atom drawings are wrong. They should be drawn to fit the earth on account of the fact that the atom is a part of the earth. The earth has 2 magnet poles. This means that each pole has an equal pull and push to hold the earth together, and so each atom should be built as it could have 2 poles. In that case BOTH THE FORCES that make magnet poles should run around a common core (the core could be a particle of sunlight).....I believe that if some enterprising man would analize the magnet metal which comes straight from the earth, he would find that the metal is NOT BUILT UP BY PROTONS AND ELECTRONS, but by NORTH AND SOUTH POLE INDIVIDUAL MAGNETS" Ed Leedskalnin.
-------------------------------------------------------
Scotty
Here is where I read that theory about gravity... just a theory but it makes alot of sense to me.
http://www.blazelabs.com/f-g-intro.asp
I believe Gravity is an effect of a force that is seeking to put all into a single point. This force is countered by Radiance which seeks to expand all into obllivion. They are so opposed that perhaps a unifying theory on a mathmatical level would be to just throw a negative into all the constants and give them new names. ::)
Since time is energy dependent or is dependent on change I don't really want to see any team win. Though at 53 I'm getting pretty fed up dealing with gravity.
Not that I want my atoms scattered on the solar wind just a little relief from the single point field would be nice. ;D
Today i was reading an article about static electricity...
This is what it said.....
Static electricity is electricity that does not flow in a current. An electric charge is generated by rubbing two nonmagnetic objects together. The friction between the two objects generates attraction because the substance with an excess of electrons transfers them to the positively-charged substance........
--------
Then later on it said.......
Your new electrons fly over your body because they are looking for a positive charge. If you touch a metal doorknob, the electrons on your body will leap into the metal, attracted by the protons there. The transfer of electrons is actually a small electrical current, and produces the tiny electric shock you feel called Static electricity.
-------------------
well bugger me....that explains it good.
http://www.electricityforum.com/static-electricity.html (http://www.electricityforum.com/static-electricity.html)
???
Now i will tell you how it works....
Rub some hard rubber until it gets hot...then attract some salt with the rubber......now move a salt crystal a bit and there is a good chance it will jump away.
Scotty....
Yea thats a pretty crappy explanation. I don't know why some people try to act like static electricity is different from the typical battery electricity. They are the same thing, no difference. "Static" is just high voltage. Any high voltage source will make the same "static" that is seen when you rub your socks on a carpet. The only difference is in the power levels. High voltage sources will kill you because they have quite a bit more energy behind them. So when you short a high voltage source, it will push maybe 2mA through your body whereas the static from the carpet will push only 2pA (peco-amps).
Basically, your body has a certain level of capacitance, which is not nearly as large as a high voltage power supply. If you had a really good capacitor connected to your feet, you could probably store enough energy to kill someone if you rubbed your socks on the carpet for a long enough time haha. 100,000 volts stored in a 1pF capacitor is way smaller energy (~0.01Joules) than 100,000 volts stored in a 1mF capacitor (~10,000,000 Joules). When either of those capacitors are discharged quickly, the current produced will be proportional to the amount of energy that is stored. The pF capacitor will hurt (like the shock from a door knob), but the mF capacitor will kill!!!
Why does the salt crystal jump away from the hard rubber when you move it a little?
Here is another thing...
Rub the hard rubber and attract iron filings with it......then remove the rubber and approach the filings with a steel magnet.....now reverse the steel magnet and approach the filings.....some of them will jump away....
This shows that the steel magnet changed the poles in the filings...so they jumped away..
Scotty
scotty1:
ttp://www.learnerstv.com/video/video.php?video=267&cat=Physics (http://ttp://www.learnerstv.com/video/video.php?video=267&cat=Physics)
Above is a link to a lecture series by MIT's Walter Lewin. This is the first video in a series of 36 on electricity and magnetism. He discusses in detail why some of the filings poles switch and why some do not. I am now on video # 4 but, I have a weak math background so the going is tough. I think you, or anyone, will enjoy this guy. He does experiments at the end of each lecture. Great stuff.
Bill
@scotty
Nacl will respond to heat rise by creating electrical charge. I believe it is called a pyraelectric substance.
They actually heatup crystals to get Mev potentials to drive cold fusion experiments.
Sorry.
.
Scotty, in the first experiment when you make the rubber hot, then bring the salt near it, and finally move the salt away and watch them jump, you are inducing an electric charge on the salt. It doesn't have to be salt, this will work with small piece of plastic, paper, even metal filing. Charge an object up, bring that charged object next to something that is "neutral" and at first the neutral item will be attracted. Once the neutral item gets close enough, or touches, it becomes the same charge as the object it touched. If you pull the object away, the newly charged item will now repel. You can make motors and ringers based on this principle.
You should investigate electrets, they aren't too hard to make and pretty neat. They are basically the electric field version of a permanent magnet.
Charles
I think that electricity is nothing more then a vibration that is created by a flow of resistance. I also think that magnets are only vibrations with different seeking poles. Meaning one vibration flows in one direction and the other in the opposite. The magnets core would just act like a antenna which attracts the vibrations.
@ Nightlife:
You should watch the video series I posted a little earlier. They are done by Prof. Walter Lewin at MIT and address many of the aspects of this discussion. You can then see how your theory might possibly fit into what is known about physics and electricity at this point in time. They are very enjoyable to watch. There are 36 videos dealing with electricity and magnetism alone, each about an hour long. I am on video 4 and loving it.
Bill
Pirate88179, I read your post on that video series but for some reason I can't get use the link you provided. I meant to ask you about it before but I got side tracked.
Is there something I need to download to be able to use that link?
Nightlife:
Yes, maybe. I had to download realplayer as I did not have it. I don't really like it and it is not set as my default player (which it tries to get you to do) but that is the only format it plays in. Most seem to already have it, I had deleted mine but downloaded it so I can see these. It should ask if you want to download realplayer, but if not, google realplayer and you can get it free. Sorry I didn't say that before. If this guy was not such a great lecturer, I would not have gone through the trouble, but it is worth it. I hope you agree.
Bill
I did a search and found another site that allows me to watch them. Thank you and I see now who he is and i have seen some of his lctures before. I am glad there are more and I too will be watching them all.
The following link is the one I am using.
http://web.mit.edu/smcs/8.02/
I've worked with guys from MIT before, they aren't very imaginative and they like to steal your ideas :-\
Pirate88179, I am now on 8.02 Spring 2002 Lecture 9 and I have found a few things with in the ones I have seen that are not right and I believe that is because he doesn't understand them properly.
So far this series does back my theory?s as well as the few things that he was unaware of happening such as the Faraday cage. that is just one of a few that I have came across so far.
The thing about the cage is that he things we can hear him when he is in it because his voice is a higher pitch. That is not true, we can hear him because he is actually producing a vibration inside which creates a vibration on the outside of the cage. He cant get a vibration in, but he can get one out. His own lecture explained how that affect works but yet he didn't catch on. I think that is because of his closed mind on what electricity is and still assuming that electrons exist. If electrons exist, then they have to be vibrations. I am not sure how to clarify them as of yet but I am most definitely positive that electricity is nothing more then a vibration. his lecture confirms this with out him even realizing it.
This lecture proves how some book teaching take away some of your common sense. IMO.
We should start a thread on this lecture series. I think we can learn a lot from it and not just by what is said but also by what isn?t and by what we find wrong with what is said.
The more I watch them, the more the mathematical physics part makes sense. That?s scary. LOL When I started it just looked like a bunch of letters and it took awhile for it to kick in that they all have a relevancy.
Just think of all the nightmares I will have now. My pies will start looking like mathematical pies, eye glasses will start looking like infinity, and my postings will all be coded by using just the first letter of words I use all the time. Nobody will understand me. Not that they do anyways. LOL
27 more to go. Do you think we can take a test after we get done and if we pass, we could get a degree from this course? LOL
@ nightlife:
I am really enjoying this lecture series. Math is my weakest area so he loses me many times, but I can go back and look up symbols on the net and finally get what he is saying. Yes, it would be nice to be able to take a test at the end but, the way I am going, I don't know if I could pass it or not, ha ha. I am learning a lot which is fun.
Bill
Pirate88179, I did a search for "Professor Walter Lewin" and I found this.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Lewin
I am trying to contact him so I can talk to him about a couple of the issues I have with his lectures I watched.
@all
Cool page here .. i wonder what the picture resembles
http://astronauticsnow.com/ENA/ena_rsi_1997.html (http://astronauticsnow.com/ENA/ena_rsi_1997.html)
Its title is this Energetic neutral atom imaging of space plasmas
From Some Pythagoras followers
It seemed clear to the Pythagoreans that the distances between the planets would have the same ratios as produced harmonious sounds in a plucked string. To them, the solar system consisted of ten spheres revolving in circles about a central fire, each sphere giving off a sound the way a projectile makes a sound as it swished through the air; the closer spheres gave lower tones while the farther moved faster and gave higher pitched sounds. All combined into a beautiful harmony, the music of the spheres.
This idea was picked up by Plato, who in his Republic says of the cosmos; ". . . Upon each of its circles stood a siren who was carried round with its movements, uttering the concords of a single scale," and who, in his Timaeus, describes the circles of heaven subdivided according to the musical ratios.
Kepler, 20 centuries later, wrote in his Harmonice Munde (1619) says that he wishes "to erect the magnificent edifice of the harmonic system of the musical scale . . . as God, the Creator Himself, has expressed it in harmonizing the heavenly motions."
And later, "I grant you that no sounds are given forth, but I affirm . . . that the movements of the planets are modulated according to harmonic proportions."
After my previous post Would it now be safe to say that the "system were a part of is much larger than us and our "system of unity" is dependant upon the rest of the solar system as well . Notice the feild lines that extend from the earth and go to the sun and ..who knows where else.. A magnetic feild line diagram of our whole solar system would be sure to shed some additional light on some mysteries here...
I have been watching some physics lectures and I have found how some get so involved in what they are told and or taught, that their common sense must be over looking the obvious.
First off, there are no such things as electrons unless you refer to them as bits of a vibration because all electricity is, is a vibration.
Common sense tells you that a solid can not pass thru a solid. Some say it's because nothing is solid and everything is poorest, that's fine except even if so, then electrons would have to weave trough pores to go thru. That is not how electricity flows. That is impossible because nothing can have the same passage ways to insure a even flow. If the flow isn't even, we would have hot and cold spots in the wires. This tells me that the only way it can flow is by way of waves and those waves must be vibrant waves.
The think that?s drives me nuts is that I have yet to hear of anyone teaching this. WHY NOT !! Is it being stopped from being taught?
Why haven't we figured out the frequency that these vibrations flow thru? the suns vibration frequency is the one we need to have as well as a way to attract it.
Another thing I figured out was that the sun puts out vibrations in one direction and the earth in the other. That is how we get a negative and a positive. I leaned that from a lecture I watched and the teacher didn't even realize what it meant as far as it's relevancy to electricity, the earth and sun.
The earth is a vibrant energy source and the sun is a vibrant energy source. The suns vibrant energy it much greater then the earths mainly due to the size and action difference. The sun is continuously exploding through out where as the earth only does so beneath the earths surface.
The suns vibrations are so intense, they pass through our atmosphere creating light when one side of the earth faces the sun. The suns vibrations are absorbed by the earths surface. The earth puts out vibrations in opposite way that the sun does when they are facing each other. The two vibrations collide and give us light and heat. The same with all living things, they all put out vibrations.
Now we get in to those things that are not alive. They must have been alive at some point and at that point, they must have had a vibrant energy. That vibrant energy's frequency can be applied to the object to split, twist or bend it, depending on the way the vibrant force is applied.
This explains why we have so many frequency?s and why some are illegal to use.
There is no way a 9th grade drop out could figure this out and not some of our top scientist. Why are they trying to hide this from us?
Before I said that electricity is nothing more then a flow of resistance which still stands all though, the flow of resistance does create a vibration that flows in direction of the resistance applied. This could also mean that electricity can be created in both directions as long as the resistance used is flown in opposite directions, this would give us a negative and positive where as if only flown in one direction, we would only get a positive.
I am still trying to get some bugs worked out in my head about this but I do feel I am now going in the right direction.
There is still much to learn with this concept and I will post more as I figure them out.
Localjoe, its not magnetic, its vibrant. A magnet is created by two vibrations applied from different directions. The vibrations stay in motion from them repelling each other and they stay attached due to the core being charged with the vibrations. This is why substances that are made of the same substances as the magnets core, are attracted to the magnet.
Think about it.
http://www.ocw.mesi.ru/OcwWeb/Physics/8-02Electricity-and-MagnetismSpring2002/VideoLectures/index.htm