Overunity.com Archives

Mechanical free energy devices => mechanic => Topic started by: kmarinas86 on December 18, 2007, 07:21:17 AM

Title: Faster, cheaper, lighter, smaller, and more powerful with NO volt switching!
Post by: kmarinas86 on December 18, 2007, 07:21:17 AM
Favored (because these qualities allow the machine do quick and nimble things for a longer time)
mechanical power
angular acceleration
torque/volume
torque/mass
torque
longevity

Neutral
resistance
voltage
loops, wire
length, wire
charge capacity
area per loop
diameter, wire

Disfavored (because these qualities prevent the machine from do quick and nimble things for a long duration)
current
mass
volume

The chart below consists of the solutions by a Microsoft Excel add-in.  What the chart below shows is that in order to follow the criteria above, you have to increase certain parameters at a faster rate than others, while decreasing others in the process.  The rate is r, where x=(1+r).

x^9: resistance
x^8: voltage
x^7: mechanical power
x^6: angular acceleration
x^4: torque/volume; wire loops; torque/mass
x^3: wire length
x^1: torque, longevity
x^0: charge capacity
x^-1: current
x^-2: area per loop
x^-3: wire diameter; mass; volume

Consider x=2.  We would have:

512 times the resistance
256 times the voltage
128 times the mechanical power
64 times the angular acceleration
16 times the torque/volume; wire loops; torque/mass
8 times the wire length
2 times the torque, longevity
The same charge capacity
50% of the current
25% of the area per loop
12.5% of the wire diameter; mass; volume

The above suggests that while the possible mechanical power is limited by electrical power, its possible have negative relationship between power and volume, power and mass, power per current - SIMULTANEOUSLY.  It's only a matter of engineering as to how small, and powerful, and how long lasting the motor can be.
Title: Re: Faster, cheaper, lighter, smaller, and more powerful with NO volt switching!
Post by: kmarinas86 on December 20, 2007, 03:04:48 AM
My third Newman motor

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mMxXqG2JFp0

(https://overunityarchives.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fx83.xanga.com%2F04fc1b7436631163601163%2Fb123396880.jpg&hash=e0b3d24d7220a97425ea67a6756fab3975aedd41)

My second Newman motor

http://img.youtube.com/vi/2FNTTyGjs04/default.jpg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-r0c2ctgrpY

(https://overunityarchives.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fxb7.xanga.com%2F1c2c1a7679531163601531%2Fb123397189.jpg&hash=a631208ef6b7c3010229a371960a58a22805c300)

My my first Newman motor

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bs0jsF8X7ys

(https://overunityarchives.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fxaa.xanga.com%2Ff42c770b74c33163601576%2Fb119244375.jpg&hash=6585a7b916cc07c42542243a91e588a7d54be6e7)
Title: Re: Faster, cheaper, lighter, smaller, and more powerful with NO volt switching!
Post by: Ray0energy on February 20, 2008, 05:36:00 AM
Quote from: kmarinas86 on December 18, 2007, 07:21:17 AM
Favored (because these qualities allow the machine do quick and nimble things for a longer time)
mechanical power
angular acceleration
torque/volume
torque/mass
torque
longevity

Neutral
resistance
voltage
loops, wire
length, wire
charge capacity
area per loop
diameter, wire

Disfavored (because these qualities prevent the machine from do quick and nimble things for a long duration)
current
mass
volume

The chart below consists of the solutions by a Microsoft Excel add-in.  What the chart below shows is that in order to follow the criteria above, you have to increase certain parameters at a faster rate than others, while decreasing others in the process.  The rate is r, where x=(1+r).

x^9: resistance
x^8: voltage
x^7: mechanical power
x^6: angular acceleration
x^4: torque/volume; wire loops; torque/mass
x^3: wire length
x^1: torque, longevity
x^0: charge capacity
x^-1: current
x^-2: area per loop
x^-3: wire diameter; mass; volume

Consider x=2.  We would have:

512 times the resistance
256 times the voltage
128 times the mechanical power
64 times the angular acceleration
16 times the torque/volume; wire loops; torque/mass
8 times the wire length
2 times the torque, longevity
The same charge capacity
50% of the current
25% of the area per loop
12.5% of the wire diameter; mass; volume

The above suggests that while the possible mechanical power is limited by electrical power, its possible have negative relationship between power and volume, power and mass, power per current - SIMULTANEOUSLY.  It's only a matter of engineering as to how small, and powerful, and how long lasting the motor can be.

still a lot of BLA BLA he ;) ???
or in Holland we say (praatjes vullen geen gaatjes) or Talks fills no holes :P
place build something and then u talk