wow I just got what he's about. I've seen his periodic table, and some info about him on here before, but I didn't get it. Now I get it, after seeing this.
(https://overunityarchives.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.5-dimension.org%2Fmembers%2Frussell%2Fscans%2Fevol_of_force.jpg&hash=f596c75c6202a9fbc2e7a8602f5da83424633fc9)
maybe I don't understand, or just don't totally agree with all the wording in that diagram, but it matches with my theory I posted a while ago. That heavy positivly charge things like protons go inward, and light high momentum and so negatively charged things go outward. And he even says everything is made of the same "stuff". His economic's is good, I don't argree with everything but "credit and dept" paragraph seen here: http://www.walter-russell.org/en/Wirtschaft.php is dead on. His philosophy is good I can tell that he's all about the "wave" "you give and then you get" equallibrium, but it's not that simple, making his philosophy seem a bit cratpotish. I know the sayings, "what goes around comes around" and "you only get what you give" but those are overlly simplified. Yeah it's like that in many cases, but not all, and I think it's because he doesn't account for waves within waves.
where I found that diagram, and there's others
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg24297.html
I just read the top, "all direction is curved - all motion is spiral". Exactly, everything in the univers is vortexual. All lines of force is vortexual. Nothing ever travels in a perfectly striaght line because, it's always effected by it's surroundings. Like a rock traveling through space, it is never in perfect balance of gravitational forces on either side, it's either orbiting on galexy, or ther other. Lines of force on a magnet is vortexual.
When you realize that you are going in at least 3 directions at once the Universe begins to appear as inertial fields upon inertial fields. The more potential energy invested in the field the stronger it is. You never move any faster you just invest your potential energy into an inertial field of choice.
GENTLEMEN please embelish this is very cool Chet
Walter Russell added quite a lot of elements in 1926, and it was a spiraling
(vortical) chart of elements. and get this, someone posted them online at a
rather high quality. which is great.
mendeleef chart:
http://www.5-dimension.org/members/russell/scans/periodic_mendeleef.jpg (http://www.5-dimension.org/members/russell/scans/periodic_mendeleef.jpg)
russell charts:
http://www.5-dimension.org/members/russell/scans/russell_periodic_l.jpg (http://www.5-dimension.org/members/russell/scans/russell_periodic_l.jpg)
http://www.5-dimension.org/members/russell/scans/periodic_chart.jpg (http://www.5-dimension.org/members/russell/scans/periodic_chart.jpg)
http://www.5-dimension.org/members/russell/scans/order_of_hardness.jpg (http://www.5-dimension.org/members/russell/scans/order_of_hardness.jpg)
http://www.5-dimension.org/members/russell/scans/6_octaves.jpg (http://www.5-dimension.org/members/russell/scans/6_octaves.jpg)
http://www.5-dimension.org/members/russell/scans/10_octaves_1.jpg (http://www.5-dimension.org/members/russell/scans/10_octaves_1.jpg)
http://www.5-dimension.org/members/russell/scans/10_octaves_2.jpg (http://www.5-dimension.org/members/russell/scans/10_octaves_2.jpg)
http://www.5-dimension.org/members/russell/scans/4,5,6,_octaves_1.jpg (http://www.5-dimension.org/members/russell/scans/4,5,6,_octaves_1.jpg)
http://www.5-dimension.org/members/russell/scans/4,5,6,_octaves_2.jpg (http://www.5-dimension.org/members/russell/scans/4,5,6,_octaves_2.jpg)
http://www.5-dimension.org/members/russell/scans/evol_of_force.jpg (http://www.5-dimension.org/members/russell/scans/evol_of_force.jpg)
http://www.5-dimension.org/members/russell/scans/univ_math.jpg (http://www.5-dimension.org/members/russell/scans/univ_math.jpg)
( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvp34trzXSI&feature=related (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvp34trzXSI&feature=related) )
Quote from: ramset on March 31, 2008, 10:05:39 PM
GENTLEMEN please embelish this is very cool Chet
there was a lot of communication between regular scientists and walter russell, about his two-way view of the universe and how it functions. most of it was during 1920s 1930s in the new york times where scientists would critique him, believing that he is just a crank, and him proving the lot of them wrong by the soundness of his thinking (balanced full idea). it'd be nice to have access to these old articles.. one day..
hmm. anyway, there area LOT of scientific diagrams that Russell drew that completely overwrite our current understanding of what gravity, magnetism, electricity and energy really are. this stuff is truly important for understanding what overunity/keelynet/etc people are after.
more people should study this, but a lot of people are deterred because Russell's view is a holistic view that also requires being able to read something with mentions of mind, consciousness, god, etc.. and a lot of people just zone out immediately when they realize that his viewpoint was of mind+matter, not just MATTER ONLY.
and, this is not my own realization, but something coming from a person that i trust wholeheartedly:
Walter Russell can be used to explain:
Ed Leedskalnin
Thomas Henry Moray
Nikola Tesla
Viktor Schauberger
Wilhelm Reich
Karl Schappeller
John Keely
Nathan Stubblefield.
pretty important stuff to be thought about.
heres some more diagrams:
http://www.philosophy.org/index.php?option=com_zoom&Itemid=77&catid=3 (http://www.philosophy.org/index.php?option=com_zoom&Itemid=77&catid=3)
Nasa is coming to grips with an unexplained force causing deacceleration of the Voyager spacecraft (or were) Something is slowing them down which seems to be heading towards the Sun. This could be Russel's sunlight on the way back home. Antiradiation force.
there is a book, that was recently sold on ebay, from 1930s, with walter russell's autograph, called the russell genero-radiative concept..
The Russell two-way universe is a universe of generation, and radiation,
(https://www.philosophy.org/images/zoom/scientific/68.jpg)
compression - expansion
(https://www.philosophy.org/images/zoom/scientific/67.jpg)
red (heat) intensifies as gravity multiplies (compression, winding of the cosmic clock spring)
blue (cold) intensifies as gravity divides (expansion, unwinding of the cosmic clock spring)
http://flickr.com/photos/79138147@N00/2390854762/sizes/o/ (http://flickr.com/photos/79138147@N00/2390854762/sizes/o/) :o
life is a charge, death is a discharge - but all those are motion, im not sure if im qualified to say motion in the wave or the wave motion for sure, but
(https://www.philosophy.org/images/zoom/scientific/89.jpg)
we get to this again, the winding and the unwinding.
and then there's this last attachment, for better understanding of the nature of electricity
the only thing i can say is: there's something here, i don't have it, thus its not mine to give as pure understanding -- but off and on there's something that coalesces/recalls in my mind, something which is still pretty amorphous with details.. ::)
but now its like, since you lot are here talking, might as well see if i cant rummage some more sense into it, its not mine to give, and i should instead of writing this, be finishing up "atomic suicide" "secret of light" "the universal one" "the russell genero-radiative concept" and russell's other work, but for some reason, since its an extremely rewarding nut to crack and get into completely, i tarry elsewhere.
in the meantime, here's 196 scientific diagrams of russell:
http://flickr.com/photos/79138147@N00 (http://flickr.com/photos/79138147@N00)
Dear Esaruoho,
I like very much what you're doing. And thank you very much for your continuous efforts in helping other people getting in contact with the Russell cosmogony.
But what I thought is a pity, that of all the scans of pictures you made available, you made no scan of the FE-Devices Mr Russell made and described. I think, as this forum here is about this topic, it would really be a benefit to have also these scans...
Howdy Y'all,
Yeah, Cosmic Law is cool!
As energy loses velocity it spirals down to be come matter.
As matter gains velocity it spirals up to become energy.
If you were in a ship traveling at the speed of light you would literally become energy, losing mass instead of mass increasing to infinity as the Law of Relativity states. Einstein was wrong!
Blessed Be Brothers...