Question:
Do you understand the O-level physics behind the theory?
Option 1: Yes. It is very easy and clear.
votes: 4
Option 2: Yes. It was a lot of hard work.
votes: 0
Option 3: I am undecided.
votes: 3
Option 4: No. The physics is too difficult.
votes: 1
Option 5: No. The Physics is wrong.
votes: 7
I am now ready to conduct a poll to see how many forum members can follow the Lee-Tseung Theory.
The poll has no expiration date and a member can change his vote.
I have never tried this feature in this forum. It will be a good learning experience.
Quote from: ltseung888 on April 07, 2008, 02:05:25 PM
I am now ready to conduct a poll to see how many forum members can follow the Lee-Tseung Theory.
The poll has no expiration date and a member can change his vote.
I have never tried this feature in this forum. It will be a good learning experience.
How many personas does Tseung have? Easy, just count the "Easy and clear" votes.
Quote from: utilitarian on April 07, 2008, 06:14:18 PM
Quote from: ltseung888 on April 07, 2008, 02:05:25 PM
I am now ready to conduct a poll to see how many forum members can follow the Lee-Tseung Theory.
The poll has no expiration date and a member can change his vote.
I have never tried this feature in this forum. It will be a good learning experience.
How many personas does Tseung have? Easy, just count the "Easy and clear" votes.
Hahhaha! That's a good one Utilitarian.
Notice also how idiotic the questions are. There should also be a selection for: "This thread has no basis for being in the OU Forum, it's way below 'O' Level Physics. "
Common sense dictates that pulse energy must be considered in the equation!
This would be a good test if the voters IP address and Name can be recorded by the server and cannot remove their own votes later.
cheers
chrisC
There are already 9 replies when only 3 people posted their comments ;D
Quote from: Kul_ash on April 14, 2008, 08:09:29 AM
There are already 9 replies when only 3 people posted their comments ;D
And the 4 'positive' votes were from the same person? aka Tseung, Devil, TopGun and Forever!
It is no wonder this thread should be removed for taking up useless data space that can be used for other useful OU applications.
Now, Mr. Tseung wants other university academics to use this forum to substantiate his ideas! Get real Lawrence.
cheers
chrisC
Tseung, you finally got your message ready to launch to the World.
Quote
The essense of the Lee-Tseung Lead Out theory
When a sideward pull is applied to a simple pendulum, the lead out gravitational energy is equal to the vertical component of the tension of the string times the vertical component of the displacement. So long as there is tension on the string, gravitational energy will be Lead Out. The ideal Lee-Tseung Pull is when the direction of pull is tangential.
æŽè"£å¼•å‡ºåœ°å¿ƒå¼•åŠ›ç†è«–çš,,ç²¾è¦
當æ"ºå‹•å™¨è¢«æ‹‰å'æ—é,Šæ™,，引出çš,,地心引力能é‡æ˜¯ç‰æ–¼ï¼šç¹©æ‹‰åŠ›çš,,åž,直數值乘繩ä½ç§»çš,,åž,直數值ã€,åªè¦ç¹©æœ‰æ‹‰åŠ›ï¼Œåœ°å¿ƒå¼•åŠ›ä¾¿å¯è¢«å¼•å‡ºã€,最佳çš,,æŽè"£æ‹‰åŠ›çš,,æ–¹å'是å'Œç¹©çš,,åŠå¾'æˆ90度(切線) ã€,
]
To debunk the Lee-Tseung Lead Out theory, the debunker has to debunk the Law of Parallelogram of Forces; resolution of force and displacement vectors into vertical and horizontal components and vector arithmetic. No scientists from MIT, Harvard, Cambridge, Paris, Tokyo Universities or similar will put their heads on the chopping block.
The challenge will come from stupid, ignorant or paid debunkers. Humans are self-centered ? believing that they are equal to God and Me. In reality, they dug up harmful chemicals from the ground to generate pollution. Clean, abundant and easy-to-use energy has been available since the dawn of Universe.
Even when Tseung stupidly spelled out the theoretical basis and over 300 inventors stumbled on the solution, the foolish human race still covered their eyes with smear, insults and lies.
All humans should kneel before me daily and recite:
It is the vertical component of the tension times the vertical displacement that gives the work done by Gravity.