Overunity.com Archives

Discussion board help and admin topics => Half Baked Ideas => Topic started by: thetagain on May 28, 2008, 10:36:20 AM

Title: Perpetual motion machine and overunity
Post by: thetagain on May 28, 2008, 10:36:20 AM
A little clarification to understand things better.

This forum is about overunity - a device which produces more energy than it receives.
This characteristic has usually been devoted to God or the Creator, who is able to create things out of nothing, energy out of emptiness, space from no-space, etc.

I think, what we are really after is a way of tapping energy that is already present.
The perpetual motion machine (perpetuum mobile) received a lot of attention in the Middle Ages and it still has many fans.

Then a bloke called Newton came and made this statement that a perpetual motion machine is impossible to be createt. Then somehow "science" agreed on this simply because they were unable to find one.

The problem is that one does not see the wood from the trees.

What is NOT a perpetual motion machine? Can you show me one?

You bring me a pebble. OK. It is a perfectly workable perpetuum mobile. Or at least a battery of a very good kind. There is enough energy in that pebble to light New York city for the next 100 years.

Each little electron in those atoms is in perpetual motion.

Well, OK, it is not PERPETUAL as we can see it will run down in a hundred years, but hey, who cares, we just pick up another one from the back yard.

I think seekers of FREE ENERGY should not really try to find overunity. We should rather TAP EXISTING ENERGY SOURCES in a more efficient and less polluting way.

Back to perpetual motion, take our solar system. It has been in perpetual motion for more than we can imagine and prolly will be too. OK, we all know it had a start and we can be pretty sure it will end one day, but for our practical purposes it is a perpetual motion machine. Just like any atom, or anything that is a thing in the material universe.

We are just not smart enough yet to tap, or better stated: channel this HUGE amount of energy.

I am pretty sure that some of us are very smart here, and we are just about to create a workable device.

You may argue with me, but I say: we are trying to create a device to tap (channel) energy, not a machine that creates energy, or produces more than it receives.

Cheers  :)
Title: Re: Perpetual motion machine and overunity
Post by: retrodynamic on June 27, 2008, 02:37:13 PM
Project Submission:
The Gearturbine, power by barr, with retrodynamic dextrogiro vs levogiro effect, at non parasitic looses system, and over-unit engine. To see details:

www.geocities.com/gearturbine