just wondering what the thoughts were on this statement.
cam
Quote from: cameron sydenham on June 04, 2008, 10:58:09 AM
just wondering what the thoughts were on this statement.
cam
If there is no energy being added from any other source, assisting the motor in producing the said horsepower, then yes, you have overunity.
I'd be kinda sceptical of how the horsepower is demonstrated. I have a vacuum cleaner that says it is 5 hp and only draws 9 amps. hmmmm, thats only 1080 watts for 5 hp. pretty sure it can't possibly do that!!!!
Quote from: cameron sydenham on June 04, 2008, 10:58:09 AM
just wondering what the thoughts were on this statement.
cam
Is this the device you are talking about?
http://www.google.com/patents?id=s5AIAAAAEBAJ&dq=6239524 (http://www.google.com/patents?id=s5AIAAAAEBAJ&dq=6239524)
I got it from what looks like your company website:
http://www.centorque.com/ (http://www.centorque.com/)
You claim to have a fuelless motor, right?
fuelless is a difficult answer, it does need electricity to run, it alone does not produce any electricity.
Quote from: cameron sydenham on June 05, 2008, 10:41:15 AM
fuelless is a difficult answer, it does need electricity to run, it alone does not produce any electricity.
I am confused. Based on the literature from your website, the motor produces electricity. So if the motor produces electricity, why does it need electricity to run? That doesn't make any sense. The device would be useless, unless it can produce more electricity than it takes in, and you have said before that is not the case - it is not a self-running perpetual motion machine. So what is the point of the device?
Atlas, i appreciate your interest/concern/skepticism in that motor concept, I was only trying to get a clearer answer to my question, with my limited understanding on the vocabulary and the concepts that are used on this site, i was unclear as to what the thoughts were to that question.
Cam.
Quote from: cameron sydenham on June 05, 2008, 11:51:41 AM
Atlas, i appreciate your interest/concern/skepticism in that motor concept, I was only trying to get a clearer answer to my question, with my limited understanding on the vocabulary and the concepts that are used on this site, i was unclear as to what the thoughts were to that question.
Cam.
Cameron
I have not had time to read all the information about your device .
I did give it a quick once over .
It looks to me that you have several motors and the motors themselves are set up kind of like a set of flywheels .
Something you might want to look at is
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,2487.1000.html
The posts I am referring to are the last 5 or 6 posts ..............starting with reply 1032
This thread is about a device using flywheels . In general most people here have decided it is a fraud ........but am not so sure . There are unrelated reportings of OU effects from belts bouncing .
If you have access to one of these machines it might be interesting to play with the belts a little
gary
The answer to the question is YES. If you can generate 1hp with LESS than 746 Watts you have overunity.
Hans von Lieven
@ resonance. as far as that motor style, we have built many, and is one of the patents the inventor has. We have also designed a belt that works in a centrifugal invironment and more importantly a bearring that works in a cintrifugal invironment. the bearring also has a 24%-27% increase in efficency. the unique thing about this motor design is that it has a linear progressing of output power to input. increase input by x% and output rpm increases by same %. ( never able to get ou though) we have taken it one amazing step further and have figured out how to use Cf.
@ resonance. as far as that motor style, we have built many, and is one of the patents the inventor has. We have also designed a belt that works in a centrifugal invironment and more importantly a bearring that works in a cintrifugal invironment. the bearring also has a 24%-27% increase in efficency. the unique thing about this motor design is that it has a linear progressing of output power to input. increase input by x% and output rpm increases by same %. ( never able to get ou though) we have taken it one amazing step further and have figured out how to use Cf.