Roughly million tons of force with the equivalent to one milliampere at one mm ? Coulomb?s Law. :o
There is a web page dedicated to this and the enigma of Coulomb?s Law.
Since, I'm lazy (and... hate typing) and do not like repeating myself; details about the enigma of Coulomb?s Law and a device that attempts to apply this are at http://www.i-am-a-i.org/free-energy/index.html
Here are some of the graphics from the web page.
This device could be considered as an electric field transformer.
I was very surprised when I saw this title because I thought it was the idea I had which involves mechanics and not electricity.
Check out...
http://www.besslerwheel.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2541
Greetings and welcome to the forum stvnjsha
This is a very good first post and very interesting.
At first glance the formulas of Coulomb's Law -- F = K x [(q1 x q2)/d2] -- and Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation -- F = K x [(m1 x m2)/d2] -- appear very similar. Both determine forces present, one electrical and the other gravitational.
Newton's law determines gravitational forces; how much we weigh. While, Coulomb's Law determines forces between electrical charges. We experience this force as static cling.
Newton's law works with mass. While Coulomb's works with charges.
FYI: 1 ampere is 1 coulomb of charge (6.2422 x 1018 electrons) passing a given point in one second
Upon closer examination, due to the constants (K) they are quite different. The K for the gravitation formula is 6.7 x 10-11(N)(m2)/kg2. The K for Coulomb's Law is 9.0 x 109 (N)(m2)/kg2.
If ones (1) were placed in the places of m1, m2, and d of Newton's law, the resultant force of gravity would be relatively insignificant. However, if ones (1) were placed in the places of q1, q2, and d of Coulomb's Law, the resultant force would be incredible. It would roughly translate to about a 1,000,000 tons of force.
Now, reduce all the variable of Coulomb's Law by a thousand (10-3) and the force available would still be about million tons. This means if you have (for one moment in time and space) one milliampere’s worth of positive charge and one milliampere’s worth of negative charge with a millimeter between them the ‘static cling’ force would still be about 1,000,000 tons.
My electronics college instructor told us that after Coulomb's Law was published, numerous people 'jumped' on it to try to tap into this physical force. From Volta, Ohm, Faraday, Franklin, etc. we got our laws of electricity. And...in terms of an application of Coulomb's Law, they all walked away "scratching their head" (instructor's words).
An effective power application of Coulomb's Law was the 'holy grail' for the early electrical pioneers.
Why hasn't this been used? The problem is like charges repel each other. To create a condition that holds a bunch of electrons in one place, those electrons have to be put under pressure. Pressure in electrical terms is voltage. To create a condition that would use this force, a very high voltage would have to be used.
This is not that difficult to do; and, it does create some arcing problems. Specially, if put these high voltages are in close proximity to each other with only a small air gap.
That much voltage is hard to contain. So, electric field forces’ usage has been restricted to small power scale applications like watches and power meters.
Coulomb's Law is why high voltage capacitors will always be ‘chunky’. We have the thin material that can stand the high voltage. But, the capacitor plates can't be too close together. If the plates were too close together, the force between the plates literally causes the plates to pinch the insulator and shorts out the capacitor.
THE ANOMOLY OF COULOMB'S LAW
There are all kinds of physical logistic problems in actually creating this condition. And...hypothetically suppose that there is a device where the physical logistics problems have been solved. The enigma of Coulomb's Law is; no way would you have to exert the electrical equivalent of that amount of force to create this condition (given a non arcing condition is established).
True, again, there are numerous physical difficulties. And...all physical problems aside, the math says the resultant force is more than what had to be put in to create it.
To give you an idea of the discrepancy between the electrical 'input' and the physical 'output', a half cycle voltage spike from a small Tesla coil can momentarily supply the voltage and current necessary for the 10-3 example used above (a million tons).
Coulomb's Law is an apparent major ‘glitch’ in the current science paradigm.1 It is a ‘glitch’ or exception to two basic physics axioms:
"Nothing can be created or destroyed."
"You can't get something for nothing."
One of my electronics college instructors worked for a high power AM radio station when he was younger. He told us the story of what happened when a million volt capacitor accidentally connected to a low voltage variable tuning capacitor. (A capacitor stores electrical charge. The variable tuning capacitor is used in this instance to keep the radio station on frequency. This type of variable capacitor was two sets of parallel mounted metal plates. They were arranged such that one set could move freely between the other set without touching.)
The story goes, that the charged million volt capacitor got connected to the normally low voltage tuning capacitor . There was a loud "thunk". (The noise was so loud everybody in the building jumped.)
The observed result was the instantaneous forces generated from Coulomb's Law was so great, that afterwards, the formerly moveable plates were pushed together by such a pressure that "It was impossible to take the tuning capacitor apart."
Within the current energy/power mechanical paradigm, to do this, such that the plates stay together and do not separate, something like a hydraulic press that exerts tons of force would be needed. Yet...a discharging electrical energy storage -- a capacitor -- device did this.
In terms of the 'thunk', using F = ma as a reference and assuming the mass of the tuning capacitor plates is relatively small, the acceleration on the capacitor plates -- toward one another -- could have been so great that the sound barrier may have been broken. Specially when that force would increase exponentially as the plates approached one another.
There is a whole study in physics around this called quantum electro-dynamics. One explanation that current physicists propose is that there are virtual photons and these virtual photons have the potential of infinite force and are everywhere. Creating this electrical condition brings the infinite potential of virtual photons from the virtual realm to the physical realm.
As I understand the theory, all temporary photonic activity gets its energy from virtual photons. The induction field around a radio antenna is considered to be of a virtual photon. So is the electric field of a capacitor. (See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_photon (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_photon))
Most of the time these photons obey the conservation of energy rule. And..."The Coulomb force (static electric force) between electric charges. It is caused by the exchange of virtual photons. In symmetric 3-dimensional space this exchange results in the inverse square law for electric force. Since the photon has no mass, the coulomb potential has an infinite range." (Wikipedia, underlining is mine)
If you learn anything from this web page, 'walk' away with this:
There is a source of incredible power or energy; that we have known about for a long time, and may be overlooking.
The intent of this aricle is not about the theory nor will it try to explain how this anamoly is possible. The idea like the Virtual Photon Power Converter is to explore possible applications or ways to access this force rather than explain.
(from i-am-a-i.org)
Assuming electric fields can manifest a virtual photon reference â€" VPR -- and assuming electric fields within capacitors have a VPR, then within the circuit of the present invention having a pair of high voltage capacitors connected in series there would be VPR within each capacitor, (b) and (c). The circuit across the two capacitors is another capacitor â€" VPR (a) â€" and this is the electric field that energizes the entire mixing capacitor plate/winding/plate/winding assembly. The electric field induced on the mixing capacitor plate/winding/plate/winding assembly electrically polarizes that assembly thus creating a fourth VPR, (d). In summary a VPR is suspended inside another VPR with two VPRs connecting the two. This event occurs when any two capacitors are in series and in close proximity. In this circuit, within VPR (d), is an electrical closed circuit magnetic field device â€" plate/winding/plate/winding assembly â€" suspended between the electric fields. This device has one end of a pair of transformer windings going through one VPR while the other ends of the pair are connected through another VPR â€" (b) and (c) -- and this magnetic field assembly is contained in VPR (d).
Because my writing skills suck, here is (hopefully) a clearer electrical perspective than the previous. This explanation takes the VPPC theory out of the esoteric virtual photon range into a common recognized electrical theory.
For any single phase power transformer attached to the grid the primary winding has an electro-magnetic footprint. Part of this footprint is that the primary is in an electric field. Out of this electric field across the primary there is an electron flow through the primary winding creating a magnetic field. Energy from the grid that creates these electric and magnetic fields is translated through the fields by the secondary winding and then to the house or whatever. The secondary gets its energy from these fields.
Both the electric and magnetic fields fluctuate with the frequency of the grid. The electric field component stays the same according to frequency and for the most part is constant. However, the magnetic field â€" electron flow â€" varies with power draw and is what translates the energy transfer. The current flow â€" magnetic field -- in the primary is directly proportional to the energy â€" VA -- being extracted from the transformer.
And, for any single phase power transformer the voltage field and the electron source/magnetic field come from the same energy source.
With the VPPC there are two energy sources. The electric field energy source suspends the primary winding (7) in a closed circuit electric field. With the electric field circuit, being a capacitive circuit, there is little to no current going through the primary (7) as it is polarized and suspended in the electric field.
The current energy source feeds into this electric field suspended coil through C1 and provides the magnetic field component for the primary. When the electric field and current flow mix in C1, the primary (7) is energized by an electron flow coming out of one high voltage(HV)potential across the transformer, through the transformer, towards and into the other HV potential on the other side of the transformer. This provides the magnetic component of the primary winding’s electro-magnetic footprint.
The secondary 8 is energized by both of these field components mixing in the primary (7). From these fields, the secondary draws its energy or power. So, essentially what this device does is it would give a line transformer primary the same electro-magnetic field footprint and therefore VA capabilities of being on the grid; when it’s not on the grid.
Since the HV circuit is a coil capacitor circuit, its power draw would be directly related to the capacitance and have a relatively low VA. In addition, normally the voltage on a capacitor is 90 degrees out of phase with the current in the coil across it. This necessitates a device (11) that keeps the voltage on the capacitor C1 and therefore on the primary in phase with the current in (4).
The major VA consumption with this device would be the current source generating the magnetic fields in the electric field suspended primary winding. In addition this power consumption would be inversely proportional to the electric field potential â€" voltage â€" across the coil. For any transformer and a given power draw, the higher the voltage field across the primary, the less the current in the magnetic field circuit.
In summary, this device would give a single phase line transformer the electro-magnetic field footprint and VA capabilities of when it’s attached to the grid with a VA input that is a fraction of its VA output. Energy is pulled out of the virtual photon quantum state to do this.
:o
When I first put the schematic for the VPPC on paper and saw how simple it was, I went into denial. For two weeks I couldn’t believe that it could be that easy. So, I did everything I could think of to find fault with it. The more I tried to find fault with it, the better it looked. It started to fit into other physical law concepts that I knew.
The schematic that originally was drawn had the current circuit slave to the voltage circuit and the converter xformer wasn’t in.
What issues and/or variables I did see are mostly around the mixing capacitors C1:
1. What kind of voltage drop would be across C1
a. Generally speaking under constant current load any voltage drop can be compensated by an increase in the high voltage circuit.
b. Changing current draws
i. A fluctuating current draw would create a fluctuating voltage across T2-4
ii. This fluctuating voltage across T2-4 can affect the capacitance of C1-6
1. As a complimentary voltage rises -- a current increase, capacitance rises
a. If capacitance of C1-6 rises, then the total capacitance of C1 rises
b. When charge stays the same and capacitance increases, voltage must drop
2. As a complimentary voltage lowers, capacitance decreases
a. If capacitance of C1-6 lowers â€" a current decrease, then the total capacitance of C1 lowers
b. When charge stays the same and capacitance lowers, voltage must increase
3. The voltage across C1 may vary with current draw
4. possible solution
a. Putting another capacitor of about the same capacitance of the whole electric field circuit across â€" in parallel with -- T1-9 before C1.
b. Putting a capacitor across T3-7
c. A combination of the above
2. How will the voltage induced on C1-6 reflect as impedance to T2
I’m sure a prototype would manifest other issues and give a considerable more data. (hint…hint)
This idea is a seed looking for fertile ground. I am not naive. I know the Beast is out there and the ‘deck is stacked’ for a single inventor/developer. :'(
The ‘shotgun approach’ â€" a number of simultaneous developments -- seems like the best gambit. With the grace of God, if enough holes in the dike occur at the same time, the Beast might miss a few.
Peace
Jerry,
If you could post a pic ?and any other info, that would be fabulous!
This seems amazing ,and the fellow that started this thread stvnjsha, makes a very sincere and convincing presentation!
stvnjsha
More please?
Chet
PS
Oh, And Merry Christmas
Jerry
Nice,Thanks for taking the time to do this!!Do you feel this could be Electrostatic in nature?
Very exciting stuff!
Chet
Jerry,
I must say they sure look Good,You must have a very light hand to not crack them!
Very cool stuff here Jerry!The potential of harnessing Electrostatic energy Boggles the mind!
Chet
Jerry,
You definately have our attention!!,Electrostatic energy is becomeing quite the topic lately.
Chet
Interesting, maybe for the future have you thought about a dremel or a rotozip and a template jig? And...if you have a drill press, the way to go is your way for circles.
In terms of this thread, the first topic is an attempt to use HV to electrically polarize a closed system and to use the electric fields in that polarized system. The premise was electrically polarizing a conductor so that it exhibited electet qualities. Because it would all be a 'closed system' electric fields would be available and it would tend not to arc to any thing outside of it. This is an attempted form of using the non-conservative character of electric fields.
I saw that one of the major factors would be the molecular matrix of the core material. For in the end, the matrix
is the closed system that is being polarized. I choose iron just to give the idea the
K.I.S.S. and to use it's conductive and magnetic characteristics.
From my limited perception, the one to go for is the second item, the VPPC. With the varied intrinsic qualities of the multitude of matrix materials that can be used, you could end up like Edison Labratories looking for filament material or Bell Labs looking for transistor material. And...you may get lost or distracted in some the interesting discoveries you make along the way.
With the VPPC, a couple of microwave xformers (one being the HV source and the other HV secondary being the mixing xformer primary), a couple of isolation xformers (one being maybe 1kVA), some glass and sheetmetal, and the phased lock power supply are the basics. There would be less variables like shapes and molecular matrices involved. In theory, you should be able to see the direct effects with less distractions and variables. My fantasy is that one can make a number of discoveries with the VPPC as well.
And...don't let me discourage you from what you are doing. For me, what you may be doing is exploring another side of the 'box' we are in. Even though your 'outside of the box' may be a different side than the one I'm pointing to. They both may lead out. ;D
Peace and Happy New Year
Steven Joshua
Quote from: Jerry Volland on December 27, 2010, 03:38:28 PM
Chet,
The main thing I'm careful of is to not spin the drill too fast or it might torque the disc out of the clamps.
And I would like to harness electrostatic energy. Although I'm not sure if what I'm doing so far is consistent with the intent of this thread. But I did do a test discharge to the disc, which is unnotched for now. Static does discharge to the disc when it's placed on wood, since wood attracts the static. And with the setup I'm using wood sometimes gives off the spark. The spark in the picture is around 4kV.
Such big power can not be obtained at all. Even with newest, element 115 basing engines. They can have power of some 200.000 T but only as cluster of many small engines (about 200-400). Please remember that big tachyons engines built by Beluzzo in Breslau (today: WrocÅ,aw, Poland), had "only" 300 T of power.
Steven,
Hope all is well. Got a question regarding the 'glass' mixing capacitor. Is the 3rd copper plated needed? I am under the impression that the electric field would terminate on the 2nd copper plate that is connected to the 'current' transformer.
The blue lines in the picture represent what I believe would be the 'electric' field. The glass needed to build the cap's could easily be found in small picture frames that you find in the $.99 stores.
Hope you have a great new Year! :)
Respectfully,
Core
Hey Core glad to hear from ya. :)
In terms of your question about the extra plate, that plate is probably not needed. I added the 3rd plate as insurance so that the mixing plate would be totally immersed in the electric field. The original design only had two plates.
Your pic is what I would guess-timate the fields' interaction involved. A pic of total fields would almost look like the flux lines of a magnetic field with each plate being a 'pole'.
Peace and Happy New Year 8)
Steve
P.S. Right now, I am looking into the phased control power supply. There is an old window on the property that has lots of 'lites' in it. I intend to cannibalize that for the cap.
Quote from: core on December 28, 2010, 10:23:37 PM
Steven,
Hope all is well. Got a question regarding the 'glass' mixing capacitor. Is the 3rd copper plated needed? I am under the impression that the electric field would terminate on the 2nd copper plate that is connected to the 'current' transformer.
The blue lines in the picture represent what I believe would be the 'electric' field. The glass needed to build the cap's could easily be found in small picture frames that you find in the $.99 stores.
Hope you have a great new Year! :)
Respectfully,
Core
You were progressing quite well on this device, anything new come out?
Quote from: Doctor No on December 28, 2010, 02:05:07 PM
Such big power can not be obtained at all. Even with newest, element 115 basing engines. They can have power of some 200.000 T but only as cluster of many small engines (about 200-400). Please remember that big tachyons engines built by Beluzzo in Breslau (today: WrocÅ,aw, Poland), had "only" 300 T of power.
Oh really? You just put your self into the same category of those who said airplanes would never fly, the atomic bomb will never go off, etc. What if we have a saucer shaped object, and there is low pressure on one side (vacuum), while the other side is subject to the full atmospheric pressure? With an atmospheric pressure of 1.033 kg. per sq. cm. we can calculate that the force operating on a saucer of 20 m. diameter is equal to 3,278,272.8 kg. This is one of the greatest forces available to us here on our planet. Increasing the diameter of the saucer, will increase the force operating on the saucer. Cathode rays or Lenard rays can create this vacuum effect by completely breaking down the atmosphere. It will require extremely high voltage/current, but the force generated on the saucer will be much higher than the energy that went into creating the vacuum, just like the amount of energy required to detonate an atomic bomb is much less than the energy released from an atomic bomb. An element 115 engine with no readily available source for the element 115 is good for nothing and it's not even capable of closely matching the force created by a potential difference in the atmospheric pressure of a relatively small diameter saucer of 20 m., Good luck with that!
GB
Of course,effect You had described it was used, but only for atmospheric flights. In space it is useless. You can only on power of free gravitons (tachyons) to count on. This atmospheric effect (better known as Coanda principle) was used in Beluzzo disc too, but mainly for better steering. So it was really an airplane, not for space flights intended machine. And to element 115 engines. They were of course tested. But because of big impulse, they had disturbed stability of ocean. The wave had over 300.000 people killed in this some 5000 from Sweden. (Unfortunately, swedish peoples are not so hard as theirs steel;-)). But they are really of not my big interest. You know, this is a time, everybody has of own ass to care:-) Dr Adolf Nowak National Socialists Polish Workers Party www.nsppp.bloog.pl
Pi paradox solved
Pi is a reflection of the the infinite.....how? think of it like shells of numbers, the point being the center...the first shell is ones, the second shell twos etc...all the way out to the shell of nines...in Pi 3.14 the decimal point is reflected..... .314 is reverse Pi or Ip....the infinite point ....this model will show how hydrogen the lightest element, atomic number 1 at the center and all atoms fit this model....the infinite aspect of gravity and the finite speed of light will be explained to absolution ....in decimal math .314 x 3.14 is equal to .314x.314....the difference is the direction.....to or away from the I. [infinite point]...try this OK so if the theory holds true, a direction, a ray, a line, must exist..... .7129 and .6105195 are points on that line ....Edward Leedskalnin showed us these points.....here is what i know , the I. is the center, .314, .7129 and .6105195 will correspond to the diameter of a spike at those points.....look at it like this looking straight down at at the bullseye ones are the first orbit, twos are the second all the way down to the diameter of nines, which equals the event horizon of a black hole.... make a few calculations and see for yourself this model fits!......david
http://www.energeticforum.com/members/david-lambright.html here is a link to my thread.....david
I assume you may be addressing Core. I’m kind of curious also.
And, some of the concepts he got from my website extend beyond what he was doing. In other words, we need more curious people like him.
The concept behind the VPPC circuit is more than the VPPC application itself. The VPPC circuit suspends a closed circuit in an electric field and magnetically exciting that closed circuit while using the mix of the two fields.
The point is; once it is recognized that for any electromagnetic field device, using separate energy sources, the combination of the electric field and the magnetic field (and their relationship) can be customized in terms of relative field strength, phase and/or field polarity, and/or spatial relationship.
From my limited perspective, this concept opens a whole new field of study (pardon the pun) and can present a broad spectrum of new applications. It’s “pick a card, any card†time. :o
One end of this application spectrum may be the VPPC with its infinite potential energy of a virtual photon. At the other end of the spectrum, reversing the electric field polarity, the basic coil/plate/coil/plate VPPC circuit can serve as an electric field modulator or switch. Somewhere in that spectrum is the potential for a RF antenna whose induction field matches its radiation field. Throw in the three vectors to EMF, shaping, mono-polarity fields, and standing waves, then this spectrum could get real sci-fi with electromagnetic force fields and propulsion.
Because of this concept’s potential, I recognize that the study and possible applications can involve many people and lifetimes. Consequently, many more people like Core are needed to experiment and record data -- play ‘mad scientistâ€. There are so many new things to be discovered in this area.
As for me, I am a religious. About as far as I have gotten is the intellectual curiosity of the availability of variable phase control inverters. My interest is in another direction. (See i-am-a-i.org or “That’s to much information†post)
I also recognize that there is more to it than just conceptualizing an idea. I recognize that eventually, R&D, manufacturing, management, marketing, finance, government, etc. are all involved. These things do not interest me (except maybe some elements of R&D).
In fact, some of these things I have a strong aversion too. I don’t mind occasionally playing Mycroft Holmes to other peoples’ Sherlock. Let those who wish to do that kind of ‘legwork’ do it. Some of the music and steps of that particular Consensual reality dance I find very distasteful. And…I recognize some people like that kind of music. They get off on it.
The point is; from my perception, more people need to take this custom EMF structuring concept and run with it.
Peace
Steven
Quote from: broli on January 21, 2011, 08:46:04 AM
You were progressing quite well on this device, anything new come out?
A previous posting gave the virtual photon explanation of the VPPC. Another posting gave the electrical/magnetic field explanation of the VPPC. This article is to take the concept of the virtual photon theory to the nth degree. It’s overview time.
Assuming non-conservative virtual photons are involved with electric fields (as well as gravity and weak nuclear). With every atom in existence, and in your body, the electron array present in its atomic shell is determined by electric fields. This means for every electron movement along with its relationship to other electrons and the atomic nucleus within that atom, VPRs â€" virtual photon references -- are present. It can be said physical form reflects these VPR relationships.
Two and a half of the four recognized physics interactions, which all physical form consists of in the current science paradigm, have non-conservative â€" VPR -- qualities. Gravity, weak nuclear, and the electric element of electromagnetic (that’s the half) present non-conservation of energy characteristics. These are the interactions that give the electrons direction in a water drop as well as forms galaxies and atomic particles. VPRs, along with all the other laws of physical form involving BTRs â€" Bubbles of Temporal/spatial Reference, http://www.i-am-a-i.org/Reading/adobe/downloads/ch3-5.pdf -- have the potential of being physically everywhere at once. Gravity, Bernoulli’s principle, gas laws, thermodynamics, etc. can manifest â€" be observed -- anywhere and at any time when the right conditions are presented. These forces/interactions and laws are “with in you and without you†as you are reading this. These truths/laws form the matrix from which you -- and whatever physical environment you may find your self in -- operate.
All this presents a picture of the virtual photon concept looking from the “bottom to the topâ€, from the perception of Man to the nature of the Universe. Now to “kick it up a notch†and approach the subject from the ‘top down’ â€" Universe too Man -- and integrate the two.
These seven postulates begin this particular ‘top down’ sequence (from I AM A I, Chapter 2 â€" Postulates and Theorems -- http://www.i-am-a-i.org/Reading/adobe/downloads/ch2-5.pdf): (Yes, it’s ‘pulpit time’. ::) )
Postulate 1: There is one God, the Source-less Source, the Formless Form. Absolute Will that is Eternal and Infinite in nature.
Yes, there is a God. This God, like gravity, exists independent of any human â€" mortal â€" thought or beliefs.
All energy, free or otherwise, comes from God, “All things come from Godâ€; it is a closed system. This concept is probably the only relevancy this the rest of this posting has with this website. This article is about the source and mechanics of all “free energyâ€, or the “Force†behind it.
Postulate 2: God’s Absolute Will actualizes as an Absolute Eternal Love
Postulate 3: God’s Absolute Love has an Absolute, Logical, Eternal Mind.
The mortal â€" human -- reference of this is your mind and heart is one thing.
Postulate 4: God’s Logical Mind is a matrix of Absolute, Eternal Truth.
Postulate 5: Creation is an Eternal effect of God’s Truth Matrix.
Or, Creation is an Eternal idea within the Mind of God.
The following is one of the theorems derived from this postulate and is also in this ‘top down’ sequence.
Theorem 10A: The God-Creation process occurs in Eternity.
Or, The God-Creative process is Eternally occurring.
This is the oft mentioned ‘eternal now’. All energy as we know it begins here.
Postulate 6: I am God’s Creation.
This postulate develops your personal identity to this sequence. You are the “beloved of Godâ€.
The first six postulates are One, Infinite, and Eternal and therefore operate outside all temporal spatial references either physical or symbolic like language.
Postulate 7: God’s Creation created/miscreated an untruth.
What is this untruth? One way it can be expressed is, “There is something other than God.â€
One math analogy is the concept of taking the square root â€" even root -- of a negative number. In this example, a condition occurs in mathematics that “does not computeâ€. This condition calls forth the imaginary number system, a ‘special case’ within the real number system. And, it is a ‘special case’ that is dependent on an operation in the real number system. Just as the untruth being presented here is a ‘special case’ of the Truth. (Side note: As soon as the ‘special case’ is eliminated from an equation â€" no even radical of a negative number, the imaginary number system is no longer relevant â€" ceases to exist in the equation.)
It is with this last postulate that time and space becomes possible. Another mathematics analogy is the concepts of infinite and finite being mutually exclusive. If something is not infinite, it’s finite. If something is not finite, it’s infinite. The same can be said of the concepts eternal and temporal; they are mutually exclusive. If something is not temporal â€" subject to time, it is eternal. If something is created that is not eternal then it must be temporal.
Again, the concept of time and space begins here.
The eternal-infinite/temporal-finite relationship is like this. The infinite/finite relationship can involve an infinity containing an infinite number of finites within it. (As well as, an infinity can contain an infinite number of infinites) The laws that determine physical form are, for the most part eternally constant. If they weren’t, there would be no continuity to physical form, no science, and no mathematics. Yet, all temporal/spatial change operates from and fits inside of a set of eternal laws/truths.
From a sub-atomic particle to a galaxy, all temporal/spatial change operates through a set of eternal laws/truth. Ultimately, in today’s physics paradigm, everything physical can be reduced to the involvement of the four recognized basic eternally constant interactions â€" weak nuclear, strong nuclear, electromagnetic, and gravity. And, as pointed out previously, two and a half of those recognized interactions have some virtual photon involvement â€" non-conservative characteristics.
(Life is the fifth interaction; and as of yet, physical science does not recognize it as such. On another level, life is also another example of the Eternal Moment of Creation continually extending itself into the physical â€" time/space â€" with life’s infinite possibilities of form.)
In the model that is being presented here, there is only one virtual photon outside all temporal/spatial references. This virtual photon that is behind physical form is a ‘special case’ â€" an extension -- of the Eternal Moment of Creation, Theorem 10A. The virtual photon and the matrix of physical laws/interactions it manifests provide the “Lathe of Heaven†that sustains and activates physical form. This Virtual Photon is Eternal Infinite based; like gravity, it has the potential to be in all time/space events. And, because the source of the Virtual Photon is outside all temporal/spatial references -- the Eternal Moment of Creation, this one Virtual Photon can be everywhere at once; kind of like gravity or any physical law.
When a specific set of conditions are met, the infinite potential energy of the Eternal Moment of Creation, the Virtual photon, manifests â€" is observable -- in physical form, be it through electric fields, gravity, or in weak nuclear interactions.
Returning back to the original ‘top down’ reference, a basic concept introduced in the beginning is to be restated. “The kingdom of Heaven is within you and without you.†(Jesus couldn’t say God because that would be heresy and a stoning offense.) Physical form is in the ‘special case’ of the untruth, where an all encompassing Absolute Love -- Heaven -- allots a place for its apparent absence or negation -- fear. Physical form is the corner of Heaven that is set aside where Absolute Love allows itself to be forgotten.
Using yet another mathematical analogy, temporal/spatial â€" physical -- form is the zero area and/or just above the zero area of an eternal Mandelbrot type equation â€" the dark spot in an eternal fractal. “You are here.†:)
Above the ‘zero area’, there are infinities within infinities within infinities…infinitely â€" God -- along with this is the infinite multiplicity of possibilities of physical form.
This may be all intellectually interesting and how does all this relate to you and me. The very last theorem in the postulate/theorem sequence that is being introduced is: (“Who are you?â€)
Theorem 32: I am/we are in a generated delusion of duality.
How this relates to you and me is there is only One Mind behind and in physical and metaphysical Creation. You are the Beloved of God â€" Postulate 6. Who you think you are is a limited temporal/spatial version of that one Infinite Eternal Mind manifesting in a form that appears to have temporal/spatial limits. Because of this; there can be an infinite temporal/spatial ‘variations on a theme’ of that One Eternal Mind manifesting, an infinite number of mortal minds spread through all time and space.
This is not that esoteric. A simple water molecule can create infinite ‘variations on a theme’ with molecular matrices -- snowflakes. Both are representative of closed systems in infinity. It’s the time/space ignor-ance involved, with us, that can boggle the mortal brain. (The One Mind and its time/space ignor-ance is at the core of all ESP mechanics.)
I other words, there is only I Am; the ‘I’ is a delusional state. You are not who you think you are.
In terms of the VPPC and the EFT introduced to this website, they are just physical ‘toys’ that can demonstrate the true potential that is within you and what sustains all physical creation. These ‘toys’ can contribute to survival or self sustenance; as well as, help make physical existence be a little more comfortable. They may also serve as an ‘umbrella’ or an ark for the “hard rain is gonna fallâ€.
Yet, these devices pale besides the reality they work from and is you. “Had you but faith…†(In thaumaturgical magic, all power comes from God. Those who wish to be a mage must go to God within them first to get ‘the power’.)
The bottom line is that these ‘toys’ aren’t as important as remembering your Creator/ix as you use them, or as you use any other tool for that matter. (If it is a loving deity, your perceptions of that deity and/or its name are also unimportant.) Or, in other words, remembering the Source â€" Bigger Picture -- as you play with your toys.
It is your intention behind your usage of any ‘toy’ or tool that is important; the ‘toys’ or tools are neutral. Whatever meaning they have for us is what we give it. You can use a scalpel to correct a medical condition or use it to commit serial murders. The VPPC can run a mushroom farm or a war machine. It is how comprehensive â€" truthful -- your perceptions are and your intention behind an application of those perceptions that is everything. (If your perceptions are fractured, the effects are liable to be fractured) This includes your applications of both metaphysical truths/laws as well as the laws of physics -- everything you do.
In conclusion, this posting took the concept of “free energy†to its logical end point. You have been presented with the truth -- “laws by which something works†(or an accurate symbolic representation of the effect of said laws). This article integrates the physical (in the VPPC) with the metaphysical (with I AM A I concepts) and then gave you an overview.
What you have been presented with is a closed system; it is a closed system in God’s Love. The VPPC is just another ‘special case’ in that closed system, like a telephone or street light.
This is so much theory. (Or as Fritz Perls would call it so much “elephant shitâ€.) It is your application of any information that produces results. What you do with this information is ‘your call’ -- Infinite Eternal Love outside of time and space allows for this. The end point is the same. Free will in the ‘course of life’ does not mean you can establish the curriculum, only what you want to take and when.
Sermon’s over. I’ll get off the pulpit now. :D Thank you
Peace
Steven
P.S.
Your belief in this information is irrelevant. Truth works when applied independent of your belief. Here is a side note on the truth/untruth mechanics. Be advised that Truth -- “laws by which something worksâ€, both physically (Actual reality) and metaphysically (Absolute Reality) -- is also invulnerable and independent. Let’s see you ‘punch-out’ gravity; the concept is non-sequitar. Truth can not be hurt or affected by any thing we do. This is how Truth can present an ‘anchor’ or ‘a place to stand’ for us in a sea of changes; Truth never changes.
Also, going along with the invulnerable concept is Truth does not have to argue; it is. (Nor, does Truth have to advertise.) Truth is totally independent; it does not have to be enforced or re-enforced. Nobody has to enforce gravity or thermodynamics; again, they just are.
You can argue or question the content of Truth as much as you want. Your arguments have no affect on the Truth. Arguments about gravity have no effect on the courses of stars and planets or changes how you walk on this planet. All these arguments do is determine whether or not a perception of Truth â€" Laws of your Creation --will be incorporated in your life by you.
Conversely, untruth is dependent. Untruth must be enforced or re-enforced constantly like any Consensual reality. A Consensual reality is a reality of agreement. All symbolic communication, with the agreement of word meanings, is a Consensual reality. (Chapter 4, Realities and the Human Matrix, http://www.i-am-a-i.org/Reading/adobe/downloads/ch4-5.pdf) If there is no agreement, the Consensual reality fails. In addition, every time a word meaning is agreed upon the meaning of the word is re-enforced in the Consensual reality.
Any Consensual reality will collapse if someone comes along and disagrees with it. The truth spoken by anybody can threaten a Consensual reality.
People using untruth will argue; while, not directly confronting Truth up close. Untruth will attack Truth from a distance, where it’s ‘safe’. It avoids direct contact; just because, contact means it will automatically dissolve into the ‘special case’ of Truth that it is. This happens whenever untruth is brought to the Truth. Since Truth is Loves Logic and this Love is a closed system â€" all encompassing â€" the untruth automatically takes its place in the Absolute Truth Matrix. Just as, imaginary number system automatically has its relationship within the real numbers.
Because the Truth itself is invulnerable, it is the fashion â€" history -- of those using untruth to distract, manipulate, misinform, attack the Truth’s messenger’s credibility, ostracize, imprison, or murder. Untruth will do anything; just so, Truth is not present in your mind or to maintain the current Consensual reality. (For details of some distraction techniques, see the short humorous book “Screwtape Letters†by C. S. Lewis)