if sodium carbonate (baking soda),
is placed between copper and steel,
than voltage and amperage may be harvested from the 2 metals.
the carbon is diamagnetic.
the sodium is paramagnetic.
on another project, i have very small pieces of copper and steel, connected by a rock hard body of elmers school glue.
they still work, almost 1 year after i made them.
EVEN THOUGH THEIR GLUE, IS NOW A ROCK.
this should always work, if:
1: one metal is more diamagnetic/paramagnetic, than the other metal.
(copper and a graphite rod, work too)
2: both paramagnetic and diamagnetic elements, are connecting together the 2 metals.
3: these connecting elements are electrically non-conductive.
i have theories for why this works.
but the most important theory, is:
that diamagnetic elements have an overall clockwise spin.
allowing them to "catch/convert" the clockwise-spinning half of electricity.
and that paramagnetic elements, have an overall counter-clockwise spin.
allowing them to "catch/convert" the counter-clockwise-spinning half of electricity.
and when these 2 metals touch, the 2 spins mix, to create electricity.
i imagine this:
1: two metal terminals, are placed in a container.
2: the right diamagnetic/paramagnetic elements, are placed between the metals, in the container.
3: the diamagnetic/paramagnetic elements are heated at hundreds of degree's. forcing them to form into a rock.
4: this rock is chemically bonded to the 2 metals. allowing the energy process to happen, as long as the rock and metals are in tact.
my problem, is that i do not know enough about mineralogy or chemistry, to choose which elements to use.or how hot to heat it.
ideally, the connecting-rock could be made at a low temperature, out of common elements.
yet would still bond to whatever 2 metals i use as the terminals.
by the way.
the narrow glue-pebbles produce about 0.6 volts, at 0.3 uA.
the wider glue pebbles produce about 0.8 volts, at 1.2 uA.
remember that they are all a year old now.
the weakness, is the glues inability to bond tightly, to the metals.
hrmmm you may be on to devolpmental process of the hutchinson battery...
curious have you tried to use rochell salt between the two?
Interesting post and thanks for the info.
a few years ago, i saw a video of john hutchison combining elements into a rock.
he said that the rock generated electricity, forever after.
but i didn't know what elements he used to make the rock, until now.
or even knew what his name was, or where to find his work
most of my understanding in this, comes from research which is completely independant of anything that john hutchison has done.
did john hutchinson reveal the building details of his electricity generating rock?
this is another possible method.
the diamagnetic carbon and hydrogen in the elmers school glue, conducts clockwise spin to the steel.
(CW is attracted to the steel.)
the paramagnetic sodium and oxygen, conduct counter-clockwise spin to the copper.
(CCW is attracted to copper)
iron atoms have one more electron than proton (or something).
so the iron atoms energy field, is a majority CCW (electrons spin counter-clockwise!)
so there is "room" for the CW to be stored, on the iron atom.
copper atoms have one more proton than electron (or something).
so the copper atoms energy field, is a majority CW (protons spin clockwise!)
so there is "room" for the CCW to be stored, on the copper atom.
the mixture of baking-soda and glue, does not conduct electricity.
so the CW and CCW build up in the metals.
INSTEAD of mixing together into electricity, like they would normally do.
the CW and CCW only mix together to form electricity, in whatever device is being powered.