8)
GET YER BRAINS GOING
lol
of course this works....
ist
bolt ill let you build the quenched one ;)
wait till i add peizeo to this
:D
guys i need a simple curcuit that can pulse at 2.5 hz anyone want to design it?
i will list this curcuit on my site for sale and the designer can have the credit ... as well as sales shoul he / she decide to .
any how there is just a laque of intrest round here so it seams....
thats ok i am not worried intrest will gro as more people understand what happins with this stuff
all the hows and whys...
ist
Hi IST :)
Sorry, I'm not the guy you're looking for to design your 2.5Hz pulse circuit.
As for the apparent lack of interest, I think I know why this is.
I think it has to do with the fairly minimalist way in which you present your ideas.
You tend to post an idea, drop a few clues as to what you're doing
and what you've concluded, but you tend to not give a full and complete
description of the setup, you hardly ever post diagrams of the circuits,
and I think it is just not clear to many that what you post are not just
new ideas you have come up with but rather that you have actually
already done some tests which seem to show very interesting if not
OU results.
I think that, if you would take more time to describe your setup in detail,
describe or even show pics of the measurements you've taken,
and indicate why that is a remarkable and potentially very usefull test result,
perhaps in combination with a schmatic diagram,
more people will understand what it is you are pointing out,
and more people may show greater interest.
I myself find your approach quite charming as it appears to combine
heavily Bearden/Bedini/Brandt/Tesla-esque elements with scalar coil
and typical pulse back emf effects, in a sort of no-nonsense "let's just
see if that'll work if I try this" sort of way.
But I too find your descriptions extremely brief and would like to see more
details. ;)
So that may be an explanation for the apparent lack of interest in your posts?
It's not that your devices are not interesting. It's that you don't make it clear
to most forum visitors exactly how interesting they are, and how much energy
you're getting out.
Perhaps simply posting a little overview of input vs output energy would already
help in drawing more attention to your posts? Just a suggestion. :)
Kind regards,
Koen
guys im doing my best at not letting it all out ...
you really have no idea how hard of a job it is .... i want people to expairment and post there results ...
you do realize how huge of an impact this will make on the world as we know it....
i dont want to convert masses i just want to teach a few of you lol the simple stuff b4 i blast off to the crazy stuff...
like ag ;D
any how it really is not hard to achive ou when you apply electricty to a magnet what is the result?
real simple ou is a switch and a peice of wire even simpler a battery and a wire ... make and break a connection ... you have ou... ;)
there many ways ... look at ottos test .. it is a positive feed back loop ... where the control induces the collector... ;D
aswell you get the standing wave for free....
real tpu ... induce the hv spikes to the low voltage current ;) what is the result?
ist
too many ways
this "G unit" lol operates from a single pulse as tesla teaches in the conversion patt.. ;) and it uses electrofied neos to amp it it then pluges into a coil amp
the NEO provides the field
Tends to be what a neodymium magnet does, yes. Creates a magnetic field.
Which test are you referring to by "ottos test"? (url?)
Quote from: innovation_station on November 05, 2008, 12:49:56 PM
guys im doing my best at not letting it all out ...
If you have something to say to us, say it. Otherwise, why are you wasting Stefan's precious bandwidth?
Paul.
Quote from: Paul-R on November 07, 2008, 09:44:15 AM
If you have something to say to us, say it. Otherwise, why are you wasting Stefan's precious bandwidth?
Paul.
go learn somthing.....
then you will know why i dont want to give it to you.....
you have just proven you have no idea what you play with ....
would you give a baby a gun??
sorry not me bro ....
it is sad to see reponces like this i have networked almost every free engery invention ever created to its source of engery :)
now you tell me why i dont just want to give it out .....
better to learn for yourselves... trust me
ist
Hmm... Well, though you have a point there,
seems to me it's not all that difficult to figure out
what you are talking about, but it's also not
easy to figure out exactly what kind of implementation
you have in mind. ;)
But let's see if I can drop a few clues that I think
relate nicely to what I think your approach is...
- Bedini's "radiant collector" (see "FE Generation")
- Tesla's various pulsed "radiant energy" collector circuits
- Kron's "open path"
- Grey's "splitting the positive"
Ok, and since you're clearly not enthousiastic about literally stating
what the connection is there, I shall refrain from doing so as well. ;)