Hello everybody. I was trying to find something about this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PC-PRrz5S30
Is here a topic about it? It came on youtube at 14 June 2008.
The one posted it, says:
"We decided to share more technical background on this issue.
The mechanism works based on the theorem of Sofia Kovalevskaya who proved a possibility of a body's motion round the immobile point.
If you take a triangle ABC and apply force through point B to point O (O is between A and C), then the triangle starts to rotate, in case the angles BCA and BAC are not equal.
This is where it starts."
Anyone knows anything?
Thank you.
Amazing.
Perhaps I can use this amazing principle to power, for example, my cuckoo clock.
http://visual.merriam-webster.com/science/measuring-devices/measure-time/weight-driven-clock-mechanism.php
Eliminate the regulating pendulum and the pawl, and Bob's your uncle. Pretty much.
This mechanism has been around since the 1700's.
Denkt nicht so kompliziert ! Es ist alles einfach zu lösen !
Simply way:
Batterie inside.
the knop ist using only for electic contac switch.
possibly an
"poor inventor"
Pese
Pese, the knob could be used to apply a magnitic pressure to a swinging and or rotating motion and the magnet on the front could be used to attract the thick wire to keep the motion going.
I am not saying it works or that it can work but it is worth checking out.
ses shure
but
it is to complicate
to produce such an movie
1 box
2 motor 1 batterie
1 electric contact
1 weigth (that hold the switch doew)
is not so complicate and you see no difference.
i i can seen in the box , and see an free energy powering magnet in this system
THAN we can learn ...
Pese
Well...i know that the video is crap cos we don't see nothing...
But i refered to it mostly cos of the "explanation"
Anyone heard about this Cauchy-Kovalevskaya Theorem?
...and it's application on a motor???
I have to agree with TinselKoala. It looks like clock work to me.
Yes but the one who post it says: You don't need to "wind it up"
Man muss das sicher oft neu aufziehen, weil der Griff = Uhrzeiger sich schneller bewegt als normale Uhr.
Muss man dann das Gewicht hochheben und wieder darauflégen ?
Diese Energie des Aufziehens ist sicher NICHT FREI !
Diese Energie muss mindest so gross sein , wie das was man rausholen will
Pese´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´
We must ensure the newly often unravel, because the handle clock-ponter = moves faster than normal clock.
Should we then lift the weight and insist again?
This energy is certainly the rearing NOT FREE!
This energy must be at least as big as what you want as Output Power
Pese
No interest in this game ..
(Also an clock movement is not free energy .)
I have to think this is a fruad and if it isn't, they need to proove it isn't by showing us what is inside.
true
The speed seems comparable to what a hamster and wheel reaches, hmmm...did anyone notice any air holes in that box ?
Regards...
I noticed that, ignoring the obvious loop splices, the weight descends ever-so-slightly as it sits upon the "plunger".
I'm giving the black box the benefit of the doubt and assuming it really is powered by the slow fall of the big weight, not some simple electric switch/motor combination.
If the maker of the video is reading this, surely he must know that, if the effect shown can be easily reproduced without any new technology, then hoax or error must be assumed, unless and until the device is made fully transparent, both actually and metaphorically, by releasing photos, videos, drawings, theoretical analysis and whatever else is necessary. Just a video like this one proves absolutely nothing and only generates challenges and controversy from the Evil Skeptics and Debunkers (like me.)