Overunity.com Archives

News announcements and other topics => News => Topic started by: hartiberlin on November 28, 2008, 05:11:02 PM

Title: Interview with Mark Goldes by Bill Alek
Post by: hartiberlin on November 28, 2008, 05:11:02 PM
Hi All,
here is the recent interview of Bill Alek
interviewing Mark Goldes, CEO of Magnetic Energy Inc.


http://audio.achieveradio.com/vortex-net-tech/Nov-22-2008-at-11-00AM---Vortex-Net-Technology.mp3

Pretty interesting topics about room temperature superconductors and Coler devices
and their magnetic overunity devices.

Regards, Stefan.
Title: Re: Interview with Mark Goldes by Bill Alek
Post by: TinselKoala on November 28, 2008, 06:39:02 PM
And here's another fairy tale for you all:
http://media.libsyn.com/media/blogrelations/fairies.mp3

I wonder why Alek didn't ask Mark why he didn't submit a device or a sample to EarthTech by the end of the summer for testing, like he promised over and over in the spring.

Mark has no technology, he has no solid-state free energy device, and he has no room-temperature superconductors. All he has is a bunch of shell corporations and a good patter.

If you recall, he has been saying essentially the same thing, over and over, for years. Yet he still has submitted nothing for independent testing.


"We didn't realize you could negotiate that out..."  so we declined Phase II funding from DOE or DOD.    Yeah, sure.
Title: Re: Interview with Mark Goldes by Bill Alek
Post by: hartiberlin on November 28, 2008, 07:49:47 PM
Hmm,
is Graham Gunderson still working at the  company ?

He was one of the best magnetic researchers I know of.

He had developed the dragless generator.

Regards,Stefan.
Title: Re: Interview with Mark Goldes by Bill Alek
Post by: khabe on November 28, 2008, 08:03:23 PM
Its nice to be the best of magnetman but any working units?
And what about another tragless man - Steven Sullivan and his generator you studied (theoretically), Stefan?
cheers,
khabe
Title: Re: Comment regarding a lack of independent testing
Post by: Overtone on March 11, 2010, 08:13:38 PM
Our Ultraconductorstm were independently replicated for the US Air Force by another firm, which made almost 1,000 samples. The founder of that company is planning to join Chava to head up the commercialization program.
Title: Re: Comment regarding a lack of independent testing
Post by: FatChance!!! on March 12, 2010, 10:45:47 AM
Quote from: Overtone on March 11, 2010, 08:13:38 PM
Our Ultraconductorstm were independently replicated for the US Air Force by another firm, which made almost 1,000 samples. The founder of that company is planning to join Chava to head up the commercialization program.

>:( >:( >:( More BS statements as usual without supporting evidence from the BS master himself.  >:( >:( >:(
8) 8) 8) I dare to say this and take the risk of being BANNED like a man with a straight mind!!!!! 8) 8) 8)
Title: Re: Interview with Mark Goldes by Bill Alek
Post by: hartiberlin on March 12, 2010, 11:48:15 AM
FatChance,
if you have something to say  , just say something valid,
but not just stupid claims...

So why do you think this is BS ??
Title: Re: Interview with Mark Goldes by Bill Alek
Post by: FatChance!!! on March 13, 2010, 03:43:19 AM
You know why Stefan!!!  :o
Mark has been promising OU devices since forever and there is nothing but words coming from him.
Not a single device or demonstration or any kind of physical hardware has ever been shown.
Only words and statements. He hasn't even got a legit company with real ongoing development.
He's a visionary desktop inventor with clouded perception and no connections to reality.
These are harsh words from me but sadly the truth.  :'(  I think TinselKoala will agree.
Title: Re: Interview with Mark Goldes by Bill Alek
Post by: Overtone on March 14, 2010, 01:07:40 PM
Chava presented yesterday at the Tesla Conference in Vienna.

Laboratory work in magnetics continues but has proven far more difficult than it seemed much earlier. However, promising devices are under development at several locations including our labs in the U.S. and Australia. When a device has been validated by EarthTech, an event which has not yet proven possible but remains likely, it will surface.

The comments on Ultraconductors are absurd. The work was interrupted by lack of funds but will soon resume. There are numerous published articles in refereed journals including the Journal of Superconductivity. The materials were independently replicated beginning with the world famous Joffe laboratory in St. Petersburg, Russia in 1989. They published 4 point probe tests and another clever way to demonstrate zero resistance. The papers were translated by the American Institute of Physics. The USAF did its own tests before awarding the Phase II SBIR Contract. The Bar Ilan University reproduced the materials and did magnetic tests to 9 Tesla, the limit of their equipment. There was no reduction or loss of conductivity

The Chava website has more about our technologies.
Title: Re: Interview with Mark Goldes by Bill Alek
Post by: FatChance!!! on March 16, 2010, 09:03:13 AM
Here comes the truth regarding Ultraconductors... 8)
It's an old road map on upcoming progress and revenues....
And the revenue was estimated to $100 millions in 2007. :o :o :o
Now it's 2010 and still no hardware and zero revenue. ::) ::) ::)
If this was for real there should at least be a few conductors for test and verification.
I hold my statement regarding this being just a visionary desktop invention.

Notice the attached ZIP
Title: Re: Interview with Mark Goldes by Bill Alek
Post by: hartiberlin on March 16, 2010, 11:00:50 AM
Okay, so where can I buy ultraconductors today ?

Or was this all  bought up by US black projects ?
Title: Re: Interview with Mark Goldes by Bill Alek
Post by: jadaro2600 on March 18, 2010, 04:22:19 AM
Quote from: hartiberlin on March 12, 2010, 11:48:15 AM
FatChance,
if you have something to say  , just say something valid,
but not just stupid claims...

This is an excellent point you make - and I think it warrants the over all demeanor of the entire forum.  "Just say something valid."

I don't mean to be sarcastic about this.  But people have been promising far-reaching technology for a good long time.  HG Wells, or George Orwell long time even.

I think it's one thing to beat the chest about technology, but to have an organization which purports far reaching claims but provides little evidence or 'paperage' about it counterintuitive to the movements their trying to create.

Keeping secrets is one thing, not having secrets and claiming you do is another.  No one needs to hold conferences about all the wildly speculative quack-science being suppressed; we know that technology is being suppressed; the good it could do society is what's at stake - not the fact that it's a secret.