What if the U.S. Military had shot down all the hijacked planes on 911?First of all hijackings are usually perpetrated by people who take hostages and make demands.These people had hostages but no demands.The hijackers convinced the passangers that they were returning to the airport.The U.S. Military heard one of those conversations and optimistically hoped that there was "something" that the hijackers wanted.Firing on a passanger plane at any given time poses a threat to the passangers and people on the ground.I think that they just let the chips fall where they may...because,without knowing their (the hijackers) intentions,there was a potential of making things worse by acting up until the point that the first plane hit the first tower and their intentions were exposed.
With a close, sensible examination of verifiable evidence and timelines, the events at the center of the failures to respond militarily to the attacks on 911 were carefully and deliberately orchestrated to resemble ineptitude, malfeasence and a stunning unpreparedness to an attack of complete surprise. It was, however, nothing of the kind.
Key aspects of the defensive machinery in the northeast United States were intentionally rendered impotent by a number of well-planned ruses and distractions on that day.
1) Vice president Cheney was given the unprecedented role of commanding the entire US air defense training regimen only months before the 911 attacks.
2) The long standing air defense protocols regarding errant aircraft were dramatically and inexplicable revised only months before the 911 attacks.
3) With a plethora of warnings, some very specific, coming from foreign governments about an impending terrorist attack on American soil, the "training drills" that rendered a military aviation response impossible were rescheduled from October of 2001 to the week of 9/10/01.
4) Thousands of "false blips" were intentionally injected into the civilian radar system, ostensibly to simulate an actual mass attack, in support of "training drills" that were taking place hundreds and even thousands of miles from our nation's capital and NYC. This critical aspect of the failures to respond made it impossible to identify and locate the actual hijacked aircraft in time.
5) The top-most Pentagon officials gave three sharply contradicing versions of their failures, one to the press shortly following the attacks, a second version that did not resemble the original version, and a third - completely different version to the 911 investigative Commission. Members of the 911 Commission knew they were lying and considered referring the matter to the Department of Justice in pursuit of perjury prosecutions. Ultimately, the 911 Commission's final report simply glossed over these crucial lies, and further, mentioned only one of the many "training drills", (at the heart of the failures to respond), relegating it to a small footnote buried deep within the report.
5) For over 35 minutes and for over 250 miles, flight 77 reversed course and traveled east, directly into the most heavily defended airspace on earth, after it was known to be hijacked. The commercial airliner negotiated a gradual 270 degree loop while descending before striking the Pentagon - the most heavily guarded building on the planet.
6) Norman Mineta, Federal Transportation Secretary, testified before the 911 Commission that he witnessed a young man warning vice president Cheney repeatedly about the incoming flight [77] when it 50 miles out, 30 miles out and 10 miles out. This sharply contradicted Cheney's version of the events, [Cheney claiming that he arrived at the undeground command center beneath the White House well after the Pentagon had been struck], yet Mr Mineta's testimony was not only ommited from the final 911 Commision's report, but his testimony was expunged from the 911 Commission's transcript and removed from the official video archive.
More hard questions and stunning inconsistencies regarding the largest hoax and mass murder in American history may be found at:
http://www.opednews.com/articles/911-an-esoteric-collectio-by-Michael-McCoy-080909-166.html
Only two planes crashed on 9/11.
The one on the towers. They were remote control planes with nobody inside. The official version is complete propaganda.
If you want to know more and who did it see: http://www.911missinglinks.com/
Warning. the truth is hard. It will affect your life.
well...b.s. ... :-\ it's like trying to explain why you got sucker punched...you can make all the excuses you want but it comes down to "you didn't see it coming".
Quote from: christo4_99 on December 11, 2008, 08:20:46 AM
well...b.s. ... :-\ it's like trying to explain why you got sucker punched...you can make all the excuses you want but it comes down to "you didn't see it coming".
In order to accept that premise, it is essential that you avoid any meaningful grasp of the verifiable sequence of events that day. You must also select and believe only one of the three versions of the events offered by the highest Pentagon officials - and thoroughly discredit the remaining two. Further, you must accept the claim that Cheney was put in command of US air defense training three months before the attacks merely by coincidence and that the myriad training drills in progress at that very moment - preventing a military response - were also coincidental.
Finally, it is absolutely essential that you knowingly allow cognitive dissonance to dictate over basic critical analysis and suspend the comon sense aptitude of an average eigth grade student.
MM
Adolf Hitler quote: "What luck for rulers that men don't think."
Quote from: b0rg13 on December 11, 2008, 03:53:29 PM
Adolf Hitler quote: "What luck for rulers that men don't think."
A stark and fundamental premise employed by both governments and institutional religion - daily.
Somebody should write a true history book.
Maybe if people could plainly see the same pattern of corruption and manipulation repeating itself over a long period of time, the type of events happening today could be averted in the future.
It may even be a best seller...if you include the sex.
Anyone raising children would have one for their kids...w/o the sex o'course.
It wouldn't hurt to work it into the story line of a soap opera either.
Regards...
this may change your mind :http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mGO1CnkxCVw