Overunity.com Archives

Energy from Natural Resources => Gravity powered devices => Topic started by: froarty on December 09, 2008, 02:37:36 PM

Title: help make a common mans working theory we can use here for gravity
Post by: froarty on December 09, 2008, 02:37:36 PM
Gravity can be modeled as the nuclei of everything in the present forming a mesh net that sinks forward in time. All atomic nuclei form a flat mesh that stretches infinetly to trace out our macroscopic 3D illusion of reality much like an electron traces out 2d image on a tv screen.. The electrons although endlessly trying to reach their opposite charge in the nucleus are forever displaced by virtual particles squeezed thru and around these nuclei. Recent work by Christian Beck at the University of London and Michael Mackey at McGill University may have resolved that dark energy is nothing other than zero-point energy. In Measureability of vacuum fluctuations and dark energy and Electromagnetic dark energy they propose that a phase transition occurs so that zero-point photons below a frequency of about 1.7 THz are gravitationally active whereas above that they are not. The smaller virtual particles above 1.7THZ go thru the nuclei which we sense as time. * The larger virtual particles below 1.7THZ are displaced around our nuclei and we sense as gravity. The two types of particles reassemble on the "past" side of the nuclei and displace the electrons into the familiar shells of standard theory with which we are familiar. The poor electron's trying to reach it's proton in the nucleus is displaced by this rippling stream of virtual particles forming the time stream behind our nuclei. The electrons orbit inside these shells oscillates between mutual repulsion of other electrons and the time stream trying to orient them directly into the past.. A single hydrogen atom in a vacuum chamber should orient with its' electron straight down since there is no mutual repulsion foming an upside down halo.  animation here :  http://www.byzipp.com/animaTime.htm   

Our nuclei displace larger virtual particles to create a gravity pressure proportional to the quanity of interlocked matter in the mesh. Sinking in the sea of time like a child sweeping a fish net thru his aquarium to clear out little squares of paper. The bigger the paper blocking the pores the more gravity we feel.

The uncertainty principle proves that the electrons are knee deep in the time stream because we know temporal anomalies are subjective and that someone standing on the electron would move smoothly from one location to another by simple physical displacement in the time stream. This suggests that the "Present" is therefore a "1 nuclei wide mesh" sinking in the sea of time. The pressure on the "nuclei mesh" by virtual particles squeezing through and around increases with matter and has direction that we commonly call "down" but from the perspective of time stream is the past. The "present" we experience is the VP streaming around and through our "1 nuclei mesh" . All "fluctuations" are simply the interactions between the time stream and matter that would otherwise just aggregate.

In the final pix below, From the perspective of the Time Axis electrons fold back from the virtual particles in the time stream. Even molecules must form such that their atoms' electrons fold back into the past. Twisted molecules can only form if the atoms bond while the normal pressure from the time stream is restricted such as is the case in Casimir cavities.




Title: Re: help make a common mans working theory we can use here for gravity
Post by: truth on December 13, 2008, 04:16:47 PM
 ???
I am new here.
I read this, and as a common man can only wonder if anyone understands this.


I look forward to reading a simplified version.
Maybe understanding your goal in posting this would help?

Everyone asks for the truth, but few welcome it!
Title: Re: help make a common mans working theory we can use here for gravity
Post by: infringer on December 13, 2008, 08:40:43 PM
I think the best way to understand gravity is to defy it.

Check out youtube there is some good lectures and information about antigravity.

And Tim Ventura is another fella out there who used to have a kick ass website back in the day which he no longer seems to update all that often shame was a great website. American Antigravity.

Just a suggestion.
Title: Re: help make a common mans working theory we can use here for gravity
Post by: truth on December 14, 2008, 12:10:33 AM
 :)
Thank you for the suggestion infringer.

I find you tube to be both useful and a huge distraction.

The gravity of the situation is that time is limited for research and watching clowns is not the most efficient use of my precious little time. Learning things not to do is only useful if I did not already know know better than to do those things.

May your friction be minimal and your efficiency be optimal.   ;D
Title: Re: help make a common mans working theory we can use here for gravity
Post by: froarty on December 15, 2008, 08:55:02 PM
My goal is to aide collaboration as we attempt to harness the time stream to provide free energy. We need a common language to share our observations and plan out goals. Much of what we need is already known and simply needs to be properly communicated to one another.
Title: Re: help make a common mans working theory we can use here for gravity
Post by: truth on December 16, 2008, 10:32:03 PM
@ froarty

I would like to help, but I have no clue about the time stream or how it could be harnessed, so I will read what is written from time to time, but I may have little or nothing to contribute due to my lack of understanding of the subject matter.

Best of luck to you, sir.     :)
Title: Re: help make a common mans working theory we can use here for gravity
Post by: utilitarian on December 17, 2008, 12:21:30 AM
Froarty,

Use gravity how?  We already use it.
Title: Re: help make a common mans working theory we can use here for gravity
Post by: hoptoad on December 17, 2008, 12:35:29 AM
Quote from: truth on December 13, 2008, 04:16:47 PM
I look forward to reading a simplified version.

Everyone asks for the truth, but few welcome it!

Simplified versions of gravity:
1. (Gravity is a drunk) What stands up must fall down!
2. (Gravity is a vacuum cleaner) That is, Earth sucks!
:P

Welcoming the truth?
If you don't think you'll like the answer to a question, then don't ask it.   :D  :P

Cheers
Title: Re: help make a common mans working theory we can use here for gravity
Post by: truth on December 17, 2008, 10:28:33 AM
@ hoptoad,


The answer that IS the TRUTH is not usually the same as answer we THINK we will get or WANT.
The only thing capable of being DENSE and EMPTY at the same is the human mind.     :P





Title: Re: help make a common mans working theory we can use here for gravity
Post by: brian334 on December 17, 2008, 06:41:13 PM
Truth,
That was a daum post.
Title: Re: help make a common mans working theory we can use here for gravity
Post by: hoptoad on December 17, 2008, 09:05:05 PM
Quote from: truth on December 17, 2008, 10:28:33 AM
@ hoptoad,
The only thing capable of being DENSE and EMPTY at the same is the human mind.     :P
Never a truer word was spoken.  :D :D :D
Cheers
Title: gravity / Time stream concept to tap ZPE
Post by: froarty on December 18, 2008, 10:53:38 AM
  -rewrite of original post -
Gravity- time should be modeled simply for investigating Zero Point Energy because it is the "stream" wa are trying to tap for free power. The gravity Time stream can be modeled as  virtual particles squeezing through the 1 nuclei wide mesh of everything in the "Present"  being draggged forward in time. This mesh net appears flat from the perspective of the time axis but in normal space appears to stretch infinetly to trace out our macroscopic 3D illusion of reality much like an electron traces out 2d image on a tv screen so we too are just a 3d corragated construction on the scaffold of time. Our electrons live in the past, although endlessly trying to reach their opposite charge in the nucleus  they are forever displaced by virtual particles squeezed thru and around these nuclei in the "Present". Recent work by Christian Beck at the University of London and Michael Mackey at McGill University may have resolved that dark energy is nothing other than zero-point energy. In Measureability of vacuum fluctuations and dark energy and Electromagnetic dark energy they propose that a phase transition occurs so that zero-point photons below a frequency of about 1.7 THz are gravitationally active whereas above that they are not. The smaller virtual particles above 1.7THZ go thru the nuclei which we sense as time. * The larger virtual particles below 1.7THZ are displaced around our nuclei which we sense as gravity. The two types of particles reassemble behind the "past" side of the nuclei and displace the electrons into the familiar shells of standard theory with which we are familiar.  The electrons then oscillate between mutual repulsion of other electrons and the virtual particles in the time stream trying to push them back into the shadow of the nuclei. It is this time stream that science seeks to harness called zero point energy.The hydrino capatilizes on the absence of large VP in Casimir cavities to allow covalent bonds to form while the electron orbits are shielded from the stream. when the hydrino rejoins the stream the covalent bond is stressed because virtual particles are trying to twist both electron orbits back to normal but discover that their orbits are baraced one against the other thru the covalent bond. The molecules' electron orbits remains "straight" and the covalent bond becomes an energy transport conserving the normally chaotic virtual particles in a "stressed" condition where they must remain organized as potential energy until combustion in your home or car occurs allowing the VP to shove the electrons back into normal space.
http://www.byzipp.com/energy
http://www.byzipp.com/animaTime.htm   

I propose that "NOW" is only about 1 nuclei wide because the uncertainty principle proves that electrons are already knee deep in the time stream.  We know temporal anomalies are subjective and that someone standing on the electron would move smoothly from one location to another by simple physical displacement in the time stream. This suggests that the "Present" is associated with the nuclei. The pressure on the "nuclei mesh" by virtual particles squeezing through and around increases with matter and has direction that we commonly call "down" but from the perspective of time stream is actually the past. The "present" we experience is the VP streaming around and through our "1 nuclei mesh" . All matter would simply aggregate if not for the interactions between the time stream and our "mesh" call it whatever you like, wave front or nuclei with trailing electrons but the concept is the same.

Gravity has an average like a child sweeping a fish net thru his aquarium to clear out little squares of paper. The bigger the paper blocking the pores the more resistance - gravity we feel on average (pressure).  From the perspective of the Time Axis electrons trail behind the nuclei, They are pushed back by the virtual particles in the time stream. Even molecules formed from these atoms will have this "folded back" orientation incorporated into their bonds. Twisted molecules such as hydrinos can only form if the atoms bond while the normal pressure from the time stream is restricted such as is the case in Casimir cavities. This perspective from the time axis will likely tell us a lot about magnetism as well -shooting from the hip I would suggest it accelerates a certain size VP in favor of others from the already "pressurized" particles in the gravity well creating eddys.

Title: Re: help make a common mans working theory we can use here for gravity
Post by: spacetrax on December 19, 2008, 03:02:35 AM
Hi Froarty,

maybe I missed something, but I don`t understand HOW do you extract the energy from these hydrinos? Do you need some material for these hydrinos to pass through - and this material gets hot?
Thanks!
Title: Re: help make a common mans working theory we can use here for gravity
Post by: froarty on December 19, 2008, 06:14:28 AM
simple combustion like Rowan University (see you tube) did in the October 08 calorimeter validation of the Rainey Nickel supplied by Black Light Power, BLP doesn't have a clue that Casimir Cavities are their real power source and is pushing a Grand Unified Theory that is being totally rejected by the physics community - meanwhile Cal-Tech put out a patent May 08 that explains the leveraging of Casimir cavities to create small amounts of power using nano materials forming casimir cavities - I guess not realizing hat they could use skeletal catalysts to self assemble the cavities like Black Light Power used but they too didn't really get it either, so focused on the "math" they didn't "visualize" what was going on like I did here http://www.byzipp.com/animation2.htm and they missed 2 huge points that I demonstrated to upper management and 2 Lockheed chemists about a month ago - I assume it is patent pending at this point, they took copies of all my paperwork but I haven't heard a peep since. Main point number 1 is if you look at my upper animation is that atoms will untwist on their axis and spread out once shielded by the Casimir Cavity from the larger VP in the time stream but  they will also twist back into their "folded back butterfly wing" position when they exit the plates if they don't form a covalent bond to "keep them straight" . the bond leverages one nuclei against the other to lock their electron orientation, when they exit the cavity the normally chaotic virtual particles have to line up to push these "OBNOXIOUS" little electrons back where they belong in the shadow of their nuclei -however they can not - the best they can do is stress the covalent bond so it becomes an energy transport and even stranger orient the new molecule sideways in the time stream into a posture of least resistance.

The strange orientation an "untwisted" molecule must assume is actually the biggest breakthrough in since for at least 100 years and holds the promise of reactionless drive. these new molecules will become a science unto themselves because they extend out into the time stream, when agitated they will turn from orientation of least resistance and give some amount of purchase on the virtual particle stream that normally just folds them in half like an umbrella suddenly opened up the molecules will be harnessed. I predict larger more stable  molecules like nitrogen with multiple covalent bonds will be converted to nitrinos and driven thru coils with ionized gas to produce the first reactionless drives for space travel.
Title: Re: help make a common mans working theory we can use here for gravity
Post by: spacetrax on December 19, 2008, 08:59:35 AM
Thank you!  If this theory proves to be correct, you are a genius!

Quote from: froarty on December 19, 2008, 06:14:28 AM
simple combustion like Rowan University (see you tube) did in the October 08 calorimeter validation of the Rainey Nickel supplied by Black Light Power, BLP doesn't have a clue that Casimir Cavities are their real power source and is pushing a Grand Unified Theory that is being totally rejected by the physics community - meanwhile Cal-Tech put out a patent May 08 that explains the leveraging of Casimir cavities to create small amounts of power using nano materials forming casimir cavities - I guess not realizing hat they could use skeletal catalysts to self assemble the cavities like Black Light Power used but they too didn't really get it either, so focused on the "math" they didn't "visualize" what was going on like I did here http://www.byzipp.com/animation2.htm and they missed 2 huge points that I demonstrated to upper management and 2 Lockheed chemists about a month ago - I assume it is patent pending at this point, they took copies of all my paperwork but I haven't heard a peep since. Main point number 1 is if you look at my upper animation is that atoms will untwist on their axis and spread out once shielded by the Casimir Cavity from the larger VP in the time stream but  they will also twist back into their "folded back butterfly wing" position when they exit the plates if they don't form a covalent bond to "keep them straight" . the bond leverages one nuclei against the other to lock their electron orientation, when they exit the cavity the normally chaotic virtual particles have to line up to push these "OBNOXIOUS" little electrons back where they belong in the shadow of their nuclei -however they can not - the best they can do is stress the covalent bond so it becomes an energy transport and even stranger orient the new molecule sideways in the time stream into a posture of least resistance.

The strange orientation an "untwisted" molecule must assume is actually the biggest breakthrough in since for at least 100 years and holds the promise of reactionless drive. these new molecules will become a science unto themselves because they extend out into the time stream, when agitated they will turn from orientation of least resistance and give some amount of purchase on the virtual particle stream that normally just folds them in half like an umbrella suddenly opened up the molecules will be harnessed. I predict larger more stable  molecules like nitrogen with multiple covalent bonds will be converted to nitrinos and driven thru coils with ionized gas to produce the first reactionless drives for space travel.