I came across this at Peswiki;
"TUV Rheinland of North America and UL testing show the same curve of Input Power versus Output Power, with several places where the output rises to as much as three times the input. "
Here's the link- http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Disturbed_Self-Compensating_Symmetry#Independent_Testing
I just wanted to get some opinions on this, UL listing are usually legit. I hope I'm not dragging up a long dead topic.
Pete
Hi,
I have looked at this device carefuly, I just don´t understand why his "output" torque sensor is located WITHIN the system rather than on the true output shaft.
TUV and UL have audited his torque sensors and logging equipment and verified that all readings are correct. But to call torque sensor 2 an output is incorrect in my opinion and neither TUV or UL did call it an output, they just verified that (RPM2 * torque sensor 2) showed greater average power than (RPM1 * torque sensor 1) an effect caused by measuring WITHIN a resonant system.
It has already been discussed a little in this thread:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=5923.10
Best, Yucca.