We have two new Youtube addresses and a new Magnetic Wankel design for home building.
Due to time constraints I can not read or respond to comments. Please contact by email if necessary at lafontegroup@charter.net
Thanks,
Butch LaFonte
http://www.youtube.com/user/LaFonteMagnetMotor1
http://www.youtube.com/user/LGPSPMM
http://www.youtube.com/user/LaFonteGroup
@Butch,
Why do you keep saying you have proof, then when someone comments and tells you that you have not understood magnetic, you ignore that and post yet more so called proofs.
This is a forum for debate, friendship, argument, fun and more, but it should not be a place for a barrage of Butch claims of devices that work without some commitment from you to talk.
You keep posting here and telling us that you are too busy to respond. Well don't bother to post.
Phil
in the alternative, post here but do not claim them to be proved!
See either of these links,
Thanks,
Butch LaFonte
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W0rfG723sIY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZqJhm_8LpA&feature=channel_page
The magnets together produce a much stronger field than when they are separated in the same enclosure...
Wow, that is really interesting.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3LOkMsh9dqk&NR=1
Butch you contradicted yourself a few times in there. Also You can't get an air gap inbetween the metal and the magnet it will always pull toward one t of the bars, and if there was going to be some other effect with a different material why didn't you show the other material? I don't see the point of the video. And definitely didn't see anything of interest.
And of course, here is where someone puts the reply, "thats because you lack the understanding to see its importance" well if thats the csae, great, but do something with it then.
Quote from: d3adp00l on April 23, 2009, 04:12:14 PMand if there was going to be some other effect with a different material why didn't you show the other material?
That's a no brainer, I didn't have the other material.
Then how could you claim anything as to its effects? A hypothesis is fine I guess, but I believe you mis-spoke yourself a few times. But never the less, what is the anticipated goal or beneficial effect you are seeing here?
Quote from: d3adp00l on April 23, 2009, 07:26:32 PM
Then how could you claim anything as to its effects? A hypothesis is fine I guess, but I believe you mis-spoke yourself a few times. But never the less, what is the anticipated goal or beneficial effect you are seeing here?
Hey, I have over 3000 designs posted, I have mis-spoke more that a few times and probably will many more times. I design and build 6 days a week and have for over 40 years. I'm going to make a lot of mistakes and mis-speak some more. I'm very involved and when you get as involved as I am you make mistakes. It comes with the territory. I do more good that harm I feel.
I would like to see if magnetic switching can be accomplished with very little work with this principle. Less work that is that the work done by the changing field.
Butch
Yes butch you are one of the few that are building here, and yes mistakes come with the territory, I have blown myself up more than once. I was in a mood. My apologies.
So looking to switch the fields is the point, I can understand why.
Quote from: d3adp00l on April 23, 2009, 08:21:02 PM
" I was in the mood"
I understand. You know the reason I got into this was because it was impossible to get energy out of magnets. If science said there might be a chance I probably would not have bothered with it. The thing is, what will I do if I ever get a self runner that produces useful work? I guess I would go looking for something impossible.
Regards,
Butch
Ok Don lets get some windmills