1:
a negative metal (iron/cobalt/nickel) repels electrons away from itself.
a positive metal (silver/gold/bismuth) attracts electrons towards itself.
this moving of electrons, is electricity.
the whole point of the 2 metals, is to cause electrons to move from negative to positive.
so why are they using the negative metal as a source of electrons,
when it is NOT the negative metals job, to be a source of electrons ??????
that is as foolish as ripping a kidney out of a delivery man,
when his job is just to deliver kidneys between hospitals.
and then when the delivery man is sick from health complications,
and can no longer DO HIS JOB,
he is replaced with a new delivery man.
then the new delivery man has his kidney ripped out, too.
then he gets sick, loses his job, and has to be replaced with yet another new delivery man !
stop damaging the delivery man, and he will do his job for decades !
you can get kidneys from other sources, than the delivery man.
supply the kidneys from a cloning lab, that can just grow more kidneys.
2:
batteries have lots of energy/electricity,
because they have lots of ELECTRONS moving between the terminals.
NOT because metals are being destroyed !!!
those electrons were mostly gained from the hydrogen atoms in the batteries acid.
or were likely ripped off of water, and put inside during manufacturing.
the electrons added by CORRODING METAL, are VERY FEW.
and again, the electrons coming off of the metals are NOT the source of power.
because the MOVEMENT of electrons between metals, is the source of power.
3:
the mainstream explanation is that energy is released, when metals corrode.
and this energy is the power source.
i doubt that much energy, if any, is released from metals corroding.
and if energy is released, i doubt the energy is causing electrons to move in one direction.
if anything, the energy released might be of a chaotic polarity,
which DISRUPTS the flow of electrons in one direction.
but even if this "corrosion-energy" were generating usable electron movement,
than it is lesser than the movement caused by the 2 metals.
and worst of all, it wastes more time/effort/energy to manufacture, than it provides benefit.
to say nothing of being needlessly unsustainable.
the positive and negative metals are ALREADY causing the electrons to move !
and unlike metal-destruction, it is sustainable.
4:
the acid's job, is just to MOVE electrons.
move electrons away from the negative charge, towards the positive charge.
the acid is JUST A HIGHWAY FOR ELECTRONS !
the acids job is NOT to destroy anything.
unless the duracell company is using the acid, to disfigure battery-metals.
creating an army of phantoms-of-the-opera batteries.
whom duracell plans to theatrically murder, for profit.
5:
batteries have strong electricity, simply because a large number of electrons are moving between 2 polarities.
NOT because metal is being destroyed !!!!!!
electrons are ALREADY being mostly taken from acids/hydrogen/water.
electrons could easily be gotten from those 3 sources, without involving metal.
because once again, the metals are just the delivery man.
not the source of kidneys.
6:
instead of making a battery slowly destroy itself, do this:
* continue to use metals to move electrons.
but get magnetic charge from additional sources, such as magnets.
to aid the charge from the metals, in moving the electrons.
* DO NOT get electrons from metals !
get electrons from water/hydrogen, which can easily be replaced/restored.
the air and environment, can put electrons back into water !
if the "acid" is open to air.
* protect the metals from corrosion, even as the metals are in contact with electron-conducting acids.
such connecting the metal to a graphite rod, which sits in the acid.
so the metals polarity can still push electrons through the acid, without the metal being damaged by the acid.
i am developing something related to this post.
but i'm not ready to disclose anything at this time.
lets just say that what i'm planning, would make dead egyptians proud.
and that sand/rocks repel electrons, yet are heavily resistant to chemical damage.