simple question. I would love to hear it.
Jerry 8)
that they can show you, and have it repeatable. Not that I have ever seen
google or youtube: Nikola Tesla
I can has OU?
From what I understand it is all sequestered, and spirited away to some deep underground bunker guarded by Marines. The ultimate reason I am given is that "we" need to be protected from these "dangerous" technologies, and that if these technologies were public knowledge we would obviously harm ourselves playing with them. So our benevolent leaders decided to look out for the public interest, lock away the dangerous technologies, and let us play with gasoline instead...
Me- no.
Others - Probably.
Enough to perform useful work - Probably not.
Just to be clear, I'm defining OU here along the lines of ZPE, gravitation, magnets, unknown source..... Yes we've achieved nuclear fission and fusion, hydro, wind, solar, and many other forms of overunity (OU depending on the perspective).
If I look at some experiments by Paul Lowrence, he seems to be getting very small amounts of power from diodes and piezo's. His work seems legitimate enough and he's not making outrageous claims or trying to sell courses for $20kUSD. This is just one example of what appears to be legitimate OU (there are others) - I've just never seen anything where we can get useful work 'YET' or even close a loop to create perpetuation.
I don't buy into the sequestered technology thing. I'm more of a believer in the constant string of con-men who make claims that only they and a few select people can witness but for strange reasons can't replicate in public or when qualified people are available to test (Hutchison, Marks, Mylow, Johnson, etc....). The MIB, energy utilities, oil companies, etc.... are part of their ploy to create plausability that the technology is being repressed. History is a sequence of disruptive technologies - they can't be stopped. If our govt can't stop people from making/buying/selling weed, then they certainly couldn't stop us from passing around TPU's, or whatever. Especially because in most of the stories, the OU devices are made from readily available humble materials with relatively simplistic designs....... Doesn't add up.
I do believe that if useful OU is tapped, then there will likely be real concerns for public safety and the possibility of the technology becoming 'controlled' - similar to nuclear fission is today (essentially OU). If one could tap copious amounts of ZPE (example), enough to automatically meet whatever load is attached, this same technology could be used quite destructively in the hands of the wrong people.
If you think about it, we were able to run submarines/ships on nuclear energy by the 1950's. The only thing that has prevented us from building cars/home power plants which only need refueled every 100 years is concerns for safety. We can shield the radiation from the small amount of U235 needed to run a nuclear powered watch for 1,000 years is so small that it probably wouldn't hurt me (or even to run your car/house for that matter). What is more likely to hurt you are crazy mother f#ckers with easy access to U235.
So in my mind, we've already developed technology which can replace our fossil fuel dependency and make distributed power generation a reality - but due to practical/security concerns/special interest groups/enviromental whacko's - it aint happening.
My oppinion.
I also wouldn't want radioactive material spilled on me in the event of an accident.
I'm curious though - why do you see nuclear fission as a form of OU? The way I see OU is that it is some device that produces more energy than it requires to function - and when you use a form of fuel, you're putting a whole lot of energy into the device.
Kinetic energy without the need of gravity can actually be CREATED out of nothing, yes you heard me right, easily. Look at pequaide's work and this channel:
http://www.youtube.com/user/broli123#p/u (http://www.youtube.com/user/broli123#p/u)
This simple device allows you to create many kilo joules of energy in a fraction of a second time. It's all based on the simple principle of conservation of linear momentum over energy. The COP of the device can be adjusted to any level if the speed and size are feasible. But COP of 10 would be possible by anyone who's not busy procrastinating.
No it wouldnt work , I will procrastinate an say it cant run any load , it has no power and it wouldnt be easy , it would be impossible .
@ best it can run forever if there is 0 friction or load .
Are you referring to the CG device in the last video on the channel? If so, I don't see how it is creating energy.
Quote from: dankie on November 04, 2009, 11:26:56 AM
No it wouldnt work , I will procrastinate an say it cant run any load , it has no power and it wouldnt be easy , it would be impossible .
@ best it can run forever if there is 0 friction or load .
Thanks for your armchair opinion. I guess the energy Pequaide and I'm creating with these setups is imaginary too. Spend some more time than the 5 min of research you just did and educate yourself.
HA !
PHYSICAL REAL WORLD WORK IS THE ONLY WAY !
Who is trying OU experiments with computed simulators ROFL ?? And I am ignorant lol ?
What I stated are scientific facts derived from real world experiments. The youtube channel serves as a visual aid to these experiments. So if you have a problem go fight it with nature.
Quote from: Comassion on November 04, 2009, 09:39:24 AM
I also wouldn't want radioactive material spilled on me in the event of an accident.
I'm curious though - why do you see nuclear fission as a form of OU? The way I see OU is that it is some device that produces more energy than it requires to function - and when you use a form of fuel, you're putting a whole lot of energy into the device.
Harnessing energy from the atom is pretty close to ZPE (in my mind). Remember that any OU will be consuming fuel - we are generally defining OU as using fuels which are currently not harnessed, or understood to be fuels at this time.
Regarding radioactive spills, if I had a nuclear powered watch - the amount of radioactive material to run it for my lifetime would be miniscule and generally not dangerous. It's similar to a nuclear powered car, home generator, TV, anything. You only need large amounts of radioactive materials to be concentrated when performing central energy production (like we do today).
Quote from: spoondini on November 04, 2009, 12:26:01 PM
Harnessing energy from the atom is pretty close to ZPE (in my mind). Remember that any OU will be consuming fuel - we are generally defining OU as using fuels which are currently not harnessed, or understood to be fuels at this time.
As I understand it, the objective with Overunity is to create a device with an efficiency ratio greater than 1 (Hence the name Overunity, 'Above oneness'). That entails not just using new types of fuels (For instance, I don't think of a solar panel as an Overunity device, despite the fact that light is relatively new in terms of being used to power devices), but actually getting more energy out of something than you put into it.
Finding and tapping into a new fuel source could certainly be extremely useful and important (and is certainly one stated intent of people on this forum), but it wouldn't be an Overunity device.
the term "overunity" is in a way damaging to our cause, a system will only be thought of as "overunity" until the true power source is dicovered, it is our job to find and tap into these new power sources.Our universe has already done the "overunity" bit, we shall just hitch a ride.
good call yucca!
i will say yes it has been found ..
quite some time ago infact! ;)
what are you after ? i may reccomend the joule theif thred :D
im just in the early stage of design of a compleat system ... with MUCH useable OUTPUT ;D
it can use power from a battery or i can configure it to compleatly self run .... ;)
for my first unit it will use an aa battery ... it will be made from 5 FOR A BUCK TOROIDES FROM GOLDMINE ELECTRONICS.... THE MOST EXPENCIVE PART IS THE CAP!
I WILL START OUT WITH 650F ULTRA CAPS .. THIS 1 CAP WILL HOLD 5400WATTS OF ENGERY AS I UNDERSTAND .. IN A 1 SECOND PULSE IT CAN DELIVER 2.7VDC @875 AMP ... FROM A AA ;)
IST!
ITS A TOSS UP WHERE TO PUT THE TOPIC.... TPU OR JT....
I HAVE A THRED SIMILAR TO THIS IN THE TPU SECTION WICH I STARTED SOMETIME AGO ...
TIME DIFFRENCIAL DEVICE .. THIS UNIT OPERATES ON TIME ... BORROWED TIME :D
owl city FIREFLYS.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aI4JLa0hbUw
YOU WOULD NOT BELEAVE YOUR EYES... IF 10 MILLION FIRE FLYS LIT UP THE WORLD IF I FELL ASLEEP ..
id like to make myself beleave .... that PLANNET EARTH TURNS SLOW-LY ITS HARD TO SAY THAT ID RATHER STAY AWAKE WHEN IM ASLEEP
CUZ EVERYTHING IS NEVER AS IT SEAMS ...
CUZ I GET 1000 HUGGS FROM 10 000 LIGHTNING BUGS ;) ;D
A FOXTROT... ;) ABOVE MY HEAD ..
DID YOU SEE HIM HIT THE MAGIC BUTTON IN THE VIDEO ... ;)
btw 10 MILLION FIRE FLIES COME HERE CUZ I HATE GOODBYES ;)
Quote from: broli on November 04, 2009, 11:56:11 AM
What I stated are scientific facts derived from real world experiments. The youtube channel serves as a visual aid to these experiments. So if you have a problem go fight it with nature.
I agree that the subject is in agreement with both scientific facts and real word experiments.
But there is not free energy. The mistake is in interpreting the results:
Kinetic energy increase comes from angular momentum conservation of the system composed of Earth and your setup. Unfortunately, the setup works only until the angular momentum is transferred, then it needs to be 'regauged' (let me please use this "free energy guru" sort of speak; no offense to you intended at all).
Truly, these kinds of experiments are fascinating to ponder about on the road of learning and deeply understanding the basic laws of nature.
Best regards,
Tinu
The case is till now, we have considerable evidence that suggest OU, as stated before (ZPE) is a myth and cleverly exploited by smart merchants.
Baroutologos
Quote from: baroutologos on November 05, 2009, 05:37:11 PM
The case is till now, we have considerable evidence that suggest OU, as stated before (ZPE) is a myth and cleverly exploited by smart merchants.
Baroutologos
If i asked you weather or not you think solid objects weighing 50lbs could float in mid air merely by being subjected to high frequency radio waves would you call that a myth as well?
There is undeniable proof overunity can be achieved. Can it be achieved for 50 bucks with some radio shack parts?..thats a different question...There is undeniable proof solid matter can not only be atomically manipulated to become weightless, it can also transform into pure light. Light itself is pure energy.
Hi everybody,
there is no overunity, nowhere.
All who claim are liars.
The most famous excuses: suppression, oil industry, ... I haven't but the neighbor a good friend of mine, the man in black ... bla bla bal
There is no overunity except you show me.
What have we learned in the endless discussions in this forum. Where is overunity? Nowhere
Alana
Undeniable huh? Its pretty much denied till now.
Is it a conspiracy? Ok... :)
Have you seen it? I have not. Why to believe something it is denied and have not seen myself?
Baroutologos
Quote
Undeniable huh? Its pretty much denied till now.
Is it a conspiracy? Ok...
Have you seen it? I have not. Why to believe something it is denied and have not seen myself?
Denied by who? By you? You refuse to do any research, of course your going to deny everything LOL
You roll your eyes at the thought of suppression? Answer this, why would any military force reveal theyre technology when they have no need to? It has long been disclosed via the freedom of information act, that our military had possesion of the first stealth bomber many years before they ever claimed it existed. Do you understand that?
Do you expect the universities to discover this technology?
They cant even provide scientific proof of telekinesis. (i can show you in person right now that it does in fact exist)
The unversities have locked theyre potential into the laws of physics and to discover the exotic technologies that do infact exist they would have to venture away from what theyve brainwashed themselves with. If you are waiting for that to happen before you come out of your own box...keep waiting.
You want proof? Watch the first link below, then watch the second link.
The first link explains how solid matter can be transformed into pure light.
The second link shows military footage released by Mexico, footage that contains solid objects flying in formation while existing in the infarred spectum. Invisible to the human eye.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WK-BziiId_0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDOOZ_IPb6Y
Amazing how a guy in his garage found this form of anti-gravity before any university across america could...
Is he smarter than them? You decide.
@Nadda
With respect to Reply #21,
I had time to see the first video you cited.
My question was: What is the effect of the human body being inside a giant hollow steel ball and having it be subjected to Tesla waves, etc, and then to travel faster than lightspeed? Do you, or do you know anyone, who does?
--Lee
Your missing the whole point. Its not the method of obtaining the results that matters, its the results themselves.
The method can undoubtedly be improved. Through out the history of mankind we've always stumbled upon the unknown scientific boundries and have had previous methods which were unkown at the time to be very unhealthy. Take an example of X-rays, when first discovered we had no idea of the affects of radiation. However after years of testing and research we undoubtedly have much much safer methods while obtaining all of the same results. The affect john hutchinson has discovered would be another area that needs advancement only in method. Which logically is the next step upon discovery.
I have no doubt, if john hutchinson were a millionaire he would find a much more efficient method. Unfortunatly he doesnt have the bank roll that the united states military does.
However, the results themselves should open the eyes of very many people. The results, though as dangerous as the method is, proves the extent solid matter can be manipulated. It breaks the barrier of conventional states of matter and opens up whole new areas of science for all to explore.
@Nada,
i have been involved in extensive experimentation since last year and checking enough theories out there. i started with Thane Heins perepiteia, proceed to Adam's motors, Bedini's energizers, Hector's Perez resonance teachings, Donald Smith Resonance extraction etc ect
I have not achieved the slightest effect that OU is involved there in any circumstances.
Have you managed to make such machine? Have you witness such technology yourself?
Do not get fooled by videos on youtube. They do not hold against any replication for the required results.
Unless you have a OU machine or experienced it first hand, you should think that all conspiracies are just conspiracies.
Why accept something never seen and denied? Ponder on this, my little noob friend.
Baroutologos
QuoteWhy accept something never seen and denied?
Never seen by you... I've seen the impossible first hand, that is why i know more exists than we know. That is why conspiracies are not just conspiracies.
QuoteDo not get fooled by videos on youtube. They do not hold against any replication for the required results.
Im sorry, did you build john hutchinsons devices and check for replicated results? No you didnt. Why deny the validity of something you have never spent a second examining? You simply take your experience of not finding answrs in the OU field and brainwash yourself into believing that everything is fake. Thats a mistake on your part, lucky for us only you have to live with that mentallity.
Quotemy little noob friend
Feel better now?
Its ok when you grow up to be an adult you wont feel the need to insult people when you dont like theyre point of view.
Ok ok! You are right and i am wrong...
I wait your Hutchinson replication, the free energy and the bizare effects.
CYA
Baroutologos
Quote from: Nadda on November 30, 2009, 08:01:58 PM
Never seen by you... I've seen the impossible first hand, that is why i know more exists than we know. That is why conspiracies are not just conspiracies.
@Nadda
I'll grant you the point above and say I myself have seen the impossible as well.
But, you can silence your critics by demonstrating your point here on this forum. Make it as simple as possible to replicate as close as possible and annotate with sources wherever possible.
I myself lack the money and freedom or I would post test results myself and prove what I say is true in my posts.
You can, too. I agree with your point. I'm on your side and I'll prove it when I have the chance.
--Lee