Anyone aware of the technology of Andrei Technology of Andrei Melnicenko?
Some YouTube intro's:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0394KHjxAgY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oNCqQd9Wr5Q
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uk_yKNIzhME
Never heard of him but it would be fairly easy to replicate his experiments and check the results. Enough info is given already.
It reminds me about Dr. Aspden theoretical considerations that, to my knowledge, were not confirmed by experimental results, including his experiments too.
A word (or two, three or more…) of caution:
- primary bulb is significantly brighter than the secondary. By elementary logic, any ‘excess energy’ that is present must have a minus sign, then. Lol!
- everyone assembling a ferrite transformer or having a broken transformer knows how ‘beneficial’ a space between the halves is. ;)
- money first (?!). no more comments needed.
It may be a fun experiment, though, if conducted with realistic expectations of …failure. And the public reports “leading-out†of it would “benefit the world†(aarrrgh… ;D )
Cheers,
Tinu
Hmm,
seems that relies also to the Dr. Stiffler and EMDevices experiments
and some other exited resonance phenomena.
Here is some nglish explanation on his homepage:
http://ferromagnetic-energy.com/core_of_the_physical_effect/
Hi,
I found Volume III of Fradays Work which was mentioned be Andrey.
I have not found any reference to a magnetic stream or wind in this document.
http://books.google.com/books?id=2BsXAAAAYAAJ (http://books.google.com/books?id=2BsXAAAAYAAJ)
May someone here is more lucky than me in finding the relevant pages.
My comment on the last two part of Andrey´s video :
Measurement errors all over. How can he measure current via a normal Ampere-meter running the system with 2 Kilohertz ?
He would need a true rms - Ampere-meter an calculate the rms-voltage using a scope.
Using incandescence bulbs as proof for a certain amount of energy is another "absolute no-go".
Anyone knows that the capture-efficiency of the back-emf-spike via diodes is less than 70 %.
So in the primary he has a loss of at least 30 %, as the bulb is only run by the back-emf.
The same goes with the secondary circuit.
Any additional comments and ideas , guys ?
Regards
Kator01