Overunity.com Archives

News announcements and other topics => News => Topic started by: falinx on February 22, 2010, 03:45:47 AM

Title: So, why hasn't this guy been credited with overunity creation?
Post by: falinx on February 22, 2010, 03:45:47 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ebxNxglVF1o

It looks like he took the info from a pdf that has been freely available for years: If you download utorrent to get this legally free document you will find out a few things as to why this device works.

http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/3507632/Magnetic_Energy_-_Free_Energy_%28PDF%29
Title: Re: So, why hasn't this guy been credited with overunity creation?
Post by: infringer on February 22, 2010, 07:52:55 PM
Can't say never really seen the video before this myself...

Besides you need a working unit sent out for verification. That is the main reason! Did anyone send a unit to mr hearman?
Title: Re: So, why hasn't this guy been credited with overunity creation?
Post by: FreeEnergy on February 22, 2010, 09:01:16 PM
i heard the inventor(s) sold out! but im not sure about this.
anyway i downloaded the file and now im trying to convert it into .doc or .html file to post here since the file is too large.
Title: Re: So, why hasn't this guy been credited with overunity creation?
Post by: falinx on February 23, 2010, 04:23:49 AM
Yeah, can't really blame people unless they have a will of steel like stanley meyer. And look what happened to him, turned down the money, next thing his own government kills him, reminds me of that story about the scorpion and the frog :(. Everyone has their price I guess, just sad though.
Title: Re: So, why hasn't this guy been credited with overunity creation?
Post by: Groundloop on February 23, 2010, 01:11:19 PM
The motor in the video was created by Ludwig Emma Brits and Victor John Christie of Australia. http://www.lutec.com.au/index.htm
Later on another firm got the full right to sell licenses.
http://www.evergreenltd.com.hk/index.html

As far as I know, no units has been produced and is available to buy yet.

G.
Title: Re: So, why hasn't this guy been credited with overunity creation?
Post by: mscoffman on February 26, 2010, 01:43:13 PM
Quote from: Groundloop on February 23, 2010, 01:11:19 PM
The motor in the video was created by Ludwig Emma Brits and Victor John Christie of Australia. http://www.lutec.com.au/index.htm
Later on another firm got the full right to sell licenses.
http://www.evergreenltd.com.hk/index.html

As far as I know, no units has been produced and is available to buy yet.

G.

The same old story..they can't possibly sell to individuals, so they go after
the power companies. But power companies can already generate electricity
and therefore don't need their device. Meanwhile they've developed zero
crediable supporting statements, and after a period of zero sales..that's it.

:S:MarkSCoffman
Title: Re: So, why hasn't this guy been credited with overunity creation?
Post by: FreeEnergy on February 26, 2010, 04:35:47 PM
found the patent for this on google:

http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=gdgNAAAAEBAJ&dq=6630806
Title: Re: So, why hasn't this guy been credited with overunity creation?
Post by: falinx on March 04, 2010, 07:23:40 PM
hmmm, seems like it could work but me I'm just the spectator of the sport, not the sportsman... as Mr Burns would say I simply don't have the cranial capacity :). However I'm not quite understanding the whole concept here and you guys will have to help me out. Overunity of any sorts has never been proven to be impossible due to the laws of our physics. Perpetual motion's definition in wikipedia is thus "However, the term more commonly refers to any device or system that perpetually (indefinitely) produces more energy than it consumes". Okay someone will have to explain that for me, "more commonly" to me would mean widely accepted as in "matter of factly" and that simply isn't true. From what I gather they are totally different. Just because something can revolve infinitely the laws of energy creation mean that it will obviously react differently when a "draw" is placed on it ie it will stop dead with in a short amount of time. They simply can't be the same. So that brings me to this magnetic energy document that I linked. Yes it could be a hoax 100% but it seems to me that a group of people must have gone to an extreme (and when you look through it you'll realise just how extreme) amount of trouble to fake this document. Yes it supposedly has aliens telling people about this stuff and immediately the smarter people ever reading that would back away from the document slowly going uh oh "where's the tin foil hats" :). But I would love to see some real research into this stuff because I believe it could very well be true. I did link the youtube clip here and it is referred to as a romag generator and labelled as such in the video. The only way a true romag generator would be producing overunity, as in this video, would be through it's utilisation of orgone energy (or zero point energy, or torsion fields... I'm not sure too sure what the energy's vogue terming is these days hur hur) is being used. If tesla could do it in the early 20th century I don't see why now it should be negated as a possibility. In the document it also states that gravity is compressed magnetism, that magnets aren't only positive and negative but they also have a neutral field etc. The thing is that this could be the way forward because as sherlock holmes, or the mind of arthur conan doyle stated: "How often have I said to you that when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth?". That sounds like logic to me :)

Anway, just my 2 cents guys!

happy researching!!
Title: Re: So, why hasn't this guy been credited with overunity creation?
Post by: gobob on April 15, 2010, 05:36:20 PM
DC amp and volt meters measuring an AC power supply will read zero--no power, regardless of the actual power output. 

AC going through a full wave rectifier does not produce DC unless there is no load. Under load without a huge capacitor, voltage and current pulsate.

I would like to compare AC amps & volts going into the rectifier (or better yet, the initial power supply that feeds the rectifier) and coming out of the motor. And, even then one should be wary of reactance.

My guess is the demonstrated process is about 90% efficient.
Title: Re: So, why hasn't this guy been credited with overunity creation?
Post by: Dr Adolf Nowak on December 11, 2010, 10:41:51 AM
We in Poland have already for sale 2 types of home/dynamic reactors: DRJ200 and 1000 series. DRJ200 is 1 disc reactor which makes slightly over 100% total effectivity. It is similar but more effective to this which are already done in Russia after Potapov^s projects. DRJ1000 is much more sophisticated, 800% total eff. machine. F.e. smallest of this kind, 11 kW produces 110 kW heat. It is only to see on: www.nsppp.bloog.pl It is page of our party: National Socialistics Polish Workers Party. We have some more projects, also for military use. One of them also for sale are new wind turbines for home use: 3-10 kW of power.
Title: Re: So, why hasn't this guy been credited with overunity creation?
Post by: TinselKoala on December 11, 2010, 12:38:09 PM
Quote from: Dr Adolf Nowak on December 11, 2010, 10:41:51 AM
We in Poland have already for sale 2 types of home/dynamic reactors: DRJ200 and 1000 series. DRJ200 is 1 disc reactor which makes slightly over 100% total effektivity. It is similar but more effective to this which are already done in Russia after Potapov^s projects. DRJ1000 is much more sophisticated, 800% total eff. machine. F.e. smallest of this kind, 11 kW produces 110 kW heat. It is only to see on: www.nsppp.bloog.pl It is page of our party: National Socialistics Polish Workers Party. We have some more projects, also for military use. One of them also for sale are new wind turbines for home use: 3-10 kW of power.

And of course your home is simply and easily powered by one of these units. You have an 11 kW machine making 110 kW heat, and this is fed to a simple heat exchanger/turbine system, off the shelf tech, with about 30 percent overall efficiency. This makes in excess of 30 kW output as usable electric power, of which you use 11 kW to power the input unit, and run your house off the remaining 19 kW, while you are cranking out wind turbines in the garage out back, for those who can't afford to buy your large system. You sell what you can't use back to the local grid for a profit.

It's brilliant !!

Can you post a photo of your installation, please? I'd like to buy one right away, before the Mossad suppresses you.
Title: Re: So, why hasn't this guy been credited with overunity creation?
Post by: utilitarian on December 11, 2010, 01:07:57 PM
Quote from: Dr Adolf Nowak on December 11, 2010, 10:41:51 AM
We in Poland have already for sale 2 types of home/dynamic reactors: DRJ200 and 1000 series. DRJ200 is 1 disc reactor which makes slightly over 100% total effektivity. It is similar but more effective to this which are already done in Russia after Potapov^s projects. DRJ1000 is much more sophisticated, 800% total eff. machine. F.e. smallest of this kind, 11 kW produces 110 kW heat. It is only to see on: www.nsppp.bloog.pl It is page of our party: National Socialistics Polish Workers Party. We have some more projects, also for military use. One of them also for sale are new wind turbines for home use: 3-10 kW of power.

National Socialist party?  As in "Nazi?"  Why the unfortunate name?
Title: Re: So, why hasn't this guy been credited with overunity creation?
Post by: Dr Adolf Nowak on December 11, 2010, 02:32:48 PM
Mr Koala! Who had given You such dates? DRJ1000 produces no electricity, heat only. It is about 9x more effective as todays atomic reactors. To make electricity for self propeling this is not yet so effective. It has to be much over 1000 to make enough water vapour (Dampf) to make it run. It is easier and more efficient with Novak-Potapov air engine. Such same scheme of working as Repulsine A.  This we have presented already some 4 y. ago during Bush-Putin meeting in S. Petersburg. But no journalist asked any question, though V. V.  had waited for. Tja, das sind die Journalisten. Auch aus Berliner Zeitung. Villeicht spater! Und DRJ1000 arbeitet nicht. Das liegte im Gehimnis bis wir DRJ200 fur Serie fest gepruft haben. Aber Du kann selbst prufen. Nachste Sa. wird Gerat erste mal fur Publikum gezeigt im alte polnische Stadt Bromberg (jetzt: Bydgoszcz). Etwas 450 km von Berlin. GruSS
Title: Re: So, why hasn't this guy been credited with overunity creation?
Post by: FatBird on December 12, 2010, 12:51:53 PM
@ falinx
http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/3507632/Magnetic_Energy_-_Free_Energy_%28PDF%29

I tried to download it, but the message says NOT FOUND.

Any ideas where we can download it?

Thanks.
Title: Re: So, why hasn't this guy been credited with overunity creation?
Post by: ArtoriosRex on December 12, 2010, 09:31:55 PM
Updated link:
http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/5547596/Magnetic_Energy_-_Free_Energy