Scott McKie, full name Richard Scott McKie, patent #5,146,395
http://www.rexresearch.com/mckie/mckie.htm
Just read the patent, especially page 19, column 16!!! No comments.
Hello all,
@Qwert
as nobody is so "crazy" to jump out with a comment I will do it:
This has NOTHING to do with a TPU!!
Otto
Quote from: otto on March 22, 2010, 03:05:21 AM
Hello all,
@Qwert
as nobody is so "crazy" to jump out with a comment I will do it:
This has NOTHING to do with a TPU!!
Otto
Hello there Otto,
why "nothing" ?
Hello all,
@tsl
if you see 1 or 2 or even more tank circuits that doesnt mean its a TPU.
I think its very easy to build tank circuits and a lot of our members have build them. Success? No.
That we understand each other, I dont say that in a TPU are not tank circuits but this drawings are not a TPU.
I miss how the coils are wound, not to mention the number of coils, not to mention a different power supply...but
IF and only IF this is a TPU then the inventor "forgot" to mention at least 80% of the most important informations and so I can say that this is NOT the TPU.
Yes, I know the inventors are hiding informations in their patents but this would be the same as somebody would want to patent a car engine without saying how it works.
No further comments on this.
Otto
If you have a parallel pair of counter pulsed tanks you have created the 'push the swing at the correct moment'. This also looks like a MEG, a Hendershot, Smith PVC tube, TPU, Bucking Toroid.
Doen't anybody look at the coil fields in parallel, the configurations where the 2 coils sit side by side? Turn a TPU on its side and you have 2 tanks sitting side by side. The configuration is like 2 wireless transmission antennas facing each other alternatively transmitting back and forth.
Is this a test? It is not a Hubbard or Deyo configuration.
In order to use iron wire as a core it needs to be biased to create a larger magnetic field. The single iron wire with insulation isn't adequate as a ferrite type core.