http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/view/153063 (http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/view/153063)
What do you think of this?
Somebody's been watching too much of the 'V' series on ABC. :)
Thanks dd...interesting reading.
I find similarly strange stories are being reported from different sources more and more these days...thats the first I heard of this one though.
Regards...
I keep telling everyone that we have an illegal alien problem here in the States, but no one believes me!
hahaha :D
QuoteSomebody's been watching too much of the 'V' series on ABC
Technically, Christ and the Angels are "extra-Terrestrial". The Bible records how they will be received upon arrival.
Of course, first the sign of His coming is seen in the heavens, giving the warlike of earth a relative few moments to prepare their reception.
It is too bad that so many are misled by the trickery of those having been thrown down here, knowing they have but little time to work their treachery.
In fact, it won't take long at all for men to see how thoroughly they've allowed themselves to be misled upon seeing Christ arriving in power and Great Glory....
Sadly, it will be too late for those ones to repent of their former course.
Blessings in Christ Yeshua
I would appreciate very much if these alien beings could tell us how to build overunity and free energy devices (and the theory behind it), instead of hiding... Besides, I think most people are interested in other species as well, bearing in mind that Star Trek Shows have prepared us for a long time.
Quote from: EMdevices on May 01, 2010, 05:38:02 PM
Somebody's been watching too much of the 'V' series on ABC. :)
Oh come on now, you don't like lizards?
thay
Quote from: gauschor on May 02, 2010, 05:53:43 AM
I would appreciate very much if these alien beings could tell us how to build overunity and free energy devices (and the theory behind it), instead of hiding... Besides, I think most people are interested in other species as well, bearing in mind that Star Trek Shows have prepared us for a long time.
take a wire ... and a source ... yikes!
i can not explain it in a simpler way!
i am sorry ! 2 things are required a wire and an engery source .. i understand the difulicty some have in doing my simple expairments !
how ever the polarity does not matter ... lol if you interupt the pos better results are atained !
stright up ... if it has an intrupted power source and copper wire or any other wire for that matter it is my work !
regards !
H
BTW im not being an ass here .... this is the true reality .. see you agin when your conclusion meets mine
Quote from: innovation_station on May 02, 2010, 10:13:23 AM
take a wire ... and a source ... yikes!
I have watched some your videos and read some of your posts (which mostly consist of keyword fragments) but still haven't found a proper presentation of OU in any of them - or I must have missed the parts with proper explanation.
Anyways - sure people can guess that you need a source and a wire, maybe also a magnet, a capacitor, and a chopper for creating an OU device, but the variety for experimentation is almost indefinite. This is the exact same
fuzziness that prevented "Free Energy" devices from a breakthrough in the past and nowadays. Most of them seemed to have a very elaborate logic (including the fact, that important parts are missing on either sketches or pictures) which will prevent any successful replication, if not fully understood.
Quote from: gauschor on May 02, 2010, 12:36:29 PM
I have watched some your videos and read some of your posts (which mostly consist of keyword fragments) but still haven't found a proper presentation of OU in any of them - or I must have missed the parts with proper explanation.
Anyways - sure people can guess that you need a source and a wire, maybe also a magnet, a capacitor, and a chopper for creating an OU device, but the variety for experimentation is almost indefinite. This is the exact same fuzziness that causes "Free Energy" innovations not being able to replicate by anyone now and in the past.
failed replacations are ones own responcibality .. clearly if you have failed you did it wrong ...
lol
i can repete my expairments and gain the same results as how i have designed my units ..
i have no problem to fully explain my devices .. but when i do i get gaylords trying to hide it or steal it !
ist!
so now i ask what is the reward for hard work and study on the bench as i have seen 0 in the line of wealth and income from my effords there for the reward is knowalge and understanding .. and the ability to CREATE .. WHAT EVER I CHOOSE !
You were too fast answering my post. I was just editing the last part of my previous message ;) Anyways...
Yes, I have no doubt that you can explain very good, because in your clips you are talking very fluid and calm, quite contrary to your forum posts.
If you have fully working devices, why don't you create a nice document and explain all bit by bit? I guess you expect some reward for what you invented, which is justified. But fact is - if people have really have found something great, there will always be some "gaylords" who want to steal your devices or suppress it - as soon as you go to the patent office. It will neither change now, nor in 100 years.
And what then? Then you are forced to keep all your findings by yourself the whole life. You live and die with your innovations while no one could take part on them. The oil industries are happy :(
You should know that most people are very lazy in constructing devices; so if you achieve to spread some devices on people, people will always know that it was *you* who has invented this thing and that it is *you* whom they need to ask and who is the origin of the knowledge. Eventually the time comes when your work is rewarded with money and when such devices go into production.
I can speak for myself only in that I made myself clear that if I would ever invent something myself I will most likely have no chance on distributing it for money after all these stories of suppressed technologies. My plans would have been to distribute it first to my closer friends and they need to spread this technology to their friends and further friends of friends until no one can stop it anymore. It is a sad circumstance, however, that one must think this way, without rewards, but it seems it is the only way to change something in the world.
i never ever was a money guy ... i simply spend it too quick !
: (
but i have been open source from the day i choose to be ... when i released my turbine self running concept
witch is fact !
aswell plans for free engery devices abounds every where you look ...
it is just MISUNDERSTOOD ! if properly understood well
i need not say more !
ist
You need to say more ;)
You can take this literally, because your are stricken with a disease many inventors have had in the past. The symptoms of this disease are:
+positive: you have something useful for mankind, you are working on devices, talent on building devices
-negative: no structure, no theory, no explanation, no documents
History and its failed attempts to replicate many OU-devices show, that these negative aspects eat up all positive ones. What I want to say by that is, that you are presenting your innovations the wrong way. All you need to do however is getting it into a reasonable structure, which people can follow. Since you are mostly talking of finished experiments and not work-in-progress the following applies to you:
1. Take one of your experiments from which you think it can be released to the public
2. Write a text why and how this works as it works, including test results
3. Write a manual/sketches on how to construct the device, which parts are used, have an eye on parts that are critical (even if they are "common" for you)
4. Record a video clip presenting it
And afterwards make a blog or 1 single big post/topic in this forum (regarding this special device) where each of the list points is included in the very first post.
What you deliver however is that:
- keywords, buzz words
- fragmented in multiple posts, often spread on different pages(!)
- topics remain incomplete because you claim they will be finished after some other experiments
- pictures/parts of pictures of an interesting device, which however mean nothing if not explained
- video clips showing something but mostly having no explanation
... all of them forcing the reader to guess. Guess-work will fail 100% when attempting to replicate. Failing leads people to ignoring such stuff.
So tell me now how shall people not misunderstand you with that kind of presentation? I can say for sure, that all your innovations will trickle away into the unknown if you keep on presenting like that. This however is just a suggestion and I don't want to dictate what you have to do; it is just fact that people will turn their back on "thrown-together" stuff. Please don't make the same mistakes many inventors did for more than 100 years now.
nope ... learn it !
all things operate on my methods
regards !
ist
It's your choice to share knowledge in a more useful way or not. Bear in mind however that you are not propagating "Open Source" with the attitude above, and people won't take you serious anymore.
Quote from: gauschor on May 02, 2010, 03:28:23 PM
It's your choice to share knowledge in a more useful way or not. Bear in mind however that you are not propagating "Open Source" with the attitude above, and people won't take you serious anymore.
my words tests results and facts ..
all speak for themselvs !
beleave me im taken far more serious than many ever will know ..
ist!