My research proves that almost all overunity devices draw their extra energy from the potential energy of the local gravitational field. And to describe them in full scientific detail, it is required to revise the Maxwells equations of Electromagnetism to no-linear equations, and Einstein's theory of gravitation. So for the academic world to account for them it is required 1-3 nobels...
Here is a the link for a paper produced by me, when the Bristish Aerospace invited me during 1998 (Greenglow project) to lecture at the Lancaster University in UK, for thsi and relevant topics:
http://www.ckscientific.com/PapersinPhysics/Lancast8_suspended.doc
also
http://users.softlab.ece.ntua.gr/~kyritsis/PapersinPhysics/Lancast8_suspended.htm
It is classical physics, not super-difficult to read.
If we did not challenge the laws of physics of Aristotle we would still be holding bows with arrows and usING slaves.
The way to extract energy from the field (electromagnetic and gravitational) and furthermore from the kinetic energy of the perpetual motion of electrons, protons, and neutrons in an atom, is exactly some of the overunity devices that are known.
So I will state, what many would be afraid that the case was with some overunity devices: IT IS SOFT ATOMIC POWER. A way to extract energy, among other sources, from atoms , without splitting them, without fusion, sometimes without even chaning their chemical bonds.
Here is a list of past Physics assumptions that I believe that 21th century and the new millenium physics has already started and will eventually turn all of them false
1) Inertial mass of bodies ( of constant ammount of molecular matter) at low speed (non-relativistic) cannot be decreased.
2) All matter starts with protons, neutrons, electrons. In other words, there are not smaller permanent particles (Quantum particles are excluded as they are not permanent)
3) Nothing goes faster than photons
4) All macroscopic electromagnetic interactions are described with the linear equations of Maxwell.
5) All forces acting on laboratory macroscopic objects at low speed (non-relativistic) are of the next 5 types a) Inertial, b) by contact with other material bodies made from protons, neutrons, electrons, c) Newtonian gravitation forces d) Maxwell's electromagnetic forces e) no other type of forces.
The Greenglow project of the British Aetospace in 1998 , was a copy of similar small project of NASA and had the next objectives (seemingly outrageous for standard Academic Science)
1) Invent new propulsion for flying
2) Produce while flying the fuells, or not using fuels at all.
3) Ability to travel faster than light
At the 1st conference, it was announced that a series of similar conferences would follow within Greenglow. But it seems that it was the first and last conference. Either they found what they were looking for, or they were entirely discouraged. The site remain in the web for a couple of years with my name among 2-3 other lectures and then it was
eliminated.
Here is the link of another case of ""overunity" or "free energy" process developped in Rowan University
The link of the youtube video about blacklight power is http://www.youtube.com/watch?vÂ=DfjOIoPwolg
It was discovered and elaborated inside Rowan University. Still, the standard academic science does not have the slightest idea where the additional energy, in the energy balance of this process , comes from.
Since it is validated by Universities , there is not the danger of accusations of being a fraud etc. And since it is highly unlikely that it is already a military classified technology, there does not seem to be a fatal obstruction in developing it. The only real difficulty is the conceptual inadequacy of the present physics.
In my perception, the missing concept to understand where this renewable energy comes from is by shifting from the old concept of "electromagnetic field" of an atom , "gravitational field" of an atom and "quantum vacuum" in an atom, as empty space for interactions propagation, to a more realistic concept of a finer layer of physical and real gaseous matter around the known particles, made from permanent particles again (as permanent as protons, neutrons, electrons) but vastly smaller (e.g. 10^(-40) as order of smaller size). All energy of almost all the "free energy devices" or "overunity devices" seems that it comes from the internal energy of this finer gaseous material layer (centuries ago called by Newton, Maxwell and many other, aether). Which is equivalent to saying that it is from the potential energy of the new unified electro-gravitational (and not only) field. And it is renewable because both it is a vast reservoir and it is replenished by the transfer of energy through friction of protons electrons and neutrons in this finer gaseous material layer of the molecular heat energy. This is the required conceptual leap for standard academic science to unblock the development of cheaper and zero CO2 emissions energy.
Quote from: DrKCostas on July 15, 2010, 06:47:22 AM
Here is the link of another case of ""overunity" or "free energy" process developped in Rowan University
The link of the youtube video about blacklight power is http://www.youtube.com/watch?vÂ=DfjOIoPwolg
It was discovered and elaborated inside Rowan University. Still, the standard academic science does not have the slightest idea where the additional energy, in the energy balance of this process , comes from.
Since it is validated by Universities , there is not the danger of accusations of being a fraud etc. And since it is highly unlikely that it is already a military classified technology, there does not seem to be a fatal obstruction in developing it. The only real difficulty is the conceptual inadequacy of the present physics.
This youtube link does not work. Can you post a valid one? Thanks.
Here is the same video (but only 60% of it) in my channel at
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZhH1rrD5YY
I tried it and the link works in youtube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfjOIoPwolg
by ifreed0m
and some CNN news about it at
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ymlc8nk7Mdk
also at
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yHfSE28PeoQ&feature=related
Good luck!
While I studied BLP processes with some interest, I have a problem
with their experimental efforts. Their experiments are not elegant
in that they always seem to be on the lookout for the next unknown
experimental effect. “Always having an Out†is ok when driving a
motor vehicle, but experimental science is not only supposed to show
what happens,
but simultaneously strategically demonstrate what is NOT happening.
Being always on the lookout for the next strange experimental effect
undermines BLP’s efforts and damages it's credibility.
For example, one way for crystals to store energy is by the Wigner Nuclear
Effect Storing energy in dislocations in the crystal lattice. Historically this
effect once put a British weapons reactor out of control. Prove that what
you are seeing is not Wigner energy, in other words prestored
preconditioned energy.
The next thing they need to prove is whether or not CF cold fusion
exists. Because CF excess process energy will sit smack in the middle
of their claims. CF is not currently explained by scientists by using a
BLP physics model.
BLP can spend their money in any way they want and run anything they
want up the flagpole, but without valid evidence, I still ain’t saluting.
:S:MarkSCoffman
I watched recently some videos in the famous site www.ted.com that show how present time innovative, talented and famous people think about the future changes in the energy model. I recommend some of them
1) Bill Gates approach:
http://www.ted.com/talks/bill_gates.html
I think quite conventional and sadly resorts to nuclear power again
2) Al Gore's (Nobel prize winner)
http://www.ted.com/talks/al_gore_warns_on_latest_climate_trends.html
Powerful way to urge.
3) Thermal solar device of small size.
http://www.ted.com/talks/bill_gross_on_new_energy.html
Brilliant! I wish such computer optimisation could be done to some other amateur "free energy" devices as well.
4) Interesting perspectives of how to win the oil-end game:
http://www.ted.com/talks/amory_lovins_on_winning_the_oil_endgame.html
5) Simplistic conventional forecast of the energy uses till 2050:
http://www.ted.com/talks/richard_sears_planning_for_the_end_of_oil.html
6) Sad debate where nuclear power wins over renewable energies:
http://www.ted.com/talks/debate_does_the_world_need_nuclear_energy.html
And what I noticed is that nowhere is mentioned the plenty many "free energy" innovations found in the web.
So I wrote a letter to Bill Gates pointing out to him, the present situation of "free energy†or “overunity†devices. I suggested to him to do something e.g. fund an institution where Universities, innovators, and investors could cooperate.
I also wrote a similar letter to Chris Anderson that runs the www.ted.com , as the perspective of energy innovations of “free energy†devices is an idea worth spreading. It contains seeds for valuable development in theoretical science, engineering, and business, fo good resolutions of the global climate crisis, and CO2 emissions.
I did not expect any response of course.
ted.com... ever follow the money? you know, cui bono?
the 4th largest offender in pollution, general electric, is the biggest funder of ted.com... actually it's pretty interesting to see who is on that 'list'...
I wonder why none undertakes to write some decent articles in wikipedia about overunity devices. Even the article on HHO referrers to Brown (original term HHO=Brown gas) as a fraudster when claiming standard properties of the HHO flame that may produce extra energy. Unfortunately or not the policy of Wikipedia is not to seek for the truth, as this may be impossible, but to keep a neutral position. So if there are objections to conventional thinkers, that rush in to accusing that all about overunity devices are fallacies and frauds, wikipedia is obliged to present the opposite opinion too, based on existing links.
It is interesting to note that the amount of energy used to create a photovoltaic array is more than the array will ever convert. The Israelis are on to something that resembles a big heat engine though. As a gas is heated it becomes less dense. Being less dense it overcomes gravity and rises. The israeli plan is to build a tower where water from the ocean is introduced at the top. This will require pumps. A current of air is initiated by fans at the base of the tower to draw in the heated air at the top of the tower. The current causes accelerated evaporation of the water and the weight of the water pumped to the top of the tower is added to the weight of the air falling inside the column. The falling air has to pass through the fans at the bottom. The fans now become turbines and begin to drive the motors they are attached to over synchronous rpm turning the motors into induction generators.
The wind inside the towers reachs a sustained velocity of 80 miles an hour. Pretty much what happens when it rains. Hot humid air rises all day long. The sun goes down and the water vapor begins to condense in the upper atmosphere. It begins to fall. Where I live it can not fall all the way back to Earth nicely as it encounters a bubble of hot humid dense air that is still trying to rise. The power of the sky waterfall then runs all over the surface of the bubble creating currents and transferring electrostatic charges between different cloud masses. Lightning discharges a tiny portion of the skyfall in small radiant energy events which serve as a reminder of the solar power transferred to water vapor. Water vapor is transparent to visible light but not to infrared. The greenhouse effect is caused by water vapor. It allows short wave em light in while absorbing both incoming ir and Earth radiated ir. Earth molecules act as frequency converters and water vapor acts as a storage medium. Why are we melting sand to capture visible light when we are inundated with ir emwave energy.
Hi Sparks,
They could get an almost cyclic process with a updraft/downdraft tower if they take two nested pipes. The outer pipe would be clear glass the inner pipe would be painted black. As the sun shines on the inner pipe the cool air from the bottom is sucked upwards between the inner and outer pipe. Now if they have a cold spray misting tube around the inner pipe spraying down through the center it would cause a downdraft through the center which then gets sucked back up through the inner and outer pipe on the updraft. This would form a complete loop.
My only guess is that they computed the mass of the heated air at the tower top. I cant remeber the exact scale of the towers because I was having a heck of a time getting my mind around just what they were accomplishing but I think it was around 80 feet tall. They probablly run this thing open circuit because there is enough hot air at this level to keep the tower in downblast mode to satisfy their needs. The air is already up there it just needs to be condensed in the inside of the column. I dont think this will work in a humid enviroment because the air is saturated with water vapor to very high altitudes. In a desert the air densities stratify at very low altitudes sometimes just a few feet off the ground. eg mirage effect. Desert nations bordering on the ocean with prevailing wind patterns that are offshore are prime candidates for such devices. They have the water scource and the low dew point air. I am in the lightning capitol of the world where it is so common place no one even notices it anymore. You would have to have a 20mile tall tower to get into anything that resembles dry air. You can have a 20mile per hour wind around here and still be sweating profusely the dew points are so high. A hurricane making land fall here would intensify there is so much steam hanging around.
Talking about ingenious techniques in deserts, I watched recently a remarkable video of how in the Golden Desert in India they harvest the scarce rain, by methods that go centuries back. It is remarkable of how they even made an artificial lake that remains in all seasons of the year, and how much water we waste in areas of multiple times more rain.
Here is the link
http://www.ted.com/talks/anupam_mishra_the_ancient_ingenuity_of_water_harvesting.html
And talking about extracting energy from the heat of air, I studied during 2002, an one of a kind patent application in the European patent office by an Australian inventor of a simple machine that was supposed to extract energy (and e.g. convert by an electric generator it to electricity) from the heat of the air. I had never seen an idea and design like that. Unlike the wind power there is no need for the wind to blow, and unlike solar power it could operate in darkness during winter time too. I do not know if they gave him a patent, or if the device really works. But its physics seemed natural and plausible. The idea and design was as follows: A wheel, that at its outer perimeter had mounted a number (I think 12) of curvilinear cones, that their axis was in the same plane of the wheel. The wheel was put in rotational motion by an external energy source in the direction of the smaller holes of the cones. As the air was entering (due to the motion) from the small hole of the cone and was exiting from the large hole of the cone, it experienced an expansion, due to the shape of the cone. When the air expands, the temperature drops. And this had as a result extraction of heat energy from the air, that was converted to kinetic, increasing the speed with which air was exiting the cone. This like in rockets had as result to push further the wheel in the direction that was already rotating. At a certain higher threshold number of rotations per minute, this additional push was sufficient to have the wheel self-running. Actually a brake was utilised so as to have the rotation at lower than destructive speeds. Then this rotational energy of the wheel could be collected and e.g. converted to electricity by an electric generator. Although I do not know if the device really worked, I found the idea of converting the abundant heat energy of air to electrical, intriguing. I could not find at that time any other patent extracting the atmospheric heat energy. And as we are in years of excess heat in the atmosphere due to CO2, such an idea is good.
All this interesting topics reminds me of a heat exchanger. It should in theory not require energy to compress and decompress air at the same time. But what happens in a heat exchanger is that one side gets warmer while the other side gets cooler. This potential difference should be possible to harness by the help of the energy in the surrounding air itself. Without question it requires much less energy to warm up a house by use of a heat exchanger compared to using electric power to heat the ovens. So I have been thinking a whole lot about how I should harness this free energy, and turn it into kinetic energy that lasts for as long as there is a sun, and air...
Vidar
There are a few patents out there that basically describe initiating a cyclonic strom and feeding the currents generated through turbines to the vertical eyewall. Basically by creating a current over warm water we lower the atomospheric pressure so that the warm water boils at a lower temperature. This leaves the water cooler the air warmer and is a conversion of potential energy stored in the water to kinetic energy expressed in the air movement.
The isreali thing is different in that the accelerated evaporation of the water adds mass to the air already lifted by the buoyant force. The water pumped up with the added mass of the air then goes down through the turbine. Like an upside down hurricane. This seems to be more powerful in that the air isnt fighting gravity to go up the eyewall it is aided by gravity going down the stack and impinging on the fans. Of course the water doesnt get up there for free but alot of the pumping energy expenditure is regained as the water falls back down through the fans. One problem I forsee is the buildup of the warm moist air around the base of the tower. This will tend to slow things down. They must have a diffusion mechanism setup so as not to accumulate back pressure from the standing most air.
Sorry to derail this thread. It is very interesting that you look for a common denominator in these OU devices and it well may reside in a quantom particle. Virtual particles are interesting in that they are necessary lest we resort to force felt at afar. Perhaps they are not all that virtual.
I am sure there are ingenious configurations that can extract heat from the atmospheric air as free renewable energy. If mother nature can do it naturally in a tornado (where air heat is converted to rotational) then man can do it. Not necessarily in an exact same geometry but some how.
I got interested in free energy from the atmospheric air heat, in an invesre way: I was trying to find a mechanical analogue, of what I perceived it was happening in most free energy magnetic generators.
I repeat here, the key to unlock the puzzle:
In my perception, the missing concept to understand where the renewable energy comes from the magnetic generators (like testatika, Searl's, DePlama's etc) is by shifting from the old concept of "electromagnetic field" of an atom , "gravitational field" of an atom and "quantum vacuum" in an atom, as empty space for interactions propagation, to a more realistic concept of a finer layer of physical and real gaseous matter around the known particles, made from permanent particles again (as permanent as protons, neutrons, electrons) but vastly smaller (e.g. 10^(-36) as order of smaller size). All energy of almost all the "free energy devices" or "overunity devices" seems that it comes from the internal heat energy of this finer gaseous material layer (centuries ago called by Newton, Maxwell and many other, aether). Which is equivalent to saying that it is from the potential energy of the new unified electro-gravitational-(and not only) field. And it is renewable because both it is a vast reservoir and it is replenished by the transfer of energy through friction of protons electrons and neutrons in this finer gaseous material layer of the matter molecular heat energy. E.g. Earth's and sun's heat. Yes we can substitute aether with particles of it, but they have to be vastly smaller than the standard electron, proton,neutron, so a two level atomicity principle. So if magnetic generators succedd in exctraction the aether heat, I though it should exist a mechanical analogue in atmospheric moleculat air too. More in my paper link at the fisrt postThis is the required conceptual leap for standard academic science to unblock the development of cheaper and zero CO2 emissions energy.
Your description of the device with the water, stream of air on it and extraction of energy is very interesting. Now I realise that the involvment of the water may make things easier Thank you!
Inspired by the 12 universal laws from Milanovich and McCunes book "The Light Shall Set You Free"(1998) I resume some of the principles of my research in the booklet in the link below, but without the mathematical equations and details, to 12 universal physical laws for the new millennium physics.
http://www.ckscientific.com/PapersinPhysics/Lancast8_suspended.doc
also
http://users.softlab.ece.ntua.gr/~kyritsis/PapersinPhysics/Lancast8_suspended.htm
also
http://preveza.teiep.gr/kyritsis/PapersinPhysics/Lancast8_suspended.pdf
1. The Law of levelled physical material reality
1.0 What we consider as physical material reality is subject and conditioned to our development in consciousness our hidden beliefs and our scientific operational competence and development. E.g. in ancient Rome the protons. neutrons, and electrons could not stand a chance to be considered as physical reality or existent at all. What was considered as physical reality was only gross pieces and aggregations of matter made by protons, neutrons, and electrons. Anything else would be shear philosophical or metaphysical.
1.1 After the 19th century we are universally mature enough to accept that any form of material existence consists of elementary indivisibles.
1.2 The content of this law is that all mater does not starts from protons, neutrons and electrons only. What we call traditionally as gravitational field, electromagnetic field, etc is accepted to have energy density in space even inertial density in space (there are classical college physics experiments with the momentum and inertia of the electromagnetic field, and similar in Einstein’s physics for the gravitational field). Therefore these fields have material existence, but they do not consist from protons electrons and neutrons! We would contradict ourselves if we would not assume that they consists too from permanent indivisible particles. Such particles have to be permanent and extremely small (e.g. 10^(-36) times smaller than the electron) otherwise quantum and nuclear physics would have pinned them down and would know them. (e.g. the neutrino that can cross the earth and not hit a single earth’s atom is 10^(-6) times only smaller than the electron. All particles of nuclear physics and quantum mechanics besides the proton, neutron, electron are of very short life duration and not permanent). This material reality of the fields we call the 4th material density. There exist also in a similar way the 5th material density. The content of this law is also that the 3rd material density as well as the 4th and 5th material densities consists from particles. Also that all the material physical reality consists of superposition of such material densities.
1.3 As far as I know our experiments go up to the 4th material density and barely only go up to the 5th material density. But they may as well exist a 6th . As we mentioned at the beginning this depends on the evolution of the civilisation and the consciousness of the human beings in it. An obvious question is why we start counting from 3. This is so, as we are counting the matter that is granulated in to the planets and stars in aggregation as 2nd material density. The next question would be what is the 1st material density. We consider the overall world of galaxies and everywhere that classical light can go as one celestial body or…..particle assuming that there more such particles creating the 1st material density.
1.4 It is obvious from the definition of the 4th material density from the classical fields, that a gas or a liquid of the 4th material density will flow through the net of atoms of a solid body of 3rd material density almost without resistance. Excatly as the electromagnetic waves of your mobile phone do.
2. The Law of Vibration
This Law states that everything in the Universe (e.g. protons, neutrons, electrons of the 3rd material density) vibrates. The spin of protons, electrons, and neutrons has a vibration frequency. The same with an atom that may have many frequencies like a musical chord (which is also the basis of smelling: Our sensing cells of smelling detect the atom’s chord-vibrations ). This holds also for the basic particles of the 4th and 5th the material density. So each material density has its own vibration characteristic frequency. Depending on the vibration source, the vibration wave may propagate in many different material densities with different speeds. In the 4th material density there is also “sound†as compression wave, but it may have the speed of light. It may be tempting to call this 4th density "sound", as quantum psi-waves, but mathematically as waves are different, as in universities are accepted mainly as probability waves of particles of the 3rd density. Still the original informal idea of DeBroglie that any (3rd material density) particle when moving maybe accompanied with a material wave (of the liquid or gaseous 4th density) is also real.
3. The Law of Action
This law in the 3rd material density is known and analysed as the 3 Newtonian laws:
a) The conservation of momentum a) The law of force and acceleration, c) the law of action reaction. Later than Newton scientists proved based on the previous 3 Newtonian laws, the law of conservation of energy. Lagrange and Hamilton were also able to derive the momentum and energy conservation from
the law of stationary action
4. The Law of Correspondence
This Law states that the known classical principles and laws of physics that explain the physical world at the 3rd density- energy, waves, vibration, and motion - have their corresponding principles in the 4th and 5th material density. "As above, so below" was the ancient quote.
5. The Law of Cause and Effect
The contact causalities or particle collision causalities or horizontal causalities that we know in the 3rd material density (e.g. law of action and reaction) hold also in the 4th and 5th material density.
6. The Law of Compensation and Deeper causalities
Besides the horizontal contact causalities within a material layer hold also the vertical causalities among material layers. The top-down flow (from 5th density to 4th, to 3rd density) is relevant to our (in-out) creative abilities.
7. The Law of Attraction
This law is essentially what Newton started studying in his universal attraction (later called gravitation) and his inverse square law. This law can only be fully revealed and the inverses square law explained only if more than the 3rd material density is included. This is the process of discovering the Unified Field Theory which is nothing else than the equations of the gaseous 4th material density. Nevertheless in the 4th material density exist also liquid and solid states.
8. The Law of Perpetual Transmutation of Energy
The material densities (3rd, 4th, 5th) are in continuous energy exchange through contact, friction, vibration, etc. There is a natural flow of energy from the 3rd density to the 4th density through friction of the spinning and rotating protons, neutrons and electrons in an atom. This transfers heat from the 3rd material density and is creating heat in the 4th material density.
9. The Law of Relativity
The content of this law is that the space measurements and time measurements, are attached to a particular material density therefore are relative not absolute. So the space and time as measured in the familiar 3rd material density may not be the same when measured in e.g. the 4th material density.
10. The Law of Polarity
10.0 The content of this law is that as in the 3rd material density there is the emergence of the electric positive, negative and neutral, so is in the 4th and 5th material density. Therefore there are triads of micro-electrons micro-protons, micro-neutrons in the 4th material density and triads of nano-protons, nano-electrons and nano-neutrons in the 5th material density. These triads create these densities as the triad of proton neutron electron creates the familiar 3rd material density.
10.1 In the 3rd material density, it is traditionally described with the system of linear equations of Maxwell’s electricity. What we know today as the Maxwell’s electromagnetic field was called originally by Maxwell himself as the Electro-magnetised aether. Aether is a gas formation of the 4th material density. Nevertheless, if after this law we introduce besides the polarity of electrons, protons, neutrons, the corresponding polarity in the gaseous 4th density (aether) and utilise the non-linear Navier-Stokes equations of the gases (that are derived by the energy and momentum conservation, but now applied after law 3 of action to the 4th material density) we may correct the Maxwell equations of electromagnetism to non-linear equations. This is part of the process of discovering the Unified Field Theory, which is nothing else than the theory of the gaseous 4th material density with its intrinsic polarity.
Remark1: Once we have discovered the Unified Field Theory, the free energy or overunity magnetic devices have full and simple explanation. The same for more overunity devices (e.g. based on Hydrogen or water). Not only they are explained but also understood as forms of renewable energy. They are of course explained and computed within the energy conservation and exchange of the of 3rd and 4th material densities simultaneously. Exclusion of the 4th material density and restriction to the 3rd material density keeps them unexplained and inaccessible to Academic Science explanations.
Remark2: As there is a periodic table of chemical elements at the 3rd material density, so there are different periodic tables of elements in the 4th and 5th material density!
It is obvious from the definition of the 4th material density from the classical fields, that a gas or a liquid of the 4th material density will flow through the net of atoms of a solid body of 3rd material density almost without resistance. Excatly as the electromagnetic waves of your mobile phone do.
As we understand there is a lot more from the reality for our science to discover.
11. The Law of subjectivity
Human beings have and are developing their bodies not only in the 3rd material density but also in the 4th and 5th. The classical literature of acupuncture or aetheric energy centres (=the charkas) exists because we have a living and evolving body in the 4th material density. By changing our beliefs about the true reality of our living bodies a new order of identity emerges for us.
12. The Law of Creation
The content of this law is that the physical levelled material reality (and e.g. its protons, neutrons, electrons etc) has been created, in the same way that we consider plants and animals as created.
Here is a rather detailed, updated, and rather complete list of free energy devices in pdf e-book form and also site by Patrick Kelly :
http://www.free-energy-info.co.uk/
http://www.free-energy-devices.com/
And also for....the psychological adventure of inventors a blog by me
at http://psychologicalkeys.blogspot.com