Overunity.com Archives

News announcements and other topics => News => Topic started by: Mk1 on June 24, 2010, 06:31:11 AM

Title: Infrared view in google sky ? what do you think?
Post by: Mk1 on June 24, 2010, 06:31:11 AM
@all

I was playing around in google sky http://www.google.com/sky/

Check this out ...

Never seen this in any books ...

Title: Re: Infrared view in google sky ? incredible ?
Post by: Mk1 on June 24, 2010, 07:32:26 AM
@all

I believe 2 waves generate the slower third ...

Title: Re: Infrared view in google sky ? incredible ?
Post by: Mk1 on June 24, 2010, 09:04:28 AM
I think this is what is called the fire serpent go have a look make sure you are on the first step of the zoom ladder the engage infrared mode.
Title: Re: Infrared view in google sky ? incredible ?
Post by: mscoffman on June 24, 2010, 09:37:42 AM

@Mk1

Quick...there it is again!;

http://seticlassic.ssl.berkeley.edu/images/skymap_sp_493.gif

---

Congrats, actually you've re-discovered the Milkyway Galaxy! Generally
dust clouds hide the optical light spectrum but the Infrared radiation
still gets through. This is how space looks when placed on a flat
map. The cause of the sinusoidal wave is the earth's tilt axis, as it
goes around the sun. Those black thingies are the solar ecliptic plane,
where the satellite/telescope can't see directly in the direction of the sun.

:S:MarkCoffman
Title: Re: Infrared view in google sky ? what do you think?
Post by: Mk1 on June 24, 2010, 09:48:01 AM
@Mark

Thanks for the confirmation ! that tilt on the axe has to effect everything .

If we could calculate its freq ( sure it can be done) i bet it would be the same as earth freq , up and down the galaxies plane and the sun .

Mark
Title: Re: Infrared view in google sky ? what do you think?
Post by: sparks on June 25, 2010, 06:16:20 AM
    I read somewhere that a Sattelite can not stay in a fixed spot relative to the Earth and that there course has them looping back and forth across the equatorial plane.  I was always amazed at the amount of heat experienced by a spaceship returning to Earth.  I always thought that if they took the energy that was coming on board the craft and used it to slow down the rentry velocity it would be alot easier on everything involved.  Instead of insulation and tiles some kind of heat to propulsion conversion.  The fall to earth would be more of an oscillation than a straightway burn out.  You figure they use umpteen amounts of fuel to go up converting that into a huge amount of inertia in a small amount of mass.  Then waste all that inertia getting back down.  Then again I'm still waiting for dynamic brakes to charge the battery in my moving oil burner with wheels and some pyroelectric converter to replace the radiator and a piezoelectric converter to replace the muffler and some magnetic bearings that do useful work instead of just heating up.  We are traversing the spacetime continoum at millions of miles an hour if we could only figure out how to convert this inertia into inertia in a more desirable vector we wouldnt need an engine at all. Just a dynamic braking system.