I accidentally found this interesting free energy when I searching a magnetic cores. I dont fully understand how it works but it seems they electrified the cores to produce a negative inductor..
Heres the link www.linux-host.org/energy/sgenesis.htm..
In that figure, the relative motion of positive and negative charge is wrong.http://www.linux-host.org/energy/schart4.gif (http://www.linux-host.org/energy/schart4.gif)
I understand now what it says. A negative inductor can be made by making a coil with its surrounding has negatively charge. It can be done by simply adding a cylindrical metal with negatively charge inside the coil. It so easy to do has anyone tried this?
Guys help, i like to test this. What is the easiest way to electrify a metal can? No van de graaf and whimhurst machine..
I have watched about this project too, effectively it seems nobody replicated... Apparently you can get an inductor who have the opposite behavior of the normal one (so it aid current instead oppose it).
There are two version: one with the winding at the exterior of the outer cylinder and one with winding between the two cylinder (In Rotoverter COMBINE doc: page 53, section "Homopolar transformer").
Such an inductor placed in a LC will produce growing oscillation instead of decaying one, in a few cycle of milliseconds, current/voltage would have insane value !
@SchubertReijiMaigo
I cant read pdf. Can u make a screen shot here?
What if instead of electrifying the surrounding of the coil into negatively charge, the copper coil is the one that electrified into negative? If the document was true, maybe that was the secret of Daniel Pomerlou's coil.
Here we go (in attachement).
QuoteWhat if instead of electrifying the surrounding of the coil into negatively charge, the copper coil is the one that electrified into negative? If the document was true, maybe that was the secret of Daniel Pomerlou's coil.
No, it look like that the non inductive coils must be in an electric field between the two cylinders.
@SchubertReijiMaigo
Its hard to read using mobile phone. Lol
Anyway, thanks for making screenshots :)
What make me wonder here is why is it called homopolar transformer?