I have an idea that is practical, but I need at least $300k for a prototype (and then $3M for patents).
It will cost $1200 to make a 6kW generator in mass production, the value of energy produced yearly about $5400, zero operating costs.
I have a theoretical proof that there are electrodynamic phenomena which violate the law of conservation of energy (I also have experimental evidence of violation of the Lenz law).
Quote from: htg on August 08, 2010, 04:31:56 PM
I have an idea that is practical, but I need at least $300k for a prototype...
First of all, you need a team that is credible to the investor.
Then you need a limited company.
Then you need a detailed breakdown of the $300k.
I don't know why you need $3M for the patent. You will probably spend $10,000 only to get to a position where you discover that
Tesla patented the idea in the late 1890s.
He must be a young dreamer. Welcome to the world of OU buddy, you'll soon discover the grim truth.
Hilarious thread!
The FE story is a story of surpression, inventors' misery, misinformation adn oblivion.
You are surely too "noob" to chase such approach, in case you had anything on hand.
Share it, try and it to develop it with others skilled in the OU field and perhaps you will gain some fame and money from donations. Otherwise, good luck :)
Hello,Sir,
Nice day.
Hereby I introduce ourselves -- Flight International Trading Co., Ltd, as a professional Permanent magnet Products supplier.
We are located in Ningbo which is the bigger seaport in China, so that the freight will be very convenient and fluent.
Our factory is located in the middle of China, Anhui province, because the cost will be lower than coastland, and my office is in NingboCity, nearby Shanghai, for control transport and contact with clients. Our main products included Ndfeb Magnet, Magnetic Assembly, Alnico magnet, Ndfeb Magnetic Jewelry and so on. We can provide all kinds of magnetic products with best quality at the competitive prices with short lead time.
Pls let me know your specific requirements for quotations. Looking forward to long-terms, fruitful and stable cooperation with you.
I think you may be have the supplier now, please kindly to keep my email in your contact list, welcome your inquiry.
Wish you have very good day.
Best regards,
--------------
Anna Wang
Marketing Manager
Flight International Trading Co., Ltd
Add: No.52,Qingqin homes, Gaoqiao Town, Yinzhou District, Ningbo,China 315100
Tel: 0086-0574-88059316
Fax: 0086-0574-88059316
Skype: flightrading
Email:anna@flightrading.com
flightrading@gmail.com
MSN: flightrading@hotmail.com
Web: http://www.flightrading.com
2010-08-9
Quote from: htg on August 08, 2010, 04:31:56 PM
I have an idea but I need at least $300k for a prototype (and then $3M for patents)
Quote from: flightrading on August 09, 2010, 05:28:48 AM
Hello,Sir,
Nice day.
Hereby I introduce ourselves -- Flight International Trading Co., Ltd, as a
professional Permanent magnet Products supplier.
We certainly need your products; I hope Stefan isn't upset by your shameless
self promotion.
Do you do Barium magnets? Some people are looking at ultrasonic transducers
using Barium Titanate, these transducers being fixed to a pole of a Barium
Ferrite magnet. The transducers "shake" the magnet in such a way that, although
it doesn't move, it generates a current in a coil surrounding the magnet. (MRA
technology, and the Davidson variant).
Also, how do you demagnetise a Neo and then re-magnetise it "on the fly" ?
Quote from: gauschor on August 09, 2010, 06:47:28 AM
@guaschor
How about;
"Shut up Jim, we're saving you."
Quote from: broli on August 08, 2010, 07:05:26 PM
He must be a young dreamer. Welcome to the world of OU buddy, you'll soon discover the grim truth.
Why You laugh at him? I was 5 to 8 y. old when i done my best discoveries and i really need not money to built a princip of working of such devices. Money are really for nothing when You have not open mind, and they not give freedom. Whats more, they enclose You and You start to think only about them;-]
I am not young (53). Several years ago I discovered a group of phenomena violating the law of energy conservation. Now I have some potential investors.
Quote from: htg on December 17, 2010, 01:42:01 PM
I am not young (53). Several years ago I discovered a group of phenomena violating the law of energy conservation. Now I have some potential investors.
I will not judge, only applaud any effort on breaking new barriers.
Good luck!
Quote from: htg on December 17, 2010, 01:42:01 PM
I am not young (53). Several years ago I discovered a group of phenomena violating the law of energy conservation. Now I have some potential investors.
The law of energy conservation has already been shown to be violated. There's nothing new in that. What is needed now is to get that fact through the doors of Academia and not to seek investors. The only thing investors are about is return on their investment and that's not the point in the OU studies. Without the infrastructure controlled by the Academia no useful product, among other things, can be achieved. Private money can never compete with that infrastructure even if it is given idealistically, that is, without expectations for ROI.
Investors seem to be interested almost only in ROI, but it looks quite good in the case of my invention.
Call me skeptic but if you even had a 4 inch cube that generated 300 amps from free air how far do you think you would get putting it on the free market in any country.
It is going to be bigger than that. But it promises ROI of at least 50%, so investors are interested.
Quote from: htg on December 17, 2010, 03:02:43 PM
Investors seem to be interested almost only in ROI, but it looks quite good in the case of my invention.
No, it never looks good when you have investors looking for ROI.
Thousands of equally brilliant inventors have come and gone before you, none managed to make a single buck from an OU phenomenon that was real. HOw do you rate your chances?
You're 53. Young enough to witness the world you helped create for the better, without montary gain in return for your guarantees of costs and performance.
Give it away. This website can form a pro bono team to take your inventions to the next level, and moreso, make them even simpler to be produced.
If your invention is real, this team will help you change the world with it. Imagine the world your grandchildren will grow up in. Or even if you don't have any, share your work out of compassion for all the children yet to be born on earth.
Do you know how much Al Gore charges for a talk which is utter billshut? Imagine how much you could charge for a talk being the ultimate founder of energy freedom of the world. Imagine the Champs Elisees, Times Square, and the red Square, all be renamed after you.
ROI will be the least of you worries if you give birth to an open source FE tech that WORKS. Who's trying to count money when the world is sending you their love?
@Cloxxki,
I second your call for openness but it concerns people who have something. This guy has nothing. Just pretending.
You are probably right. Most of scientists and technicians which want to do sthg in chapter of OU, don^t even know what are dealing with. For example, most even don^t knows such terms as: Biefeld-Brown effect, living water, tachyons, gravitons. They don^t even "feel" the thing. But only my party has answer to all this questions. www.nsppp.bloog.pl
@ Dr Adolf
If I join your party will I get a free copy of Mein Kamp?
Mark
... or a portable self-sustaining gas chamber ...
@markdansie
Hi, ignore this Dr Shitbrain. It is winter and I think he is very bored because he spreads his shit at several threads now.
www.overunity.com is now full of Dr Shitbrain .... >:(
This gnom is seeking for attention.
Regards,
pix
Quote from: markdansie on December 17, 2010, 08:48:00 PM
@ Dr Adolf
If I join your party will I get a free copy of Mein Kamp?
Mark
Ja aber naturlich. Mein Kampf uber Korper und Seele von unsere Fuhrer zuruck nach Heimat zu bringen. (zudem: schreiben sie alle nicht aus Stamford Hill?:-))
Quote from: Omnibus on December 17, 2010, 03:15:12 PM
No, it never looks good when you have investors looking for ROI.
Do you know any rich investors (who can invest at least GigaDollars) that are looking for anything else than ROI?
Quote from: Omnibus on December 17, 2010, 02:13:10 PM
The law of energy conservation has already been shown to be violated. There's nothing new in that. What is needed now is to get that fact through the doors of Academia and not to seek investors. The only thing investors are about is return on their investment and that's not the point in the OU studies. Without the infrastructure controlled by the Academia no useful product, among other things, can be achieved. Private money can never compete with that infrastructure even if it is given idealistically, that is, without expectations for ROI.
Don't depend on Academia. In this day and age it is mostly full of bullshit. It influences political agendas excessively, not to mention it does not provide a real education or learning environment. Rote learning is idiot nonsense.
Quote from: Xaverius on December 18, 2010, 11:22:27 AM
Don't depend on Academia. In this day and age it is mostly full of bullshit. It influences political agendas excessively, not to mention it does not provide a real education or learning environment. Rote learning is idiot nonsense.
In the field of physics it is largely true. So my solution is not to depend upon opinions of fraudulent scientists, but to turn to investors.
Quote from: Omnibus on December 17, 2010, 09:06:27 PM
... or a portable self-sustaining gas chamber ...
How close once more You are! When had You came to us today, You could see not far from city a machine to burn ecologicaly biomass and everything. It consumes 180 kG/1 H. With 50 of such type, we can easily burn 1 mln EU-Jews in only 1 year. You and other are very energetical Jews, also this will be much of free energy for our Nation.:-)
Quote from: Xaverius on December 18, 2010, 11:22:27 AM
Don't depend on Academia. In this day and age it is mostly full of bullshit. It influences political agendas excessively, not to mention it does not provide a real education or learning environment. Rote learning is idiot nonsense.
It's not a matter of relying on Academia. Of course, there's no way anyone there would agree now to even listen to you if you start talking OU stuff. It's about putting Academia in the corner with undeniable results and thus changing it. That's because, like I said, nothing, no private money, can compete with the infrastructure for research available in Academia, so much needed for the OU research but unavailable now. To rely on private investors with their ROI is not only even more immoral and even less of an educational and learning environment than to rely on acceptance by the politically driven current Academia but is also very inefficient as a way to acieve success in OU research. This has been proven by a number of unsuccessful enterpises based on private funding for OU. Some of these unsuccessful enterprises have been mentioned here and they are multimillion dollar companies, mind you.
@ htg
The game is rigged. You will never profit from it any more than your worst enemy. Everybody forgets that free part of free energy once they get it figured out or they get intimidated.
Here is some good advice from someone your age - build a really nice set of plans so it is easy to replicate and just throw it out there. There are lots of ways to get paid. Money is only one of them and quite frankly, the least satisfying. Since you stand zero chance of making some money you have nothing to lose.
If you insist on trying to be the enemy, then you get what you deserve and you will. The investors will first tell you to stop disclosing or the press. Now you live in the shadows. Then they sue you for some stupid BS and discredit you in a crooked court. Now you have no money, no reputation. ...and lastly, they kill you to close the case. How many times have we seen that happen?
Your time and what you do with it on this Earth is your art. If your art is spending your life looking to exploit others for personal gain, you are a parasite. We have enough parasites and we call them bankers and oilmen (The BO party)
You are never going to defeat your enemy by becoming your enemy. Although... You can win a battle or two that way.
The moment you demonstrate it to an investor, one of them will be a spook. Especially since you went and posted what you did. You are not anonymous on the internet. It takes an hour to know exactly who you are. You are claiming to have a prototype of a free energy device with is considered a national security economic threat.
Next the spook reports to HQ. Pretty soon you get a knock on the door and a warrantless search and they take your stuff, break what is left behind under what are called Presidential "military marching orders". The they place you under a gag order and tell you to go pound sand. If you violate the gag order, you go to federal prison.
A good patent attorney can skirt around some of that but not all and you are about to wreck your life. Why don't you ask a talented intellectual property attorney if what I just wrote is true. You will see that it is but then I have family in that business.
Nothing personal but my guess is you have nothing that could be patented and no free energy device is a good investment. Stan Meyer ring a bell?
@quarktoo
do these spooks only appear in the USA or even here in Australia ?
I have worked with many people world wide and been involved in testing many potentially disruptive technologies and never came across one. I actually have an ex spook amoungst my associates.
Now you mention Stan Myers.....what has Stan got to do with it? Have you researched what Stan really did die from (it was not food poinioning)?
Why dont these spooks shut down companies like first solar or GE who are building wind turbines....why is it the power companies themselves funding blacklight power?
Really I enjoy reading your comments but they are based of rumors and mythology.
There is big bucks out there for development, further research and commercialisation...all that needed is some proof of concept. One company I know has spent 30 million of HHO in the last 5 years alone.
Kind Regards
Mark
Quote from: markdansie on December 18, 2010, 05:35:05 PM
@quarktoo
do these spooks only appear in the USA or even here in Australia ?
I have worked with many people world wide and been involved in testing many potentially disruptive technologies and never came across one. I actually have an ex spook amoungst my associates.
Now you mention Stan Myers.....what has Stan got to do with it? Have you researched what Stan really did die from (it was not food poinioning)?
Why dont these spooks shut down companies like first solar or GE who are building wind turbines....why is it the power companies themselves funding blacklight power?
Really I enjoy reading your comments but they are based of rumors and mythology.
There is big bucks out there for development, further research and commercialisation...all that needed is some proof of concept. One company I know has spent 30 million of HHO in the last 5 years alone.
Kind Regards
Mark
Wind power will never replace gasoline.
"potentially disruptive technologies" have not replaced gasoline.
"first solar" will not replace gasoline
"blacklight power" has been at it for 20 years and they have not replaced gasoline. But then he gets a nice paycheck to just keep researching it. Lead or silver.
Puharich could have replaced gasoline but was found at the bottom of the stairs with a broken neck. He hid out in Mexico after asssasin threat.
Stan Meyer could have but didn't replace gasoline. His autopsy was never released.
One company I know has spent 30 million of HHO in the last 5 years alone - hey have not replaced gasoline.
Anybody see a pattern here?If you really think spooks could shut down GE, you are not living in reality. That is not how they operate or what they do.
@Quark
Actually i am not sure if it was released or not but o now someone who has read it.
I see where your comming from re gasoline but ask.
What are the biggest threats to gasoline?
1. Electric cars are now starting to roll of production lines and are subsidised by the government.
2 Battery and cap research which will enable longer range and cheaper electric cars is having millions spent on it by governments and major corperations including IBM (Zinc Air) etc
3, Bio fuels are ermerging, go to Brazil and see how much bio fuel they use. In Australia the government is making it mandatory that a percentage of all fuel sold is Bio. So are they going to lock up all the corn farmers?
the thing that has caused a shift in recent years are governments committing to reducing Global warming. The race is on for non polluting technologies.
Anyway could write a book on this but now I have an understanding of where you are comming from.
Mark
Well add this to your book. Here in the US, electric cars are limited to a speed of 25MPH BY LAW.
Tesla motor broke that rule and the key players were killed in a plane crash and a real snake took over the company.
I could add more but you get the drift. Here in the US, the government claims to be doing one thing but in reality are doing another.
We know that after the 2012 solar even and depopulation that they are going to move to free energy devices. Oil is unsustainable. Between then and now, the oil companies have been setting themselves up to control it.
Quote from: Cloxxki on December 17, 2010, 05:45:48 PM
ROI will be the least of you worries if you give birth to an open source FE tech that WORKS. Who's trying to count money when the world is sending you their love?
I do not think energy will ever be free. It costs to build the device and obviously ROI is a primary consideration for investors.
In the event free comes too late or never you could bone up on the wood gas idea so you can survive another day. There was a world without petro fuel and without banks and masive debt once upon a time.
Of course you may have to learn to have manners and act sivilized since you will have more time to speak with your family and freinds if that day comes. It's wonderful to imagine solving the worlds problems but that reguires surviving the failures.
Quote from: gauschor on August 09, 2010, 06:47:28 AM
"Because expressing how dumb that was in words just doesn't work."
Thats the best one I've seen in a while !
Thanks for the refreshing levity. :)
Quote from: htg on December 19, 2010, 02:59:56 AM
I do not think energy will ever be free. It costs to build the device and obviously ROI is a primary consideration for investors.
Not so. Eventually ROI will become obsolete once OU takes grounds.
Quote from: Omnibus on December 19, 2010, 01:09:31 PM
Not so. Eventually ROI will become obsolete once OU takes grounds.
This isn't even funny anymore.
You're preaching that "OU has been already validated before..."
Hello?
'''It's wonderful to imagine solving the worlds problems but that reguires surviving the failures.'''
Indeed!!!
Wellspoken,
J.