Obsevations found during machine calculations and tests.
What was realised during the calculations was that Newton's math equations seemed incomplete
Newton’s laws of motion are in fact incorrect or incomplete -
two objects of exact size shape and weight, with the same external friction properties
placed on the same surface take exactly the same amount of energy to move according to those laws
This is not true, the machine discovered that fact.
take two balls/spheres of identical size and shape and weight and place them on a track
now it does not matter if the inside of one ball is a cement compound and the other a plastic compound
as long as the external physical properties and weight are the same, and according to Newton's law will roll an equal distance when
an equal amount of energy force is applied to them.
Now simply fill one ball completely with water and no air, ensuring the other has the same weight.
the ball filled with water will require less energy to move.
why?
even though each needs the same start push to move the same weight, take a ball
cut the ball in half so it looks like a wheel, the right hand side of the wheel must have all its weight on one side lifted over the
12 o’clock position with each rotation, the ball containing the water only rotates the shell, the water is not lifted at all,
so no energy is required to do this, initially it was thought that friction of the water inside against the shell
would level out this effect, however we realised that
the glass on the table test proves this does not occur, in short it is as if one weight was on a pallet being dragged and one is on wheels, yet the math described by Newton does not account for this effect under objects in motion, they both have the same weight and external forces.
The wheel has momentum!! So does the ball!!
What does this mean the scheme of things? well if nothing else the limits of the math are flawed, and it means new machinery can be built
So it seems you really can reinvent the wheel.
Want to prove it without any expense?
Take a large glass of water and fill another glass with any non fluid item, weigh them, now place them on a table ensuring both glasses are the same now tape a piece of string on each glass one at 10 o’clock and one at 2 o’clock, pull the string between the glasses keeping them apart, now tie the string to each end of a pencil, place your fingers in the centre of the pencil holding lightly and pull with a little speed, so as to rotate the glasses, you will find the pencil will swing off centre as it struggles more against the one with the solid fill. Point proven, equal objects with equal friction do not move equal distances with equal energy. Whilst the math may work for most items it is not complete, therefore we are not using all the available energy efficiency in design.
Just an observation you may wish to consider.
A Quinn 25/08/10
Quote from: The Eskimo Quinn on August 24, 2010, 07:21:20 PM
Obsevations found during machine calculations and tests.
What was realised during the calculations was that Newton's math equations seemed incomplete
...
You say that Newton's math are incomplete but I don't see any math in your thesis.
In order we can treat the problem, please apply Newton's math to your system and show us what is wrong.
its simple the energy cannot transfer to the wayer the energy is going between the water and the inside of the ball the non water filled ball the enrgy is being conducted thru the ball hence the inside spins
a wheel within a wheel within a wheel you dont see the enrgy wheel
144,000 divide 1-12 each gives you your exact corresponsding opposite
your three loops of your enrgy watch my axis of infinity video on you tube
1= 144,000
7/3 2.33333
but when 144,000 is 1
7x144,000= 1008000/3 =336000 a perfect number. three loops your zero a wheel within a wheel within a wheel
your water your energy you ball
no water is one wheel a ball another fluid with drag becomes a wheel within a wheel but partial midles wheel your shorting energy between the outside and inside
Im a bit frustrated on this
0 zero
144,000/0 theres more zeros in 144,000
the any other number
why can I not determine how many zeros
are in 144,000 with a calculation
10 100 1000 the zeros are very important
there loops
so i tried a manipulation
-2 and 2 = zero right
then why does 144,000/-2
give me -288,000 then times 2
give me -144,000 that tells me -2 and 2
are not equal so what does equal zero
and thru what calculation gives me the loops all them?
Zero is not two theres 4 corners
of earth 144,000x1015 /-1015
x -1015 x1015 = 144,000
but had to stil do it in three
which was bs 144000/1000
=144 = 15 zeros 14x10= 140
but 100 has two and if you count the first
zero its 16 but beings i axis that zero
its already included
Quotefrom: The Eskimo Quinn on August 25, 2010, 01:21:20 AM
Obsevations found during machine calculations and tests.
What was realised during the calculations was that Newton's math equations seemed incomplete
...
You say that Newton's math are incomplete but I don't see any math in your thesis.
In order we can treat the problem, please apply Newton's math to your system and show us what is wrong.
I dont need math
to tell you hes wrong he never calculated how the
apple Got to the space to start with
or the energy release that causes the apple to fall
so its so far off its not even worth
debating
black hole frequency builds the tree antigravity
ben franklins kite and key
the apple is formed from antigravity
to space newton and einstein tried to calculate the apple falling
e=mc2 but it cannot fall without the energy loss
the transfer of water so much water the radiation
energy is now no longer anitgravity
it falls but you didnt calculate the tree limb
reverse or the amount of energy back thru the tree to the ground
which is reverse of antigravity so which
math would you even consider trying to debate
start at the begeing the energy to make the tree
If you can calculate the exact
energy to make the tree the apple the water
the fall the decompossition the frequency to air the
the energy from the sun the loss from the leaves to the moon
at night the rock and earth the fertilizer and when your all
perfect you see its 144,000 the axis of everrything
I can explain how I believe things has been created and what I think of Newtons law - if you allow me :)
Matter as we know it (Mountains, water, birds, trees etc.) are all basically made up of positive, negative, neutral charges. A combination of how many positive and negative charges that are combined, and how these combinations are chemically fused into other combined charges, determine what these things are made of (Metaloxide (mountain), water (bihydroxide - or something), birds (Carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, sulfur, metals and minerals), trees (the same) etc. These charges (All charges combined are the atoms) are made up of potential energy that has been created by energy. I want to believe that matter are pure energy that is trapped in time. The origins of energy are allways when these atoms combines and turns into something else, or splits into something else, a moment in still-time that force time to reoccour - then an atom in another place in the periodic table has been created. Fusions and fisions under high gravitional pressure and high temperatures. Each time this happens, matter will loose some of its mass to energy and create time. So this is the origin of energy as I believe it. The neutral charges does not change the atoms place in the periodic table, but changes its weight and stability. We know that nuclear radiation comes from unstable matter. This instability will at last find its equilibrium, but it takes time. Sometimes very short time and sometimes very long time. We call it half-life of a radioactive matter. This half-life isn't really half-life, but bearly half life - as I believe it - because it isn't infinite energy in matter, or unstable matter.
Now. Matter are energy that is trapped in time. Some matter are unstable, and loose its mass by radiation from unstable nuces. In fact all matter are some how radioactive btw. We humans are made up of energy that is trapped in time, so how can we then observe time? That is because we are being powered by intake of external energy that we harness, and lets our brain work with tiny electric charges that radiate energy which we earlier "consumed". This energy is what makes us think and observe - because it isn't the matter itself that is the memory, but the energy in electric charges and flow of electric current through matter (neurons) which is the memory. And in order to enhance memory, there are made tiny connections that expands the complexity of electric conductive networks of wires in the brain. This memory will be available as long we can harness energy from the surroundings. Some connections are bad and some are good - this is how we forgets one thing and remembers another thing. The network that has the strongest connections, is where the energyflow will go first, and with greatest flow of energy, and therefor supress the bad connections with low energy flow - the part of the memory we do believe we have forgotten. Time is energy, and energy is time. It is our observations which has made the sense of the time going by, because new connections are made in the brain every moment. Time are just a series of actions that has reactions in which origin are energy. We must apply energy in order to define time.
Gravity are a very mysterious force. Gravity will pull those balls downhill - rather negative angular to the gravity field. Negative? Well, matter are energy that is trapped in time, and wants to find its equilibrium as pure energy. I believe that gravity is the force that is a function of this process. It takes energy from the object as the object approaches the gravity field. We can apply energy to the object to pull it uphill again, and use energy to fight gravity and gain potential energy. Gravity are the final state of matter, so why does matter wants to convert into pure energy? I have been thinking that gravity are the exact opposite of energy. Gravity wants to consume matter and make it stable at a zero potential state - however within an infinitely small space with infinite gravity. Gravity is the opposite of time. Time is energy. For each calories we spend are a waste of time so to speak :D
Back to the balls downhill. Two balls with the same hardness and surface structure with same mass will spend the same potential energy all the way till the end of the track. The one that is filled with water will take longer time to accelerate and longer time to stop, because water are liquid and it requires time to force all atoms to rotate in the same direction.
Have you ever tried the raw/boiled egg experiment? A raw egg with liquid content are initially opposing rotation. When it has started to spin, you can stop it and release it instantly, but the egg will continue to spin. That is a raw egg. So what difference in content do we have when the egg has boiled for 10 minutes? It is the same, but now the content are solid. You can start to spin it and stop it on your command.
This is the case with the ball with water in it, but ofcourse boiled water doesn't harden - you have to freeze it. With ice inside the ball instead - will that change its potential energy? No! Will it change the way it rolls down the track? Yes!
So where are we heading? Will Newtons incorrect laws do any good? Maybe he was (some how) wrong, but that doesn't change the nature...
Or have I been missing something - except that it is probably much more to matter and energy than what I believe it is ;D
Vidar
Vidar you get a 10
you correct remove or add energy to anything
it becomes a different state hutchesion
proves this there are infinate atomic structures
because you add a apple to a tree it
becomes a structure its one big structure
your trying to seperate the periocid elements
based on individiual structure
but never calculated the structure you dont see
the invisible the einstien turned people to and from
on philidelphia these are spirits
anyways emough of that
the neucleus is not nuetral by anymeans
its a frequency it bounces so fast its apears nuetral
the proton and electron called positive and negative
are not positive and negative
but 1 energy and 2 energy
oh my chemistry is bad sorry dr foryenance
wiped my memory
anyways the amount of energy frequencg in
the neucleus is what changes the energy state
when you change it like hutchesion
with the frequency crystal you not effecting the
elenctron or proton as usual but
lifting the ice cream in ice cream state
seperating the metal in metal state to insert paper thru it
without burning the paper electons or protons
anyways thats not why i came back on today
im going try to explain the pyramid structure