Poll
Question:
Right or Wrong?
Option 1: Right
votes: 1
Option 2: Wrong
votes: 5
http://www.energy.com/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=36
Hopefully,
that this is THE WAY
Pese
www.alt-nrg.de/pppp
(alternative link.collections)
Hopefully,
that this is THE WAY
Pese
www.alt-nrg.de/pppp
(alternative link.collections)
.umm,... what is this?,..i see a circle and 2 lines..
i don't get it
It ressembles two reed switches the first one and the new angle to set them on the second one.
Quote from: nievesoliveras on September 30, 2010, 09:38:16 AM
It ressembles two reed switches the first one and the new angle to set them on the second one.
Yeah, but why ?, I don't get what it's about either, could you enlighten us ?.
Quote from: Bulbz on September 30, 2010, 11:19:18 AM
Yeah, but why ?, I don't get what it's about either, could you enlighten us ?.
Hi, here is his blog link and use google translate from Chinese to English:
http://zyaling.blogspot.com/
This is what I got:
"Fulcrum lever to expand the use of energy pulley-type methods
The first step, the fulcrum for the edge of the pulley set. Power arm is 2 times the resistance arm. The second step, the leverage exerted power end power F1, resistance to F2 <= 1/2F1. The role of leverage in the power under the pulley rotation rolling along a certain arc.
Results: Power and resistance of different sizes, the distance is the same as the work done (energy, energy efficiency) to be quite different. Resistance force lever arm is the arm 2 times 2 times the energy to add value. The key is caused by the rotation of pulley fulcrum displacement, so that the same two forces away.
Where the energy come from? First, the credit leverage, strong (resistance) so do not, since no more (less) resistance, the object of course is always movement. Second, the pulley of the credit, resulting in the displacement of the fulcrum (the passage of time), so that the displacement of the same power and resistance."
Maybe Zhang Yalin could help to weed out mistranslations the computers did...
My computer broke down, and it won't be fixed until 7 days later.
It'll take a relatively long time for me to check the translation. I'll be here again as soon as my computer is up and running. Study the graphic yourselves and try to figure out what it's about. Thanks guys.
The graphic above mainly means that by fixing a lever to the edge of a wheel, force will be saved without increasing the distance. The work gained is thus bigger than the work consumed. That's what I can say for now. Talk to you later.
If F2=2F1,
then
W1=F1*H 1, W2=F2*H2, H1=H2, W2=W1*2
Hi Zhang yalin,
I am akunkeji, recently right? You also study the leverage?
This is the other graphic from my blog.
Fix a flywheel to a motor, which is set between the spokes of a bike rear wheel. Connect the flywheel with that of the rear wheel. When the motor starts, the flywheel connected to it drives the flywheel connected to the rear wheel in motion, then the rear wheel also moves, the motor and the rear wheel move simultaneously at the same speed. And the rear wheel theoretically moves at an ever increasing speed. The rear wheel can be used to start a generator. Thus the energy gained is much bigger than the energy consumed.
Do you mean that the motor will be turning with the wheel like this?
The motor and the battery are tied to the spokes securely.
The Theory of Operation needs simpler, step by step clarification.
To nievesoliveras: Yes, your graphic is exactly what I mean. Thank you very much.
The law of conservation of energy could have been beaten by a simple experiment
The proportion of the length of the resistance arm of the lever and force arm is 1:2,
The weight of the load and the force is 2:1.
The pivoting point of the lever fixed on the edge of the wheel.
The graphic above mainly means that by fixing a lever to the edge of a wheel, force will be saved without increasing the distance. The work gained is thus bigger than the work consumed.
W1(work paid)=F1*H (downward height) , W2(gained)=F2*H(upward height) , F2=2F1, W2=2W1.
How accelerated speed remains unchanged
According to the formula of the second law of Newton: F = ma, “F†and “m†are constant, but “a†changed. Any engines nowadays can keep acceleration only for a short time.
Only when the speed of a force-applying object is faster than or equal to that of an object applied on, can the speed of the object applied on increase.
Because the power of action should be more than that of the objects of resistance, the accelerating speed can go on, just like riding a bicycle downhill, while you can’t anyway speed it more than before at all.
We can keep “a (accelerated speed)†unchanged like “g (accelerated speed of gravity)†in the way as follows:
The motor and the battery are tied to the spokes securely
Given a flywheel fixed on a motor, which is set between the spokes of a bike rear wheel. Connect the flywheel with that of the rear wheel. When the motor starts, the flywheel connected to it drives the flywheel connected to the rear wheel in motion, then the rear wheel also moves, the motor and the rear wheel move simultaneously at the same speed. And the rear wheel theoretically moves at an ever increasing speed. The rear wheel can be used to start a generator. Thus the energy gained is much bigger than the energy consumed.
I don't think this will ever work. However, it might be nice to see a video if ever it does work.